Home
Jump to Risk Factors
Jump to Industries
Jump to Exposures
Jump to Event Codes
Jump to Wiki Summary

Industries
Electronic Equipment and Instruments
Asset Management and Custody Banks
Investment Banking and Brokerage
Health Care Facilities
Technology Hardware Storage and Peripherals
Information Technology
Technology Hardware and Equipment
Exposures
Economic
Military
Leadership
Rights
Express intent
Intelligence
Crime
Regime
Material Aid
Judicial
Provide
Cooperate
Political reform
Event Codes
Demand
Solicit support
Yield to order
Yield position
Propose
Reject
Psychological state
Consult
Endorse
Yield
Release or return
Veto
Sanction
Acknowledge responsibility
Rally support
Complain
Accident
Promise policy support
Human death
Sports contest
Warn
Reduce routine activity
Agree
Collaborate
Adjust
Force
Military blockade
Grant
Vote
Reward
Promise
Wiki Wiki Summary
Financial condition report In accounting, a financial condition report (FCR) is a report on the solvency condition of an insurance company that takes into account both the current financial status, as reflected in the balance sheet, and an assessment of the ability of the company to survive future risk scenarios. Risk assessment in an FCR involves dynamic solvency testing, a type of dynamic financial analysis that simulates management response to risk scenarios, to test whether a company could remain solvent in the face of deteriorating economic conditions or major disasters.
Balance sheet In financial accounting, a balance sheet (also known as statement of financial position or statement of financial condition) is a summary of the financial balances of an individual or organization, whether it be a sole proprietorship, a business partnership, a corporation, private limited company or other organization such as government or not-for-profit entity. Assets, liabilities and ownership equity are listed as of a specific date, such as the end of its financial year.
Financial statement Financial statements (or financial reports) are formal records of the financial activities and position of a business, person, or other entity.\nRelevant financial information is presented in a structured manner and in a form which is easy to understand.
Financial ratio A financial ratio or accounting ratio is a relative magnitude of two selected numerical values taken from an enterprise's financial statements. Often used in accounting, there are many standard ratios used to try to evaluate the overall financial condition of a corporation or other organization.
Financial law Financial law is the law and regulation of the insurance, derivatives, commercial banking, capital markets and investment management sectors. Understanding Financial law is crucial to appreciating the creation and formation of banking and financial regulation, as well as the legal framework for finance generally.
Trustmark (bank) Trustmark is a commercial bank and financial services company headquartered in Jackson, Mississippi, United States, with subsidiaries Trustmark National Bank, Trustmark Investment Advisors, and Fisher Brown Bottrell Insurance. The bank's initial predecessor, The Jackson Bank, was chartered by the State of Mississippi in 1889.
Financial analysis Financial analysis (also referred to as financial statement analysis or accounting analysis or Analysis of finance) refers to an assessment of the viability, stability, and profitability of a business, sub-business or project. \nIt is performed by professionals who prepare reports using ratios and other techniques, that make use of information taken from financial statements and other reports.
Form 10-K A Form 10-K is an annual report required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), that gives a comprehensive summary of a company's financial performance. Although similarly named, the annual report on Form 10-K is distinct from the often glossy "annual report to shareholders," which a company must send to its shareholders when it holds an annual meeting to elect directors (though some companies combine the annual report and the 10-K into one document).
Special Activities Center The Special Activities Center (SAC) is a division of the Central Intelligence Agency responsible for covert operations and paramilitary operations. The unit was named Special Activities Division (SAD) prior to 2015.
Operations management Operations management is an area of management concerned with designing and controlling the process of production and redesigning business operations in the production of goods or services. It involves the responsibility of ensuring that business operations are efficient in terms of using as few resources as needed and effective in meeting customer requirements.
Operations research Operations research (British English: operational research), often shortened to the initialism OR, is a discipline that deals with the development and application of advanced analytical methods to improve decision-making. It is sometimes considered to be a subfield of mathematical sciences.
Emergency operations center An emergency operations center (EOC) is a central command and control facility responsible for carrying out the principles of emergency preparedness and emergency management, or disaster management functions at a strategic level during an emergency, and ensuring the continuity of operation of a company, political subdivision or other organization.\nAn EOC is responsible for strategic direction and operational decisions and does not normally directly control field assets, instead leaving tactical decisions to lower commands.
Operation Condor Operation Condor (Spanish: Operación Cóndor, also known as Plan Cóndor; Portuguese: Operação Condor) was a United States-backed campaign of political repression and state terror involving intelligence operations and assassination of opponents. It was officially and formally implemented in November 1975 by the right-wing dictatorships of the Southern Cone of South America.Due to its clandestine nature, the precise number of deaths directly attributable to Operation Condor is highly disputed.
The Specialist The Specialist is a 1994 American action thriller film directed by Luis Llosa and starring Sylvester Stallone, Sharon Stone, James Woods, Eric Roberts and Rod Steiger. It is loosely based on "The Specialist" series of novels by John Shirley.
Specialist (rank) Specialist is a military rank in some countries’ armed forces. In the United States Armed Forces, it is one of the four junior enlisted ranks in the U.S. Army, above private (PVT), private (PV2), and private first class and is equivalent in pay grade to corporal.
Educational specialist The Education Specialist, also referred to as Educational Specialist or Specialist in Education (Ed.S. or S.Ed.), is a specialist degree in education and terminal professional degree in the U.S. that is designed to provide knowledge and theory in the field of education beyond the master's degree level. Generally, 30-65 hours of graduate study are required, depending on the specialty.
