Home
Jump to Risk Factors
Jump to Industries
Jump to Exposures
Jump to Event Codes
Jump to Wiki Summary

Industries
Commercial and Professional Services
Asset Management and Custody Banks
Technology Hardware Storage and Peripherals
Information Technology
Technology Hardware and Equipment
Exposures
Regime
Economic
Express intent
Military
Leadership
Provide
Political reform
Crime
Rights
Material Aid
Event Codes
Consult
Sports contest
Agree
Human death
Yield
Acknowledge responsibility
Solicit support
Yield to order
Warn
Endorse
Yield position
Travel to meet
Reject
Threaten
Reward
Host meeting
Grant
Release or return
Seize
Accident
Demand
Rally support
Defy norms
Complain
Veto
Offer peace proposal
Ask for protection
Force
Wiki Wiki Summary
Contract A contract is a legally enforceable agreement that creates, defines, and governs mutual rights and obligations among its parties. A contract typically involves the transfer of goods, services, money, or a promise to transfer any of those at a future date.
Federal government of the United States The federal government of the United States (U.S. federal government or U.S. government) is the national government of the United States, a federal republic in North America, composed of 50 states, a city within a federal district (the city of Washington in the District of Columbia, where the entire federal government is based), five major self-governing territories and several island possessions. The federal government is composed of three distinct branches: legislative, executive, and judicial, whose powers are vested by the U.S. Constitution in the Congress, the president and the federal courts, respectively.
Federation A federation (also known as a federal state) is a political entity characterized by a union of partially self-governing provinces, states, or other regions under a central federal government (federalism). In a federation, the self-governing status of the component states, as well as the division of power between them and the central government, is typically constitutionally entrenched and may not be altered by a unilateral decision, neither by the component states nor the federal political body.
Australian Government The Australian Government, also known as the Commonwealth Government, is the national government of Australia, a federal parliamentary constitutional monarchy. Like other Westminster-style systems of government, the Australian Government is made up of three branches: the executive (the prime minister, the ministers, and government departments), the legislative (the Parliament of Australia), and the judicial.
Federal Reserve The Federal Reserve System (also known as the Federal Reserve or simply the Fed) is the central banking system of the United States of America. It was created on December 23, 1913, with the enactment of the Federal Reserve Act, after a series of financial panics (particularly the panic of 1907) led to the desire for central control of the monetary system in order to alleviate financial crises.
Government A government is the system or group of people governing an organized community, generally a state.\nIn the case of its broad associative definition, government normally consists of legislature, executive, and judiciary.
Government of India The Government of India (ISO: Bhārat Sarkār) (often abbreviated as GoI; also known as the Central or Union Government), or simply the Centre, is the federal governing authority of the Republic of India created by the Constitution of India as the legislative, executive and judicial authority to govern the union of twenty eight states and eight union territories. The president acts as the head of state and is the highest figure of authority, nominally, of the nation however it is the prime minister who is the chief executive.
Executive (government) The executive (short for executive branch or executive power) is the part of government that enforces law, and has responsibility for the governance of a state.\nIn political systems based on the principle of separation of powers, authority is distributed among several branches (executive, legislative, judicial)—an attempt to prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a single group of people.
Military government A military government is generally any government that is administered by military forces, whether or not this government is legal under the laws of the jurisdiction at issue, and whether this government is formed by natives or by an occupying power. It is usually carried out by military workers.
Borne government The Borne government is the forty-third and current government of the French Fifth Republic, formed on 16 May 2022 and headed by Élisabeth Borne as Prime Minister under the presidency of Emmanuel Macron.\n\n\n== Context ==\n\n\n=== Formation ===\nOn 16 May 2022, Jean Castex tendered the resignation of his government to the President of the Republic.
Government of Canada The government of Canada (French: gouvernement du Canada) is the body responsible for the federal administration of Canada. A constitutional monarchy, the Crown is the corporation sole, assuming distinct roles: the executive, as the Crown-in-Council; the legislature, as the Crown-in-Parliament; and the courts, as the Crown-on-the-Bench.
Local government Local government is a generic term for the lowest tiers of public administration within a particular sovereign state. This particular usage of the word government refers specifically to a level of administration that is both geographically-localised and has limited powers.
Management Management (or managing) is the administration of an organization, whether it is a business, a non-profit organization, or a government body. It is the art and science of managing resources of the business.
Regulation Regulation is the management of complex systems according to a set of rules and trends. In systems theory, these types of rules exist in various fields of biology and society, but the term has slightly different meanings according to context.
Regulation A In the United States under the Securities Act of 1933, any offer to sell securities must either be registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or meet certain qualifications to exempt it from such registration. Regulation A (or Reg A) contains rules providing exemptions from the registration requirements, allowing some companies to use equity crowdfunding to offer and sell their securities without having to register the securities with the SEC. Regulation A offerings are intended to make access to capital possible for small and medium-sized companies that could not otherwise bear the costs of a normal SEC registration and to allow nonaccredited investors to participate in the offering.
