MANTECH INTERNATIONAL CORP ITEM 1A Risk Factors We depend on contracts with the US federal government for substantially all of our revenues |
If our relationships with the federal government are harmed, our business could be adversely affected |
We expect that federal government contracts will continue to be the primary source of our revenues for the foreseeable future |
We derived approximately 98prca of our revenues from our federal government customers, (consisting primarily of customers in the Intelligence Community, the Departments of Defense, State, Homeland Security and Justice, and other US federal government agencies) in each of the last two years |
Our business, prospects, financial condition or operating results could be materially harmed if • We are suspended or debarred from contracting with the federal government or a significant government agency, • Our reputation or relationship with government agencies is impaired, or • The government ceases to do business with us, or significantly decreases the amount of business it does with us |
Among the key factors in maintaining our relationships with federal government agencies are our performance on individual contracts and task orders, the strength of our professional reputation and the relationships of our senior management with our customers |
Federal government spending priorities may change in a manner that harms our business |
Our business depends upon continued federal government expenditures on intelligence, defense and other programs that we support |
These expenditures have not remained constant over time |
For example, the overall US defense budget declined for periods of time in the late 1980s and the early 1990s |
While spending authorizations for intelligence and defense-related programs by the government have increased in recent years, and in particular after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, future levels of expenditures and authorizations for these programs may decrease, remain constant or shift to programs in areas where we do not currently provide services |
Our business, prospects, financial condition or operating results could be materially harmed by the following • Budgetary constraints affecting federal government spending generally, or specific departments or agencies in particular, and changes in fiscal policies or available funding, • Changes in federal government programs or requirements, • Federal government shutdowns (such as that which occurred during the federal government’s 1996 fiscal year) and other potential delays in the government appropriations process, • Curtailment of the federal government’s use of professional services providers, • Competition and consolidation in the information technology industry, • The adoption of new laws or regulations, • Delays in the payment of our invoices by federal government offices due to problems with, or upgrades to, federal government information systems, or for other reasons, and • General economic conditions |
13 ______________________________________________________________________ [14]Table of Contents Federal government contracts contain provisions that are unfavorable to us |
Federal government contracts contain provisions, and are subject to laws and regulations, that give the government rights and remedies not typically found in commercial contracts |
These provisions may allow the government to • Terminate existing contracts for convenience, as well as for default, • Reduce or modify contracts or subcontracts, • Cancel multi-year contracts and related orders if funds for contract performance for any subsequent year become unavailable, • Decline to exercise an option to renew a multi-year contract, • Claim rights in products and systems produced by us, • Suspend or debar us from doing business with the federal government or with a governmental agency, and • Control or prohibit the export of our products |
If the government terminates a contract for convenience, we may recover only our incurred or committed costs, settlement expenses and profit on work completed prior to the termination |
If the government terminates a contract for default, we may not recover even those amounts, and instead may be liable for excess costs incurred by the government in procuring undelivered items and services from another source |
We may experience performance issues on some of our contracts |
We may receive show cause or cure notices under contracts that, if not addressed to the government’s satisfaction, could give the government the right to terminate those contracts for default or to cease procuring our services under those contracts in the future |
We may be exposed to liabilities or losses from operations that we have or will discontinue or otherwise sell, including our MSM subsidiary |
In February 2005, we reached a final corporate determination to exit the personnel security investigation (PSI) services business and discontinue operations at our MSM subsidiary |
Currently, we intend to sell MSM as a going-concern |
We have engaged in discussions with potential buyers, and we expect to complete the sale or other disposition of the MSM operations by the end of the second quarter of 2006 |
However, we cannot assure you that we will complete a transaction under the terms currently being discussed with such parties, or at all |
Similarly, we may incur unanticipated additional costs in connection with the sale or disposition of MSM If we are not able to sell or dispose of MSM on the terms currently contemplated, our business, prospects, financial condition or operating results could be harmed |
In recent years, we have sold or wound down the operations of other businesses as well |
For more information on these discontinued operations, please see Item 7 |
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Discontinued Operations and Note 16 to our consolidated financial statements |