Technology specialist An IT specialist, computer professional, or an IT professional may be:\n\na person working in the field of information technology;\na person who has undergone training in a computer-field-related colleges, universities and computer institutes; or\na person who has proven extensive knowledge in the area of computing.
Specialist degree The specialist degree is an academic degree conferred by a college or university. The degree is formatted differently worldwide and may be either a five-year program or a doctoral level graduate program that occurs after a master's degree but before a doctoral degree.
The Heart Specialist The Heart Specialist is a 2006 American romantic comedy-drama film written, produced and directed by Dennis Cooper, and starring Wood Harris, Zoe Saldana, Brian J. White and Mýa. Originally released under the title Ways of the Flesh, the film premiered at the 2006 Boston Film Festival and remained unreleased until 2011, when it was granted a limited theatrical release by Freestyle Releasing.
Good Friday Agreement The Good Friday Agreement (GFA), or Belfast Agreement (Irish: Comhaontú Aoine an Chéasta or Comhaontú Bhéal Feirste; Ulster-Scots: Guid Friday Greeance or Bilfawst Greeance), is a pair of agreements signed on 10 April 1998 that ended most of the violence of the Troubles, a political conflict in Northern Ireland that had ensued since the late 1960s. It was a major development in the Northern Ireland peace process of the 1990s.
Paris Agreement The Paris Agreement (French: Accord de Paris), often referred to as the Paris Accords or the Paris Climate Accords, is an international treaty on climate change, adopted in 2015. It covers climate change mitigation, adaptation, and finance.
TRIPS Agreement The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) is an international legal agreement between all the member nations of the World Trade Organization (WTO). It establishes minimum standards for the regulation by national governments of different forms of intellectual property (IP) as applied to nationals of other WTO member nations.
Haavara Agreement The Haavara Agreement (Hebrew: הֶסְכֵּם הַעֲבָרָה‎ Translit.: heskem haavara Translated: "transfer agreement") was an agreement between Nazi Germany and Zionist German Jews signed on 25 August 1933. The agreement was finalized after three months of talks by the Zionist Federation of Germany, the Anglo-Palestine Bank (under the directive of the Jewish Agency) and the economic authorities of Nazi Germany.
Schengen Agreement The Schengen Agreement (English: SHENG-ən, Luxembourgish: [ˈʃæŋən] (listen)) is a treaty which led to the creation of Europe's Schengen Area, in which internal border checks have largely been abolished. It was signed on 14 June 1985, near the town of Schengen, Luxembourg, by five of the ten member states of the then European Economic Community.
Minsk agreements The Minsk agreements were a series of international agreements which sought to end the war in the Donbas region of Ukraine. The first, known as the Minsk Protocol, was drafted in 2014 by the Trilateral Contact Group on Ukraine, consisting of Ukraine, Russia, and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), with mediation by the leaders of France and Germany in the so-called Normandy Format.
Simla Agreement The Simla Agreement, also spelled Shimla Agreement, was a peace treaty signed between India and Pakistan on 2 July 1972 in Shimla, the capital city of the Indian state of Himachal Pradesh. It followed the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971, which began after India intervened in East Pakistan as an ally of Bengali rebels who were fighting against Pakistani state forces in the Bangladesh Liberation War.
Mike Budenholzer Michael Vincent Budenholzer (born August 6, 1969) is an American professional basketball coach who is the head coach of the Milwaukee Bucks of the National Basketball Association (NBA). Before joining the Bucks, he spent five seasons as head coach of the Atlanta Hawks and 17 seasons with the San Antonio Spurs, serving as an alternate video coordinator for the first two seasons and then as an assistant coach behind head coach Gregg Popovich.
Air Force Outstanding Unit Award The Air Force Outstanding Unit Award is one of the unit awards of the United States Air Force. It was established in 1954 and was the first independent Air Force decoration created (to this point, Air Force personnel were routinely awarded Army decorations).
Zach Hyman Zachary Martin Hyman (born June 9, 1992) is a Canadian professional ice hockey left winger and author, currently playing for the Edmonton Oilers of the National Hockey League (NHL). He previously played for the Toronto Maple Leafs.
Bobby Plump Bobby Gene Plump (born September 9, 1936) is a member of the Milan High School basketball team that won the Indiana High School Athletic Association (IHSAA) State Tournament in 1954. Plump was selected Indiana's coveted "Mr.
Galadriel Stineman Galadriel Lynn Putthoff Stineman (born October 20, 1990) is an American actress and model. She is best known for her roles as Gwen Tennyson in Ben 10: Alien Swarm and as Cassidy Finch in The Middle.
G. V. Prasad G. V. Prasad (Telugu: జి.వి. ప్రసాద్) is an Indian business executive, and co-chairman and managing director of Dr.
Johnny Davis (basketball, born 2002) Jonathan Christian Davis (born February 27, 2002) is an American basketball player. He played college basketball for the Wisconsin Badgers.
List of Senior CLASS Award men's basketball winners The Senior CLASS Award is presented each year to the outstanding senior NCAA Division I Student-Athlete of the Year in men's basketball. The acronym "CLASS" stands for Celebrating Loyalty and Achievement for Staying in School.
Don Bexley Donald Thomas Bexley (March 10, 1910 – April 15, 1997) was an American actor and comedian, best known for playing Bubba Bexley on the 1970s television sitcom Sanford and Son.\n\n\n== Early life ==\nBexley was born in either Jamestown, Virginia or Detroit, Michigan to Mr.
