Home
Jump to Risk Factors
Jump to Industries
Jump to Exposures
Jump to Event Codes
Jump to Wiki Summary

Industries
Investment Banking and Brokerage
Health Care Distribution and Services
Health Care Facilities
Technology Hardware Storage and Peripherals
Information Technology
Technology Hardware and Equipment
Exposures
Military
Regime
Ease
Intelligence
Express intent
Rights
Judicial
Provide
Event Codes
Military blockade
Solicit support
Release or return
Warn
Adjust
Yield to order
Demand
Sanction
Reject
Travel to meet
Yield
Vote
Complain
Acknowledge responsibility
Force
Sports contest
Threaten
Human death
Psychological state
Accident
Wiki Wiki Summary
Allotransplantation Allotransplant (allo- meaning "other" in Greek) is the transplantation of cells, tissues, or organs to a recipient from a genetically non-identical donor of the same species. The transplant is called an allograft, allogeneic transplant, or homograft.
Bone grafting Bone grafting is a surgical procedure that replaces missing bone in order to repair bone fractures that are extremely complex, pose a significant health risk to the patient, or fail to heal properly. Some small or acute fractures can be cured without bone grafting, but the risk is greater for large fractures like compound fractures.
Organ transplantation Organ transplantation is a medical procedure in which an organ is removed from one body and placed in the body of a recipient, to replace a damaged or missing organ. The donor and recipient may be at the same location, or organs may be transported from a donor site to another location.
Skin grafting Skin grafting, a type of graft surgery, involves the transplantation of skin. The transplanted tissue is called a skin graft.Surgeons may use skin grafting to treat:\n\nextensive wounding or trauma\nburns\nareas of extensive skin loss due to infection such as necrotizing fasciitis or purpura fulminans\nspecific surgeries that may require skin grafts for healing to occur - most commonly removal of skin cancersSkin grafting often takes place after serious injuries when some of the body's skin is damaged.
Nerve allograft Nerve allotransplantation (allo- means "other" in Greek) is the transplantation of a nerve to a receiver from a donor of the same species. For example, nerve tissue is transplanted from one person to another.
Chronic allograft nephropathy Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is a kidney disorder which is the leading cause of kidney transplant failure, occurring months to years after the transplant.\n\n\n== Symptoms and signs ==\nCAN is characterized by a gradual decline in kidney function and, typically, accompanied by high blood pressure and hematuria.
Allograft inflammatory factor 1 Allograft inflammatory factor 1 (AIF-1) also known as ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 (IBA1) is a protein that in humans is encoded by the AIF1 gene.\n\n\n== Gene ==\nThe AIF1 gene is located within a segment of the major histocompatibility complex class III region.
Anterior cruciate ligament The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of a pair of cruciate ligaments (the other being the posterior cruciate ligament) in the human knee. The two ligaments are also called "cruciform" ligaments, as they are arranged in a crossed formation.
Cardiac allograft vasculopathy Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a progressive type of coronary artery disease in people who have had a heart transplant. As the donor heart has lost its nerve supply there is typically no chest pain, and CAV is usually detected on routine testing.
Regulation Regulation is the management of complex systems according to a set of rules and trends. In systems theory, these types of rules exist in various fields of biology and society, but the term has slightly different meanings according to context.
Technology Technology is the result of accumulated knowledge and application of skills, methods, and processes used in industrial production and scientific research. Technology is embedded in the operation of all machines, with or without detailed knowledge of their function, for the intended purpose of an organization.
HCL Technologies HCL Technologies (Hindustan Computers Limited) is an Indian multinational information technology (IT) services and consulting company headquartered in Noida. It is a subsidiary of HCL Enterprise.
Renaissance Technologies Renaissance Technologies LLC, also known as RenTech or RenTec, is an American hedge fund based in East Setauket, New York, on Long Island, which specializes in systematic trading using quantitative models derived from mathematical and statistical analysis. Their signature Medallion fund is famed for the best record in investing history.
