| MILACRON INC      Item 1A   Risk Factors       Risks Relating to Our Liquidity and Our Indebtedness       If our cash flow available to service our debt does not continue to improve,     we may not be able to service our debt with cash from operating activities,     which may cause us to default on our debt instruments | 
    
    
      | In 2001, 2002 and 2003, we experienced significantly lower demand for our     plastics machinery, primarily due to the global economic slowdown and, more     specifically, a dramatic decline in capital goods spending | 
    
    
      | While shipment     volumes improved in 2004 and 2005, they remained below historical levels | 
    
    
      | These lower levels of demand for plastics machinery led to significantly     more intense price competition than we had historically experienced | 
    
    
      | Our     plastics processing customers’ production capacities were under utilized     during  the  period  2001 through 2004 which resulted in a significant     reduction in capital spending | 
    
    
      | While capacity utilization in the plastics     processing industry improved in 2005, a return to higher levels of capital     spending can be expected to trail the increase in utilization | 
    
    
      | During the year ended December 31, 2005, our earnings were inadequate to     cover fixed charges by dlra20 million | 
    
    
      | It is possible that our business will     not be able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to service our     indebtedness and pay other expenses, that currently anticipated cost savings     and operating improvements will not be realized on schedule or at all or     that future borrowings will not be available to us under our asset based     facility in an amount sufficient to enable us to make interest payments on     our indebtedness or to fund other liquidity needs | 
    
    
      | Our continued viability depends on realizing anticipated cost savings and     operating improvements on schedule during 2006 and, as we have seen moderate     improvements in order levels in 2005, continued improvement in sales volume     in 2006 and beyond, the latter of which is largely beyond our control | 
    
    
      | Unless we realize anticipated cost savings and operating improvements on     schedule and volume and pricing levels improve, we may need to fund interest     payments on our 111/2prca Senior Secured Notes in part with the proceeds of     borrowings under our asset based facility, the major provisions of which are     discussed in detail in the section of Item 7 of this Form 10-K captioned     “Liquidity and Sources of Capital | 
    
    
      | ” However, our ability to borrow under our     asset based facility is subject to borrowing base limitations, including an     excess availability reserve (as described below), which may be adjusted from     time to time by the administrative agent for the lenders at its discretion,     and our satisfaction of certain conditions to borrowing under our asset     based facility, including, among other things, conditions related to the     continued accuracy of our representations and warranties and the absence of     any unmatured or matured defaults (including under financial covenants) or     any material adverse change in our business or financial condition | 
    
    
      | In     particular, our continued ability to borrow under our asset based facility     is contingent on our ability to comply with financial covenants, including a     minimum cumulative total North America EBITDA requirement and a cumulative     capital  expenditures  limitation  that  will apply during 2006 if our     availability under the asset based facility falls below specified levels for     specified periods and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio requirement     beginning in 2007 | 
    
    
      | We have had to seek several waivers of and amendments to     the financial covenants in our asset based facility in order to continue to     be able to borrow, and we may need to attempt to further renegotiate our     covenants with our lenders to assure compliance | 
    
    
      | However, we cannot control     our lenders’ actions and future negotiations may be unsuccessful | 
    
    
      | If we have     no additional availability or are otherwise unable to borrow against our     asset based facility, our liquidity would be impaired and we would need to     pursue alternative sources of liquidity to service our debt and pay our     expenses | 
    
    
      | It is possible that we would not be able to sell assets, refinance     debt or raise equity on commercially acceptable terms or at all, which could     cause us to default on our obligations under our indebtedness | 
    
    
      | Our inability     to generate sufficient cash flow or draw sufficient amounts under our asset     based facility to satisfy our debt obligations and pay our other expenses,     or our failure to comply with the covenants governing our indebtedness,     could cause us to default on our obligations and would have a material     adverse  effect  on  our  business, financial condition and results of     operations | 
    
    
      | Our liquidity depends on the availability of borrowings under our asset     facility, which is subject to the discretion of the administrative agent     thereunder | 
    
    
      | Pursuant to the terms of our asset based facility, the cash we receive from     collection of receivables is subject to an automatic “sweep” to repay the     borrowings under our asset based facility on a daily basis | 
    
    
      | As a result, we     rely on borrowings under our asset based facility as our primary source of     cash for use in our North American operations | 
    
    
      | 11       _________________________________________________________________    [64]Table of Contents       The availability of borrowings under our asset based facility is subject to     a borrowing base limitation, including a dlra10 million excess availability     reserve and a dlra1 million hedging reserve (as a result of an interest rate     swap that was entered into in 2004), and other conditions to borrowing | 
    
    
      | Certain  of  the  components  of the borrowing base are subject to the     discretion of the administrative agent | 
    
    
      | In addition, the satisfaction of     conditions to borrowing under our asset based facility is determined by the     administrative agent in its discretion | 
    
    
      | Further, the administrative agent     has the customary ability to reduce, unilaterally, the availability of     borrowings at any time by, for example, reducing advance rates, imposing or     changing collateral value limitations, establishing reserves or declaring     certain collateral ineligible | 
    
    
      | If the administrative agent exercises its     discretion and limits the availability of borrowings under our asset based     facility, our liquidity could be materially adversely affected and our     availability could fall below the levels at which additional covenants,     including a minimum cumulative total North America EBITDA requirement, would     begin to apply | 
    
    
      | Our substantial level of indebtedness may adversely affect our financial     condition,  limit  our ability to grow and compete and prevent us from     fulfilling our obligations under our indebtedness | 
    
    
      | As  of  December 31,  2005, we had approximately dlra240 million in total     indebtedness | 
    
    
      | In addition, as of December 31, 2005, we and certain of our     non-US subsidiaries  had  guaranteed dlra6 million of off-balance sheet     obligations related to customer financings | 
    