Senior CLASS Award The Senior CLASS Award is awarded to the most outstanding senior student-athlete in 10 NCAA Division I sports. An acronym for "Celebrating Loyalty and Achievement for Staying in School," the Senior CLASS Award focuses on the total student-athlete and encourages them to use their platform in athletics to make a positive impact as leaders in their communities.
Risk Factors
LABRANCHE & CO INC Item 1A RISK FACTORS The following risk factors should be carefully considered in evaluating our business and us because they have a significant impact on our business, operating results, financial condition, and cash flows
If any of these risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition, operating results and/or cash flows could be adversely affected
The market structure in which we operate may change, making it difficult for us to maintain our levels of profitability
The market structure in which we operate is subject to changes that could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations
Most notably, the NYSE’s recently-consummated 17 ______________________________________________________________________ merger with Archipelago, as well as recent proposed changes in the NYSE’s automated trade execution system and the SEC’s recent proposed structural changes in the US equity trading markets, may have an adverse effect on our business
In February 2004 and again on August 2, 2004, the NYSE proposed to expand its Direct+® trading system to eliminate the current limits on size, timing and types of orders that currently may be executed electronically through the Direct+® system and thereby create a so-called hybrid market intended to incorporate a number of new trade execution options while preserving the option of access to auction price discovery and deep liquidity
Specifically, the NYSE’s proposals would eliminate the 1cmam099-share restriction on NYSE Direct+® orders, as well as the prohibition against entering orders for the same account within 30 seconds, and would permit market orders and immediate-or-cancel orders to be eligible for Direct+® execution
In addition, the NYSE’s proposals contain a number of other new features designed to “create a liquidity pool accessible for electronic and auction price discovery; the opportunity for benefits associated with human judgment at the point of sale; and accountable performance with focused communication by specialists
” The NYSE has begun the technological work necessary to implement its proposed changes in the NYSE Direct+® system and, in December 2004, extended the pilot phase of this Direct+® system through December 23, 2005, subject to review and approval of these proposed changes by the SEC It is possible that the NYSE may again extend this pilot phase in order to complete the technological work to finalize the Direct+® system
In February 2004, the SEC proposed new rules which would require, subject to certain exceptions, that every “order execution facility” (ie, every national securities exchange, national securities association that operates an order execution facility, alternative trading system, exchange specialist and market maker, OTC market maker, block positioner and any other broker or dealer that executes orders internally by trading as principal or crossing orders as agent) establish, maintain and enforce polices and procedures reasonably designed to prevent the execution of a “trade-through” (viz, the execution of an order at a price that is inferior to a price displayed in another market) in its market
As originally proposed, this requirement would apply to all incoming orders in “NMS Stocks,” including all NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX-listed stocks and any order execution facility that executes orders internally within its market, whether or not that market posts its best bid and offer, and would have (1) allowed customers (and broker dealers trading for their own accounts) to “opt-out” of the protections of the rule by providing informed consent to the execution of their orders, on an order-by-order basis, in one market without regard to the possibility of obtaining a better price in another market, and (2) taken into account the differences between the speed of execution in electronic versus manual markets by providing an automated market with the ability to trade through a non-automated market at a price up to a certain amount away from the best bid or offer displayed by the non-automated market
On April 6, 2005, the SEC adopted Regulation NMS (“Regulation NMS”)
Regulation NMS is expected to become effective in 2006 and could have a significant impact on the regulation of trading on securities exchanges and marketplaces
Specifically, the rule establishes inter-market protection against “trade-throughs” for all NMS stocks and protection of only those quotations that are immediately accessible through automatic execution
The rule generally does not contain the “opt-out” exception described above that would have allowed market participants to disregard displayed quotations, but does include a number of exceptions to the “opt-out” 18 ______________________________________________________________________ proscription to help ensure that the rule is workable with high-volume securities
The rule also is anticipated to protect the best bids and offers of each exchange, Nasdaq, and the NASD’s Alternative Display Facility
While it is too early to anticipate the impact that Regulation NMS could have on our trading, it is possible that the rule could materially affect our compliance costs and alter the competitive environment in which our Specialist and Market-Making segment functions
There also may be regulatory changes following the closing of the merger of the NYSE and Archipelago Holdings, Inc
Any failure by us to adapt to these changes could materially adversely affect our results in the new NYSE Market following the merger
Please see “—Risks Associated with the Recently-Consummated NYSE Merger” for a more detailed discussion
We are subject to extensive regulation under federal and state laws that could result in investigations, fines or other penalties
On March 29, 2004, we entered into a definitive agreement with the NYSE and the SEC to settle investigations by the NYSE and the SEC concerning specialist trading activity
Pursuant to the agreement, and without admitting or denying any wrongdoing, we paid on April 7, 2004 a total of dlra63dtta5 million with respect to certain trades that occurred during the five-year period from 1999 through 2003
In December 2004, our LaBranche & Co
LLC subsidiary received a notice from the NASD Amex Regulation Division stating a preliminary determination by the NASD Amex Regulation Division’s staff to seek disciplinary action against LaBranche & Co
LLC for violations of certain federal securities laws and the AMEX’s Constitution and Rules, including Sections 10(b), 9A and 17(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, in connection with manual book freezes effected in one of LaBranche & Co
LLC’s Amex specialist stocks during the period March 8, 2004 through October 21, 2004
This notice of possible disciplinary action has not yet been resolved
In addition, our broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to increasing regulatory inquiries and informal investigations in the ordinary course of business and, as a result, are spending more resources on responding to, and defending, these inquiries and investigations
It is possible that these additional resources could result in increased legal and professional fees, as well as additional fines and formal regulatory actions going forward
It is too early to predict whether and to what extent any of these regulatory inquiries could escalate
However, if any of these ordinary inquiries progress into material regulatory or legal proceedings, such proceedings could result in settlements, determinations or judgments requiring substantial payments of sanctions, fines and penalties, as well as the costs of defending these actions, which could materially and adversely affect our business and operations