United Technologies United Technologies Corporation (UTC) was an American multinational conglomerate headquartered in Farmington, Connecticut. It researched, developed, and manufactured products in numerous areas, including aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building automation, and industrial products, among others.
Emerging technologies Emerging technologies are technologies whose development, practical applications, or both are still largely unrealized, such that they are figuratively emerging into prominence from a background of nonexistence or obscurity. These technologies are generally new but also include older technologies.
Raytheon Technologies Raytheon Technologies Corporation is an American multinational aerospace and defense conglomerate headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts. It is one of the largest aerospace, intelligence services providers, and defense manufacturers in the world by revenue and market capitalization.
Lumen Technologies Lumen Technologies, Inc. (formerly CenturyLink) is an American \ntelecommunications company headquartered in Monroe, Louisiana, that offers communications, network services, security, cloud solutions, voice, and managed services.
Information technology Information technology (IT) is the use of computers to create, process, store, retrieve, and exchange all kinds of electronic data and information. IT is typically used within the context of business operations as opposed to personal or entertainment technologies.
United States The United States of America (U.S.A. or USA), commonly known as the United States (U.S. or US) or America, is a country primarily located in North America. It consists of 50 states, a federal district, five major unincorporated territories, 326 Indian reservations, and nine minor outlying islands.
List of states and territories of the United States The United States of America is a federal republic consisting of 50 states, a federal district (Washington, D.C., the capital city of the United States), five major territories, and various minor islands. The 48 contiguous states and Washington, D.C., are in North America between Canada and Mexico.
President of the United States The president of the United States (POTUS) is the head of state and head of government of the United States of America. The president directs the executive branch of the federal government and is the commander-in-chief of the United States Armed Forces.
United States Congress The United States Congress is the legislature of the federal government of the United States. It is bicameral, being composed of a lower body, the House of Representatives, and an upper body, the Senate.
United States Navy The United States Navy (USN) is the maritime service branch of the United States Armed Forces and one of the eight uniformed services of the United States. It is the largest and most powerful navy in the world, with the estimated tonnage of its active battle fleet alone exceeding the next 13 navies combined, including 11 U.S. allies or partner nations as of 2015.
List of presidents of the United States The president of the United States is the head of state and head of government of the United States, indirectly elected to a four-year term by the American people through the Electoral College. The office holder leads the executive branch of the federal government and is the commander-in-chief of the United States Armed Forces.
United States dollar The United States dollar (symbol: $; code: USD; also abbreviated US$ or U.S. Dollar, to distinguish it from other dollar-denominated currencies; referred to as the dollar, U.S. dollar, American dollar, or colloquially buck) is the official currency of the United States and several other countries. The Coinage Act of 1792 introduced the U.S. dollar at par with the Spanish silver dollar, divided it into 100 cents, and authorized the minting of coins denominated in dollars and cents.
Republican Party (United States) The Republican Party, also referred to as the GOP ("Grand Old Party"), is one of the two major contemporary political parties in the United States, along with its main historic rival, the Democratic Party.\nThe GOP was founded in 1854 by anti-slavery activists who opposed the Kansas–Nebraska Act, which allowed for the potential expansion of chattel slavery into the western territories.
Democratic Party (United States) The Democratic Party is one of the two major contemporary political parties in the United States. It was founded in 1828 by supporters of Andrew Jackson, making it the world's oldest active political party.
United States Marine Corps The United States Marine Corps (USMC), also referred to as the United States Marines, is the maritime land force service branch of the United States Armed Forces responsible for conducting expeditionary and amphibious operations through combined arms, implementing its own infantry, artillery, aerial, and special operations forces. The U.S. Marine Corps is one of the eight uniformed services of the United States.
Competition Competition is a rivalry where two or more parties strive for a common goal which cannot be shared: where one's gain is the other's loss (an example of which is a zero-sum game). Competition can arise between entities such as organisms, individuals, economic and social groups, etc.