    
      | As of December 31, 2005, we had     approximately dlra65 million of undrawn commitments under our asset based     facility of which approximately dlra37 million was available to be borrowed | 
    
    
      | Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences | 
    
    
      | For example,     it could:         •  require us to dedicate a substantial portion or even all of our cash     flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the     availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures,     research and development efforts and other general corporate purposes;         •  increase the amount of interest expense that we have to pay because     some  of  our  borrowings are at variable rates of interest, which, if     increased, will result in higher interest payments;         •  increase our vulnerability to existing and future adverse economic and     industry conditions;         •  limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our     business and the industries in which we operate;         •  make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect     to our indebtedness;         •  place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that     have less indebtedness;         •  limit, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants in our     indebtedness, among other things, our ability to borrow additional funds,     dispose of assets or pay cash dividends; and          •   restrict us from making strategic acquisitions, introducing new     technologies or exploiting business opportunities | 
    
    
      | The  agreements  governing our indebtedness impose financial and other     restrictions upon us, including compliance with certain financial covenants | 
    
    
      | In  addition,  our asset based facility is subject to a borrowing base     limitation, including the excess availability reserve, which may be adjusted     from time to time in the discretion of the administrative agent for the     lenders and is subject to meeting financial covenants | 
    
    
      | We have had to seek     several  waivers of and amendments to the covenants in our asset based     facility in order to remain in compliance, and we may not be able to comply     with these covenants in the future or satisfy conditions to the availability     of borrowings | 
    
    
      | Failure to achieve compliance with covenants contained in any     of these agreements could result in a loss of funding availability or a     default under the related agreement, and could lead to acceleration of the     related debt and the acceleration of debt under the other agreements | 
    
    
      | If we     are  unable to meet our expenses and debt obligations, we will need to     refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness, sell assets or raise equity | 
    
    
      | However,  we  may  not  be  able  to refinance or otherwise repay such     indebtedness, sell assets or raise equity on acceptable terms or at all and,     if that is the case, we would be unable to service our indebtedness and our     continued viability would be threatened | 
    
    
      | 12       _________________________________________________________________    [65]Table of Contents       Despite current indebtedness levels, we and our subsidiaries may still be     able to incur substantially more debt | 
    
    
      | This could further exacerbate the     risks associated with our substantial leverage | 
    
    
      | We  and  our  subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial additional     indebtedness  in the future | 
    
    
      | The terms of the agreements governing our     indebtedness do not fully prohibit us or our subsidiaries from doing so | 
    
    
      | Subject to borrowing base limitations, including an excess availability     reserve, which may be adjusted from time to time in the discretion of the     administrative agent for the lenders under our asset based facility, and our     satisfaction  of certain conditions to borrowing under our asset based     facility, including, among other things, conditions related to the continued     accuracy  of our representations and warranties and the absence of any     unmatured or matured defaults (including under financial covenants) or any     material adverse change in our business or financial condition, our asset     based facility permits additional borrowings thereunder | 
    
    
      | As of December 31,     2005, we had approximately dlra65 million of undrawn commitments thereunder of     which approximately dlra37 million was available to be borrowed | 
    
    
      | If new debt is     added to our subsidiaries’ current debt levels, the related risks that we     and they now face could intensify | 
    
    
      | Restrictions and covenants in debt agreements limit our ability to take     certain actions | 
    
    
      | The indenture governing the 111/2prca Senior Secured Notes and the credit     agreement for our asset based facility contain a number of significant     restrictions and covenants that limit our ability and our subsidiaries’     ability, among other things, to:         •  borrow money;         •  use assets as security in other borrowings or transactions;         •  pay dividends on capital stock or purchase capital stock;         •  sell assets;         •  enter into certain transactions with affiliates; and         •  make certain investments or acquisitions | 
    
    
      | We  are currently restricted by the terms of the indenture from paying     dividends on our Series B Preferred Stock | 
    
    
      | As  discussed above, the credit agreement for our asset based facility     requires us to satisfy certain financial covenants and other conditions to     borrowing | 
    
    
      | Also, the availability of borrowings under our asset based     facility are subject to a borrowing base limitation, including the excess     availability and hedging reserves and our satisfaction of certain conditions     to borrowing | 
    
    
      | Subject to certain limited exceptions, our accounts receivable     and inventory, our cash and cash equivalents and certain other collateral,     are pledged to secure on a first priority basis our asset based facility and     certain  other obligations and, subject to certain exceptions, are not     permitted to be pledged to secure other indebtedness we or our subsidiaries     may otherwise be able to incur | 
    
    
      | Events beyond our control, such as prevailing economic conditions, changes     in consumer preferences and changes in the competitive environment, could     hinder any improvement in, or further impair, our operating performance,     which could affect our ability and that of our subsidiaries to comply with     the  terms  of  our  debt  instruments | 
    
    
      | It is possible that we and our     subsidiaries  will  not  be  able to comply with the provisions of our     respective debt instruments, including any applicable financial covenants in     the credit agreement for our asset based facility | 
    
    
      | Breaching any of these     covenants, conditions or restrictions or the failure to comply with our     obligations after the lapse of any applicable grace periods could result in     a  loss of funding availability or a default under the applicable debt     instruments, including the credit agreement for our asset based facility | 
    
    
      | If     there were an event of default, holders of such defaulted debt could cause     all  amounts  borrowed  under  these instruments to be due and payable     immediately | 
    
    
      | It is possible that our assets or cash flow or that of our     subsidiaries would not be sufficient to fully repay borrowings under the     outstanding debt instruments, either upon maturity or if accelerated upon an     event of default | 
    
    
      | It is also possible that if we were required to repurchase     the 111/2prca Senior Secured Notes or any other debt securities upon a change     of control we would not be able to refinance or restructure the payments on     such debt | 
    
    
      | Further, if we are unable to repay, refinance or restructure our     indebtedness under our asset based facility, the                                         13       _________________________________________________________________    [66]Table of Contents       lenders under our asset based facility could proceed against the collateral     securing that indebtedness | 
    