Our consolidated financial statements reflect, under the heading “Discontinued Operations,” our estimate of the net losses we expected from these operations through the date we estimated they would be disposed, and all losses expected to be realized upon the disposal of these operations |
Even after the disposition of these businesses, we may continue to be exposed to some liabilities arising from their prior operations |
Additionally, when we sell one of our subsidiaries, the operative contractual agreement may contain provisions that require us to indemnify the purchaser for certain liabilities that arose prior to the sale date but that are discovered afterwards |
Even though these liabilities are often capped, until the indemnification period expires, we may continue to be exposed to such liabilities |
14 ______________________________________________________________________ [15]Table of Contents If we fail to comply with complex procurement laws and regulations, we could be liable for various penalties or sanctions |
We must comply with laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration and performance of federal government contracts |
These laws and regulations affect how we conduct business with our federal government contracts |
In complying with these laws and regulations, we may incur additional costs, and non-compliance may also allow for the assignment of additional fines and penalties, including contractual damages |
Among the more significant laws and regulations affecting our business are the following: • The Federal Acquisition Regulations Along with agency regulations supplemental to the Federal Acquisition Regulations, comprehensively regulate the formation, administration and performance of federal government contracts • The Truth in Negotiations Act Requires certification and disclosure of all cost and pricing data in connection with contract negotiations • The Cost Accounting Standards and Cost Principles Imposes accounting requirements that govern our right to reimbursement under certain cost-based federal government contracts • Laws, regulations and executive orders restricting the use and dissemination of information classified for national security purposes and the export of certain products and technical data |
We engage in international work falling under the jurisdiction of US export control laws |
Failure to comply with these control regimes can lead to severe penalties, both civil and criminal, and can include debarment from contracting with the US government |
Our contracting agency customers periodically review our performance under and compliance with the terms of our federal government contracts |
We also routinely perform internal reviews |
If a government review or investigation uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil or criminal penalties or administrative sanctions, including • Termination of contracts • Forfeiture of profits • Cost associated with triggering of price reduction clauses • Suspension of payments • Fines, and • Suspension or debarment from doing business with federal government agencies |
If we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we may also suffer harm to our reputation, which could impair our ability to win awards of contracts in the future or receive renewals of existing contracts |
If we are subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions or suffer harm to our reputation, our current business, future prospects, financial condition, or operating results could be materially harmed |
In addition, we are subject to industrial security regulations of the Department of Defense and other federal agencies that are designed to safeguard against unauthorized release or access to classified information by foreign nationals |
The government may also reform our procurement practices or adopt new contracting rules and regulations, including cost accounting standards, that could be costly to satisfy or that could impair our ability to obtain new contracts |
Unfavorable federal government audit results could subject us to penalties or sanctions, and could harm our reputation and relationships with our customers and impair our ability to win new contracts |
The Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) and other government agencies routinely audit and investigate government contracts |
These agencies review a contractor’s performance on its contract, cost structure and 15 ______________________________________________________________________ [16]Table of Contents compliance with applicable laws, regulations and standards |
The DCAA also reviews the adequacy of, and a contractor’s compliance with, its internal control systems and policies, including the contractor’s purchasing, property, estimating, compensation and management information systems |
Any costs found to be improperly allocated to a specific contract will not be reimbursed, while such costs already reimbursed must be refunded |
Therefore, a DCAA audit could materially affect our competitive position and result in a substantial adjustment to our revenues |
If a government audit uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, fines and suspension or debarment from doing business with federal government agencies |
In addition, we could suffer serious harm to our reputation if allegations of impropriety were made against us |
We derive significant revenues from contracts awarded through a competitive bidding process |
We expect that a significant portion of our future business will be awarded through competitive bidding |