We cannot assure you that we will be able to detect or prevent all employee misconduct or rule violations
We are subject to extensive regulation under both federal and state laws
In addition, the SEC, the NYSE, the NASD, the AMEX, other SROs and state securities commissions require strict compliance with their respective rules and regulations
As a result of our acquisitions since 1997 and the increase in the size of our business and in the number of our employees, the risk that we will not detect or prevent employee misconduct has increased
Employee misconduct that 19 ______________________________________________________________________ may be difficult to detect could result in losses
Misconduct by employees could include, among other things, binding us to transactions that exceed authorized limits or present excessive risks, violation of securities rules or exchange rules that have not been detected by the technological systems installed by the exchanges to prevent such violations or hiding from us unauthorized or unsuccessful activities, which, in any case, may result in unknown and unmanaged risks or losses
Employee misconduct could also involve the improper use or disclosure of confidential information, which could result in regulatory sanctions and serious reputation or financial harm
If there are any additional investigations or actions against us or any of our subsidiaries, such investigations or actions could result in settlements, determinations or judgments requiring substantial payments by us, including the costs of defending such investigations or actions, the imposition of substantial sanctions, fines or penalties and the suspension or revocation of our registration with the SEC as a broker-dealer or our suspension or expulsion as a member firm of the NYSE, the AMEX and the other exchanges on which we operate, in which case we would be unable to operate our business
It also may be difficult for us to comply with other new or revised legislation or regulations imposed by the SEC, other US or foreign governmental regulatory authorities and SROs, including the NYSE and the AMEX The risks of failure to comply with foreign laws and rules will increase as our LSPE and LSPH subsidiaries begin to operate as foreign broker-dealers
Failure to comply with any of these rules or regulations would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or operating results
Other changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules by the SEC, these governmental authorities and SROs also could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or operating results
Failure to comply with undertakings set forth in the settlement with the NYSE and SEC could adversely affect us
In connection with the settlement of the NYSE and the SEC investigations concerning our NYSE specialist trading activity, we agreed to, and we are complying with, the following undertakings: • implementation of systems and procedures to ensure appropriate follow up and review with regard to information provided to LaBranche & Co
LLC on a daily basis by the NYSE with regard to specialists’ override of the Principal Inhibitor function, which identifies specialist principal trades that may have been effected while an executable agency order was reflected in the order book on the same side of the market; • creation of a committee, including LaBranche & Co
LLC’s chief compliance officer and at least two members of senior management, specifically charged with meeting periodically (no less frequently than monthly) to evaluate specialist rule compliance; • development and/or enhancement of systems and procedures to track and maintain records identifying the individuals acting as specialist and clerk for each security at all times throughout each trading day; • annual certification, through LaBranche & Co
LLC’s chief executive officer, that a review has been conducted by the chief compliance officer of trading in LaBranche & 20 ______________________________________________________________________ Co
LLC’s principal account for the purpose of detecting interpositioning, trading ahead and unexecuted limit order violations; • bi-annual assessment of, and reports on, the adequacy of the resources devoted to LaBranche & Co
LLC’s compliance function, and devotion of adequate funds and staffing to the compliance department; and • retention of an independent consultant to review and evaluate LaBranche & Co
LLC’s compliance systems, policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that LaBranche & Co
LLC is in compliance with federal securities laws and NYSE rules with regard to specialist trading
If we are, in the future, unable to maintain our compliance with any of these undertakings for reasons that we cannot foresee, such failure could have a material adverse effect on our business and our regulatory compliance structure
We also are subject to the risks of securities laws liability and related civil litigation
Many aspects of our business involve substantial risks of legal liability
A specialist is exposed to substantial risks of liability under federal and state securities laws, other federal and state laws and court decisions, as well as rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC, the NYSE and the AMEX The above-described settlement with the NYSE and SEC has also resulted in the initiation of purported class action and derivative action proceedings against us and certain of our officers and directors in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and other proceedings in other courts, all of which are described under “Business—Legal Proceedings
” In 2004 and early 2005, we also had received requests for information from the SEC and the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York as part of an industry-wide investigation relating to activities of NYSE floor specialists from 1999 through 2003
Two additional actions have been commenced by entities against four national securities exchanges and 35 securities brokers (including our LSP subsidiary) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging that LSP conspired with the other defendants by allegedly failing to execute orders, canceling orders and refusing to cancel orders for the purchase and sale of options
While we deny the allegations of wrongdoing against us in these actions, there can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome or timing of their resolution
The range of possible resolutions could include determinations and judgments against us or settlements that could require substantial payments by us, including the costs of defending such investigations and suits, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
We also are subject to the risk of civil litigation, employment claims and other actions in the ordinary course of our business operations
In particular, LFSI, as successor in interest to ROBB PECK McCOOEY Clearing Corporation, or RPMCC, has been the target, from time to time, of various claims and lawsuits incidental to the ordinary course of RPMCC’s business 21 ______________________________________________________________________ operations, and we have been the subject of a suit filed on behalf of a former employee by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for discrimination on the basis of disability
It is possible that we could incur significant legal expenses in defending ourselves against these and future lawsuits or claims
An adverse resolution of any future lawsuits or claims against us could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or operating results
We may have insufficient capital in the future and may be unable to secure additional financing when we need it
Our business depends on the availability of adequate capital