Regulation (European Union) A regulation is a legal act of the European Union that becomes immediately enforceable as law in all member states simultaneously. Regulations can be distinguished from directives which, at least in principle, need to be transposed into national law.
Formula One regulations The numerous Formula One regulations, made and enforced by the FIA and later the FISA, have changed dramatically since the first Formula One World Championship in 1950. This article covers the current state of F1 technical and sporting regulations, as well as the history of the technical regulations since 1950.
Radio regulation Radio regulation refers to the regulation and licensing of radio in international law, by individual governments, and by municipalities.\n\n\n== International regulation ==\nThe International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is a specialized agency of the United Nations (UN) that is responsible for issues that concern information and communication technologies.
New York Codes, Rules and Regulations The New York Codes, Rules and Regulations (NYCRR) contains New York state rules and regulations. The NYCRR is officially compiled by the New York State Department of State's Division of Administrative Rules.
Queen's Regulations The Queen's Regulations (first published in 1731 and known as the King's Regulations when the monarch is a king) is a collection of orders and regulations in force in the Royal Navy, British Army, Royal Air Force, and Commonwealth Realm Forces (where the same person as on the British throne is also their separate head of state), forming guidance for officers of these armed services in all matters of discipline and personal conduct. Originally, a single set of regulations were published in one volume.
Network management Network management is the process of administering and managing computer networks. Services provided by this discipline include fault analysis, performance management, provisioning of networks and maintaining quality of service.
Risk management Risk management is the identification, evaluation, and prioritization of risks (defined in ISO 31000 as the effect of uncertainty on objectives) followed by coordinated and economical application of resources to minimize, monitor, and control the probability or impact of unfortunate events or to maximize the realization of opportunities.\nRisks can come from various sources including uncertainty in international markets, threats from project failures (at any phase in design, development, production, or sustaining of life-cycles), legal liabilities, credit risk, accidents, natural causes and disasters, deliberate attack from an adversary, or events of uncertain or unpredictable root-cause.
Women Management Women Management is a modeling agency based in New York. Founded by Paul Rowland in 1988, Women also has two sister agencies, Supreme Management and Women 360 Management, which is also part of the Women International Agency Chain.
Sport management Sport management is the field of business dealing with sports and recreation. Sports management involves any combination of skills that correspond with planning, organizing, directing, controlling, budgeting, leading, or evaluating of any organization or business within the sports field.
Emergency management Emergency management, also called emergency response or disaster management, is the organization and management of the resources and responsibilities for dealing with all humanitarian aspects of emergencies (prevention, preparedness, response, mitigation, and recovery). The aim is to prevent and reduce the harmful effects of all hazards, including disasters.
Test management Test management most commonly refers to the activity of managing a testing process. A test management tool is software used to manage tests (automated or manual) that have been previously specified by a test procedure.
Problem management Problem management is the process responsible for managing the lifecycle of all problems that happen or could happen in an IT service. The primary objectives of problem management are to prevent problems and resulting incidents from happening, to eliminate recurring incidents, and to minimize the impact of incidents that cannot be prevented.
Facility management Facility management, or facilities management, (FM) is a professional management discipline focused on the efficient and effective delivery of logistics and other support services related to real property, it encompasses multiple disciplines to ensure functionality, comfort, safety and efficiency of the built environment by integrating people, place, process and technology, as defined by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). The profession is certified through Global Facility Management Association (Global FM) member organizations.
Facility ID The facility ID number, also called a FIN or facility identifier, is a unique integer number of one to six digits, assigned by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Media Bureau to each broadcast station in the FCC Consolidated Database System (CDBS) and Licensing and Management System (LMS) databases, among others.\nBecause CDBS includes information about foreign stations which are notified to the U.S. under the terms of international frequency coordination agreements, FINs are also assigned to affected foreign stations.
Health facility A health facility is, in general, any location where healthcare is provided. Health facilities range from small clinics and doctor's offices to urgent care centers and large hospitals with elaborate emergency rooms and trauma centers.
Facility location The study of facility location problems (FLP), also known as location analysis, is a branch of operations research and computational geometry concerned with the optimal placement of facilities to minimize transportation costs while considering factors like avoiding placing hazardous materials near housing, and competitors' facilities. The techniques also apply to cluster analysis.
Mint (facility) A mint is an industrial facility which manufactures coins that can be used as currency.\nThe history of mints correlates closely with the history of coins.
