Home
Jump to Risk Factors
Jump to Industries
Jump to Exposures
Jump to Event Codes
Jump to Wiki Summary

Industries
Investment Banking and Brokerage
Technology Hardware Storage and Peripherals
Information Technology
Technology Hardware and Equipment
Construction and Engineering
Automobiles and Components
Electrical Components and Equipment
Semiconductors and Semiconductor Equipment
Semiconductor Equipment
Automobile Manufacturers
Motorcycle Manufacturers
Application Software
Asset Management and Custody Banks
Health Care Facilities
Exposures
Military
Regime
Political reform
Intelligence
Rights
Express intent
Ease
Cooperate
Provide
Judicial
Crime
Event Codes
Military blockade
Solicit support
Adjust
Agree
Psychological state
Grant
Demand
Yield to order
Warn
Sports contest
Accident
Pessimistic comment
Consult
Yield
Reward
Promise
Request
Acknowledge responsibility
Host meeting
Vote
Force
Release or return
Seize
Yield position
Empathize
Human death
Wiki Wiki Summary
Operation Mincemeat Operation Mincemeat was a successful British deception operation of the Second World War to disguise the 1943 Allied invasion of Sicily. Two members of British intelligence obtained the body of Glyndwr Michael, a tramp who died from eating rat poison, dressed him as an officer of the Royal Marines and placed personal items on him identifying him as the fictitious Captain (Acting Major) William Martin.
Operations research Operations research (British English: operational research), often shortened to the initialism OR, is a discipline that deals with the development and application of advanced analytical methods to improve decision-making. It is sometimes considered to be a subfield of mathematical sciences.
Stock market A stock market, equity market, or share market is the aggregation of buyers and sellers of stocks (also called shares), which represent ownership claims on businesses; these may include securities listed on a public stock exchange, as well as stock that is only traded privately, such as shares of private companies which are sold to investors through equity crowdfunding platforms. Investment is usually made with an investment strategy in mind.
Arithmetic Arithmetic (from Ancient Greek ἀριθμός (arithmós) 'number', and τική [τέχνη] (tikḗ [tékhnē]) 'art, craft') is an elementary part of mathematics that consists of the study of the properties of the traditional operations on numbers—addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, exponentiation, and extraction of roots. In the 19th century, Italian mathematician Giuseppe Peano formalized arithmetic with his Peano axioms, which are highly important to the field of mathematical logic today.
Bitwise operation In computer programming, a bitwise operation operates on a bit string, a bit array or a binary numeral (considered as a bit string) at the level of its individual bits. It is a fast and simple action, basic to the higher-level arithmetic operations and directly supported by the processor.
Special Activities Center The Special Activities Center (SAC) is a division of the Central Intelligence Agency responsible for covert operations and paramilitary operations. The unit was named Special Activities Division (SAD) prior to 2015.
Operations management Operations management is an area of management concerned with designing and controlling the process of production and redesigning business operations in the production of goods or services. It involves the responsibility of ensuring that business operations are efficient in terms of using as few resources as needed and effective in meeting customer requirements.
Emergency operations center An emergency operations center (EOC) is a central command and control facility responsible for carrying out the principles of emergency preparedness and emergency management, or disaster management functions at a strategic level during an emergency, and ensuring the continuity of operation of a company, political subdivision or other organization.\nAn EOC is responsible for strategic direction and operational decisions and does not normally directly control field assets, instead leaving tactical decisions to lower commands.
Surgery Surgery is a medical or dental specialty that uses operative manual and instrumental techniques on a person to investigate or treat a pathological condition such as a disease or injury, to help improve bodily function, appearance, or to repair unwanted ruptured areas.\nThe act of performing surgery may be called a surgical procedure, operation, or simply "surgery".
Operation (mathematics) In mathematics, an operation is a function which takes zero or more input values (called operands) to a well-defined output value. The number of operands (also known as arguments) is the arity of the operation.
Intellectual property Intellectual property (IP) is a category of property that includes intangible creations of the human intellect. There are many types of intellectual property, and some countries recognize more than others.
TRIPS Agreement The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) is an international legal agreement between all the member nations of the World Trade Organization (WTO). It establishes minimum standards for the regulation by national governments of different forms of intellectual property (IP) as applied to nationals of other WTO member nations.
Emerging technologies Emerging technologies are technologies whose development, practical applications, or both are still largely unrealized, such that they are figuratively emerging into prominence from a background of nonexistence or obscurity. These technologies are generally new but also include older technologies.
Healing Is Difficult Healing Is Difficult is the second studio album by Australian singer and songwriter Sia. It was released in the United Kingdom on 9 July 2001 and in the United States on 28 May 2002.
Difficult People Difficult People is an American dark comedy streaming television series created by Julie Klausner. Klausner stars alongside Billy Eichner as two struggling and jaded comedians living in New York City; the duo seemingly hate everyone but each other.
Difficult Loves Difficult Loves (Italian: Gli amori difficili) is a 1970 short story collection by Italo Calvino. It concerns love and the difficulty of communication.
A Difficult Woman A Difficult Woman is an Australian television series which screened in 1998 on the ABC. The three part series starred Caroline Goodall, in the title role of a woman whose best friend is murdered and is determined to find out why. It was written by Nicholas Hammond and Steven Vidler and directed by Tony Tilse.
Difficult to Cure Difficult to Cure is the fifth studio album by the British hard rock band Rainbow, released in 1981. The album marked the further commercialization of the band's sound, with Ritchie Blackmore once describing at the time his appreciation of the band Foreigner.
Second-language acquisition Second-language acquisition (SLA), sometimes called second-language learning — otherwise referred to as L2 (language 2) acquisition, is the process by which people learn a second language. Second-language acquisition is also the scientific discipline devoted to studying that process.
The Difficult Couple The Difficult Couple (Chinese: 难夫难妻; pinyin: Nànfū Nànqī), also translated as Die for Marriage, is a 1913 Chinese film. It is known for being the earliest Chinese feature film.
The Globe Sessions The Globe Sessions is the third studio album by American singer-songwriter Sheryl Crow, released on September 21, 1998, in the United Kingdom and September 29, 1998, in the United States, then re-released in 1999. It was nominated for Album of the Year, Best Rock Album and Best Engineered Non-Classical Album at the 1999 Grammys, winning the latter two awards.