We cannot be sure that we will have sufficient capital in the future or that additional financing will be available on a timely basis, or on terms favorable to us
Historically, we have satisfied these needs with internally generated funds, the issuance of subordinated debt by our operating subsidiaries and the issuance of common stock and notes representing our indebtedness
While we currently anticipate that our available cash resources will be sufficient to meet our anticipated working capital, regulatory capital and capital expenditure requirements through at least the next twelve months, we may need to raise additional funds to: • increase the capital available to us for our inventory positions; • expand or diversify our operations; • acquire complementary businesses; or • respond to unanticipated capital requirements
We may be required to obtain this additional financing on short notice as a result of rapid, unanticipated developments, such as a steep market decline
Our revenues may decrease due to changes affecting the economy or changes affecting the securities markets, such as decreased volume, volatility or liquidity
Adverse changes affecting the economy and/or the securities markets could result in a further decline in market volatility or liquidity, thus negatively impacting revenues at our Specialist and Market-Making segment and our Execution and Clearing segment
Many elements of our cost structure do not decline if we experience reductions in our revenues and we may be unable to adjust our cost structure on a timely basis, or at all, and we could suffer losses
The lack of growth in share volume, rising program trading and low levels of volatility on the NYSE over the past three years have negatively affected our results of operations and may adversely affect our operations in the future
Although US equity prices generally recovered in 2003, 2004 and 2005, adverse changes in the economy and the securities markets could return, resulting in: • losses from declines in the market value of securities held in our accounts; • a decline in trading volume on the NYSE, the AMEX and other exchanges; 22 ______________________________________________________________________ • a decline in volatility in the securities markets in which we act as a specialist; • the failure of buyers and sellers of securities to fulfill their settlement obligations; and • further increases in claims and litigation
Whether market and economic conditions will continue to improve and whether we will be able to adequately protect our interests and maintain revenues in the future is uncertain
Risks associated with our trading transactions could result in trading losses
A majority of our Specialist and Market-Making segment’s revenues are derived from trading by us as principal
We may incur trading losses relating to these activities, since each such trade primarily involves the purchase, sale or short sale of securities for our own account
In any period, we may incur trading losses in a significant number of our specialist stocks, options, rights and ETFs for a variety of reasons, including price declines, lower trading volumes and the required performance of our specialist obligations
From time to time, we have large position concentrations in securities of a single issuer or issuers engaged in a specific industry
In general, because our inventory of securities is marked-to-market on a daily basis, any downward price movement in these securities results in an immediate reduction of our revenues and operating results
Our specialist and market-maker trading in options, ETFs, futures, other derivative instruments and foreign currencies also exposes us to certain additional risks associated with such factors as price fluctuations, foreign exchange currency movements, changes in the liquidity of markets, volatility and counterparty credit
Although we have adopted and carry out risk management procedures, we cannot be sure that these procedures have been formulated properly to identify or completely limit our risks and, even if formulated properly, we cannot be sure that we will successfully implement these procedures
As a result, we may not be able to manage our risks successfully or avoid trading losses
Our securities transactions are conducted as principal and agent with broker-dealer counterparties located in the United States
While the NYSE, the AMEX and the clearing houses monitor the credit standing of the counterparties with which we conduct business, we cannot be certain that any of these counterparties will not default on their obligations
If any do, our business, financial condition and/or operating results could be adversely affected
Specialist and market-maker rules require us to make unprofitable trades and refrain from making profitable trades
Our roles as a specialist and market maker, at times, require us to make trades that adversely affect our operating results
In addition, as a specialist and market-maker, we are at times required to refrain from trading for our own account in circumstances in which it may be to our advantage to trade
For example, we may be obligated to act as a principal when buyers or sellers outnumber each other and take a position counter to the market, buying or selling shares to support an orderly market in the affected stocks
In addition, specialists and market-makers generally may not trade for their own account when public buyers are meeting public sellers in an 23 ______________________________________________________________________ orderly fashion and may not compete with public orders at the same price
By having to support an orderly market, maintain inventory positions and refrain from trading under some favorable conditions, we are subject to risk
In addition, one consequence of the SEC and the NYSE investigations of NYSE specialist trading practices may be amendments by the NYSE and, possibly, the AMEX, of the rules, practices and procedures governing our specialist and market-making activities in a manner that could adversely affect our trading revenues
Failure to comply with net capital and net liquid asset requirements may result in the revocation of our registration with the SEC or our expulsion from the NYSE and/or the AMEX The SEC, the NYSE, the AMEX and various other regulatory agencies have stringent rules with respect to the maintenance of minimum levels of capital and net liquid assets by securities broker-dealers and specialist firms
LLC and LSPS are required to maintain minimum combined net liquid assets of approximately dlra447dtta0 million
Failure by any of our broker-dealer and specialist subsidiaries to maintain its required level of net capital and net liquid assets may subject it to suspension or revocation of its SEC registration or suspension or expulsion by the NYSE and/or the AMEX If this occurs, we would be unable to operate our business
In addition, a change in these rules, the imposition of new rules or any unusually large capital requirement or charge against the regulatory capital of any of our broker-dealer subsidiaries could limit those areas of our operations which require intensive use of capital
These rules also could restrict our ability to withdraw capital from our broker-dealer subsidiaries, thus limiting our ability to expand, diversify or even maintain our present levels of business, pay dividends, repay debt and repurchase shares of our outstanding common stock
We depend primarily on our Specialist and Market-Making activities, and if they fail to generate revenues as anticipated, it would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations
We derive the vast majority of our revenues from specialist and market-making activities
If demand for our specialist and market-making services fails to grow, grows more slowly than we currently anticipate or declines, our financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected
We expect our specialist and market-making activities to continue to account for the vast majority of our revenues for the foreseeable future