Pine Gap Pine Gap is the commonly used name for a satellite surveillance base and Australian Earth station approximately 18 kilometres (11 mi) south-west of the town of Alice Springs, Northern Territory in the centre of Australia. It is jointly operated by Australia and the United States, and since 1988 it has been officially called the Joint Defence Facility Pine Gap (JDFPG); previously, it was known as Joint Defence Space Research Facility.The station is partly run by the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), US National Security Agency (NSA), and US National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) and is a key contributor to the NSA's global interception effort, which included the ECHELON program.
Risk Factors
MANTECH INTERNATIONAL CORP ITEM 1A Risk Factors We depend on contracts with the US federal government for substantially all of our revenues
If our relationships with the federal government are harmed, our business could be adversely affected
We expect that federal government contracts will continue to be the primary source of our revenues for the foreseeable future
We derived approximately 98prca of our revenues from our federal government customers, (consisting primarily of customers in the Intelligence Community, the Departments of Defense, State, Homeland Security and Justice, and other US federal government agencies) in each of the last two years
Our business, prospects, financial condition or operating results could be materially harmed if • We are suspended or debarred from contracting with the federal government or a significant government agency, • Our reputation or relationship with government agencies is impaired, or • The government ceases to do business with us, or significantly decreases the amount of business it does with us
Among the key factors in maintaining our relationships with federal government agencies are our performance on individual contracts and task orders, the strength of our professional reputation and the relationships of our senior management with our customers
Federal government spending priorities may change in a manner that harms our business
Our business depends upon continued federal government expenditures on intelligence, defense and other programs that we support
These expenditures have not remained constant over time
For example, the overall US defense budget declined for periods of time in the late 1980s and the early 1990s
While spending authorizations for intelligence and defense-related programs by the government have increased in recent years, and in particular after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, future levels of expenditures and authorizations for these programs may decrease, remain constant or shift to programs in areas where we do not currently provide services
Our business, prospects, financial condition or operating results could be materially harmed by the following • Budgetary constraints affecting federal government spending generally, or specific departments or agencies in particular, and changes in fiscal policies or available funding, • Changes in federal government programs or requirements, • Federal government shutdowns (such as that which occurred during the federal government’s 1996 fiscal year) and other potential delays in the government appropriations process, • Curtailment of the federal government’s use of professional services providers, • Competition and consolidation in the information technology industry, • The adoption of new laws or regulations, • Delays in the payment of our invoices by federal government offices due to problems with, or upgrades to, federal government information systems, or for other reasons, and • General economic conditions
13 ______________________________________________________________________ [14]Table of Contents Federal government contracts contain provisions that are unfavorable to us
Federal government contracts contain provisions, and are subject to laws and regulations, that give the government rights and remedies not typically found in commercial contracts
These provisions may allow the government to • Terminate existing contracts for convenience, as well as for default, • Reduce or modify contracts or subcontracts, • Cancel multi-year contracts and related orders if funds for contract performance for any subsequent year become unavailable, • Decline to exercise an option to renew a multi-year contract, • Claim rights in products and systems produced by us, • Suspend or debar us from doing business with the federal government or with a governmental agency, and • Control or prohibit the export of our products
If the government terminates a contract for convenience, we may recover only our incurred or committed costs, settlement expenses and profit on work completed prior to the termination
If the government terminates a contract for default, we may not recover even those amounts, and instead may be liable for excess costs incurred by the government in procuring undelivered items and services from another source
We may experience performance issues on some of our contracts
We may receive show cause or cure notices under contracts that, if not addressed to the government’s satisfaction, could give the government the right to terminate those contracts for default or to cease procuring our services under those contracts in the future
We may be exposed to liabilities or losses from operations that we have or will discontinue or otherwise sell, including our MSM subsidiary
In February 2005, we reached a final corporate determination to exit the personnel security investigation (PSI) services business and discontinue operations at our MSM subsidiary
Currently, we intend to sell MSM as a going-concern
We have engaged in discussions with potential buyers, and we expect to complete the sale or other disposition of the MSM operations by the end of the second quarter of 2006
However, we cannot assure you that we will complete a transaction under the terms currently being discussed with such parties, or at all
Similarly, we may incur unanticipated additional costs in connection with the sale or disposition of MSM If we are not able to sell or dispose of MSM on the terms currently contemplated, our business, prospects, financial condition or operating results could be harmed
In recent years, we have sold or wound down the operations of other businesses as well
For more information on these discontinued operations, please see Item 7
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Discontinued Operations and Note 16 to our consolidated financial statements
Our consolidated financial statements reflect, under the heading “Discontinued Operations,” our estimate of the net losses we expected from these operations through the date we estimated they would be disposed, and all losses expected to be realized upon the disposal of these operations
Even after the disposition of these businesses, we may continue to be exposed to some liabilities arising from their prior operations