Competitor backlinking Competitor backlinking is a search engine optimization strategy that involves analyzing the backlinks of competing websites within a vertical search. The outcome of this activity is designed to increase organic search engine rankings and to gain an understanding of the link building strategies used by business competitors.By analyzing the backlinks to competitor websites, it is possible to gain a benchmark on the number of links and the quality of links that is required for high search engine rankings.
Competitors for the Crown of Scotland When the crown of Scotland became vacant in September 1290 on the death of the seven-year-old child Queen Margaret, 13 claimants to the throne came forward. Those with the most credible claims were John Balliol, Robert Bruce, John Hastings and Floris V, Count of Holland.
Sport of athletics Athletics is a group of sporting events that involves competitive running, jumping, throwing, and walking. The most common types of athletics competitions are track and field, road running, cross country running, and racewalking.
List of female fitness and figure competitors This is a list of female fitness and figure competitors.\n\n\n== A ==\nJelena Abbou\n\n\n== B ==\nLauren Beckham\nAlexandra Béres\nSharon Bruneau\n\n\n== C ==\nNatalie Montgomery-Carroll\nJen Cassetty\nKim Chizevsky\nSusie Curry\n\n\n== D ==\nDebbie Dobbins\nNicole Duncan\n\n\n== E ==\nJamie Eason\nAlexis Ellis\n\n\n== F ==\nAmy Fadhli\nJaime Franklin\n\n\n== G ==\nAdela García \nConnie Garner\nElaine Goodlad\nTracey Greenwood\nOksana Grishina\n\n\n== H ==\nMallory Haldeman\nVanda Hădărean\nJen Hendershott\nSoleivi Hernandez\nApril Hunter\n\n\n== I ==\n\n\n== J ==\nTsianina Joelson\n\n\n== K ==\nAdria Montgomery-Klein\nAshley Kaltwasser\n\n\n== L ==\nLauren Lillo\nMary Elizabeth Lado\nTammie Leady\nJennifer Nicole Lee\nAmber Littlejohn\nJulie Lohre\nJenny Lynn\n\n\n== M ==\nTimea Majorová\nLinda Maxwell\nDavana Medina\nJodi Leigh Miller\nChisato Mishima\n\n\n== N ==\nKim Nielsen\n\n\n== O ==\n\n\n== P ==\nVicky Pratt\nElena Panova\nChristine Pomponio-Pate\nCathy Priest\n\n\n== Q ==\n\n\n== R ==\nMaite Richert\nCharlene Rink\nKelly Ryan\n\n\n== S ==\nErin Stern\nCarol Semple-Marzetta\nKrisztina Sereny\nTrish Stratus (Patricia Anne Stratigias)\n\n\n== T ==\nKristi Tauti\nJennifer Thomas\n\n\n== U ==\n\n\n== V ==\nLisa Marie Varon\n\n\n== W ==\nLatisha Wilder\nTorrie Wilson\nLyen Wong\nJenny Worth\nNicole Wilkins\n\n\n== Y ==\n\n\n== Z ==\nMarietta Žigalová\nMalika Zitouni\n\n\n== See also ==\nList of female bodybuilders\n\n\n== References ==\nThere has been a rise in the number of women wanting to compete as fitness models.
List of Dancing with the Stars (American TV series) competitors Dancing with the Stars is an American reality television show in which celebrity contestants and professional dance partners compete to be the best dancers, as determined by the show's judges and public voting. The series first broadcast in 2005, and thirty complete seasons have aired on ABC. During each season, competitors are progressively eliminated on the basis of public voting and scores received from the judges until only a few contestants remain.
Competitor Group Competitor Group, Inc. (CGI) is a privately held, for-profit, sports marketing and management company based in Mira Mesa, San Diego, California.
Round-robin tournament A round-robin tournament (or all-play-all tournament) is a competition in which each contestant meets every other participant, usually in turn. A round-robin contrasts with an elimination tournament, in which participants are eliminated after a certain number of losses.