Technology Technology is the result of accumulated knowledge and application of skills, methods, and processes used in industrial production and scientific research. Technology is embedded in the operation of all machines, with or without detailed knowledge of their function, for the intended purpose of an organization.
Information technology Information technology (IT) is the use of computers to create, process, store, retrieve, and exchange all kinds of electronic data and information. IT is typically used within the context of business operations as opposed to personal or entertainment technologies.
Financial technology Financial technology (abbreviated fintech or FinTech) is the technology and innovation that aims to compete with traditional financial methods in the delivery of financial services. It is an emerging industry that uses technology to improve activities in finance.
Language technology Language technology, often called human language technology (HLT), studies methods of how computer programs or electronic devices can analyze, produce, modify or respond to human texts and speech. Working with language technology often requires broad knowledge not only about linguistics but also about computer science.
Space technology Space technology is technology for use in outer space, in travel (astronautics) or other activities beyond Earth's atmosphere, for purposes such as spaceflight, space exploration, and Earth observation. Space technology includes space vehicles such as spacecraft, satellites, space stations and orbital launch vehicles; deep-space communication; in-space propulsion; and a wide variety of other technologies including support infrastructure equipment, and procedures.
Information technology consulting In management, information technology consulting (also called IT consulting, computer consultancy, business and technology services, computing consultancy, technology consulting, and IT advisory) is a field of activity which focuses on advising organizations on how best to use information technology (IT) in achieving their business objectives.\nOnce a business owner defines the needs to take a business to the next level, a decision maker will define a scope, cost and a time frame of the project.
Bachelor of Technology A Bachelor of Technology (Latin Baccalaureus Technologiae, commonly abbreviated as B.Tech. or BTech; with honours as B.Tech.
HCL Technologies HCL Technologies (Hindustan Computers Limited) is an Indian multinational information technology (IT) services and consulting company headquartered in Noida. It is a subsidiary of HCL Enterprise.
Renaissance Technologies Renaissance Technologies LLC, also known as RenTech or RenTec, is an American hedge fund based in East Setauket, New York, on Long Island, which specializes in systematic trading using quantitative models derived from mathematical and statistical analysis. Their signature Medallion fund is famed for the best record in investing history.
Palantir Technologies Palantir Technologies is a public American software company that specializes in big data analytics. Headquartered in Denver, Colorado, it was founded by Peter Thiel, Nathan Gettings, Joe Lonsdale, Stephen Cohen, and Alex Karp in 2003.
United Technologies United Technologies Corporation (UTC) was an American multinational conglomerate headquartered in Farmington, Connecticut. It researched, developed, and manufactured products in numerous areas, including aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building automation, and industrial products, among others.
Raytheon Technologies Raytheon Technologies Corporation is an American multinational aerospace and defense conglomerate headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts. It is one of the largest aerospace, intelligence services providers, and defense manufacturers in the world by revenue and market capitalization.
Lumen Technologies Lumen Technologies, Inc. (formerly CenturyLink) is an American \ntelecommunications company headquartered in Monroe, Louisiana, that offers communications, network services, security, cloud solutions, voice, and managed services.
Risk Factors
TRANSMETA CORP Item 1A Risk Factors The factors discussed below are cautionary statements that identify important risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition and results of operations would suffer
In this case, the trading price of our common stock could decline and investors might lose all or part of their investment in our common stock
We have a history of losses, and we must successfully execute on our modified business model if we are to sustain our operations
Except for the second, third, and fourth quarters of fiscal 2005, we have historically reported negative cash flows from operations, because the gross profit, if any, generated from our product revenue and our licensing and service revenue has not been sufficient to cover our operating cash requirements
Beginning during our second quarter of fiscal 2005, our product business contributed positive gross margin to our operating results in part due to end-of-life sales demand and price increases on certain products; however, the sales of those products have declined significantly since the end of the third fiscal quarter of 2005
Further, while we have improved our financial results and financial position beginning during our second quarter of fiscal 2005, we reported net losses during fiscal 2005 and expect to report net losses and negative net cash flows during fiscal 2006
Since our inception, we have incurred a cumulative loss aggregating dlra655dtta5 million, which includes net losses of dlra6dtta2 million during fiscal 2005, dlra106dtta8 million in fiscal 2004, dlra87dtta6 million in fiscal 2003 and dlra110dtta0 million in fiscal 2002, which losses have reduced stockholders’ equity to dlra55dtta0 million at December 31, 2005
At the end of 2004, we determined that there was substantial doubt that our existing cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment balances and cash from operations would be sufficient to fund our operations, planned capital and R&D expenditures for the next twelve months under the business model that we pursued during and through the end of 2004, which business model was primarily focused on designing, developing and selling software-based x86-compatible microprocessor products
Accordingly, we undertook a critical evaluation of our customers’ requirements for our products and of the economics and competitive conditions in the market for x86-compatible microprocessors, and we announced a modified business model 7 _________________________________________________________________ [59]Table of Contents and a related restructuring plan based in part on that evaluation in March 2005
We must execute successfully on our modified business model with which we have limited experience
We might fail to operate successfully under our modified business model
In March 2005, we announced a modified business model and related restructuring plan
As part of this modified business model, we have decided to focus our ongoing efforts on licensing our advanced technologies and intellectual property, engaging in synergistic engineering services opportunities and continuing our product business on a modified basis to focus on those customer opportunities and product models that are economically advantageous for the company
The modification of our business model entails significant risks and costs, and we might not succeed in operating within this model or under our restructuring plan for many reasons
These reasons include the risks that we might not be able to continue developing viable technologies, deliver engineering services in accordance with customer expectations, achieve market acceptance for our products or technologies, earn adequate revenues from the sale of our products or from our licensing and services businesses, or achieve sustained profitability
Employee concern about changes in our business model or the effect of such changes on their workloads or continued employment might cause our employees to seek or accept other employment, depriving us of the human and intellectual capital that we need in order to succeed
Because we necessarily lack historical operating and financial results for our modified business model, it will be difficult for us, as well as for investors, to predict or evaluate our business prospects and performance
Our business prospects would need to be considered in light of the uncertainties and difficulties frequently encountered by companies undergoing a business transition or in the early stages of development
The modification of our business model might also create uncertainties and cause our stock price to fall and impair our ability to raise additional capital
We might not be able to execute on our modified business model if we lose key management or technical personnel, on whose knowledge, leadership and technical expertise we rely
Our success under our modified business model will depend heavily upon the contributions of our key management and technical personnel, whose knowledge, leadership and technical expertise would be difficult to replace