Additionally, when we sell one of our subsidiaries, the operative contractual agreement may contain provisions that require us to indemnify the purchaser for certain liabilities that arose prior to the sale date but that are discovered afterwards
Even though these liabilities are often capped, until the indemnification period expires, we may continue to be exposed to such liabilities
14 ______________________________________________________________________ [15]Table of Contents If we fail to comply with complex procurement laws and regulations, we could be liable for various penalties or sanctions
We must comply with laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration and performance of federal government contracts
These laws and regulations affect how we conduct business with our federal government contracts
In complying with these laws and regulations, we may incur additional costs, and non-compliance may also allow for the assignment of additional fines and penalties, including contractual damages
Among the more significant laws and regulations affecting our business are the following: • The Federal Acquisition Regulations Along with agency regulations supplemental to the Federal Acquisition Regulations, comprehensively regulate the formation, administration and performance of federal government contracts • The Truth in Negotiations Act Requires certification and disclosure of all cost and pricing data in connection with contract negotiations • The Cost Accounting Standards and Cost Principles Imposes accounting requirements that govern our right to reimbursement under certain cost-based federal government contracts • Laws, regulations and executive orders restricting the use and dissemination of information classified for national security purposes and the export of certain products and technical data
We engage in international work falling under the jurisdiction of US export control laws
Failure to comply with these control regimes can lead to severe penalties, both civil and criminal, and can include debarment from contracting with the US government
Our contracting agency customers periodically review our performance under and compliance with the terms of our federal government contracts
We also routinely perform internal reviews
If a government review or investigation uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil or criminal penalties or administrative sanctions, including • Termination of contracts • Forfeiture of profits • Cost associated with triggering of price reduction clausesSuspension of payments • Fines, and • Suspension or debarment from doing business with federal government agencies
If we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we may also suffer harm to our reputation, which could impair our ability to win awards of contracts in the future or receive renewals of existing contracts
If we are subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions or suffer harm to our reputation, our current business, future prospects, financial condition, or operating results could be materially harmed
In addition, we are subject to industrial security regulations of the Department of Defense and other federal agencies that are designed to safeguard against unauthorized release or access to classified information by foreign nationals
The government may also reform our procurement practices or adopt new contracting rules and regulations, including cost accounting standards, that could be costly to satisfy or that could impair our ability to obtain new contracts
Unfavorable federal government audit results could subject us to penalties or sanctions, and could harm our reputation and relationships with our customers and impair our ability to win new contracts
The Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) and other government agencies routinely audit and investigate government contracts
These agencies review a contractor’s performance on its contract, cost structure and 15 ______________________________________________________________________ [16]Table of Contents compliance with applicable laws, regulations and standards
The DCAA also reviews the adequacy of, and a contractor’s compliance with, its internal control systems and policies, including the contractor’s purchasing, property, estimating, compensation and management information systems
Any costs found to be improperly allocated to a specific contract will not be reimbursed, while such costs already reimbursed must be refunded
Therefore, a DCAA audit could materially affect our competitive position and result in a substantial adjustment to our revenues
If a government audit uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, fines and suspension or debarment from doing business with federal government agencies
In addition, we could suffer serious harm to our reputation if allegations of impropriety were made against us
We derive significant revenues from contracts awarded through a competitive bidding process
We expect that a significant portion of our future business will be awarded through competitive bidding
Competitive bidding presents a number of risks, including • Bidding on programs in advance of the completion of their design, which may result in unforeseen technological difficulties and cost overruns, • Spending substantial cost and managerial time and effort to prepare bids and proposals for contracts that may not be awarded to us, which may result in reduced profitability, • Failing to accurately estimate the resources and cost structure that will be required to service any contract we are awarded, • Incurring expense and delay due to a competitor’s protest or challenge of contract awards made to us, including the risk that any such protest or challenge could result in the resubmission of bids on modified specifications, or in the termination, reduction or modification of the awarded contract, which may result in reduced profitability, • Changes to client bidding practices or government reform of its procurement practices, which may alter the prescribed contract relating to GSA contracts or other government-wide contracts, and • Changes in policy and goals by the government providing set aside funds to small businesses, disadvantaged businesses, and other socio-economic requirements in the allocation of contracts
We may not be provided the opportunity in the near term to bid on contracts that are held by other companies and are scheduled to expire if the government extends the existing contract
If we are unable to win particular contracts that are awarded through the competitive bidding process, we may be unable to operate in the market for services that are provided under those contracts for a number of years
If we are unable to consistently win new contract awards over any extended period, our business and prospects will be adversely affected