Competitive bidding presents a number of risks, including • Bidding on programs in advance of the completion of their design, which may result in unforeseen technological difficulties and cost overruns, • Spending substantial cost and managerial time and effort to prepare bids and proposals for contracts that may not be awarded to us, which may result in reduced profitability, • Failing to accurately estimate the resources and cost structure that will be required to service any contract we are awarded, • Incurring expense and delay due to a competitor’s protest or challenge of contract awards made to us, including the risk that any such protest or challenge could result in the resubmission of bids on modified specifications, or in the termination, reduction or modification of the awarded contract, which may result in reduced profitability, • Changes to client bidding practices or government reform of its procurement practices, which may alter the prescribed contract relating to GSA contracts or other government-wide contracts, and • Changes in policy and goals by the government providing set aside funds to small businesses, disadvantaged businesses, and other socio-economic requirements in the allocation of contracts |
We may not be provided the opportunity in the near term to bid on contracts that are held by other companies and are scheduled to expire if the government extends the existing contract |
If we are unable to win particular contracts that are awarded through the competitive bidding process, we may be unable to operate in the market for services that are provided under those contracts for a number of years |
If we are unable to consistently win new contract awards over any extended period, our business and prospects will be adversely affected |
The government may terminate our federal government contracts at any time |
We derive substantially all of our revenue from federal government contracts that may span one or more base years and one or more option years |
Federal government agencies generally have the right not to exercise these option periods |
Additionally, federal government contracts typically contain provisions permitting a government client to terminate the contracts for its convenience |
A decision not to exercise option periods or a decision to terminate contracts could result in a substantial adjustment to our revenues and reduce the profitability of these contracts to us |
16 ______________________________________________________________________ [17]Table of Contents We may not accurately estimate the expenses, time and resources necessary to satisfy our contractual obligations |
We enter into three types of federal government contracts for our services: cost-plus, time-and-materials and fixed-price |
For our last two fiscal years, we derived revenue from such contracts as follows: Contract Type 2005 2004 Cost-Plus 26dtta8 % 28dtta7 % Time-and-Materials 63dtta0 % 61dtta4 % Fixed-Price 10dtta2 % 09dtta9 % Under cost-plus contracts, we are reimbursed for allowable costs and paid a fee, which may be fixed or performance-based |
To the extent that the actual costs incurred in performing a cost-plus contract are within the contract ceiling and allowable under the terms of the contract and applicable regulations, we are entitled to reimbursement of our costs, plus a profit |
However, if our costs exceed the ceiling or are not allowable under the terms of the contract or applicable regulations, we may not be able to recover those costs |
Under time-and-materials contracts, we are reimbursed for labor at negotiated hourly billing rates and for certain expenses |
We assume financial risk on time-and-material contracts because we assume the risk of performing those contracts at negotiated hourly rates |
Under fixed-price contracts, we perform specific tasks for a fixed price |
Compared to cost-plus contracts, fixed-price contracts generally offer higher margin opportunities, but involve greater financial risk because we bear the impact of cost overruns and bear the risk of underestimating the level of effort required to perform the contractual obligations, which could result in increased costs and expenses |
Our profits could be adversely affected if our costs under any of these contracts exceed the assumptions we used in bidding for the contract |
If we acquire other businesses, our contract mix may change |
We may not receive the full amount authorized under our contracts and we may not accurately estimate our backlog |
As of December 31, 2005, our estimated contract backlog totaled approximately dlra2dtta3 billion, of which approximately dlra467 million was funded |
Backlog is our estimate of the remaining future revenues from existing signed contracts, and assume the exercise of all options relating to such contracts |
Backlog also includes estimates of revenues for solutions that we believe we will be asked to provide in the future under the terms of executed multiple-award contracts, and estimates of revenues from indefinite delivery indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts |
Our estimates of future revenues are necessarily inexact, and the receipt and timing of any of these revenues is subject to various contingencies, many of which are beyond our control |
The actual accrual of revenues on programs included in backlog and funded backlog may never occur, or may change as a result of a program schedule change, a program cancellation, a contract modification, an option that we had assumed would be exercised not being exercised, or an inaccurate estimate regarding the level of solutions that we are asked to provide |
There can be no assurance that our backlog will result in actual revenue in any particular period, or at all, or that any contract included in backlog will be profitable |
There is a higher degree of risk in this regard with respect to unfunded backlog |
In recent years we have derived a significant percentage of our revenues under GSA schedule contracts and task orders, which are procurement vehicles under which government agencies may, but are not required to, purchase professional services or products |
Our estimates are based on our experience using such vehicles and similar contracts |