Many of these individuals have been with us for several years and have developed specialized knowledge and skills relating to our technology and lines of business
We have no individual employment contracts and do not maintain key person insurance on any of our personnel
We might not be able to execute on our modified business model if we were to lose the services of any of our key personnel
If any of these individuals were to leave our company unexpectedly, we could face substantial difficulty in hiring qualified successors and could experience a loss in productivity while any such successor develops the necessary training and experience
We may not be able to raise any more financing, or financing may only be available on terms unfavorable to us or our stockholders
Although we believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment balances and cash from operations will be sufficient to fund our operations, planned capital and research and development expenditures for the next twelve months under our modified business model, it is possible that we may need to raise significant additional funds through public or private equity or debt financing in order to continue operations under our modified business model
Further, as we continue to develop new technologies or to enhance our products or service competencies in accordance with our modified business model, we might require more cash to fund our operations
Although we generated positive cash flows from operations during the second, third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2005, we have had a history of net losses and negative cash flow from operations and we might not sustain positive cash flow or profitability
A variety of other business contingencies could contribute to our need for funds in the future, including the need to: • fund expansion; • fund marketing expenditures; • develop or enhance our products or technologies; 8 _________________________________________________________________ [60]Table of Contents • enhance our operating infrastructure; • hire additional personnel; • respond to customer concerns about our viability; • respond to competitive pressures; or • acquire complementary businesses or technologies
If we were to raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of our stockholders would be reduced, and these newly issued securities might have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of our then-existing stockholders
For example, in order to raise equity financing, we may decide to sell our stock at a discount to our then current trading price, which may have an adverse effect on our future trading price
Our ability to raise additional financing through the issuance of securities may be impaired by our ineligibility until May 25, 2006 to utilize a short-form registration statement on Form S-3 because we were delayed in filing our report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 until May 25, 2005
Although we can issue unregistered securities, or use other means to register our securities, we might not be able to raise additional financing on terms favorable to us, or at all
If we are unable to raise additional funds or to sustain our operations on a modified business model in the future, then substantial doubt may develop as to our ability to continue to operate our business as a going concern, with substantial adverse effects on the value of our common stock and our ability to raise additional capital
This uncertainty may also create concerns among our current and future customers, vendors and licensees as to whether we will be able to fulfill our obligations or, in the case of customers, fulfill their future product or service needs
As a result, our current and prospective customers, licensees and strategic partners might decide not to do business with us, or only do so on less favorable terms and conditions
Employee concern about the future of the business and their continued prospects for employment may cause employees to seek employment elsewhere, depriving us of the human and intellectual capital we need to be successful
We may fail to meet the continued listing requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market, which may cause our stock to be delisted and result in reduced liquidity of our stock, reduce the trading price of our stock, and impair our ability to raise financing
During the second quarter of 2005, we received notices of potential delisting of our stock from the Nasdaq National Market based on our failure to satisfy continued listing requirements of the Nasdaq National Market respecting our failure to timely file a periodic report with the SEC and to maintain a minimum bid price per share of at least dlra1dtta00
Since receiving those notices, we filed the periodic report in question and we regained compliance with the minimum bid price rule
We received notice from the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications staff indicating that we had cured each of those failures
However, it is possible that we might be unable to timely file a periodic report with the SEC in the future or that our stock price may again fall below the minimum bid price in the future
If we are unable to maintain compliance with these or other listing requirements, our common stock may be delisted from the Nasdaq National Market
Delisting from the Nasdaq National Market would adversely affect the trading price and limit the liquidity of our common stock and therefore cause the value of an investment in our company to substantially decrease
If our common stock were to be delisted, holders of our common stock would be less able to purchase or sell shares as quickly and as inexpensively as they have done historically
For instance, failure to obtain listing on another market or exchange may make it more difficult for traders to sell our securities
Broker-dealers may be less willing or able to sell or make a market in our common stock
The loss or discontinuation of our Nasdaq National Market listing may result in a decrease in the trading price of our common stock due to a decrease in liquidity, reduced analyst coverage and less interest by institutions and individuals in investing in our common stock
The success of our licensing business depends on maintaining and increasing our LongRun2 licensing revenue
Although we have achieved increased revenue in our licensing business, our licensing business revenue will depend upon executing our obligations under existing licensing agreements and our entering into new 9 _________________________________________________________________ [61]Table of Contents licensing agreements
Most of our licensing revenue is currently associated with international customers
Our ability to enter into new LongRun2 licensing agreements depends in part upon the adoption of our LongRun2 technology by our licensees and potential licensees and the success of the products incorporating our technology sold by licensees
While we anticipate that we will continue our efforts to license our technology to licensees, we cannot predict the timing or the extent of any future licensing revenue, and recent levels of license revenues may not be indicative of future periods
We have limited visibility regarding when and to what extent our licensees will use our LongRun2 or other licensed technologies
We have not yet earned or received any royalties under any of our LongRun2 licensees
Our receipt of royalties from our LongRun2 licenses depends on our licensees incorporating our technology into their manufacturing and products, their bringing their products to market, and the success of their products
Our licensees are not contractually obligated to manufacture, distribute or sell products using our licensed technologies
Thus, our entry into and our full performance of our obligations under our LongRun2 licensing agreements do not necessarily assure us of any future royalty revenue
Any royalties that we are eligible to receive are based upon our licensees’ use of our licensed technologies and, as a result, we do not have direct access to information that would enable us to forecast the timing and amount of any future royalties
Factors that negatively affect our licensees and their customers could adversely affect our future royalties
The success of our licensees is subject to a number of factors, including: • the competition these companies face and the market acceptance of their products; • the pricing policies of our licensees for their products incorporating our technology and whether those products are competitively priced; • the engineering, marketing and management capabilities of these companies and technical challenges unrelated to our technology that they face in developing their products; and • the financial and other resources of our licensees
Because we do not control the business practices of our licensees and their customers, we have little influence on the degree to which our licensees promote our technology
Our licensing and services revenue cycle is long and unpredictable, which makes it difficult to predict future revenues, which may cause us to miss analysts’ estimates and may result in unexpected changes in our stock price