The government may terminate our federal government contracts at any time
We derive substantially all of our revenue from federal government contracts that may span one or more base years and one or more option years
Federal government agencies generally have the right not to exercise these option periods
Additionally, federal government contracts typically contain provisions permitting a government client to terminate the contracts for its convenience
A decision not to exercise option periods or a decision to terminate contracts could result in a substantial adjustment to our revenues and reduce the profitability of these contracts to us
16 ______________________________________________________________________ [17]Table of Contents We may not accurately estimate the expenses, time and resources necessary to satisfy our contractual obligations
We enter into three types of federal government contracts for our services: cost-plus, time-and-materials and fixed-price
For our last two fiscal years, we derived revenue from such contracts as follows: Contract Type 2005 2004 Cost-Plus 26dtta8 % 28dtta7 % Time-and-Materials 63dtta0 % 61dtta4 % Fixed-Price 10dtta2 % 09dtta9 % Under cost-plus contracts, we are reimbursed for allowable costs and paid a fee, which may be fixed or performance-based
To the extent that the actual costs incurred in performing a cost-plus contract are within the contract ceiling and allowable under the terms of the contract and applicable regulations, we are entitled to reimbursement of our costs, plus a profit
However, if our costs exceed the ceiling or are not allowable under the terms of the contract or applicable regulations, we may not be able to recover those costs
Under time-and-materials contracts, we are reimbursed for labor at negotiated hourly billing rates and for certain expenses
We assume financial risk on time-and-material contracts because we assume the risk of performing those contracts at negotiated hourly rates
Under fixed-price contracts, we perform specific tasks for a fixed price
Compared to cost-plus contracts, fixed-price contracts generally offer higher margin opportunities, but involve greater financial risk because we bear the impact of cost overruns and bear the risk of underestimating the level of effort required to perform the contractual obligations, which could result in increased costs and expenses
Our profits could be adversely affected if our costs under any of these contracts exceed the assumptions we used in bidding for the contract
If we acquire other businesses, our contract mix may change
We may not receive the full amount authorized under our contracts and we may not accurately estimate our backlog
As of December 31, 2005, our estimated contract backlog totaled approximately dlra2dtta3 billion, of which approximately dlra467 million was funded
Backlog is our estimate of the remaining future revenues from existing signed contracts, and assume the exercise of all options relating to such contracts
Backlog also includes estimates of revenues for solutions that we believe we will be asked to provide in the future under the terms of executed multiple-award contracts, and estimates of revenues from indefinite delivery indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts
Our estimates of future revenues are necessarily inexact, and the receipt and timing of any of these revenues is subject to various contingencies, many of which are beyond our control
The actual accrual of revenues on programs included in backlog and funded backlog may never occur, or may change as a result of a program schedule change, a program cancellation, a contract modification, an option that we had assumed would be exercised not being exercised, or an inaccurate estimate regarding the level of solutions that we are asked to provide
There can be no assurance that our backlog will result in actual revenue in any particular period, or at all, or that any contract included in backlog will be profitable
There is a higher degree of risk in this regard with respect to unfunded backlog
In recent years we have derived a significant percentage of our revenues under GSA schedule contracts and task orders, which are procurement vehicles under which government agencies may, but are not required to, purchase professional services or products
Our estimates are based on our experience using such vehicles and similar contracts
However, there are no assurances that all, or any, of such estimated contract value will be recognized as revenue
17 ______________________________________________________________________ [18]Table of Contents Many of our federal government customers execute their procurement budgets through multiple award contracts under which we are required to compete for post-award orders, or for which we may not be eligible to compete, potentially limiting our ability to win new contracts and increase revenue
Budgetary pressures and reforms in the procurement process have caused many US federal government customers to increasingly purchase goods and services through multiple award IDIQ contracts, General Services Administration (GSA) Schedule contracts and other multiple award and/or Government Wide Acquisition Contracts (GWAC) vehicles
These contract vehicles have resulted in increased competition and pricing pressure requiring that we make sustained post-award efforts to realize revenues under the relevant contract
There can be no assurance that we will continue to increase revenues or otherwise sell successfully under these contract vehicles
Our failure to compete effectively in this procurement environment could harm our operating results
Failure to maintain strong relationships with other contractors could result in a decline in our revenues
In 2005 and 2004, we derived 18dtta7prca and 14dtta0prca of our revenues, respectively, from contracts in which we acted as a subcontractor to other contractors or to joint ventures that we and other contractors formed to bid on and execute particular contracts or programs
We expect to continue to depend on relationships with other contractors for a portion of our revenues for the foreseeable future
Our business, prospects, financial condition or operating results could be harmed if other contractors eliminate or reduce their subcontracts or joint venture relationships with us, either because they choose to establish relationships with our competitors or because they choose to directly offer services that compete with our business, or if the government terminates or reduces these other contractors’ programs or does not award them new contracts
If we are unable to manage our growth, our business could be adversely affected
Sustaining our growth has placed significant demands on our management, as well as on our administrative, operational and financial resources
To continue to manage our growth, we must continue to improve our operational, financial and management information systems and expand, motivate and manage our workforce