Risk Factors
REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES INC Item 1A RISK FACTORS An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk
You should consider each of the risks and uncertainties described in this section and all of the other information in this document before deciding to invest in our common stock
Any of the risk factors we describe below could severely harm our business, financial condition and results of operations
The market price of our common stock could decline if any of these risks or uncertainties develop into actual events
You may lose all or part of the money you paid to buy our common stock
We depend heavily upon a limited number of sources of human tissue, and any failure to obtain tissue from these sources in a timely manner will interfere with our ability to process and distribute allografts
The limited supply of human tissue has at times limited our growth, and may not be sufficient to meet our future needs
In addition, due to seasonal changes in mortality rates, some scarce tissues that we use for our allografts are at times in particularly short supply
Other factors, some of which are unpredictable, such as negative publicity and regulatory actions in our industry also can unexpectedly reduce the available supply of tissue
We rely on donor recovery groups for our human tissue supply
Donor recovery groups are part of relatively complex relationships
They provide support to donor families, are regulated by the FDA, and are often affiliated with hospitals, universities or organ procurement groups
Our relationships with donor recovery groups, which are critical to our supply of tissue, can be affected by relationships they have with other organizations
Any negative impact of the regulatory and disease transmission issues facing the industry, as well as the negative publicity that these issues create, could have an impact on our ability to negotiate favorable contracts with recovery groups
Southeast Tissue Alliance, or SETA, our largest donor recovery group, supplied us with approximately 25prca of our total human tissue for the year ended December 31, 2005
Our three largest recovery groups together supplied approximately 52prca of our total tissue for the year ended December 31, 2005
If we were to lose any one of these three sources of tissue, the impact on our operating results would be material
We cannot be sure that our supply of human tissue will continue to be available at current levels or will be sufficient to meet our needs
If we are no longer able to obtain tissue from our current sources sufficient to meet our needs, we may not be able to locate additional replacement sources of tissue on commercially reasonable terms, if at all
Any interruption of our business caused by the need to locate additional sources of tissue would significantly hurt our revenues
We expect our revenues would decline in proportion to any decline in tissue supply
12 ______________________________________________________________________ [48]Table of Contents If we fail to maintain our existing strategic relationships or are unable to identify additional distributors of our implants, our revenues may decrease
We currently derive the majority of our revenues through our relationships with two companies, Medtronic Sofamor Danek, or MSD and Exactech, Inc
For the year ended December 31, 2005, we derived approximately 60prca and 5prca of our revenues from distribution by MSD and Exactech, respectively
MSD provides nearly all of the instrumentation, surgeon training, distribution assistance and marketing materials for our line of spinal allografts
MSD materially reduced its orders from us during the past year
If our relationship with MSD is terminated or further reduced for any reason and we are unable to replace the relationship with other means of distribution, we would suffer a material decrease in revenues
We may need to obtain the assistance of additional distributors to market and distribute our new allografts and technologies, as well as to market and distribute our existing allografts and technologies to new market segments or geographical areas
We may not be able to find additional distributors who will agree to and successfully market and distribute our allografts and technologies on commercially reasonable terms, if at all
If we are unable to establish additional distribution relationships on favorable terms, our revenues may decline
If third party payors fail to provide appropriate levels of reimbursement for the use of our implants, our revenues would be adversely affected
Political, economic and regulatory influences are subjecting the healthcare industry in the United States to fundamental change
Any new federal or state legislation could result in significant changes in the availability, delivery, pricing or payment for healthcare services and products
While we cannot predict what form any new legislation will take, it is possible that any significant healthcare legislation, if adopted, could lower the amounts paid to us for our services, which would decrease our revenues
Our revenues depend largely on the reimbursement of patients’ medical expenses by government health care programs and private health insurers
Governments and private insurers closely examine medical procedures incorporating new technologies to determine whether the procedures will be covered by payment, and if so, the level of payment which may apply
We cannot be sure that third party payors will continue to reimburse us or provide payment at levels which will be profitable to us