    
      | In that event, any proceeds received upon a     realization of such collateral would be applied first to amounts due under     our asset based facility before any proceeds would be available to make     payments on the 111/2prca Senior Secured Notes | 
    
    
      | In addition, any event of     default or declaration of acceleration under one debt instrument could also     result  in  an  event  of  default  under  one  or  more of our or our     subsidiaries’ other debt instruments, including the 111/2prca Senior Secured     Notes | 
    
    
      | Due to the restrictions, conditions and covenants contained in the credit     agreement for our asset based facility, we may need to seek additional     amendments or waivers from our lenders in order to avoid a loss of funding     availability or a default resulting from an inability to improve our results     of operations or to permit our entry into certain transactions we may desire     to consummate in the future | 
    
    
      | In the past, we have had to seek amendments and     waivers to financing facilities, including our asset based facility, and in     certain  cases we have agreed to pay the lenders a fee to obtain their     consent | 
    
    
      | We  may be required to pay the lenders under our asset based     facility a fee for their consent to any further amendments or waivers we may     seek in the future | 
    
    
      | It is also possible that we will not be able to obtain     any amendment or waiver we may seek in the future | 
    
    
      | It is also possible that     we will need to seek bondholder consent for certain transactions we may     desire to consummate in the future | 
    
    
      | There can be no assurance that such     consent will be received | 
    
    
      | An  “ownership change” for US federal income tax purposes will cause     utilization  of  our  pre-change  tax loss carryforwards and other tax     attributes to be substantially delayed, which could increase income tax     expense and decrease available cash in future years | 
    
    
      | The conversion of certain of our debt obligations into common stock and the     subsequent exchange of this common stock and certain other debt obligations     for convertible preferred stock on June 10, 2004 triggered an “ownership     change”  for US federal income tax purposes | 
    
    
      | As a consequence of the     ownership change, the timing of our utilization of our pre-change US tax     loss carryforwards and other tax attributes will be limited to an amount of     approximately dlra23 million per year | 
    
    
      | The allowable limitation is cumulative     for years in which it is not fully utilized | 
    
    
      | At December 31, 2005, the     cumulative limitation amounts to approximately dlra35 million which consists of     dlra12 million from 2004 and dlra23 million from 2005 | 
    
    
      | This delay could increase     tax  expense  and  decrease  available cash in future years | 
    
    
      | The above     limitations do not apply to any post-change in control net operating losses     incurred | 
    
    
      | Risks Relating to Our Business       If we fail to continue to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or to remedy any material weaknesses in our     internal controls that we may identify in the future, such failure could     result  in  material  misstatements in our financial statements, cause     investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and have     a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock | 
    
    
      | During 2004, we conducted our initial evaluation of the company’s internal     control  over financial reporting based on the criteria established in     “Internal  Control — Integrated  Framework” issued by the Committee of     Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) | 
    
    
      | We assessed the     effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting as     of December 31, 2004 | 
    
    
      | As of that date, three material weaknesses, as defined     in standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board     (United States), were identified | 
    
    
      | A material weakness is a deficiency in     internal control over financial reporting that results in more than a remote     likelihood that a material misstatement of annual or interim financial     statements will not be prevented or detected | 
    
    
      | The identified weaknesses were     as follows:         •  inadequate levels of review of complex and judgmental accounting     issues;         •  inadequate segregation of incompatible duties with respect to manual     and  computer-based  business processes at the corporate and operating     levels; and         •  insufficient controls with respect to the accounting for inventories,     primarily at one major North American manufacturing facility | 
    
    
      | 14       _________________________________________________________________    [67]Table of Contents         During 2005, we successfully remediated these material weaknesses and no     additional material weaknesses were identified on our assessment as of     December 31,  2005 | 
    
    
      | However,  there can be no assurance that material     deficiencies will not be identified in the future | 
    
    
      | In  the  event  that a material weakness is identified, we will employ     qualified personnel and adopt and implement policies and procedures to     address any material weaknesses that we identify | 
    
    
      | However, the process of     designing and implementing effective internal controls is a continuous     effort that requires us to anticipate and react to changes in our business     and the economic and regulatory environments and to expend significant     resources to maintain a system of internal controls that is adequate to     satisfy our reporting obligations as a public company | 
    
    
      | There can be no     assurance  that  the measures we will take will remediate any material     weaknesses that we may identify or that we will implement and maintain     adequate controls over our financial process and reporting in the future | 
    
    
      | Any failure to remediate any material weaknesses that we may identify or to     implement new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their     implementation, could harm our operating results, cause us to fail to meet     our  reporting  obligations or result in material misstatements in our     financial statements | 
    
    
      | Any such failure also could adversely affect the     results of the periodic management evaluations and, in the case of a failure     to remediate any material weaknesses that we may identify, would adversely     affect the annual auditor attestation reports regarding the effectiveness of     our  internal control over financial reporting that are required under     Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | 
    
    
      | Inferior internal controls     could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial     information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our     capital stock | 
    
    
      | Many of our customers are in cyclical industries that have historically     experienced significant downturns, which has resulted in substantially     reduced demand for our products | 
    
    
      | The success of our business depends on the profitability of our customers’     business | 
    
    
      | Many of our customers are in businesses that are highly cyclical     in nature and sensitive to changes in general economic conditions, such as     the  automotive, building materials, electronics and consumer durables     industries | 
    
    
      | Their demand for our products and services changes as a result     of  general  economic  conditions  (including  increases in their cost     structures),  interest rates and other factors beyond our control | 
    
    
      | The     performance of our business is directly related to the production levels of     our customers | 
    
    
      | In particular, prices for plastic resins used to make plastic     products and parts increased significantly in 2005 and can be expected to     remain  at  high  levels for the foreseeable future | 
    