Our future success will depend on: • continued growth in the volume of trading and the number of listings on the NYSE, the AMEX and other exchanges; • being chosen as the specialist for additional listed companies and ETFs; • our ability to respond to regulatory and technological changes; and • our ability to respond to changing demands in the marketplace
Over the past few years, a number of alternative trading systems have been developed or emerged
These alternative trading systems may compete with specialists by increasing trading in 24 ______________________________________________________________________ NYSE-listed and AMEX-listed securities off the NYSE and the AMEX trading floors
In addition, as described above, the SEC and the NYSE’s market structure rule changes could result in increased trading of NYSE-listed and AMEX-listed securities in electronically-matched orders and thus reduce levels of trading of such securities through specialists
Historically, a relatively small number of listed companies has accounted for a significant portion of our revenues from our NYSE specialist trading activities
The loss of any of these listed companies could have an adverse effect on our revenues
For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005, transactions in our 10 most actively traded NYSE specialist stocks accounted for approximately 19dtta0prca, 16dtta8prca and 13dtta6prca of our total NYSE principal trading revenues, respectively
The composition of these ten most actively traded specialist stocks changes frequently
We can lose these listed companies if they cease to be traded on the NYSE as a result of being acquired or otherwise delisted
In addition, under NYSE procedures allowing listed companies greater latitude to request a change in their specialist or if the NYSE were to determine that we have failed to fulfill our obligations as specialist for a listed company, our registration as the specialist for that listed company could be canceled or suspended
Although we have further diversified our specialist and market-making operations into additional products and marketplaces, this diversification may not adequately diminish our risk of reliance on certain operations
We cannot assure you that we will continue to be able to effectively compete in the specialist and market-making industry
We cannot be sure that we will be able to compete effectively with current or future competitors in the specialist and market-making industry
We obtain all our new equity listings on the NYSE by going through an allocation process
In this process, either a committee of the NYSE or the listing company chooses the specialist
The competition for obtaining new listing companies is intense
We expect competition to continue and further intensify in the future
We also compete with significantly larger entities to be the specialist in ETFs traded on the NYSE and the AMEX Although we have been able to secure a market share of the ETF specialist business with many of the established ETF issuers, we cannot assure you that our growth in market share will continue as our competitors focus more resources on their ETF specialist business or as market participants enter the ETF market
Some of our competitors may have significantly greater financial and other resources than we have in both specialist and market-making activities and may have greater name recognition
These competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or evolving opportunities and listing company requirements
They also may be able to undertake more extensive promotional activities to attract new listing companies, especially those which are not publicly-traded specialist firms
Our failure to compete effectively would have an adverse effect on our operating results
25 ______________________________________________________________________ We have significant debt obligations
We have a significant amount of debt
As of December 31, 2005, our total debt outstanding was dlra493dtta8 million, excluding subordinated liabilities related to contributed exchange memberships
LLC also may borrow, subject to certain conditions, up to dlra200dtta0 million to finance its specialist security positions under a committed line-of-credit with a US commercial bank
Our significant level of debt could have important consequences, including the following: • our ability to obtain additional financing to fund growth, working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements or other purposes may be impaired; • our ability to use operating cash flow in other areas of our business may be limited because we dedicate a substantial portion of these funds to service our debt; and • limitation on our flexibility to adjust to changing market conditions, changes in our industry and economic downturns
Our ability to take certain actions may be restricted by the terms of our outstanding indebtedness
The covenants in the indenture governing our outstanding 9dtta5prca Senior Notes due 2009 and our outstanding 11dtta0prca Senior Notes due 2012, in the aggregate principal amount of approximately dlra460dtta0 million (collectively, the “outstanding senior notes”), LaBranche & Co
LLC’s dlra200dtta0 million committed line of credit agreement with a bank and subordinated note purchase agreements (under which approximately dlra9dtta0 million remains outstanding), as well as any future financing agreements, may adversely affect our ability to finance future operations or capital needs or to engage in other business activities
These covenants may limit or restrict our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries, under certain circumstances, to: • incur additional debt; • pay dividends and make distributions; • repurchase our common stock or subordinated indebtedness prior to maturity; • make certain investments; • create liens on our assets; • transfer or sell assets; • enter into transactions with affiliates; • issue or sell stock of subsidiaries; or • merge or consolidate
26 ______________________________________________________________________ For example, our ability to take certain actions, such as incurring additional indebtedness (other than certain “permitted indebtedness”) or making certain “restricted payments” (such as paying dividends, redeeming stock or repurchasing subordinated indebtedness prior to maturity), is limited if our consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio, as defined by our debt covenants and calculated on a trailing four-quarter basis, is at or below a threshold of 2dtta00:1, as more fully described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Capital Resources
” Although our consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio currently is above 2:00:1, we have in the past been below this ratio, which prevented us from making “restricted payments” exceeding dlra15dtta0 million in the aggregate over the life of the indenture
In addition, under the indenture governing our outstanding senior notes, even if our consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio is 2dtta00:1 or greater, we cannot make any such “restricted payments” if doing so will cause our cumulative “restricted payments” since May 18, 2004 to be greater than the sum of (A) 50dtta0prca of our cumulative consolidated net income since July 1, 2004 (or, if such calculation is a loss, minus 100dtta0prca of such loss) and (B) 100dtta0prca of the net cash proceeds received from any issuance or sale of our capital stock since July 1, 2004 and certain other amounts
As of December 31, 2005, this covenant prevented us from making restricted payments in excess of dlra36dtta2 million
Although we have not made any restricted payments since May 18, 2004, we cannot be sure if, when or to what extent the covenants in the indenture will prevent us from making restricted payments in the future
The note purchase agreement governing this subordinated indebtedness requires LaBranche & Co
LLC’s ability to comply with these ratios may be affected by events beyond our or its control
