Home
Jump to Risk Factors
Jump to Industries
Jump to Exposures
Jump to Event Codes
Jump to Wiki Summary

Industries
Technology Hardware Storage and Peripherals
Information Technology
Technology Hardware and Equipment
Research and Consulting Services
Application Software
Automobiles and Components
Electrical Components and Equipment
Investment Banking and Brokerage
Human Resource and Employment Services
IT Consulting and Services
IT Consulting and Other Services
Exposures
Military
Express intent
Provide
Regime
Ease
Rights
Cooperate
Judicial
Crime
Political reform
Event Codes
Solicit support
Pessimistic comment
Sports contest
Propose
Warn
Host meeting
Yield to order
Accident
Demand
Riot
Adjust
Request
Promise
Force
Military blockade
Reject
Seize
Agree
Consult
Vote
Collaborate
Human death
Release or return
Yield
Wiki Wiki Summary
Software release life cycle A software release life cycle is the sum of the stages of development and maturity for a piece of computer software. Cycles range from its initial development to its eventual release, and include updated versions of the released version to help improve software or fix software bugs still present in the software.Computer users are most likely to be familiar with the beta phase, as software products are sometimes publicly advertised as being beta in order to reduce users' expectations of their reliability.
Significant figures Significant figures (also known as the significant digits, precision or resolution) of a number in positional notation are digits in the number that are reliable and necessary to indicate the quantity of something.\nIf a number expressing the result of a measurement (e.g., length, pressure, volume, or mass) has more digits than the number of digits allowed by the measurement resolution, then only as many digits as allowed by the measurement resolution are reliable, and so only these can be significant figures.
Significant other The term significant other (SO) has different uses in psychology and in colloquial language. Colloquially "significant other" is used as a gender-neutral term for a person's partner in an intimate relationship without disclosing or presuming anything about marital status, relationship status, gender identity, or sexual orientation.
Bit numbering In computing, bit numbering is the convention used to identify the bit positions in a binary number.\n\n\n== Bit significance and indexing ==\n\nIn computing, the least significant bit (LSB) is the bit position in a binary integer representing the binary 1s place of the integer.
Significant form Significant form refers to an aesthetic theory developed by English art critic Clive Bell which specified a set of criteria for what qualified as a work of art.
Statistical significance In statistical hypothesis testing, a result has statistical significance when it is very unlikely to have occurred given the null hypothesis. More precisely, a study's defined significance level, denoted by \n \n \n \n α\n \n \n {\displaystyle \alpha }\n , is the probability of the study rejecting the null hypothesis, given that the null hypothesis is true; and the p-value of a result, \n \n \n \n p\n \n \n {\displaystyle p}\n , is the probability of obtaining a result at least as extreme, given that the null hypothesis is true.
The Simpsons The Simpsons is an American animated sitcom created by Matt Groening for the Fox Broadcasting Company. The series is a satirical depiction of American life, epitomized by the Simpson family, which consists of Homer, Marge, Bart, Lisa, and Maggie.
Significant Mother Significant Mother is an American television sitcom created by Erin Cardillo and Richard Keith. Starring Josh Zuckerman, Nathaniel Buzolic and Krista Allen, it premiered on The CW network on August 3 and ended its run on October 5, 2015.
Internet In finance and economics, interest is payment from a borrower or deposit-taking financial institution to a lender or depositor of an amount above repayment of the principal sum (that is, the amount borrowed), at a particular rate. It is distinct from a fee which the borrower may pay the lender or some third party.
Software as a Product Software as a product (SaaP, also programming product, software product) is a product, software, which is made to be sold to users, and users pay for licence which allows them to use it, in contrast to SaaS, where users buy subscription and where the software is centrally hosted.\nOne example of software as a product has historically been Microsoft Office, which has traditionally been distributed as a file package using CD-ROM or other physical media or is downloaded over network.
Software Software is a set of computer programs and associated documentation and data. This is in contrast to hardware, from which the system is built and which actually performs the work.
Software product management Software product management (sometimes also referred to as digital product management or, in the right context just product management) is the discipline of building, implementing and managing software or digital products, taking into account life-cycle considerations and an audience. It is the discipline and business process which governs a product from its inception to the market or customer delivery and service in order to maximize revenue.