    
      | When resin prices     increase, our customers’ profit margins decrease, resulting in lower demand     for our products | 
    
    
      | Therefore, our business is affected by fluctuations in the     price of resin which has had an adverse effect on our business and ability     to generate operating cash flows | 
    
    
      | The costs of other materials and services     used by our customers also increased during 2005, a factor which has also     adversely affected our sales volume and profitability | 
    
    
      | As a result of the significant downturn in the US manufacturing sector     that began in 2001, consolidated sales from continuing operations fell from     peak  levels  of  dlra994dtta3 million in 1999 and dlra974dtta5 million in 2000 to     dlra755dtta2 million in 2001, dlra693dtta2 million in 2002, dlra739dtta7 million in 2003,     dlra774dtta2 million in 2004 and dlra808dtta9 million in 2005 | 
    
    
      | Our net loss from all operations including     goodwill  impairment  charges, restructuring costs, refinancing costs,     discontinued  operations  and cumulative effect of change in method of     accounting was dlra35dtta6 million in 2001, dlra223dtta2 million in 2002, dlra190dtta9 million     in 2003, dlra51dtta8 million in 2004 and dlra14dtta0 million in 2005 | 
    
    
      | While demand is     gradually  improving,  we have experienced a prolonged decrease in our     plastics machinery sales because of the slowdown in many of our plastics     technologies businesses end markets | 
    
    
      | For the year ended December 31, 2005,     sales in our three plastics technologies businesses were dlra696dtta7 million,     compared to dlra904dtta2 million in 1999, dlra873dtta8 million in 2000, dlra662dtta4 million     in 2001, dlra597dtta2 million in 2002, dlra635dtta5 million in 2003 and dlra665dtta2 million     in 2004 | 
    
    
      | While sales have continued to improve in relation to the low point     that occurred in 2002, they have not yet reached the levels attained in 1999     and  2000 | 
    
    
      | From continuing operations, we lost dlra28dtta6 million in 2001,     dlra18dtta7 million in 2002, dlra183dtta7 million in 2003, dlra51dtta3 million in 2004 and     dlra16dtta5 million in 2005 | 
    
    
      | The loss from continuing operations for 2003 includes     a noncash goodwill impairment charge of dlra65dtta6 million (with no tax benefit)     and an income tax charge of approximately dlra71 million to establish valuation     allowances related to US deferred tax assets | 
    
    
      | The losses for 2003 and 2004     include refinancing costs of dlra1dtta8 million and dlra21dtta4 million, respectively,     in both cases, with no tax benefit | 
    
    
      | Declines in economic conditions in                                         15       _________________________________________________________________    [68]Table of Contents       the  industries served by our customers has and may continue to have a     material adverse effect on our business and ability to generate positive     operating cash flows | 
    
    
      | If a large portion of our North American and Western European customers     continue to outsource their manufacturing activities to areas where we do     not currently have manufacturing operations, we may encounter difficulties     keeping these customers | 
    
    
      | In recent years, many companies have been outsourcing their manufacturing     activities to lower cost regions such as Asia and Eastern Europe | 
    
    
      | The toy     industry and the electronics industry, for example, have outsourced much of     their manufacturing to areas outside the United States and Western Europe | 
    
    
      | Retaining business from outsourcing customers involves challenges such as     being able to compete for their business with competitors that have more     proximate operations, incurring extra costs to supply those customers, and     in some cases being able to establish our own manufacturing operations     closer to those customers, as we did in China in 2004 with the formation of     a joint venture to manufacture injection molding machines | 
    
    
      | However, the     establishment  of  new  manufacturing  operations involves significant     investment and time | 
    
    
      | If our customers continue to outsource to lower cost     areas, we may not be able to expand our operations rapidly enough to meet     their  needs on a cost-effective basis or at all | 
    
    
      | Additionally, if our     competitors further expand their operations to China and other areas where     manufacturing activities are outsourced before we do, they may increase     their customer base at our expense | 
    
    
      | We operate in highly competitive industries, many of which are currently     subject  to intense price competition, and if we are unable to compete     successfully our results of operations could fail to further improve or     could deteriorate | 
    
    
      | Many of the industries in which we operate are highly competitive | 
    
    
      | Our     products may not compete successfully with those of our competitors | 
    
    
      | The     markets for plastics machinery and related products are highly competitive     and include a number of North American, European and Asian competitors | 
    
    
      | Principal competitive factors in the plastics machinery industry are: price,     product features, technology, performance, reliability, quality, delivery     and customer service | 
    
    
      | We also face many competitors in the industrial fluids     segment of our business | 
    
    
      | Principal competitive factors in our industrial     fluids segment include price, market coverage, technology, performance,     delivery and customer service | 
    
    
      | We may encounter difficulties in our restructuring and cost-savings efforts,     which could prevent us from achieving our anticipated cost savings | 
    
    
      | Over the past several years we have taken significant actions to realign our     cost structure to improve customer service and respond to the lower levels     of demand we have experienced in our plastics technologies businesses | 
    
    
      | During 2005, we announced that we will be implementing additional plans to     further reduce our costs and streamline our operations | 
    
    
      | However, we may not     be  able  to  fully  implement these plans or achieve anticipated cost     reductions | 
    
    
      | In addition, our anticipated cost savings are based upon certain     estimates  that may prove to be inaccurate | 
    
    
      | Our ability to achieve the     anticipated cost savings could be adversely affected by a number of factors,     including, for example, compliance with foreign labor and other laws and     regulations and disruptions to our operations that may occur in implementing     planned restructurings | 
    
    
      | Further increases in our cost structure will have an adverse effect on our     operating results on cash flows | 
    
    
      | During  2005, we experienced significant increases in the costs of raw     materials used in our business, particularly for steel and for chemicals     used in the production of metalworking fluids | 
    
    
      | We also experienced higher     transportation and utility costs due principally to significant increase in     oil  prices | 
    