If any of the covenants in this agreement are breached, or if LaBranche & Co
LLC is unable to comply with required financial ratios, we or it may be in default under such agreements
A significant portion of this indebtedness then may become immediately due and payable
We are not certain whether we would have, or be able to obtain, sufficient funds to make required accelerated payments under our indebtedness, including payments on our outstanding senior notes
We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flows to meet our debt service obligations, including payments on the outstanding senior notes
Our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to make scheduled payments on our debt obligations will depend on our future financial performance, which will be, to an extent, subject to general economic, financial, competitive, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control
We cannot provide assurance that our business will generate sufficient cash flows or that future borrowings will be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our debt, including the outstanding senior notes, or to fund our other liquidity needs
If our future cash flows from operations are insufficient to pay our obligations as they mature or to fund our liquidity needs, we may be forced to sell assets, obtain additional equity capital or restructure or 27 ______________________________________________________________________ refinance all or a portion of our debt, including the outstanding senior notes, on or before maturity
We cannot assure you that we will be able to repay or refinance our debt, including the outstanding senior notes, on a timely basis or on satisfactory terms, if at all
We may not be able to finance a change of control offer required by the indenture governing the outstanding senior notes
If we were to experience a change of control, we would be required to offer to repurchase all outstanding senior notes then-outstanding, as well as all of our then-outstanding 12dtta0prca senior subordinated notes due 2007, in the aggregate principal amount of approximately dlra13dtta6 million (the “2007 notes”), in each case at a price equal to 101dtta0prca of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of repurchase
This purchase requirement may delay or make it harder for others to obtain control of us
If a change of control were to occur, it is possible that we would not have sufficient funds to repurchase these notes or that restrictions in the credit agreement and LaBranche & Co
LLC’s subordinated note purchase agreements and such other notes would not allow such repurchases
If we do not have sufficient funds at the time of a repurchase obligation or cannot meet any obligations under the credit agreement, the subordinated note purchase agreements, the indenture governing the outstanding senior notes, or the indenture governing the 2007 notes, we would be forced to seek additional third-party financing
However, it is possible that we would not be able to obtain such financing on favorable terms, or at all
Our success depends on our ability to accurately process and record our transactions, and any failure to do so could subject us to losses
Our specialist, market-making and clearing and execution activities require us to accurately record and process a very large number of transactions on a daily basis
Any failure or delay in recording or processing transactions could cause substantial losses for brokers, their customers and/or us and could subject us to claims for losses
We rely on our staff to operate and maintain our information and communications systems properly, and we depend on the integrity and performance of those systems
Our recording and processing of trades is subject to human and processing errors
Moreover, extraordinary trading volume or other events could cause our information and communications systems to operate at an unacceptably low speed or even fail
Any significant degradation or failure of our information systems or any other systems in the trading process could cause us to fail to complete transactions or could cause brokers who place trades through us to suffer delays in trading
Any information or communication systems failure or decrease in information or communications systems performance that causes interruptions in our operations could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or operating results
Our systems may fail as a result of a hardware, software, power or telecommunications failure
In addition, our offices are located in close proximity to the site of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center
The aftermath of the attacks on the World Trade Center required us to close our operations and temporarily operate from our disaster recovery site
The NYSE also was forced to stop operating for four consecutive trading days, which caused our operations to halt
It is possible that additional terrorist attacks or acts of war may occur in the future and that such 28 ______________________________________________________________________ attacks could compromise or disable our systems
Although we have established back-up disaster recovery centers in New Jersey and New York and have an overall business continuity plan in the event of another disaster, these measures may not be effective in preventing an interruption of our business
We also are dependent on the proper and timely function of complex information and communications systems maintained and operated by or for the NYSE, the AMEX and clearing and depositary institutions
Failures or inadequate or slow performance of any of these systems could adversely affect our ability to operate and complete trades
The failure to complete trades on a timely basis could subject us to losses and claims for losses of brokers and their customers
Our future success will depend on the ability to upgrade information and communications systems, and any failure to do so could harm our business and profitability
The development of complex communications and new technologies, including Internet-based technologies, may render our existing information and communications systems outdated
In addition, our information and communications systems must be compatible with those of the NYSE and the AMEX As a result, when and if the NYSE or the AMEX upgrades its systems, we will need to make corresponding upgrades
Our future success will depend on our ability, on a cost-effective basis, to timely respond to changing technologies
Our failure to do so could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or operating results
The NYSE’s ability to develop information and communications systems and complex computer and other technology systems has been instrumental in its growth and success
We are dependent on the continuing development of technological advances by the NYSE and the AMEX, a process over which we have no control
If the NYSE for any reason is unable to continue its history of computer-related and other technological developments and advances, it could have an adverse effect on the success of the NYSE, including its ability to grow, to manage its trading volumes and to attract new listings
Any such developments can be expected to adversely affect our operations, financial condition and operating results
If we lose the services of our key personnel or cannot hire additional qualified personnel, our business will be harmed
Our future success depends on the continued service of key employees, particularly George ML LaBranche, IV, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
The loss of the services of any of our key personnel or the inability to identify, hire, train and retain other qualified personnel in the future could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or operating results
Competition for key personnel and other highly qualified management, trading, compliance and technical personnel is intense