Software product line Software product lines (SPLs), or software product line development, refers to software engineering methods, tools and techniques for creating a collection of similar software systems from a shared set of software assets using a common means of production.The Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute defines a software product line as "a set of software-intensive systems that share a common, managed set of features satisfying the specific needs of a particular market segment or mission and that are developed from a common set of core assets in a prescribed way."\n\n\n== Description ==\nManufacturers have long employed analogous engineering techniques to create a product line of similar products using a common factory that assembles and configures parts designed to be reused across the product line. For example, automotive manufacturers can create unique variations of one car model using a single pool of carefully designed parts and a factory specifically designed to configure and assemble those parts.
SoftKey SoftKey International (originally SoftKey Software Products, Inc.) was a software company founded by Kevin O'Leary in 1986 in Toronto, Ontario. It was known as The Learning Company from 1995 to 1999 after acquiring The Learning Company and taking its name.
Easy Software Products Easy Software Products was the vendor who originally invented the Common Unix Printing System (CUPS) and HTMLDOC software. It was founded near Washington, D.C. in 1993 and was located in Morgan Hill, California.
Proprietary software Proprietary software, also known as non-free software or closed-source software, is computer software for which the software's publisher or another person reserves some licensing rights to use, modify, share modifications, or share the software, restricting user freedom with the software they lease. It is the opposite of open-source or free software.
On-premises software On-premises software (abbreviated to on-prem, and incorrectly referred to as on-premise) is installed and runs on computers on the premises of the person or organization using the software, rather than at a remote facility such as a server farm or cloud. On-premises software is sometimes referred to as "shrinkwrap" software, and off-premises software is commonly called "software as a service" ("SaaS") or "cloud computing".
PTC (software company) PTC Inc. (formerly Parametric Technology Corporation) is an American computer software and services company founded in 1985 and headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts.
Technology Technology is the result of accumulated knowledge and application of skills, methods, and processes used in industrial production and scientific research. Technology is embedded in the operation of all machines, with or without detailed knowledge of their function, for the intended purpose of an organization.
Second-language acquisition Second-language acquisition (SLA), sometimes called second-language learning — otherwise referred to as L2 (language 2) acquisition, is the process by which people learn a second language. Second-language acquisition is also the scientific discipline devoted to studying that process.
Healing Is Difficult Healing Is Difficult is the second studio album by Australian singer and songwriter Sia. It was released in the United Kingdom on 9 July 2001 and in the United States on 28 May 2002.
Difficult People Difficult People is an American dark comedy streaming television series created by Julie Klausner. Klausner stars alongside Billy Eichner as two struggling and jaded comedians living in New York City; the duo seemingly hate everyone but each other.
A Difficult Woman A Difficult Woman is an Australian television series which screened in 1998 on the ABC. The three part series starred Caroline Goodall, in the title role of a woman whose best friend is murdered and is determined to find out why. It was written by Nicholas Hammond and Steven Vidler and directed by Tony Tilse.
Difficult to Cure Difficult to Cure is the fifth studio album by the British hard rock band Rainbow, released in 1981. The album marked the further commercialization of the band's sound, with Ritchie Blackmore once describing at the time his appreciation of the band Foreigner.
For Love or Money (2014 film) For Love or Money (Chinese: 露水红颜) is a Chinese romance film based on Hong Kong novelist Amy Cheung's 2006 novel of the same name. The film was directed by Gao Xixi and starring Liu Yifei and Rain.
The Difficult Couple The Difficult Couple (Chinese: 难夫难妻; pinyin: Nànfū Nànqī), also translated as Die for Marriage, is a 1913 Chinese film. It is known for being the earliest Chinese feature film.
Difficult (song) "Difficult" is the fourth single from French-American recording artist Uffie's debut album, Sex Dreams and Denim Jeans. The single was produced by Uffie's label-mate and friend SebastiAn and was released by Ed Banger Records, Because Music and Elektra Records on October 18, 2010.
.NET .NET (pronounced as "dot net"; previously named .NET Core) is a free and open-source, managed computer software framework for Windows, Linux, and macOS operating systems. It is a cross-platform successor to .NET Framework.
Comparison of the Java and .NET platforms Comparison of the Java and .NET platforms.\n\n\n== Legal issues ==\n\n\n=== .NET ===\nThe Mono project aims to avoid infringing on any patents or copyrights and, to the extent that they are successful, the project can be safely distributed and used under the GPL. On November 2, 2006, Microsoft and Novell announced a joint agreement whereby Microsoft promised not to sue Novell or its customers for patent infringement.