    
      | As discussed elsewhere in this Item 1A, our pension costs     continued to increase in 2005 and can be expected to increase further in     2006 | 
    
    
      | In combination, these factors adversely affected our profitability in     2005 and can be expected to continue to do so in the future | 
    
    
      | While we have     responded by further reducing our cost structure and increasing the prices     we charge our customers, these measures were not always sufficient to offset     the effects of the cost increases we experienced | 
    
    
      | Our asset based facility     includes a covenant that requires us to maintain minimum levels of EBITDA in     2006 in certain circumstances and achieve specified fixed charge coverage     ratios beginning in 2007 | 
    
    
      | If we are unable to minimize                                         16       _________________________________________________________________    [69]Table of Contents       the effects of historical and future cost increases with further selling     price increases, it is possible that we will be unable to comply with these     covenants | 
    
    
      | Our  significant  international operations subject us to risks such as     unfavorable political, regulatory, labor and tax conditions | 
    
    
      | Our business is subject to risks related to the different legal, political,     social  and  regulatory  requirements  and economic conditions of many     jurisdictions | 
    
    
      | For the year ended December 31, 2005, markets outside the     US represented the following percentages of our consolidated sales: Europe     26prca; Canada and Mexico 7prca; Asia 7prca; and the rest of the world 4prca | 
    
    
      | We expect     sales from international markets to continue to represent a significant     portion of our total sales | 
    
    
      | Risks inherent in our international operations     include the following:         •  agreements may be difficult to enforce and receivables difficult to     collect through a foreign country’s legal system;         •  foreign countries may impose additional withholding taxes or otherwise     tax  our foreign income, impose tariffs or adopt other restrictions on     foreign trade or investment, including currency exchange controls;         •  general economic and political conditions in the countries in which we     operate could have an adverse effect on our earnings from operations in     those countries;          •  fluctuations in exchange rates may affect product demand and may     adversely affect the profitability in US dollars or products and services     provided  by  us in foreign markets where payment for our products and     services is made in the local currency;         •  unexpected adverse changes in foreign laws or regulatory requirements     may occur; and          •  compliance with a variety of foreign laws and regulations may be     difficult | 
    
    
      | Our overall success as a global business depends, in part, upon our ability     to succeed in differing and unpredictable legal, regulatory, economic,     social and political conditions | 
    
    
      | We may not be able to continue to succeed     in  developing  and  implementing policies and strategies that will be     effective in each foreign market where we do business | 
    
    
      | Any of the foregoing     factors may have a material adverse effect on our ability to generate cash     flow and grow our business | 
    
    
      | Our operations are conducted worldwide and our results of operations are     subject to currency translation risk and currency transaction risk that     could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations | 
    
    
      | The financial condition and results of operations of each of our foreign     operating subsidiaries are reported in the relevant local currency and then     translated to US dollars at the applicable currency exchange rate for     inclusion in our consolidated financial statements | 
    
    
      | Exchange rates between     these  currencies  and  US dollars  in  recent years have fluctuated     significantly and may do so in the future | 
    
    
      | For the year ended December 31,     2005, we generated approximately 44prca of our sales in foreign currencies,     particularly the euro | 
    
    
      | Significant changes in the value of the euro relative     to the US dollar could have an adverse effect on our financial condition     and results of operations and our ability to meet interest and principal     payments on euro-denominated debt and US dollar denominated debt | 
    
    
      | For the     year ended December 31, 2004, we experienced favorable translation effects     on new orders of dlra24 million and sales of dlra25 million in relation to 2003 | 
    
    
      | In 2005, favorable currency effects in relation to 2004 were dlra4 million for     new orders and dlra3 million for sales despite a weakening of the euro versus     the US dollar over the course of the year | 
    
    
      | The effects on earnings were     not material in either 2004 or 2005 | 
    
    
      | If the euro should continue to weaken     against the US dollar in the future, we will experience a negative effect     in translating our European new orders, sales and earnings when compared to     historical results | 
    
    
      | In addition to currency translation effects, we incur     currency transaction risk whenever one of our operating subsidiaries enters     into either a purchase or a sales transaction using a different currency     from the currency in which it records revenues | 
    
    
      | Given the volatility of     exchange  rates, we may not be able to effectively manage our currency     transaction and translation risks and any volatility in currency exchange     rates may have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of     operations and, therefore, on our ability to make principal and interest     payments on our indebtedness when due | 
    
    
      | 17       _________________________________________________________________    [70]Table of Contents       Our operations depend to a great extent on the economy of the European and     Asian markets | 
    
    
      | These economies may not be as stable as that of the US       Our operations depend upon the economies of the European and Asian markets | 
    
    
      | These  markets  include  countries with economies in various stages of     development  or  structural reform, some of which are subject to rapid     fluctuations in terms of consumer prices, employment levels, gross domestic     product, interest and foreign exchange rates | 
    
    
      | We may be subject to such     fluctuations in the local economies | 
    
    
      | To the extent such fluctuations have an     effect on the ability of our consumers to pay for our products, the growth     of our products in such markets could be impacted negatively | 
    
    
      | Certain  of our targeted markets are in countries in which the rate of     inflation is significantly higher than that of the US It is possible that     significant increases in the rates of inflation in such countries could not     be offset, in whole or in part, by corresponding price increases by us even     over the long-term | 
    
    
      | Our principal US pension plan is underfunded, which we expect will require     us to make cash contributions to the plan, which, in turn, will reduce the     cash available for our business, and adverse equity market or interest rate     conditions may increase our pension liability and expense | 
    
    
      | As of December 31, 2005, the projected benefit obligation under our Milacron     Retirement Plan exceeded the plan’s fair value of assets by dlra165 million,     based on a discount rate of 5dtta75prca | 
    
    
      | In 2004 and 2005, we were required to     make  contributions  to  this  plan  of dlra4dtta2 million and dlra2dtta4 million,     respectively | 
    