If we fail to maintain the high processing standards that our implants require or if we are unable to develop processing capacity as required, our commercial opportunity will be reduced or eliminated
Our implants require careful calibration and precise, high-quality processing
Achieving precision and quality control requires skill and diligence by our personnel
If we fail to achieve and maintain these high processing standards, including avoiding processing errors, design defects or component failures: • we could be forced to recall, withdraw or suspend distribution of our implants; • our implants and technologies could fail quality assurance and performance tests; • production and deliveries of our implants could be delayed or cancelled; and • our processing costs could increase
Further, to be successful, we will need to manage our human tissue processing capacity related to tissue recovery and demand for our allografts
It may be difficult for us to match our processing capacity to demand due to problems related to yields, quality control and assurance, tissue availability, adequacy of control policies and procedures, and lack of skilled personnel
If we are unable to process and produce our implants on a timely basis, at acceptable quality and costs, and in sufficient quantities, or if we experience unanticipated technological problems or delays in processing, it will reduce our revenues and increase our cost per allograft processed
13 ______________________________________________________________________ [49]Table of Contents Our allograft and xenograft implants and technologies could become subject to significantly greater regulation by the FDA, which could disrupt our business
The FDA could identify deficiencies in future inspections of our facilities or promulgate future regulatory rulings that could disrupt our business, hurting our profitability
For example, in mid-2001, the FDA reviewed our BioCleanse^® process after the FDA raised concerns about the process
While the FDA concluded that the compliance portion of its review of our BioCleanse^® process in January 2002 and determined we were in compliance with existing FDA requirements and that no regulatory action was warranted, the possibility always exists that the FDA could raise concerns with these or other aspects of our business
The FDA’s decision, that no regulatory action was warranted, does not constitute a formal approval of our BioCleanse^® process and the FDA is free to raise the same or similar concerns in the future
If any of our allografts fall under the FDA’s definitions of “more than minimally manipulated or indicated for nonhomologous use,” we would be required to obtain medical device approval or clearance or biologics licenses, which could require clinical testing
Disapproval of our license applications and restricted distribution of any of our allografts, which may become subject to pre-market approval, may result
The FDA could require post-market testing and surveillance to monitor the effects of such allografts, could restrict the commercial applications of these allografts, and could conduct periodic inspections of our facility and our suppliers’ facilities
Delays encountered during the FDA approval process could shorten the patent protection period during which we have the exclusive right to commercialize such technologies or could allow others to come to market with similar technologies before us
FDA regulations of human cellular and tissue-based products, titled “Good Tissue Practices,” went into full force as of May 2005
These regulations cover all stages of allograft processing, from procurement of tissue to distribution of final allografts
These regulations may increase regulatory scrutiny within our industry and lead to increased enforcement action which affects the conduct of our business
In addition, the effect of these regulations may have a significant effect upon recovery agencies which supply us with tissue and increase the cost of recovery activities
Any such increase would translate into increased costs to us, as we compensate the recovery agencies based on their cost of recovery
Other regulatory entities include state agencies with statutes covering tissue banking
Of particular relevance to our business are regulations issued by Florida, New York, California and Maryland
Most states do not currently have tissue banking regulations
However, recent incidents of allograft related infections in the industry may stimulate the development of regulation in other states
It is possible that others may make allegations against us or against donor recovery groups or tissue banks, including those with which we have a relationship, about non-compliance with applicable FDA regulations or other relevant statutes and regulations
Allegations like these could cause regulators or other authorities to take investigative or other action, or could cause negative publicity for our business and our industry
Some of our implants in development will contain tissue derived from animals, commonly referred to as xenografts
Xenograft implants are medical devices that are subject to pre-market approval or clearance by the FDA We may not receive FDA approval or clearance to market new implants as we attempt to expand the quantity of xenograft implants available for distribution
The allograft industry is subject to additional local, state, federal and international government regulations and any increased regulations of our current or future activities could significantly increase the cost of doing business, thereby reducing our profitability