It is difficult to predict accurately our future revenues from either the granting of new licenses or the generation of royalties by our licensees under our existing licenses
In addition, engineering services are dependent upon the varying level of assistance desired by licensees and, therefore, revenue from these services is also difficult to predict
Most of our service revenue is currently associated with international customers
There can be no assurance that we can accurately estimate the amount of resources required to complete projects, or that we will have, or be able to expend, sufficient resources required to complete a project
Furthermore, there can be no assurance that the development schedules of our licensees will not be changed or delayed
Our licensees are not obligated to continue using our licensed technology or to use future generations of our technologies in future manufacturing processes, and therefore our past contract revenue may not be indicative of the amount of such revenue in any future period
All of these factors make it difficult to predict future licensing and service revenue, which may result in us missing analysts’ estimates and may cause unexpected changes in our stock price
We have only recently entered the engineering services business, and our ability to succeed in that line of business is uncertain and subject to many risks
While we have already generated current and deferred revenue from delivering engineering services to third parties under contract, we entered that line of business only recently and have only limited experience as a provider of contract engineering services
Our current engineering services business is substantially limited to 10 _________________________________________________________________ [62]Table of Contents two agreements entered into during fiscal 2005, one entered into with the Sony Group in March 2005, and one entered into with Microsoft in May 2005
The term of the design services agreement with Sony Group extends to March 31, 2007; however, the services we provide are agreed upon pursuant to specific project agreements with terms of one year or less
Our current project agreements expire by their terms on March 31, 2006, corresponding to Sony Group’s fiscal year end
We expect to continue to provide services to the Sony Group after March 31, 2006, and we are negotiating project agreements with the Sony Group respecting such services
However, due to the uncertainty of these negotiations, we cannot assure you that we will extend any of the current project agreements or enter any additional project agreements, or that such agreements, if any, will continue to require engineering services of the same kind or at the same level as we provided in 2005
The Microsoft definitive development services agreements are currently structured so that we provide development services of approximately thirty Transmeta engineers to Microsoft relating to a proprietary Microsoft project
We have substantially completed the services to be provided under these development services agreements, and, upon Microsoft’s acceptance thereof, we will recognize the related revenue and direct cost of sale, which we expect will occur in 2006
We currently are in negotiations with Microsoft regarding the provision of additional services, and, although we expect to continue to provide services to Microsoft in 2006, we do not necessarily expect that the scale of those services during 2006 will be at the same level as during 2005
Under both of those agreements, we are obligated to provide certain design or development services to our customers or to achieve certain project milestones
While we believe that we can perform our service obligations to the satisfaction of our service customers, there can be no assurance that we can accurately estimate the personnel or other resources required to perform our obligations under those agreements, or that we will have, or be able to devote, the personnel or resources required to complete our project milestones
Furthermore, there can be no assurance that the project schedules of our services customers will not be changed, delayed or even canceled
We depend upon timely contractual payments from our service customers to cover a substantial portion of our personnel costs, and the cancellation of any project could have a material adverse effect on our operating results in any period
Our service customers are not obligated to continue using our engineering services to complete their existing projects, or to engage us to provide engineering services on any future project
Our ability to extend or renew our engineering services agreements, or to win other engineering services contracts in the future, will depend in part upon our successful performance of our obligations under our existing engineering services agreements
Accordingly, our current engineering services revenue is not necessarily indicative of the engineering services revenue that we can expect in any future period
We could encounter a variety of technical and manufacturing problems that could delay or prevent us from satisfying customer demand for Efficeon TM8000 series microprocessors manufactured using a 90 nanometer process
We are using Fujitsu Limited to manufacture our 90 nanometer Efficeon TM8000 series microprocessors
Manufacturing on an advanced 90 nanometer CMOS process involves a variety of technical and manufacturing challenges
Fujitsu Limited has limited experience with the 90 nanometer CMOS process and, although we have achieved production of our Efficeon TM8800 product on the Fujitsu Limited 90 nanometer CMOS process, we cannot be sure that Fujitsu Limited’s 90 nanometer foundry will achieve production shipments on our planned schedule or that other manufacturing challenges might not later arise
For example, during 2001 and again in 2004, we experienced yield problems as we migrated our products to smaller geometries, which caused increases in our product costs, delays in product availability and diversion of engineering personnel
If we encounter problems with the manufacture of the Efficeon TM8000 series microprocessors using the 90 nanometer process that are more significant or take longer to resolve than we anticipate, our ability to fulfill our customer demand would suffer and we could incur significant expenses
Our restructuring plan has reduced our resources and ability to pursue opportunities and support customers in emerging markets for our microprocessor products
The modification of our business model has reduced our historical business focus on product sales, and we have reduced operating expenses associated with our product business as part of our restructuring plan, including the reduction of our workforce
Our restructuring plan has substantially limited our resources and ability to pursue opportunities in emerging markets for which our products are suited, including new classes of 11 _________________________________________________________________ [63]Table of Contents computing devices such as UPCs and other unique PC form factors, which require newly developed technologies, extensive development time, and marketing support
We currently derive a substantial portion of our revenue from a small number of customers and licensees, and our revenue would decline significantly if any major customer were to cancel, reduce or delay a transaction relating to our products, licenses and services
Our customer base is highly concentrated
For example, revenue from three customers in the aggregate accounted for 83prca of total revenue during fiscal 2005
We expect that a small number of customers will continue to account for a significant portion of our revenue
Our future revenue will depend upon our ability to meet contractual obligations under our customer agreements and on our ability to fulfill product orders, if any, from these customers
Our customers and licensees are significantly larger than we are and have bargaining power to demand changes in terms and conditions of our agreements
The loss of any major customer or licensee, or delays in delivery or performance under our customer agreements, and could significantly reduce or delay our recognition of revenue
We face intense competition in the power management, engineering services and x86-compatible microprocessor markets
Many of our competitors are much larger than we are and have significantly greater resources
We may not be able to compete effectively
The development of power management and transistor leakage control technologies is an emerging field subject to rapid technological change, and our competition for licensing such technologies, and providing related services, is unknown and could increase
Our LongRun2 technologies are highly proprietary and, though the subject of patents and patents pending, are marketed primarily as trade secrets subject to strict confidentiality protocols
Although we are not aware of any other company offering any comparable power management or leakage control technologies, we note that most semiconductor companies have internal efforts to reduce transistor leakage and power consumption in current and future semiconductor products