    
      | We  will  be  required  to  make significant additional     contributions to the plan in the future in order to comply with minimum     funding requirements imposed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act     of 1974, as amended, and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended | 
    
    
      | The     amount of any such required contributions will be determined annually based     on an actuarial valuation of the plan as performed by the plan’s actuaries | 
    
    
      | Based on an actuarial valuation for the plan completed as of January 1,     2005, contributions are expected to be dlra2dtta7 million in 2006 | 
    
    
      | This amount is     not expected to change significantly, if at all | 
    
    
      | We currently expect that     the minimum required contribution in 2007 will be approximately dlra50 million | 
    
    
      | However, actual contributions for years after 2006 cannot be reasonably     determined at this time because of the potential effects of new legislation     pending in the US Congress | 
    
    
      | If enacted, this legislation is expected to     have the effect of increasing the total required contribution amounts but     allowing them to be made over a longer period of time than under current     law | 
    
    
      | Enactment of the legislation could significantly change the estimated     minimum required contribution for 2007 of dlra50 million | 
    
    
      | In addition, interest     rate relief measures that had been in place under the Pension Funding Act of     2004 expired on December 31, 2005 and have not yet been replaced | 
    
    
      | These     relief measures allowed plan sponsors to use higher interest rates based on     corporate bond yields to establish funding requirements than would otherwise     have been the case | 
    
    
      | In this regard, current law would have required the     yield in 30 year Treasury securities to be used if interest rate relief had     not  been  in  place | 
    
    
      | In  the  absence of interest rate relief or new     legislation, funding requirements beyond 2006 could increase substantially | 
    
    
      | We are evaluating various alternatives, some of which have the potential of     permitting us to satisfy our funding obligations over a longer period of     time, but there is no assurance that these measures will be available or     prove to be feasible | 
    
    
      | Additionally,  there  is  a  risk that if the Pension Benefit Guaranty     Corporation concludes that its risk with respect to our pension plan may     increase unreasonably if the plan continues to operate, if we are unable to     satisfy the minimum funding requirement for the plan or if the plan becomes     unable to pay benefits, then the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation could     terminate the plan and take control of its assets | 
    
    
      | In such event, we may be     required  to make an immediate payment to the Pension Benefit Guaranty     Corporation  of  all  or  a substantial portion of the underfunding as     calculated by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation based upon its own     assumptions | 
    
    
      | The underfunding calculated by the Pension Benefit Guaranty     Corporation could be substantially greater than the underfunding we have     calculated because, for example, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation     may use a significantly lower discount rate | 
    
    
      | If such payment is not made,     then  the  Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation could place liens on a     material  portion  of  our assets and the assets of any members of our     controlled group | 
    
    
      | Such action could adversely affect our financial condition     and results of operations | 
    
    
      | In addition, failure to fund the pension plan as     required by law (or incurring certain liens in connection with a failure to     fund or seeking a waiver from funding obligations) would be a breach of the     terms of our asset based facility and therefore a default | 
    
    
      | If such default     is not cured or waived, our indebtedness could be accelerated which would     have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and financial position | 
    
    
      | Finally, funding the pension plan might require the sale of significant     business assets which                                         18       _________________________________________________________________    [71]Table of Contents       would  adversely affect our ability to generate cash in the future | 
    
    
      | In     addition, such sales of assets would generally require lender and, possibly,     bondholder consent and it is possible that such consent will not be granted | 
    
    
      | As  a  result  of the decline in the financial markets, we changed our     assumption for the expected rate of return on plan assets in 2003 from 9dtta5prca     to 9prca | 
    
    
      | The rate will be further lowered to 8dtta75prca for 2006 | 
    
    
      | The change from     the 9dtta5prca rate of return assumption to the lower 9prca rate had the effect of     increasing the amount of pension expense that would otherwise have been     reportable in 2005 by more than dlra1dtta8 million | 
    
    
      | The change to the 8dtta75prca rate     for 2006 will have the effect of increasing pension expense by $ | 
    
    
      | 9 million     in relation to the amount that would be recorded using the 9prca rate | 
    
    
      | Before     deducting charges of dlra4dtta7 million for supplemental retirement benefits, we     recorded pension income of dlra9dtta4 million related to this plan in 2002, of     which dlra7dtta6 million related to continuing operations | 
    
    
      | In 2003, however,     pension income decreased to dlra0dtta6 million, once again excluding charges for     supplemental benefits of dlra3dtta2 million | 
    
    
      | In 2004, we recorded pension expense     of  dlra6dtta7 million,  substantially  all  of  which related to continuing     operations | 
    
    
      | Pension expense increased further to dlra12dtta3 million in 2005 | 
    
    
      | Pension expense for 2006 and beyond is dependent on a number of factors     including returns on plan assets and changes in the plan’s discount rate and     therefore cannot be predicted with certainty | 
    
    
      | At this time, however, we     expect pension expense to be approximately dlra13 to dlra14 million in 2006 | 
    
    
      | Because of the significant decrease in the value of the assets of the funded     plan  for certain US employees and retirees during 2001 and 2002 and     decreases  in  the plan’s discount rate, we recorded a minimum pension     liability adjustment of dlra118 million effective December 31, 2002 | 
    
    
      | This     resulted in a dlra95 million after-tax reduction in shareholders’ equity | 
    
    
      | At     December 31, 2003, the reduction in shareholders’ equity was decreased by     dlra14 million (with no tax effect) due to an increase in plan assets in 2003     that was partially offset by an increase in liabilities that resulted from a     lower  discount  rate | 
    
    
      | However,  the  amount  of  the  adjustment  to     shareholders’ equity related to this plan was increased by dlra6 million in     2004  and dlra18 million in 2005 (in both cases, with no tax benefit) due     principally to further discount rate reductions | 
    