Some aspects of our business are subject to additional local, state, federal or international regulation
Changes in the laws or new interpretations of existing laws could negatively affect our business, revenues or 14 ______________________________________________________________________ [50]Table of Contents prospects, and increase the costs associated with conducting our business
In particular, the procurement and transplantation of allograft tissue is subject to federal regulation under the National Organ Transplant Act, or NOTA, a criminal statute that prohibits the purchase and sale of human organs, including bone and other tissue
NOTA permits the payment of reasonable expenses associated with the transportation, processing, preservation, quality control and storage of human tissue, which are the types of services we perform
If in the future NOTA were amended or interpreted in a way that made us unable to include some of these costs in the amounts we charge our customers, it could reduce our revenues and therefore hurt our business
It is possible that more restrictive interpretations or expansions of NOTA could be adopted in the future which could require us to change one or more aspects of our business, at a substantial cost, in order to continue to comply with this statute
A variety of additional local, state, federal and international government laws and regulations govern our business, including those relating to the storage, handling, generation, manufacture and disposal of medical wastes from the processing of tissue
If we fail to conduct our business in compliance with these laws and regulations, we could be subject to significant liabilities
We could be subject to significant liabilities arising from hazardous biological materials for which our insurance may not be adequate
Moreover, such insurance may not always be available in the future on commercially reasonable terms, if at all
If our insurance proves to be inadequate to pay a damage award, we may not have sufficient funds to do so, which could harm our financial condition and liquidity
Our success will depend on the continued acceptance of our allograft and xenograft implants and technologies by the medical community
Our new allograft and xenograft implants, technologies or enhancements to existing implants may never achieve broad market acceptance, which can be affected by numerous factors, including: • lack of clinical acceptance of our implants and technologies; • introduction of competitive tissue repair treatment options which render our implants and technologies too expensive or obsolete; • lack of availability of third-party reimbursement; and • difficulty training surgeons in the use of our tissue implants and technologies
Market acceptance will also depend on our ability to demonstrate that our existing and new implants and technologies are an attractive alternative to existing tissue repair treatment options
Our ability to do so will depend on surgeons’ evaluations of the clinical safety, efficacy, ease of use, reliability and cost-effectiveness of these tissue repair options and technologies
For example, we believe that some in the medical community have lingering concerns over the risk of disease transmission through the use of allografts
Furthermore, we believe that even if the medical community generally accepts our implants and technologies, recommendations and endorsements by influential surgeons will be important to their broad commercial success
If our implants and technologies are not broadly accepted in the marketplace, we may not achieve a competitive position in the market
Rapid technological changes will affect us and our customers, which could result in reduced demand for our allografts
Technologies change rapidly in our industry
For example, steady improvements have been made in synthetic human tissue substitutes which compete with our tissue implants
Unlike allografts, synthetic tissue technologies are not dependent on the availability of tissue
If one of our competitors successfully introduces synthetic technologies using recombinant technologies, which stimulate the growth of tissue surrounding an implant, it could result in a decline in demand for tissue implants
Although our growth strategy contemplates introducing new implants and technologies, the development of these new implants and technologies is a 15 ______________________________________________________________________ [51]Table of Contents complex and uncertain process, requiring a high level of innovation, as well as the ability to accurately predict future technology and market trends
The implants we currently have in development will require significant additional development, investment and testing
We may need to undertake costly and time-consuming efforts to achieve these objectives
We may not be able to respond effectively to technological changes and emerging industry standards, or to successfully identify, develop or support new technologies or enhancements to existing implants in a timely and cost-effective manner, if at all
If we are unable to achieve the improvements in our implants necessary for their successful commercialization, the demand for our implants will suffer
We face intense competition, which could result in reduced acceptance and demand for our implants and technologies
The medical technology/biotechnology industry is intensely competitive
We compete with companies in the United States and internationally that engage in the development and production of medical technologies and processes including: • biotechnology, orthopedic, pharmaceutical, biomaterial and other companies; • academic and scientific institutions; and • public and private research organizations