Indeed, all of our current and prospective licensees are larger, technologically sophisticated companies, which generally have significant resources and internal efforts to develop their own technological solutions
Our microprocessor design and development engineering services are highly specialized and customized, and the related technical know how is subject to rapid technological change
We experience competition to provide these services primarily from our customers, which are larger, technologically sophisticated companies, and have their own internal engineering resources
Further, our existing and potential customers typically have existing relationships with other third parties that provide competitive engineering services
The market for microprocessor products is intensely competitive, is subject to rapid technological changes and has been for many years dominated by Intel Corporation
In our legacy product business, we faced competition from Intel, Advanced Micro Devices and VIA Technologies
Under our modified business model, we expect to continue to face competition from these and other companies in the markets that we currently target or may target in the future
We are dependent on third-party companies for the design and manufacture of core-logic chipsets, graphics chips, motherboards, BIOS software and other components
Many of our current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, significantly greater financial, technical, product development and marketing resources, greater name recognition, significantly greater influence and leverage in the industry and much larger customer bases than we do
We may not be able to compete effectively against current and potential competitors, especially those with significantly greater resources and market leverage
We may experience manufacturing difficulties that could increase the cost and reduce the supply of our products
The fabrication of wafers for our microprocessors is a highly complex and precise process that requires production in a tightly controlled, clean room environment
Minute impurities, difficulties in the fabrication 12 _________________________________________________________________ [64]Table of Contents process, defects in the masks used to print circuits on a wafer or other factors can cause numerous die on each wafer to be nonfunctional
The proportion of functional die expressed as a percentage of total die on a wafer is referred to as product “yield
Semiconductor companies frequently encounter difficulties in achieving expected product yields, particularly when introducing new products
Yield problems may not be identified and resolved until a product has been manufactured and can be analyzed and tested, if ever
As a result, yield problems are often difficult, time-consuming and expensive to correct
We have experienced yield problems in the past, and we may experience yield problems in the future that impair our ability to deliver our products to our customers, increase our costs, adversely affect our margins and divert the efforts of our engineering personnel
Difficulties in achieving the desired yields often occur in the early stages of production of a new product or in the migration of manufacturing processes to smaller geometries
We could experience difficulties in achieving desired yields or other manufacturing problems in the production of our Efficeon TM8000 series products that could delay our ability to deliver Efficeon TM8000 series products, adversely affect our costs and gross margins and harm our reputation
Even with functional die, normal variations in wafer fabrication can cause some die to run faster than others
Variations in speed yield could lead to excess inventory of the slower, less valuable die, a resulting unfavorable impact on gross margins and an insufficient inventory of faster products, depending upon customer demand
Our lengthy and variable product sales cycles make it difficult for us to predict when and if a design win will result in volume shipments
We depend upon other companies designing our microprocessors into their products, which we refer to as design wins
Many of our targeted customers consider the choice of a microprocessor to be a strategic decision
Thus our targeted customers may take a long time to evaluate our products, and many individuals may be involved in the evaluation process
We anticipate that the length of time between our initial contact with a customer and the time when we recognize revenue from that customer will vary
We expect our sales cycles to range typically from six to 12 months, or more, from the time we achieve a design win to the time the customer begins volume production of products that incorporate our microprocessors
We do not have historical experience selling our products that is sufficient for us to determine accurately how our sales cycles will affect the timing of our revenue
Variations in the length of our sales cycles could cause our revenue to fluctuate widely from period to period
While potential customers are evaluating our products and before they place an order with us, we may incur sales and marketing expenses and expend significant management and engineering resources without any assurance of success
The value of any design win depends upon the commercial success of our customers’ products
If our customers cancel projects or change product plans, we could lose anticipated sales
We can offer no assurance that we will achieve further design wins or that the products for which we achieve design wins will ultimately be introduced or will, if introduced, be commercially successful
If we fail to forecast demand for our products accurately, we could lose sales and incur inventory losses
The demand for our products depends upon many factors and is difficult to forecast
Many shipments of our products may be made near the end of each fiscal quarter, which makes it difficult to estimate demand for our products
Significant unanticipated fluctuations in demand have caused, and in the future could cause, problems in our operations
The lead-time required to fabricate large volumes of wafers is often longer than the lead-time our customers provide to us for delivery of their product requirements
As a result, we have only a limited ability to react to fluctuations in demand for our products, which could cause us to have either too much or too little inventory of a particular product
If demand does not develop as we expect, we could have excess production
Excess production would result in excess inventories of product, which would use cash and could result in inventory write-downs and write-offs
We have limited capability to reduce ongoing production once wafer fabrication has commenced
Conversely, if demand exceeds our expectations, Fujitsu Limited might not be able to fabricate wafers as quickly as we need them
Also, Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, or ASE, might not be able to increase assembly functions in a timely manner
In that event, we would need to increase production and assembly rapidly or find, qualify and begin production and assembly at additional manufacturers or providers of assembly and test services, which may not be possible within a time frame acceptable to our customers
The inability of our product manufacturer or ASE to increase production 13 _________________________________________________________________ [65]Table of Contents rapidly enough could cause us to fail to meet customer demand
In addition, rapid increases in production levels to meet unanticipated demand could result in higher costs for manufacturing and other expenses
These higher costs could lower our gross margins
If our customers are not able to obtain the other components necessary to build their systems, sales of our products could be delayed or cancelled
Suppliers of other components incorporated into our customers’ systems may experience shortages, which could reduce the demand for our products
For example, from time to time, the computer and semiconductor industries have experienced shortages of some materials and devices, such as memory components, displays, and storage devices
Our customers could defer or cancel purchases of our products if they are not able to obtain the other components necessary to build their systems
We rely on an independent foundry that has no obligation to provide us with fixed pricing or production capacity for the fabrication of our wafers, and our business will suffer if we are unable to obtain sufficient production capacity on favorable terms
We do not have our own manufacturing facilities and, therefore, must rely on third parties to manufacture our products
We currently rely on Fujitsu Limited in Japan to manufacture our 90 nanometer Efficeon TM8000 series products
We do not have manufacturing contracts with Fujitsu Limited, and therefore we cannot be assured that we will have any guaranteed production capacity
These foundries may allocate capacity to other companies’ products while reducing the capacity available to us on short notice