However, there are no assurances that all, or any, of such estimated contract value will be recognized as revenue |
17 ______________________________________________________________________ [18]Table of Contents Many of our federal government customers execute their procurement budgets through multiple award contracts under which we are required to compete for post-award orders, or for which we may not be eligible to compete, potentially limiting our ability to win new contracts and increase revenue |
Budgetary pressures and reforms in the procurement process have caused many US federal government customers to increasingly purchase goods and services through multiple award IDIQ contracts, General Services Administration (GSA) Schedule contracts and other multiple award and/or Government Wide Acquisition Contracts (GWAC) vehicles |
These contract vehicles have resulted in increased competition and pricing pressure requiring that we make sustained post-award efforts to realize revenues under the relevant contract |
There can be no assurance that we will continue to increase revenues or otherwise sell successfully under these contract vehicles |
Our failure to compete effectively in this procurement environment could harm our operating results |
Failure to maintain strong relationships with other contractors could result in a decline in our revenues |
In 2005 and 2004, we derived 18dtta7prca and 14dtta0prca of our revenues, respectively, from contracts in which we acted as a subcontractor to other contractors or to joint ventures that we and other contractors formed to bid on and execute particular contracts or programs |
We expect to continue to depend on relationships with other contractors for a portion of our revenues for the foreseeable future |
Our business, prospects, financial condition or operating results could be harmed if other contractors eliminate or reduce their subcontracts or joint venture relationships with us, either because they choose to establish relationships with our competitors or because they choose to directly offer services that compete with our business, or if the government terminates or reduces these other contractors’ programs or does not award them new contracts |
If we are unable to manage our growth, our business could be adversely affected |
Sustaining our growth has placed significant demands on our management, as well as on our administrative, operational and financial resources |
To continue to manage our growth, we must continue to improve our operational, financial and management information systems and expand, motivate and manage our workforce |
If we are unable to manage our growth while maintaining our quality of service and profit margins, or if new systems that we implement to assist in managing our growth do not produce the expected benefits, our business, prospects, financial condition or operating results could be adversely affected |
We may not be successful in identifying acquisition candidates, and we may undertake acquisitions that could increase our costs or liabilities or be disruptive |
One of our key operating strategies is to selectively pursue acquisitions |
We have made a number of acquisitions in the past, are currently evaluating a number of potential acquisition opportunities, and will consider other acquisitions in the future |
We may not be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates at prices we consider appropriate, or finance acquisitions on terms that are satisfactory to us |
If we do identify an appropriate acquisition candidate, we may not be able to successfully negotiate the terms of an acquisition, finance the acquisition or, if the acquisition occurs, integrate the acquired business into our existing business |
Negotiations of potential acquisitions and the integration of acquired business operations could disrupt our business by diverting management away from day-to-day operations |
Acquisitions of large businesses or other material operations may require additional debt or equity financing, resulting in additional leverage or dilution of ownership |
If we are unable to successfully integrate companies that we acquire, our revenue and operating results could suffer |
The integration of such businesses into our operations may result in unforeseen operating difficulties (including incompatible accounting and information management systems), may absorb significant management attention and may require significant financial resources that would otherwise be available for the ongoing development or expansion of our business |
The difficulties of integration may be increased by the necessity of coordinating geographically dispersed organizations, integrating personnel with disparate business backgrounds and combining different corporate cultures |
In certain acquisitions, federal acquisition regulations 18 ______________________________________________________________________ [19]Table of Contents may require us to enter into government novation agreements, a potentially time-consuming process |
We also may not realize cost efficiencies or synergies that we anticipated when selecting our acquisition candidates |
We may experience attrition, including, but not limited to, key employees of the acquired companies, during and following the integration of the acquired businesses that could reduce our future revenue |
In addition, we may need to record write-downs from future impairments of intangible assets, which could reduce our future reported earnings |
At times, acquisition candidates may have liabilities or adverse operating issues that we fail to discover through due diligence prior to the acquisition |
In particular, to the extent that prior owners of any acquired businesses or properties failed to comply with or otherwise violated applicable laws or regulations, or failed to fulfill their contractual obligations to the federal government or other clients, we, as the successor owner, may be financially responsible for these violations and failures and may suffer harm to our reputation or otherwise be adversely affected |