ASP.NET Core ASP.NET Core is a free and open-source web framework and successor to ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET. However ASP.NET Core version 3 works only on .NET Core dropping support of the .NET Framework.The framework is a complete rewrite that unites the previously separate ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Web API into a single programming model.
Xamarin Xamarin is a Microsoft-owned San Francisco-based software company founded in May 2011 by the engineers that created Mono, Xamarin.Android (formerly Mono for Android) and Xamarin.iOS (formerly MonoTouch), which are cross-platform implementations of the Common Language Infrastructure (CLI) and Common Language Specifications (often called Microsoft .NET).\nWith a C#-shared codebase, developers can use Xamarin tools to write native Android, iOS, and Windows apps with native user interfaces and share code across multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux.
.NET Framework version history Microsoft started development on the .NET Framework in the late 1990s originally under the name of Next Generation Windows Services (NGWS). By late 2001 the first beta versions of .NET 1.0 were released.
ASP.NET MVC ASP.NET MVC is a web application framework developed by Microsoft that implements the model–view–controller (MVC) pattern. It is no longer in active development.
Battle.net Battle.net is an Internet-based online game, social networking service, digital distribution, and digital rights management platform developed by Blizzard Entertainment. The service was launched on December 31, 1996, followed a few days later with the release of Blizzard's action-role-playing video game Diablo on January 3, 1997.
List of .NET libraries and frameworks This article contains a list of libraries that can be used in .NET languages. These languages require .NET Framework, Mono, or .NET, which provide a basis for software development, platform independence, language interoperability and extensive framework libraries.
Risk Factors
JDA SOFTWARE GROUP INC Item 1A Risk Factors We operate in a dynamic and rapidly changing environment that involves numerous risks and uncertainties
The following section describes some, but not all, of these risks and uncertainties that we believe may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or the market price of our stock
This section should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as of December 31, 2005 and for the year then ended contained elsewhere in this Form 10-K Our Stock Price Has Been And May Remain Volatile
The trading price of our common stock has in the past and may in the future be subject to wide fluctuations
Examples of factors that we believe have led to disappointing results include the following: • Cancelled or delayed purchasing decisionsAnnouncements of reduced visibility and increased uncertainty concerning future demand for our products; • Increased competition; • Elongated sales cycles; • A limited number of reference accounts with implementations in the early years of product release; • Certain design and stability issues in early versions of our products; • Lack of desired features and functionality in our products; and • Performance of other technology stocks or our industry
In addition, fluctuations in the price of our common stock may expose us to the risk of securities class action lawsuits
Defending against such lawsuits could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources
Furthermore, any settlement or adverse determination of these lawsuits could subject us to significant liabilities
In January 2006, we began providing quantitative guidance for the first time since 2002
Because of the difficulty in predicting the timing of particular sales within any one quarter, we are providing annual guidance only
Our actual quarterly operating results have varied in the past and are expected to continue to vary in the future
If our quarterly or annual operating results fail to meet management’s or analysts’ expectations, the price of our stock could decline
Many factors may cause these fluctuations, including: • The difficulty of predicting demand for our software products and services, including the size and timing of individual contracts and our ability to recognize revenue with respect to contracts signed in a given quarter, particularly with respect to our larger customers; • Changes in the length and complexity of our sales cycle; • Competitive pricing pressures and competitive success or failure on significant transactions; • Customer order deferrals resulting from the anticipation of new products, economic uncertainty, disappointing operating results by the customer, or otherwise; • The timing of new software product and technology introductions and enhancements to our software products or those of our competitors, and market acceptance of our new software products and technology; 14 _________________________________________________________________ [50]Table of Contents • Changes in the number, size or timing of new and renewal maintenance contracts or cancellations; • Changes in our operating expenses; • Changes in the mix of domestic and international revenues, or expansion or contraction of international operations; • Our ability to complete fixed price consulting contracts within budget; • Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; • Operational issues resulting from corporate reorganizations; and • Lower-than-anticipated utilization in our consulting services group as a result of increased competition, reduced levels of software sales, reduced implementation times for our products, changes in the mix of demand for our software products, or other reasons
Charges to earnings resulting from past or future acquisitions may also adversely affect our operating results
Under purchase accounting, we allocate the total purchase price to an acquired company’s net tangible assets, amortizable intangible assets and in-process research and development based on their fair values as of the date of the acquisition and record the excess of the purchase price over those fair values as goodwill