Foundry customers that are larger than we and have greater economic resources, that have long-term agreements with these foundries or that purchase in significantly larger volumes than we may cause these foundries to reallocate capacity to them, decreasing the capacity available to us
In addition, these foundries could, with little or no notice, refuse to continue to fabricate all or some of the wafers that we require
If these foundries were to stop manufacturing for us, we would likely be unable to replace the lost capacity in a timely manner
Transferring to another manufacturer would require a significant amount of time and money
As a result, we could lose potential sales and fail to meet existing obligations to our customers
These foundries could also, with little or no notice, change the terms under which they manufacture for us, which could cause our manufacturing costs to increase substantially
Our reliance on Fujitsu to fabricate our wafers limits our ability to control the production, supply and delivery of our products
Our reliance on third-party manufacturers exposes us to a number of risks outside our control, including the following: • unpredictability of manufacturing yields and production costs; • interruptions in shipments; • Inability to control quality of finished products; • Inability to control product delivery schedules; • potential lack of access to key fabrication process technologies; and • potentially greater exposure to misappropriation of our intellectual property
We depend on ASE to provide assembly and test services
If ASE were to cease providing services to us in a timely manner and on acceptable terms, our business would suffer
We rely on ASE, which is located in Taiwan, for the majority of our assembly and test services
We do not have a contract with ASE for test and assembly services, and we typically procure these services from ASE on a per order basis
ASE could cease to perform all of the services that we require, or could change the terms upon which it performs services for us
If we were required to find and qualify alternative assembly or testing services, we could experience delays in product shipments, increased product costs or a decline in 14 _________________________________________________________________ [66]Table of Contents product quality
In addition, as a result of our reliance on ASE, we do not directly control our product delivery schedules
If ASE were not to provide high quality services in a timely manner, our costs could increase, we could experience delays in the delivery of our products and our product quality could suffer
If our products are not compatible with industry standards, hardware that our customers design into their systems or that is used by end-users or software applications or operating systems for x86-compatible microprocessors, market acceptance of our products and our ability to maintain or increase our revenues would suffer
Our products are designed to function as components of a system
If our customers experience system-level incompatibilities between our products and the other components in their systems, we could be required to modify our products to overcome the incompatibilities or delay shipment of our products until the manufacturers of other components modify their products or until our customers select other components
These events would delay purchases of our products, cause orders for our products to be cancelled or result in product returns
In addition, to gain and maintain market acceptance, our microprocessors must not have significant incompatibilities with software for x86-compatible microprocessors, and in particular, the Windows operating systems, or hardware used by end-users
Software applications, games or operating systems with machine-specific routines programmed into them can result in specific incompatibilities
If a particular software application, game or operating system is programmed in a manner that makes it unable to respond correctly to our microprocessor, it will appear to users of that software that our microprocessor is not compatible with that software
Software or hardware incompatibilities that are significant or are perceived to be significant could hinder our products from achieving or maintaining market acceptance and impair our ability to increase our revenues
In an effort to test and ensure the compatibility of our products with hardware and software for x86-compatible microprocessors, we rely on the cooperation of third-party hardware and software companies, including manufacturers of graphics chips, motherboards, BIOS software and other components
All of these third-party designers and manufacturers produce chipsets, motherboards, BIOS software and other components to support each new generation of Intel’s microprocessors, and Intel has significant leverage over their business opportunities
If these third parties were to cease supporting our microprocessor products, our business would suffer
Our products may have defects that could damage our reputation, decrease market acceptance of our products, cause us to lose customers and revenue and result in liability to us
Highly complex products such as our microprocessors may contain hardware or software defects or bugs for many reasons, including design issues or defective materials or manufacturing processes
If any of our products contains defects, or has reliability, quality or compatibility problems, our reputation might be damaged significantly and customers might be reluctant to buy our products, which could result in the loss of or failure to attract customers
In addition, these defects could interrupt or delay sales
We may have to invest significant capital and other resources to correct these problems
If any of these problems is not found until after we have commenced commercial production of a new product, we might incur substantial additional development costs
If we fail to provide solutions to the problems, such as software patches, we could also incur product recall, repair or replacement costs
These problems might also result in claims against us by our customers or others
In addition, these problems might divert our technical and other resources from other development efforts
Moreover, we would likely lose, or experience a delay in, market acceptance of the affected product or products, and we could lose credibility with our current and prospective customers
This is particularly significant as we are a new entrant to a market dominated by large well-established companies
15 _________________________________________________________________ [67]Table of Contents We are subject to general economic and market conditions
Our business is subject to the effects of general economic conditions in the United States and worldwide and, in particular, market conditions in the semiconductor and computer industries
In 2001, 2002 and through parts of 2003, our operating results were adversely affected by unfavorable global economic conditions and reduced information technology spending, particularly in Japan, where we currently generate a substantial portion of our revenue
These adverse conditions resulted in decreased demand for notebook computers and, as a result, our products, which are components of notebook computers
Further, demand for our products decreases as computer manufacturers seek to manage their component and finished product inventory levels
If we do not keep pace with technological change, our products may not be competitive and our revenue and operating results may suffer
The semiconductor industry is characterized by rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions and enhancements, and ongoing customer demands for greater performance
In addition, the average selling price of any particular microprocessor product has historically decreased substantially over its life, and we expect that trend to continue
As a result, our products may not be competitive if we fail to introduce new products or product enhancements that meet evolving customer demands
It may be difficult or costly for us, or we may not be able, to enhance existing products to fully meet customer demands, particularly in view of our restructuring plan
Advances in battery design, cooling systems and power management systems could adversely affect our ability to achieve widespread market acceptance for our products and technologies
We believe that our ability to achieve widespread market acceptance for our products and technologies will depend in large part on whether potential purchasers of our products believe that the low power usage of our products is a substantial benefit
Advances in battery technology, or energy technologies such as fuel cell technologies, that offer increased battery life and enhanced power capacity, as well as the development and introduction of more advanced cooling systems, may make microprocessor power consumption a less important factor to our customers and potential customers
These developments, or developments in power management systems by third parties, may adversely affect our ability to market and sell our products