If we are unable to manage our growth while maintaining our quality of service and profit margins, or if new systems that we implement to assist in managing our growth do not produce the expected benefits, our business, prospects, financial condition or operating results could be adversely affected
We may not be successful in identifying acquisition candidates, and we may undertake acquisitions that could increase our costs or liabilities or be disruptive
One of our key operating strategies is to selectively pursue acquisitions
We have made a number of acquisitions in the past, are currently evaluating a number of potential acquisition opportunities, and will consider other acquisitions in the future
We may not be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates at prices we consider appropriate, or finance acquisitions on terms that are satisfactory to us
If we do identify an appropriate acquisition candidate, we may not be able to successfully negotiate the terms of an acquisition, finance the acquisition or, if the acquisition occurs, integrate the acquired business into our existing business
Negotiations of potential acquisitions and the integration of acquired business operations could disrupt our business by diverting management away from day-to-day operations
Acquisitions of large businesses or other material operations may require additional debt or equity financing, resulting in additional leverage or dilution of ownership
If we are unable to successfully integrate companies that we acquire, our revenue and operating results could suffer
The integration of such businesses into our operations may result in unforeseen operating difficulties (including incompatible accounting and information management systems), may absorb significant management attention and may require significant financial resources that would otherwise be available for the ongoing development or expansion of our business
The difficulties of integration may be increased by the necessity of coordinating geographically dispersed organizations, integrating personnel with disparate business backgrounds and combining different corporate cultures
In certain acquisitions, federal acquisition regulations 18 ______________________________________________________________________ [19]Table of Contents may require us to enter into government novation agreements, a potentially time-consuming process
We also may not realize cost efficiencies or synergies that we anticipated when selecting our acquisition candidates
We may experience attrition, including, but not limited to, key employees of the acquired companies, during and following the integration of the acquired businesses that could reduce our future revenue
In addition, we may need to record write-downs from future impairments of intangible assets, which could reduce our future reported earnings
At times, acquisition candidates may have liabilities or adverse operating issues that we fail to discover through due diligence prior to the acquisition
In particular, to the extent that prior owners of any acquired businesses or properties failed to comply with or otherwise violated applicable laws or regulations, or failed to fulfill their contractual obligations to the federal government or other clients, we, as the successor owner, may be financially responsible for these violations and failures and may suffer harm to our reputation or otherwise be adversely affected
The discovery of any material liabilities associated with our acquisitions could cause us to incur additional expenses and cause a reduction in our operating profits
If we fail to recruit and retain skilled employees or employees with the necessary security clearances, we might not be able to perform under our contracts or win new business
To be competitive, we must have employees who have advanced information technology and technical services skills and who work well with our customers in a government or defense-related environment
These employees are in great demand and are likely to remain a limited resource in the foreseeable future
If we are unable to recruit and retain a sufficient number of these employees, our ability to maintain and grow our business could be negatively impacted
In addition, some of our contracts contain provisions requiring us to commit to staff a program with certain personnel the customer considers key to our successful performance under the contract
In the event we are unable to provide these key personnel or acceptable substitutions, the customer may terminate the contract, and we may not be able to recover certain incurred costs
We face competition from other firms, many of which have substantially greater resources
We operate in highly competitive markets and generally encounter intense competition to win contracts
We compete with many other firms, ranging from small, specialized firms to large, diversified firms, many of which have substantially greater financial, management and marketing resources than we do
Our competitors may be able to provide our customers with different or greater capabilities or benefits than we can provide in areas such as technical qualifications, past contract performance, geographic presence, price and the availability of qualified professional personnel
Our failure to compete effectively with respect to any of these or other factors could cause our revenue and operating profits to decline
In addition, our competitors also have established or may establish relationships among themselves or with third parties to increase their ability to address our customers’ needs
Accordingly, it is possible that new competitors or alliances among competitors may emerge
Pedersen, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, effectively controls our company, and his interests may not be aligned with those of other stockholders
As of December 31, 2005, Mr
Pedersen owned approximately 45dtta5prca of our outstanding shares of Class A and Class B common stock, and owned or controlled approximately 89dtta3prca of the combined voting power of our stock
Accordingly, Mr
Pedersen controls the vote on all matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders
Pedersen beneficially owns a majority of the combined voting power of our common stock, he will have the ability, without the consent of our public stockholders, to elect all members of our board of directors and to control our management and affairs
Pedersen’s voting control may have the effect of preventing or discouraging transactions involving an actual or a potential change of control of the Company, regardless of whether a premium is offered over then-current market prices
Pedersen could also cause a registration statement to be filed and to become effective under the Securities Act of 1933, thereby permitting him to freely sell or transfer the shares of common stock that he owns
Pedersen may conflict with the interests of other holders of our common stock