The discovery of any material liabilities associated with our acquisitions could cause us to incur additional expenses and cause a reduction in our operating profits |
If we fail to recruit and retain skilled employees or employees with the necessary security clearances, we might not be able to perform under our contracts or win new business |
To be competitive, we must have employees who have advanced information technology and technical services skills and who work well with our customers in a government or defense-related environment |
These employees are in great demand and are likely to remain a limited resource in the foreseeable future |
If we are unable to recruit and retain a sufficient number of these employees, our ability to maintain and grow our business could be negatively impacted |
In addition, some of our contracts contain provisions requiring us to commit to staff a program with certain personnel the customer considers key to our successful performance under the contract |
In the event we are unable to provide these key personnel or acceptable substitutions, the customer may terminate the contract, and we may not be able to recover certain incurred costs |
We face competition from other firms, many of which have substantially greater resources |
We operate in highly competitive markets and generally encounter intense competition to win contracts |
We compete with many other firms, ranging from small, specialized firms to large, diversified firms, many of which have substantially greater financial, management and marketing resources than we do |
Our competitors may be able to provide our customers with different or greater capabilities or benefits than we can provide in areas such as technical qualifications, past contract performance, geographic presence, price and the availability of qualified professional personnel |
Our failure to compete effectively with respect to any of these or other factors could cause our revenue and operating profits to decline |
In addition, our competitors also have established or may establish relationships among themselves or with third parties to increase their ability to address our customers’ needs |
Accordingly, it is possible that new competitors or alliances among competitors may emerge |
Pedersen, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, effectively controls our company, and his interests may not be aligned with those of other stockholders |
As of December 31, 2005, Mr |
Pedersen owned approximately 45dtta5prca of our outstanding shares of Class A and Class B common stock, and owned or controlled approximately 89dtta3prca of the combined voting power of our stock |
Accordingly, Mr |
Pedersen controls the vote on all matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders |
Pedersen beneficially owns a majority of the combined voting power of our common stock, he will have the ability, without the consent of our public stockholders, to elect all members of our board of directors and to control our management and affairs |
Pedersen’s voting control may have the effect of preventing or discouraging transactions involving an actual or a potential change of control of the Company, regardless of whether a premium is offered over then-current market prices |
Pedersen could also cause a registration statement to be filed and to become effective under the Securities Act of 1933, thereby permitting him to freely sell or transfer the shares of common stock that he owns |
Pedersen may conflict with the interests of other holders of our common stock |
19 ______________________________________________________________________ [20]Table of Contents The loss of any member of our senior management could impair our customer relationships and disrupt the management of our business |
We believe that our success depends in part on the continued contributions of our co-founder, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, George J Pedersen; our President and Chief Operating Officer, Robert A Coleman; our Chief Financial Officer, Kevin M Phillips; our Senior Executive Vice President, Eugene C Renzi; and other members of our senior management |
We rely on our executive officers and senior management to generate business and execute programs successfully |
Furthermore, the relationships and reputation that members of our management team have established and maintain with government and military personnel contribute to our ability to maintain good customer relations and to identify new business opportunities |
Pedersen, Mr |
Coleman, Mr |
Renzi or any other senior management personnel could impair our ability to identify and secure new contracts, to maintain good customer relationships and otherwise to manage our business |
We may be liable for systems and service failures |
We create, implement and maintain information technology and technical services solutions that are often critical to our customers’ operations, including those of federal, state and local governments |
We have experienced and may in the future experience some systems and service failures, schedule or delivery delays and other problems in connection with our work |
If our solutions, services, products or other applications have significant defects or errors, are subject to delivery delays or fail to meet our customers’ expectations, we may • Lose revenues due to adverse customer reaction, • Be required to provide additional services to a customer at no charge, • Receive negative publicity, which could damage our reputation and adversely affect our ability to attract or retain customers, and • Suffer claims for substantial damages against us |