Our products and technologies may infringe the intellectual property rights of others, which may cause us to become subject to expensive litigation, cause us to incur substantial damages, require us to pay significant license fees or prevent us from selling our products
Our industry is characterized by the existence of a large number of patents and frequent claims and related litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights
We cannot be certain that our products and technologies do not and will not infringe issued patents, patents that may be issued in the future, or other intellectual property rights of others
In addition, leading companies in the semiconductor industry have extensive intellectual property portfolios with respect to semiconductor technology
From time to time, third parties, including these leading companies, may assert exclusive patent, copyright, trademark and other intellectual property rights to technologies and related methods that are important to us
We expect that we may become subject to infringement claims as the number of products and competitors in our target markets grows and the functionality of products overlaps
We have received, and may in the future receive, communications from third parties asserting patent or other intellectual property rights covering our products
Litigation may be necessary in the future to defend against claims of infringement or invalidity, to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others, to enforce our intellectual property rights, or to protect our trade secrets
We may also be subject to claims from customers for indemnification
Any resulting litigation, regardless of its resolution, could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources
If it were determined that our products infringe the intellectual property rights of others, we would need to obtain licenses from these parties or substantially reengineer our products and technologies in order to avoid 16 _________________________________________________________________ [68]Table of Contents infringement
We might not be able to obtain the necessary licenses on acceptable terms, or at all, or to reengineer our products and technologies successfully
Moreover, if we are sued for infringement and lose the suit, we could be required to pay substantial damages or be enjoined from licensing or using the infringing products or technology
Any of the foregoing could cause us to incur significant costs and prevent us from selling our products
Any dispute regarding our intellectual property may require us to indemnify certain licensees or third parties, the cost of which could severely hamper our business operations and financial condition
In any potential dispute involving our patents or other intellectual property, our licensees could also become the target of litigation
Our LongRun2 license agreements and certain of our development services agreements provide limited indemnities
In addition to the time and expense required for us to supply such indemnification to our licensees, a licensee’s development, marketing and sales of licensed products incorporating our LongRun2 technology could be severely disrupted or shut down as a result of litigation, which in turn could severely hamper our business operations and financial condition
If we are unable to protect our proprietary rights adequately, our competitors might gain access to our technology and we might not compete successfully in our markets
We believe that our success will depend in part upon our proprietary technology
We rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secret laws and contractual obligations with employees and third parties to protect our proprietary rights
These legal protections provide only limited protection and may be time consuming and expensive to obtain and enforce
If we fail to protect our proprietary rights adequately, our competitors might gain access to our technology
As a result, our competitors might offer similar products and we might not be able to compete successfully in our market
Moreover, despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may copy aspects of our products and obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary
Also, our competitors may independently develop similar, but not infringing, technology, duplicate our products, or design around our patents or our other intellectual property
In addition, other parties may breach confidentiality agreements or other protective contracts with us, and we may not be able to enforce our rights in the event of these breaches
Furthermore, the laws of many foreign countries do not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States
We may be required to spend significant resources to monitor and protect our intellectual property rights
Our pending patent and trademark applications may not be approved
Our patents, including any patents that may result from our patent applications, may not provide us with any competitive advantage or may be challenged by third parties
If challenged, our patents might not be upheld or their claims could be narrowed
We may initiate claims or litigation against third parties based on our proprietary rights
Any litigation surrounding our rights could force us to divert important financial and other resources from our business operations
The evolution of our business could place significant strain on our management systems, infrastructure and other resources, and our business may not succeed if we fail to manage it effectively
Our ability to implement our business plan in a rapidly evolving market requires effective planning and management process
Changes in our business plans could place significant strain on our management systems, infrastructure and other resources
In addition, we expect that we will continue to improve our financial and managerial controls and procedures
We will also need to expand, train and manage our workforce worldwide
Furthermore, we expect that we will be required to manage an increasing number of relationships with suppliers, manufacturers, customers and other third parties
If we fail to manage change effectively, our employee-related costs and employee turnover could increase and our business may not succeed
17 _________________________________________________________________ [69]Table of Contents We have significant international operations, which exposes us to risk and uncertainties
In addition, ASE is located in Taiwan, and the Fujitsu Limited foundry we use for our 90 nanometer product is located in Japan
In addition, we generally ship our products from a third-party warehouse facility located in Hong Kong
In attempting to conduct and expand business internationally, we are exposed to various risks that could adversely affect our international operations and, consequently, our operating results, including: • difficulties and costs of staffing and managing international operations; • fluctuations in currency exchange rates; • unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, including imposition of currency exchange controls; • longer accounts receivable collection cycles; • import or export licensing requirements; • problems in the timeliness or quality of product deliveries; • potentially adverse tax consequences; • major health concerns, such as SARS; • political and economic instability, for example as a result of tensions between Taiwan and the People’s Republic of China; and • potentially reduced protection for intellectual property rights
Our operating results are difficult to predict and fluctuate significantly
A failure to meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors could result in a substantial decline in our stock price
Our operating results fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter, and we expect that our operating results will fluctuate significantly in the future as a result of one or more of the risks described in this section or as a result of numerous other factors
You should not rely on quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations as an indication of our future performance
Our stock price has declined substantially since our stock began trading publicly
If our future operating results fail to meet or exceed the expectations of securities analysts or investors, our stock price would likely decline from current levels
A large portion of our expenses, including rent and salaries, is fixed or difficult to reduce
Our expenses are based in part on expectations for our revenue
If our revenue does not meet our expectations, the adverse effect of the revenue shortfall upon our operating results may be acute in light of the fixed nature of our expenses
We often make many shipments of our products at or near the end of each fiscal quarter, which makes it difficult to estimate or adjust our operating activities quickly in response to a shortfall in expected revenue
Our reported financial results may be adversely affected by changes in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States are subject to issuance and interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the SEC, and various bodies formed to promulgate and interpret appropriate accounting principles