    
      | These adjustments were     recorded  as  a  component of accumulated other comprehensive loss and     therefore did not affect reported earnings or loss | 
    
    
      | However, they resulted     in after-tax reductions of shareholders’ equity, including dlra105 million at     December 31, 2005 | 
    
    
      | Adverse market conditions or additional discount rate     reductions would result in an increase in the plan’s underfunded position,     which would result in further minimum pension liability adjustments | 
    
    
      | We  may  be  unable  to  respond  in an effective and timely manner to     technological changes in our industry and could lose customers as a result | 
    
    
      | Our success in the future will depend in part upon our ability to maintain     and enhance our technological capabilities, develop and market products and     applications that meet changing customer needs and successfully anticipate     or respond to technological changes of our competitors in a cost-effective     and  timely manner | 
    
    
      | Our inability to anticipate, respond to or utilize     changing technologies could cause us to lose customers | 
    
    
      | We may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property and     proprietary rights, which could harm our future success and competitive     position | 
    
    
      | Our future success and competitive position depend in part upon our ability     to  obtain  and  maintain certain proprietary technologies used in our     principal products | 
    
    
      | We have not always been successful in preventing the     unauthorized  use  of our existing intellectual property rights by our     competitors | 
    
    
      | For example, in the past we have determined that certain of our     competitors  were  using  our patented designs in the designs of their     machines | 
    
    
      | We negotiated royalty payments from these competitors which     totaled dlra8dtta3 million in 2000, dlra1dtta1 million in 2001, dlra4dtta5 million in 2002,     $ | 
    
    
      | It is possible we will not be     able to discover unauthorized use of our proprietary technologies in the     future or that we will not be able to receive any payments therefor | 
    
    
      | If we     are not successful in protecting our intellectual property it may result in     the loss of valuable technologies or require us to make payments to other     companies for utilizing their intellectual property rights | 
    
    
      | We generally     rely on patent, trade secret and copyright laws as well as confidentiality     agreements with other parties to protect our technologies; however, some of     our technologies may not be protected | 
    
    
      | In addition, we cannot be assured     that:         •  any of our patents will not be invalidated, circumvented or licensed to     others;         •  any of our pending or future patent applications will be issued within     the scope of the claims sought by us, if at all;                                         19       _________________________________________________________________    [72]Table of Contents           •  others will not develop technologies that are similar or superior to     our technologies, duplicate our technologies or design around our     patents; or          •   steps  taken  by  us  to  protect our technologies will prevent     misappropriation of such technologies | 
    
    
      | We also own or have rights to various trademark registrations and trademark     registration applications in the United States and certain international     jurisdictions  that  we  use in connection with our business | 
    
    
      | Policing     unauthorized use of our trademarks is difficult and expensive, and it is     possible  that  we will not be able to prevent misappropriation of our     trademark rights in all jurisdictions, particularly in countries whose laws     do not grant the same protections as does the United States | 
    
    
      | We are subject to litigation that could have an adverse effect upon our     business, financial condition, results of operations or reputation | 
    
    
      | We are a defendant in or otherwise a party to numerous lawsuits and other     proceedings that result from, and are incidental to, the conduct of our     business | 
    
    
      | These suits and proceedings concern issues including product     liability, patent infringement, environmental matters and personal injury     matters | 
    
    
      | In several such lawsuits and proceedings, some of which seek     substantial dollar amounts, multiple plaintiffs allege personal injury     involving products, including metalworking fluids and tools, supplied and/or     managed  by us | 
    
    
      | We are vigorously defending these claims and, based on     current  information, believe we have recorded appropriate reserves in     addition to excess carrier insurance coverage and indemnity claims against     third parties | 
    
    
      | The projected availability under our asset based credit     facility is currently expected to be adequate to cover our cash needs under     these claims, assuming satisfaction or waiver of the conditions to borrowing     thereunder | 
    
    
      | However, it is possible that our ultimate liability could     substantially exceed our current reserves, but the amount of any such excess     cannot reasonably be determined at this time | 
    
    
      | Were we to have significant     adverse  judgments or determine as the cases progress that significant     additional reserves should be recorded, our future operating results and     financial  condition,  particularly  our liquidity, could be adversely     affected | 
    
    
      | Our operations may subject us to potential responsibilities and costs under     environmental  laws that could have an adverse effect on our business,     financial condition and results of operations | 
    
    
      | Our operations are subject to environmental laws and regulations in the US     and abroad relating to the protection of the environment and health and     safety matters, including those governing discharges of pollutants to the     air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and     wastes  and  the  clean-up  of  contaminated  sites | 
    
    
      | The operation of     manufacturing plants entails risks under environmental laws and regulations | 
    
    
      | We  could incur significant costs, including clean-up costs, fines and     sanctions, and claims by third parties for property damage and personal     injury, as a result of violations of or liabilities under these laws and     regulations | 
    
    
      | We are currently involved in a limited number of remedial     investigations and actions at various locations, including former plant     facilities  and  off-site  disposal sites | 
    
    
      | While, based on information     currently known to us, we believe that we maintain adequate reserves with     respect to these matters, our liability could exceed forecasted amounts, and     the  imposition of additional clean-up obligations or the discovery of     additional contamination at these or other sites could result in additional     costs | 
    
    
      | In addition, potentially significant expenditures could be required     to comply with environmental laws and regulations, including requirements     that may be adopted or imposed in the future | 
    
    
      | A significant softening of the US economy could require us to change our     assumptions  regarding our deferred tax assets, which could materially     increase  our  income  tax expense and adversely affect our results of     operations | 
    
    
      | At December 31, 2005, we had significant deferred tax assets related to US     and non-US net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and related to     charges that have been deducted for financial reporting purposes but which     are not yet deductible for income tax reporting | 
    
    
      | These charges include the     write-down of goodwill and a charge to equity related to minimum pension     funding | 
    