19 ______________________________________________________________________ [20]Table of Contents The loss of any member of our senior management could impair our customer relationships and disrupt the management of our business
We believe that our success depends in part on the continued contributions of our co-founder, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, George J Pedersen; our President and Chief Operating Officer, Robert A Coleman; our Chief Financial Officer, Kevin M Phillips; our Senior Executive Vice President, Eugene C Renzi; and other members of our senior management
We rely on our executive officers and senior management to generate business and execute programs successfully
Furthermore, the relationships and reputation that members of our management team have established and maintain with government and military personnel contribute to our ability to maintain good customer relations and to identify new business opportunities
Pedersen, Mr
Coleman, Mr
Renzi or any other senior management personnel could impair our ability to identify and secure new contracts, to maintain good customer relationships and otherwise to manage our business
We may be liable for systems and service failures
We create, implement and maintain information technology and technical services solutions that are often critical to our customers’ operations, including those of federal, state and local governments
We have experienced and may in the future experience some systems and service failures, schedule or delivery delays and other problems in connection with our work
If our solutions, services, products or other applications have significant defects or errors, are subject to delivery delays or fail to meet our customers’ expectations, we may • Lose revenues due to adverse customer reaction, • Be required to provide additional services to a customer at no charge, • Receive negative publicity, which could damage our reputation and adversely affect our ability to attract or retain customers, and • Suffer claims for substantial damages against us
In addition to any costs resulting from product warranties, contract performance or required corrective action, these failures may result in increased costs or loss of revenues if they result in customers postponing subsequently scheduled work or canceling or failing to renew contracts
While many of our contracts with the federal government limit our liability for damages that may arise from negligence in rendering services to our customers, we cannot be sure that these contractual provisions will protect us from liability for damages if we are sued
Furthermore, our errors and omissions and product liability insurance coverage may not continue to be available on reasonable terms or in sufficient amounts to cover one or more large claims, or the insurer may disclaim coverage as to some types of future claims
The successful assertion of any large claim against us could seriously harm our business
Even if not successful, these claims could result in significant legal and other costs and may be a distraction to our management and may harm our reputation
Covenants in our credit facility may restrict our financial and operating flexibility
We maintain a credit facility with Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, KeyBank National Association, Branch Banking and Trust Company of Virginia, Chevy Chase Bank, FSB, and Riggs Bank, NA Our agreement initially provides for a dlra125 million revolving credit facility that can be increased to dlra200 million
The maturity date of the agreement is February 25, 2009
Our credit facility contains covenants that limit or restrict our ability to borrow additional money, merge or consolidate, sell or dispose of assets other than in the ordinary course of business, make acquisitions, enter into related-party transactions, pay dividends, and make certain capital expenditures
Our credit facility also requires us to maintain specified financial covenants relating to asset coverage, fixed charge coverage, and debt coverage ratios
Our ability to satisfy these financial ratios can be affected by events beyond our control, and we cannot assure you that we will meet these ratios
Default under our credit facility could allow the lenders to declare all amounts outstanding to be immediately due and payable
We 20 ______________________________________________________________________ [21]Table of Contents have pledged substantially all of our assets to secure the debt under our credit facility
If the lenders declare amounts outstanding under the credit facility to be due, the lenders could proceed against those assets
Any event of default, therefore, could have a material adverse effect on our business if the creditors determine to exercise their rights
We also may incur future debt obligations that might subject us to restrictive covenants that could affect our financial and operational flexibility, restrict our ability to pay dividends on our common stock or subject us to other events of default
From time to time we may require consents or waivers from our lenders to permit actions that are prohibited by our credit facility
If our lenders refuse to provide waivers of our credit facility’s restrictive covenants and/or financial ratios, then we may be in default under our credit facility, and we may be prohibited from undertaking actions that are necessary or desirable to maintain and expand our business
Security breaches in classified government systems could adversely affect our business
Many of the programs we support and systems we develop, install and maintain involve managing and protecting information involved in intelligence, national security and other classified government functions
While we have programs designed to comply with relevant security laws, regulations and restrictions, a security breach in one of these systems could cause serious harm to our business, damage our reputation and prevent us from being eligible for further work on critical classified systems for federal government customers
Losses that we could incur from such a security breach could exceed the policy limits that we have for errors and omissions or product liability insurance
Damage to our reputation or limitations on our eligibility for additional work resulting from a security breach in one of the systems we develop, install and maintain could materially reduce our revenue
Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate
Our quarterly revenues and operating results may fluctuate significantly in the future