In addition to any costs resulting from product warranties, contract performance or required corrective action, these failures may result in increased costs or loss of revenues if they result in customers postponing subsequently scheduled work or canceling or failing to renew contracts |
While many of our contracts with the federal government limit our liability for damages that may arise from negligence in rendering services to our customers, we cannot be sure that these contractual provisions will protect us from liability for damages if we are sued |
Furthermore, our errors and omissions and product liability insurance coverage may not continue to be available on reasonable terms or in sufficient amounts to cover one or more large claims, or the insurer may disclaim coverage as to some types of future claims |
The successful assertion of any large claim against us could seriously harm our business |
Even if not successful, these claims could result in significant legal and other costs and may be a distraction to our management and may harm our reputation |
Covenants in our credit facility may restrict our financial and operating flexibility |
We maintain a credit facility with Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, KeyBank National Association, Branch Banking and Trust Company of Virginia, Chevy Chase Bank, FSB, and Riggs Bank, NA Our agreement initially provides for a dlra125 million revolving credit facility that can be increased to dlra200 million |
The maturity date of the agreement is February 25, 2009 |
Our credit facility contains covenants that limit or restrict our ability to borrow additional money, merge or consolidate, sell or dispose of assets other than in the ordinary course of business, make acquisitions, enter into related-party transactions, pay dividends, and make certain capital expenditures |
Our credit facility also requires us to maintain specified financial covenants relating to asset coverage, fixed charge coverage, and debt coverage ratios |
Our ability to satisfy these financial ratios can be affected by events beyond our control, and we cannot assure you that we will meet these ratios |
Default under our credit facility could allow the lenders to declare all amounts outstanding to be immediately due and payable |
We 20 ______________________________________________________________________ [21]Table of Contents have pledged substantially all of our assets to secure the debt under our credit facility |
If the lenders declare amounts outstanding under the credit facility to be due, the lenders could proceed against those assets |
Any event of default, therefore, could have a material adverse effect on our business if the creditors determine to exercise their rights |
We also may incur future debt obligations that might subject us to restrictive covenants that could affect our financial and operational flexibility, restrict our ability to pay dividends on our common stock or subject us to other events of default |
From time to time we may require consents or waivers from our lenders to permit actions that are prohibited by our credit facility |
If our lenders refuse to provide waivers of our credit facility’s restrictive covenants and/or financial ratios, then we may be in default under our credit facility, and we may be prohibited from undertaking actions that are necessary or desirable to maintain and expand our business |
Security breaches in classified government systems could adversely affect our business |
Many of the programs we support and systems we develop, install and maintain involve managing and protecting information involved in intelligence, national security and other classified government functions |
While we have programs designed to comply with relevant security laws, regulations and restrictions, a security breach in one of these systems could cause serious harm to our business, damage our reputation and prevent us from being eligible for further work on critical classified systems for federal government customers |
Losses that we could incur from such a security breach could exceed the policy limits that we have for errors and omissions or product liability insurance |
Damage to our reputation or limitations on our eligibility for additional work resulting from a security breach in one of the systems we develop, install and maintain could materially reduce our revenue |
Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate |
Our quarterly revenues and operating results may fluctuate significantly in the future |
A number of factors cause our revenues, cash flow and operating results to vary from quarter to quarter, including • Fluctuations in revenues earned on fixed-price contracts and contracts with a performance-based fee structure, • Commencement, completion or termination of contracts during any particular quarter, • Timing of award or performance incentive fee notices, • Timing of significant bid and proposal costs, • Variable purchasing patterns under government GSA schedule contracts, blanket purchase agreements and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contracts, • Strategic decisions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions, divestitures, spin-offs and joint ventures, • Seasonal fluctuations in our staff utilization rates, • Changes in Presidential administrations and senior federal government officials that affect the timing of technology procurement, • Changes in federal government policy or budgetary measures that adversely affect government contracts in general, and • Increased purchase requests from customers for equipment and materials in connection with the federal government’s fiscal year end, which may affect our quarter operating results |
Because a relatively large amount of our expenses are fixed, cash flows from our operations may vary significantly as a result of changes in the volume of services provided under existing contracts and the number of contracts that are commenced, completed or terminated during any quarter |