Many of our competitors have much greater financial, technical, research, marketing, distribution, service and other resources than we have
Moreover, our competitors may offer a broader array of tissue repair treatment products and technologies or may have greater name recognition than we do in the marketplace
For example, we compete with a number of divisions of Johnson & Johnson, a company with significantly greater resources and brand recognition than we have
Our competitors, including several development stage companies, may develop or market technologies that are more effective or commercially attractive than ours, or that may render our technologies obsolete
For example, the successful development of a synthetic tissue product that permits remodeling of bones could result in a decline in the demand for allograft-based products and technologies
If we do not manage the medical release of donor tissue into processing in an efficient manner, it could affect our profitability
There are many factors which affect the level and timing of donor medical releases, such as effectiveness of donor screening performed by our donor recovery groups, the timely receipt, recording and review of required medical documentation, and employee loss and turnover in our medical records department
Some of our donor recovery groups are also processors who provide us with partially processed tissues which they have already determined to be medically suitable for processing
Therefore, these sources provide a higher level of documentation than those that perform donor recovery alone
Although we strive for the timely medical release of tissue, while at the same time maximizing safety for our employees and for tissue recipients, our internal policies may sacrifice timely release of tissue in favor of safety
We continue to review our internal policies in order to provide the best framework for medical releases, however we can provide no assurance that releases will occur at levels which maximize our processing efficiency and minimize our cost per allograft processed
Negative publicity concerning methods of human tissue recovery and screening of donor tissue in our industry could reduce demand for our allografts and impact the supply of available donor tissue
Media reports or other negative publicity concerning both improper methods of tissue recovery from donors and disease transmission from donated tissue could limit widespread acceptance of our allografts
Unfavorable reports of improper or illegal tissue recovery practices, both in the United States and internationally, as well as incidents of improperly processed tissue leading to transmission of disease, may broadly affect the rate of future tissue donation and market acceptance of allograft technologies
16 ______________________________________________________________________ [52]Table of Contents Potential patients may not distinguish our allografts, technologies and the tissue recovery and the processing procedures we have in place, from those of our competitors or others engaged in tissue recovery
In addition, families of potential donors may become reluctant to agree to donate tissue to for-profit tissue processors
If our patents and the other means we use to protect our intellectual property prove to be inadequate, our competitors could exploit our intellectual property to compete more effectively against us
The law of patents and trade secrets is constantly evolving and often involves complex legal and factual questions
The US government may deny or significantly reduce the coverage we seek in our patent applications before or after a patent is issued
We therefore cannot be sure that any particular patent we apply for will be issued, that the scope of the patent protection will be comprehensive enough to provide adequate protection from similar technologies which may compete with ours, that interference proceedings regarding any of our patent applications will not be filed, or that we will achieve any other competitive advantage from a patent
In addition, it is possible that one or more of our patents will be held invalid if challenged or that others will claim rights in or ownership of our patents and other proprietary rights
If any of these events occur, our competitors may be able to use our intellectual property to compete more effectively against us
Because patent applications are secret until patents are actually issued (or until 18 months after a patent application has been filed) and the publication of discoveries in the scientific or patent literature lags behind actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that our patent application was the first application filed covering a particular invention
If another party’s rights to an invention are superior to ours, we may not be able to obtain a license to use that party’s invention on commercially reasonable terms, if at all
In addition, our competitors, many of which have greater resources than we do, could obtain patents that will prevent, limit or interfere with our ability to make use of our inventions either in the United States or in international markets
Further, the laws of some foreign countries do not always protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States
Litigation or regulatory proceedings in the United States or foreign countries also may be necessary to enforce our patent or other intellectual property rights or to determine the scope and validity of our competitorsproprietary rights