We cannot assure you that we will be able to attract or retain highly qualified personnel in the future
Our current and prospective employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles with us and our business prospects
This uncertainty may adversely affect our ability to attract and retain key personnel, which would adversely affect our business and results of operations
29 ______________________________________________________________________ We may have difficulty successfully managing our growth
Our business has grown since 1997, primarily due to acquisitions and organic growth through the continued expansion of our specialist and market-making operations
The growth of our business has increased the demands upon our management and operations
This growth has required, and will continue to require, an increase in investment in management personnel, financial and management systems and controls and facilities
The scope of procedures for assuring compliance with applicable rules and regulations, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has changed as the size and complexity of our business has increased
In response, we have implemented formal compliance procedures that are regularly updated
Our future operating results will depend on our ability to continue: • to improve our systems for operations, financial control and communication and information management; • to refine our compliance procedures and enhance our compliance oversight; • to raise additional capital if and when needed; • to effectively deploy assets, capital or workforce; • to maintain strong relationships with, and attract new, listed companies; and • to retain and incentivize our employees
Three of our current or former executive officers are in a position to substantially control matters requiring a stockholder vote
Certain of our current and former managing directors who currently own a significant amount of our outstanding common stock have entered into a stockholdersagreement under which they have agreed, among other things, that their shares of our common stock will be voted, for as long as they own their shares, as directed by a majority vote of George ML LaBranche, IV, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Alfred O Hayward, Jr, our executive officer, director and Chief Executive Officer of LaBranche & Co
LLC, and James G Gallagher, a former executive officer and director
Accordingly, these individuals have the ability to substantially control most matters requiring approval by our common stockholders
These matters include the election and removal of directors and the approval of any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all our assets
This concentration of ownership could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control, a merger or consolidation, a takeover or another business combination
30 ______________________________________________________________________ Risks Associated with the Recently Consummated NYSE Merger The value of the NYSE Group stock we received in the NYSE merger with Archipelago may significantly lose value following the merger
In connection with the recently-consummated merger between the NYSE and Archipelago, we received approximately 3dtta1 million shares of NYSE Group common stock in exchange for our 39 NYSE memberships
Under the merger agreement, there are restrictions on the sale of the NYSE Group shares following the merger
As provided in the agreement, one-third of these NYSE Group shares will be released from these sale restrictions on each of the first three anniversaries of the closing of the merger
Although the agreement allows the NYSE to release these sale restrictions early in a secondary offering, we will only be able to participate in such an offering by selling a small portion of our NYSE Group stock
As a consequence, there is a risk that there could be a significant drop in the value of the NYSE Group stock prior to the time we are able and choose to monetize the consideration we received in exchange for the NYSE memberships we held prior to the NYSE merger
We expect to mark our NYSE Group shares to market, subject to any applicable discounts due to restrictions on transfer
Any substantial drop in the price of NYSE Group stock following the merger could require us to consider whether such drop in value has created an impairment of our intangible assets
Such an impairment, if any, would adversely affect our financial results in a particular fiscal period
The regulatory environment following the NYSE merger could change and thereby adversely affect our compliance and strategic efforts
As disclosed in connection with the NYSE merger, NYSE Regulation is expected to perform the regulatory function for the NYSE and the Pacific Stock Exchange
In addition, the NYSE Group has proposed that technology play a greater role in trading, compliance and regulation
The NYSE Group also has indicated that NYSE Regulation may be self-funding
It is possible that these factors could cause regulatory or technological errors, especially if NYSE Regulation is unable to adequately self-fund its operations
This environment could produce additional regulatory scrutiny, which could cause us to expend additional resources to monitor and enhance our compliance with NYSE rules
We also may be required to expend substantial resources to coordinate our technological compliance systems with those of the new technological requirements of the NYSE market, which could increase our overall Specialist and Market-Making segment operating expenses and adversely affect our operating results
The role of the specialist on the NYSE may substantially change following the merger and we may not be able to timely adapt
Although senior NYSE officials have continued to publicly state that there will continue to be an auction market with a central point of sale on the NYSE following the merger, and that specialists will continue to play an integral role in making a fair and orderly market and providing liquidity, there is speculation that large issuers’ stocks will trade entirely electronically with minimal participation by specialists
We may not be able to anticipate or adequately and effectively deploy capital, workforce and technology to respond to such a change
Although we have expended considerable resources to enable us to adapt to such a situation, we may not be able to timely or successfully do so
Any failure by us to anticipate, respond or adapt to a 31 ______________________________________________________________________ changing NYSE Market following the merger could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition
The NYSE Group may not achieve the anticipated cost savings, technology improvements, growth opportunities and other benefits anticipated from the transaction, which could adversely affect the operations of the NYSE specialist firms following the merger
Some of the stated purposes of the NYSE’s merger with Archipelago are the cost savings, the ability to compete with an increasingly electronic marketplace, potential market growth opportunities and other synergies
Prior to the merger, the NYSE and Archipelago operated as separate companies with different goals, technology, infrastructures and market structures
The success of the NYSE merger will depend, in part, on the ability to achieve these cost savings, efficiencies and technological and product advances
If the NYSE Group is not able to successfully achieve these objectives, the anticipated cost savings, technological and revenue growth and synergies may not be realized fully or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected
In such event, the new NYSE Market may lose listed companies, exchange-based trading market share and additional product lines and order flow
To the extent the NYSE Market is unable to attract new listed companies or products or loses existing listed companies and products, our financial results and operations could be materially adversely affected