    
      | At December 31, 2005, we had provided valuation allowances against     all net deferred tax assets except dlra62 million in the US that are offset     by qualified tax planning strategies and available carrybacks and dlra9 million     of non-US assets to be realized through future income expectations and tax     planning strategies | 
    
    
      | Valuation allowances serve to reduce the recorded     deferred tax assets to amounts reasonably expected to be realized in the     future | 
    
    
      | The establishment of valuation allowances and their                                         20       _________________________________________________________________    [73]Table of Contents       subsequent adjustment requires a significant amount of judgment because     expectations as to the realization of deferred tax assets — particularly     those assets related to net operating loss carryforwards — are generally     contingent on the generation of taxable income, the reversal of deferred tax     liabilities in the future and the availability of qualified tax planning     strategies | 
    
    
      | Tax planning strategies represent prudent and feasible actions     that management would take to create taxable income to keep a tax attribute     from expiring during the carryforward period | 
    
    
      | Determinations of the amounts     related to tax planning strategies assume hypothetical transactions, some of     which involve the disposal of substantial business assets, and certain     variables which are judgmental and subjective | 
    
    
      | In determining the need for     valuation allowances, we consider our short-term and long-range internal     operating plans, which are based on the current economic conditions in the     markets and countries in which we operate, and the effect of potential     economic changes on our various operations | 
    
    
      | At   December 31,   2005,   we   had   non-US net   operating   loss     carryforwards — principally in The Netherlands, Germany and Italy — totaling     dlra185 million and related deferred tax assets of dlra57 million | 
    
    
      | Valuation     allowances totaling dlra48 million had been provided with respect to these     assets | 
    
    
      | We believe that it is more likely than not that portions of the net     operating loss carrryforwards in these jurisdictions will be utilized | 
    
    
      | However,  there  is  currently  insufficient positive evidence in some     non-US jurisdictions — primarily Germany and Italy — to conclude that no     valuation allowances are required | 
    
    
      | At December 31, 2005, we had a US federal net operating loss carryforward     of dlra116 million, which will expire between 2023 and 2026 | 
    
    
      | Deferred tax     assets related to this loss carryforward, as well as to federal tax credit     carryforwards  (dlra16 million)  and  additional  state  and  local  loss     carryforwards (dlra10 million), totaled dlra66 million | 
    
    
      | Additional deferred tax     assets totaling approximately dlra117 million had also been provided for book     deductions  not  currently  deductible for tax purposes, including the     writedown of goodwill, postretirement health care benefit costs and accrued     pension liabilities | 
    
    
      | The deductions for financial reporting purposes are     expected to be deducted for income tax purposes in future periods, at which     time they will have the effect of decreasing taxable income or increasing     the net operating loss carryforward | 
    
    
      | The latter will have the effect of     extending the ultimate expiration of the net operating loss carryforwards     beyond 2026 | 
    
    
      | The  transaction  entered  into  with  Glencore  Finance AG and Mizuho     International plc on June 10, 2004 caused an “ownership change” as defined     by the Internal Revenue code and regulations and will substantially delay     the  timing  of the utilization of certain of the pre-change US loss     carryforwards and other tax attributes that are discussed in the preceding     paragraph | 
    
    
      | The company has calculated an annual limitation of approximately     dlra23 million that can be used to offset post-change taxable income | 
    
    
      | The     annual  limitation  is  cumulative  for  any portion not used in prior     post-change years | 
    
    
      | Therefore, the cumulative limitation at the end of 2005     was approximately dlra35 million which consisted of dlra12 million from 2004 and     dlra23 million from 2005 | 
    
    
      | This delay will increase tax expense and decrease     available cash in future years | 
    
    
      | As  of December 31, 2005, US deferred tax assets net of deferred tax     liabilities totaled dlra183 million and US valuation allowances totaled     dlra121 million | 
    
    
      | We continue to rely on the availability of qualified tax     planning strategies to conclude that valuation allowances are not required     with respect to a portion of our US deferred tax assets | 
    
    
      | At December 31,     2005, valuation allowances had not been recorded with respect to dlra62 million     to US deferred tax assets based on qualified tax planning strategies of     dlra59 million and tax carrybacks of dlra3 million | 
    
    
      | We  will  continue to reassess our conclusions regarding qualified tax     planning strategies and their effect on the amount of valuation allowances     that are required on a quarterly basis | 
    
    
      | This could result in an increase or     decrease in income tax expense and a corresponding decrease or increase in     shareholders’ equity in the period of the adjustment | 
    
    
      | If we are unable to retain key employees, our performance may be hindered | 
    
    
      | Our ability to provide high-quality products and services depends in part on     our ability to retain our skilled personnel in the areas of management,     product engineering, servicing and sales | 
    
    
      | Certain of our businesses rely     heavily on key personnel in the engineering, design and formulation of our     products | 
    
    
      | Our results of operations could be adversely affected if we are     unable to retain key employees or recruit replacements | 
    
    
      | 21       _________________________________________________________________    [74]Table of Contents       The interests of our principal shareholders may conflict with those of other     shareholders | 
    
    
      | As of March 1, 2006, Glencore Finance AG, Mizuho International plc and     Triage Offshore Funds, Ltd | 
    
    
      | collectively owned 100prca of the shares of our     outstanding Series B Preferred Stock, which represents approximately 53prca of     our outstanding equity (on an as-converted basis) | 
    
    
      | In addition, Glencore,     Mizuho and Triage have special voting and approval rights as holders of     shares of Series B Preferred Stock | 
    
    
      | By virtue of such stock ownership,     Glencore, Mizuho and Triage have the power to significantly influence our     affairs and to influence, if not decide, the outcome of matters required to     be submitted to shareholders for approval, including the election of our     directors and amendment of our charter and bylaws | 
    
    
      | As of March 1, 2006, the     company had been advised by Mizuho that it intended to sell its shares of     Series B Preferred Stock |