A number of factors cause our revenues, cash flow and operating results to vary from quarter to quarter, including • Fluctuations in revenues earned on fixed-price contracts and contracts with a performance-based fee structure, • Commencement, completion or termination of contracts during any particular quarter, • Timing of award or performance incentive fee notices, • Timing of significant bid and proposal costs, • Variable purchasing patterns under government GSA schedule contracts, blanket purchase agreements and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contracts, • Strategic decisions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions, divestitures, spin-offs and joint ventures, • Seasonal fluctuations in our staff utilization rates, • Changes in Presidential administrations and senior federal government officials that affect the timing of technology procurement, • Changes in federal government policy or budgetary measures that adversely affect government contracts in general, and • Increased purchase requests from customers for equipment and materials in connection with the federal government’s fiscal year end, which may affect our quarter operating results
Because a relatively large amount of our expenses are fixed, cash flows from our operations may vary significantly as a result of changes in the volume of services provided under existing contracts and the number of contracts that are commenced, completed or terminated during any quarter
We incur significant operating 21 ______________________________________________________________________ [22]Table of Contents expenses during the start-up and early stages of large contracts, and typically we do not receive corresponding payments in that same quarter
We may also incur significant or unanticipated expenses when a contract expires, terminates or is not renewed
Payments due to us from federal government agencies may be delayed due to billing cycles or as a result of failures of governmental budgets to gain Congressional and Administration approval in a timely manner
The federal government’s fiscal year ends September 30
If a federal budget for the next fiscal year has not been approved by that date in each year, our clients may have to suspend engagements that we are working on until a budget has been approved
Any such suspensions may reduce our revenue in the fourth quarter of that year or the first quarter of the subsequent year
The federal government’s fiscal year end can also trigger increased purchase requests from clients for equipment and materials
Any increased purchase requests we receive as a result of the federal government’s fiscal year end would serve to increase our third or fourth quarter revenue, but may decrease profit margins for that quarter, as these activities generally may not be as profitable as our typical offerings
Our business depends upon obtaining and maintaining required security clearances
Many of our federal government contracts require our employees to maintain various levels of security clearances, and we are required to maintain certain facility security clearances complying with Department of Defense requirements
Obtaining and maintaining security clearances for employees involves a lengthy process, and it is difficult to identify, recruit and retain employees who already hold security clearances
If our employees are unable to obtain or retain security clearances or if our employees who hold security clearances terminate employment with us, the customer whose work requires cleared employees could terminate the contract or decide not to renew it upon its expiration
In addition, we expect that many of the contracts on which we will bid will require us to demonstrate our ability to obtain facility security clearances and perform work with employees who hold specified types of security clearances
To the extent we are not able to obtain facility security clearances or engage employees with the required security clearances for a particular contract, we may not be able to bid on or win new contracts, or effectively rebid on expiring contracts
Our employees or subcontractors may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, which could cause us to lose contracts
While we have ethics and compliance programs in place, we are exposed to the risk that employee fraud or other misconduct could occur
Additionally, from time to time we enter into arrangements with subcontractors and joint venture partners to bid on and execute particular contracts or programs; as a result, we are exposed to the risk that fraud or other misconduct or improper activities by such persons may occur
Misconduct by employees, subcontractors or joint venture partners could include intentional failures to comply with federal laws, federal government procurement regulations or the terms of contracts that we receive, falsifying time records or failures to disclose unauthorized or unsuccessful activities to us
These actions could lead to civil, criminal, and/or administrative penalties (including fines, imprisonment, suspension and/or debarment from performing federal government contracts) and harm our reputation
Misconduct by our employees, subcontractors or joint venture partners could also involve the improper collection, handling or use of our customers’ sensitive or classified information, which could result in regulatory sanctions and serious harm to our reputation
We have from time to time experienced occurrences of misconduct and improper activities by our employees, subcontractors or joint venture partners
It is not always possible to deter misconduct by our employees, subcontractors or joint venture partners
Under certain circumstances, conduct of our employees can be imputed to the ManTech subsidiary for which they work and the conduct of ManTech subsidiaries can be imputed to ManTech International Corporation with the consequence that ManTech International Corporation could be subject to sanctions and penalties for actions taken by our subsidiaries and/or the employees of our subsidiaries
The precautions we take to prevent and detect such activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses, and such misconduct by employees, subcontractors or joint venture partners could result in serious civil or criminal penalties or sanctions or harm to our reputation, which could cause us to lose contracts or cause a reduction in revenue
22 ______________________________________________________________________ [23]Table of Contents We may be harmed by intellectual property infringement claims
We may be subject to claims from our employees or third parties who assert that software solutions and other forms of intellectual property that we used in delivering services and solutions to our customers infringe upon intellectual property rights of such employees or third parties
If our vendors, our employees or third parties assert claims that we or our customers are infringing on their intellectual property rights, we could incur substantial costs to defend these claims
In addition, if any of these infringement claims are ultimately successful, we could be required to • Cease selling or using products or services that incorporate the challenged software or technology, • Obtain a license or additional licenses, or • Redesign our products and services that rely on the challenged software or technology