A change in these principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on our reported financial results, and could affect the reporting of transactions completed before the announcement of a change
For example, in December 2004, FASB issued SFAS 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” which replaces SFAS 123 and supersedes APB 25
We are required to adopt SFAS 123(R) in our first quarter of fiscal year 2006
SFAS 123(R) requires that compensation costs relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements
The pro forma disclosure previously permitted under SFAS 123 will no longer be an acceptable alternative to recognition of expense in the financial statements
We currently measure compensation costs related to share-based payments under APB 25, as allowed by SFAS 123, and 18 _________________________________________________________________ [70]Table of Contents provide disclosure in notes to our financial statements as required by SFAS 123
We might experience payment disputes for amounts owed to us under our LongRun2 licensing agreements, and this may harm our results of operations
The standard terms of our LongRun2 license agreements require our licensees to document the royalties owed to us from the sale of products that incorporate our technology and report this data to us on a quarterly basis
While standard license terms give us the right to audit books and records of our licensees to verify this information, audits can be expensive, time consuming, and potentially detrimental to our ongoing business relationship with our licensees
Our failure to audit our licensees’ books and records may result in us receiving more or less royalty revenues than we are entitled to under the terms of our license agreements
The result of such royalty audits could result in an increase, as a result of a licensee’s underpayment, or decrease, as a result of a licensee’s overpayment, to previously reported royalty revenues
Such adjustments would be recorded in the period they are determined
Any adverse material adjustments resulting from royalty audits or dispute resolutions may result in us missing analyst estimates and causing our stock price to decline
Royalty audits may also trigger disagreements over contract terms with our licensees and such disagreements could hamper customer relations, divert the efforts and attention of our management from normal operations and impact our business operations and financial condition
The price of our common stock has been volatile and is subject to wide fluctuations
The market price of our common stock has been volatile and is likely to remain subject to wide fluctuations in the future
Many factors could cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate, including: • variations in our quarterly results; • market conditions in our industry, the industries of our customers and the economy as a whole; • announcements of technological innovations by us or by our competitors; • introductions of new products or new pricing policies by us or by our competitors; • acquisitions or strategic alliances by us or by our competitors; • recruitment or departure of key personnel; • the gain or loss of significant orders; • the gain or loss of significant customers; and • changes in the estimates of our operating performance or changes in recommendations by securities analysts
In addition, the stock market generally and the market for semiconductor and other technology-related stocks in particular experienced a decline during 2000, 2001 and through 2002, and could decline from current levels, which could cause the market price of our common stock to fall for reasons not necessarily related to our business, results of operations or financial condition
The market price of our stock also might decline in reaction to events that affect other companies in our industry even if these events do not directly affect us
Accordingly, you may not be able to resell your shares of common stock at or above the price you paid
Securities litigation is often brought against a company following a period of volatility in the market price of its securities, and we have been subject to such litigation in the past
Any such lawsuits in the future will divert management’s attention and resources from other matters, which could also adversely affect our business and the price of our stock
19 _________________________________________________________________ [71]Table of Contents Our California facilities and the facilities of third parties upon which we rely to provide us critical services are located in regions that are subject to earthquakes and other natural disasters
Our California facilities, including our principal executive offices, are located near major earthquake fault lines
If there is a major earthquake or any other natural disaster in a region where one of our facilities is located, our business could be materially and adversely affected
In addition, ASE, upon which we currently rely for the majority of our assembly and test services, is located in Taiwan, and
Fujitsu Limited, which fabricates a significant amount of our wafers, is located in Japan
Taiwan and Japan have experienced significant earthquakes and could be subject to additional earthquakes in the future
Any earthquake or other natural disaster in these areas could materially disrupt our manufacturer’s production capabilities and ASE’s assembly and test capabilities and could result in our experiencing a significant delay in delivery, or substantial shortage, of wafers and possibly in higher wafer prices
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, stockholder rights plan and Delaware law contain provisions that could discourage or prevent a takeover, even if an acquisition would be beneficial to our stockholders
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as provisions of Delaware law, could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders
These provisions include: • establishing a classified board of directors so that not all members of our board may be elected at one time; • providing that directors may be removed only “for cause” and only with the vote of 66^2/3prca of our outstanding shares; • requiring super-majority voting to amend some provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws; • authorizing the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock that our board could issue to increase the number of shares and to outstanding discourage a takeover attempt; • limiting the ability of our stockholders to call special meetings of stockholders; • prohibiting stockholder action by written consent, which requires all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our stockholders; and • establishing advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our board or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings
In addition, the stockholder rights plan, which we implemented in 2002, and Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control
We may identify material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting
In compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we test our system of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31 of the applicable fiscal year
In our evaluation as of December 31, 2004, we identified six material weaknesses
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, that results in there being more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected
The material weaknesses that we had identified affected all of our significant accounts
During 2005, we undertook actions in order to remediate each of the material weaknesses, and as a consequence of these actions, we have remediated all of those material weaknesses in our system of internal control over financial reporting
However, we cannot assure you that we will not in the future identify further material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting
20 _________________________________________________________________ [72]Table of Contents Changes in securities laws and regulations have increased our costs
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has required and will require changes in some of our corporate governance, public disclosure and compliance practices
The Act has also required the SEC to promulgate new rules on a variety of subjects and the National Association of Securities Dealers to adopt revisions to its requirements for companies, such as us, that are listed on the NASDAQ National Market
These developments have increased our legal and financial compliance costs and have made some activities, such as SEC reporting requirements, more difficult
Additionally, we expect these developments to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage
These developments could make it more difficult for us to attract qualified executive officers and attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors, particularly to serve on our audit committee
We are presently evaluating and monitoring regulatory developments and cannot estimate the timing or magnitude of additional costs we may incur as a result