We incur significant operating 21 ______________________________________________________________________ [22]Table of Contents expenses during the start-up and early stages of large contracts, and typically we do not receive corresponding payments in that same quarter |
We may also incur significant or unanticipated expenses when a contract expires, terminates or is not renewed |
Payments due to us from federal government agencies may be delayed due to billing cycles or as a result of failures of governmental budgets to gain Congressional and Administration approval in a timely manner |
The federal government’s fiscal year ends September 30 |
If a federal budget for the next fiscal year has not been approved by that date in each year, our clients may have to suspend engagements that we are working on until a budget has been approved |
Any such suspensions may reduce our revenue in the fourth quarter of that year or the first quarter of the subsequent year |
The federal government’s fiscal year end can also trigger increased purchase requests from clients for equipment and materials |
Any increased purchase requests we receive as a result of the federal government’s fiscal year end would serve to increase our third or fourth quarter revenue, but may decrease profit margins for that quarter, as these activities generally may not be as profitable as our typical offerings |
Our business depends upon obtaining and maintaining required security clearances |
Many of our federal government contracts require our employees to maintain various levels of security clearances, and we are required to maintain certain facility security clearances complying with Department of Defense requirements |
Obtaining and maintaining security clearances for employees involves a lengthy process, and it is difficult to identify, recruit and retain employees who already hold security clearances |
If our employees are unable to obtain or retain security clearances or if our employees who hold security clearances terminate employment with us, the customer whose work requires cleared employees could terminate the contract or decide not to renew it upon its expiration |
In addition, we expect that many of the contracts on which we will bid will require us to demonstrate our ability to obtain facility security clearances and perform work with employees who hold specified types of security clearances |
To the extent we are not able to obtain facility security clearances or engage employees with the required security clearances for a particular contract, we may not be able to bid on or win new contracts, or effectively rebid on expiring contracts |
Our employees or subcontractors may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, which could cause us to lose contracts |
While we have ethics and compliance programs in place, we are exposed to the risk that employee fraud or other misconduct could occur |
Additionally, from time to time we enter into arrangements with subcontractors and joint venture partners to bid on and execute particular contracts or programs; as a result, we are exposed to the risk that fraud or other misconduct or improper activities by such persons may occur |
Misconduct by employees, subcontractors or joint venture partners could include intentional failures to comply with federal laws, federal government procurement regulations or the terms of contracts that we receive, falsifying time records or failures to disclose unauthorized or unsuccessful activities to us |
These actions could lead to civil, criminal, and/or administrative penalties (including fines, imprisonment, suspension and/or debarment from performing federal government contracts) and harm our reputation |
Misconduct by our employees, subcontractors or joint venture partners could also involve the improper collection, handling or use of our customers’ sensitive or classified information, which could result in regulatory sanctions and serious harm to our reputation |
We have from time to time experienced occurrences of misconduct and improper activities by our employees, subcontractors or joint venture partners |
It is not always possible to deter misconduct by our employees, subcontractors or joint venture partners |
Under certain circumstances, conduct of our employees can be imputed to the ManTech subsidiary for which they work and the conduct of ManTech subsidiaries can be imputed to ManTech International Corporation with the consequence that ManTech International Corporation could be subject to sanctions and penalties for actions taken by our subsidiaries and/or the employees of our subsidiaries |
The precautions we take to prevent and detect such activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses, and such misconduct by employees, subcontractors or joint venture partners could result in serious civil or criminal penalties or sanctions or harm to our reputation, which could cause us to lose contracts or cause a reduction in revenue |
22 ______________________________________________________________________ [23]Table of Contents We may be harmed by intellectual property infringement claims |
We may be subject to claims from our employees or third parties who assert that software solutions and other forms of intellectual property that we used in delivering services and solutions to our customers infringe upon intellectual property rights of such employees or third parties |
If our vendors, our employees or third parties assert claims that we or our customers are infringing on their intellectual property rights, we could incur substantial costs to defend these claims |
In addition, if any of these infringement claims are ultimately successful, we could be required to • Cease selling or using products or services that incorporate the challenged software or technology, • Obtain a license or additional licenses, or • Redesign our products and services that rely on the challenged software or technology |