These proceedings can be costly, result in development delays, and divert our management’s attention from our business
We also rely upon unpatented proprietary techniques and processes in tissue recovery, research and development, tissue processing and quality assurance
It is possible that others will independently develop technology similar to ours or otherwise gain access to or disclose our proprietary technologies
We may not be able to meaningfully protect our rights in these proprietary technologies, which would reduce our ability to compete
In 1996, a law was passed in the United States that limits the enforcement of patents covering the performance of surgical or medical procedures on a human body
This law prevents medical practitioners and health care entities who practice these procedures, not otherwise covered by a patented procedure, from being sued for patent infringement
Therefore, depending upon how these limitations are interpreted by the courts, they could have a material adverse effect on our ability to enforce any of our proprietary methods or procedures deemed to be surgical or medical procedures
Our success will depend in part on our ability to operate without infringing on or misappropriating the proprietary rights of others, and if we are unable to do so we may be liable for damages
We cannot be certain that US or foreign patents or patent applications of other companies do not exist or will not be issued that would prevent us from commercializing our allografts and technologies
Third parties may sue us for infringing or misappropriating their patent or other intellectual property rights
Intellectual property litigation is costly
If we do not prevail in litigation, in addition to any damages we might have to pay, we could be required to stop the infringing activity or obtain a license requiring us to make royalty payments
It is possible that a required license will not be available to us on commercially acceptable terms, if at all
In addition, a 17 ______________________________________________________________________ [53]Table of Contents required license may be non-exclusive, and therefore our competitors may have access to the same technology licensed to us
If we fail to obtain a required license or are unable to design around another company’s patent, we may be unable to make use of some of the affected technologies or distribute the affected allografts which would negatively impact our revenues
We or our competitors may be exposed to product liability claims which could cause us to be liable for damages or cause investors to think we will be liable for similar claims in the future
The development of allografts and technologies for human tissue repair and treatment entails an inherent risk of product liability claims, and substantial product liability claims may be asserted against us
We are party to a number of legal proceedings related to product liability
We currently have dlra20 million of product liability insurance to cover claims
This amount of insurance may not be adequate for current claims if we are not successful in our defenses, and furthermore, we may not have adequate insurance coverage for any future claims that arise
Moreover, insurance covering our business may not always be available in the future on commercially reasonable terms, if at all
If our insurance proves to be inadequate to pay a damage award, we may not have sufficient funds to do so, which would harm our financial condition and liquidity
In addition, successful product liability claims made against one of our competitors could cause claims to be made against us or expose us to a perception that we are vulnerable to similar claims
In addition, claims against us, regardless of their merit or potential outcome, may also hurt our ability to obtain surgeon endorsement of our allografts or to expand our business
If we are not successful in expanding our distribution activities into international markets, we will not be able to pursue one of our strategies for increasing our revenues
Our current and planned international distribution strategies vary by market, as well as within each country in which we operate
For example, we distribute only a portion of our line of allografts within each country
Our international operations will be subject to a number of risks which may vary from the risks we face in the United States, including: • the need to obtain regulatory approvals in additional foreign countries before we can offer our implants and technologies for use; • longer distribution-to-collection cycles, as well as difficulty in collecting amounts owed to us; • dependence on local distributors; • limited protection of intellectual property rights; • fluctuations in the values of foreign currencies; and • political and economic instability
The value of our investment in Organ Recovery Systems, Inc
is dependent on the financial success of this venture
We own 1cmam285cmam347 shares of convertible preferred stock issued by Organ Recovery Systems, Inc, or ORS, a privately held company, for which the purchase price was dlra5dtta25 million
ORS is organized for the purpose of advancing organ transplantation technology
Realization of our investment in ORS is dependent upon ORS’s successful execution of its operational strategies and the continued industry acceptance of its current and future product developments
If ORS does not successfully execute its operational strategies and recognize long-term profitability, the value of our investment could be impaired which could have a negative effect on our financial statements for the period in which the impairment occurs