Management’s estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable but which are inherently uncertain
As a result, any of the following or other factors could result in material charges that would adversely affect our results: • Loss on impairment of goodwill and/or other intangible assets; • Changes in the useful lives or the amortization of identifiable intangible assets and charges for stock-based compensation; • Accrual of newly identified pre-merger contingent liabilities, in which case the related charges could be required to be included in earnings in the period in which the accrual is determined to the extent it is identified subsequent to the finalization of the purchase price allocation; and • Charges to income to eliminate certain JDA pre-merger activities that duplicate those of the acquired company or to reduce our cost structure
We recorded a dlra9dtta7 million loss on impairment of goodwill in our In-Store Systems business segment in fourth quarter 2005
In addition we recorded impairment losses of dlra200cmam000 and dlra1dtta1 million in fourth quarter 2005 and 2004, respectively on the trademarks acquired from E3 Corporation
Software license revenues in any quarter depend substantially upon contracts signed and the related shipment of software in that quarter
It is therefore difficult for us to accurately predict software license revenues
Because of the timing of our sales, we typically recognize the substantial majority of our software license revenues in the last weeks or days of the quarter, and we may derive a significant portion of our quarterly software license revenues from a small number of relatively large sales
In addition, it is difficult to forecast the timing of large individual software license sales with a high degree of certainty due to the extended length of the sales cycle and the generally more complex contractual terms that may be associated with such licenses that could result in the deferral of some or all of the revenue to future periods
Accordingly, large individual sales have sometimes occurred in quarters subsequent to when we anticipated
Although our increased use of Proof of Concept (“POC”) and Milestone-Based (“Milestone”) licensing models may improve our ability to predict the timing of certain deals, they still represent a small percentage of our overall software license revenues and we expect to experience continued difficulty in accurately forecasting the timing of deals
If we receive any significant cancellation or deferral of customer orders, or we are unable to conclude license negotiations by the end of a fiscal quarter, our operating results may be lower than anticipated
In addition, any weakening or uncertainty in the economy may make it more difficult for us to predict quarterly results in the future, and could negatively impact our business, operating results and financial condition for an indefinite period of time
Our revenue and profitability depend on the overall demand for our software and related services
A regional and/or global change in the economy and financial markets could result in delay or cancellation of customer purchases
15 _________________________________________________________________ [51]Table of Contents Historically, developments associated with terrorist attacks on United States’ interests, continued violence in the Middle East, natural catastrophes or contagious diseases such as the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (“SARS”) have resulted in economic, political and other uncertainties, and factors such as these could further adversely affect our revenue growth and operating results
If demand for our software and related services decrease, our revenues would decrease and our operating results would be adversely affected which, in turn, may cause our stock price to fall
Our Gross Margins May Vary Significantly Or Decline
Because the gross margins on product revenues (software licenses and maintenance services) are significantly greater than the gross margins on consulting services revenue, our combined gross margin has fluctuated from quarter to quarter and it may continue to fluctuate significantly based on revenue mix
Demand for the implementation of products with longer implementation timeframes, specifically Merchandise Operations Systems and In-Store Systems, has been depressed for an extended period of time
Although we have seen indications in recent quarters that demand for Merchandise Operations Systems may be returning, we believe that overall demand continues to be greater for products that have a higher short term ROI and a lower total cost of ownership with less disruption to the underlying business of our customers
Most of our current implementations are for our Strategic Demand Management Solutions that have shorter implementation timeframes and most of the software demand in recent years has been for these products
Depressed sales of Merchandise Operations Systems and In-Store Systems continues to have a corollary negative impact on our service revenues as consulting services revenue typically lags the performance of software revenues by as much as one year
In addition, gross margins on consulting services revenue vary significantly with the rates at which we utilize our consulting personnel, and as a result, our overall gross margins will be adversely affected when there is not enough sufficient demand for our consulting services
We may face some constraints on our ability to adjust consulting service headcount and expense to meet demand, due in part to our need to retain consulting personnel with sufficient skill sets to implement and maintain our full set of products
Our expense levels are based on our expectations of future revenues
Since software license sales are typically accompanied by a significant amount of consulting and maintenance services, the size of our services organization must be managed to meet our anticipated software license revenues
We have also made a strategic decision to make a significant investment in new product development
As a result, we hire and train service personnel and incur research and development costs in advance of anticipated software license revenues
If software license revenues fall short of our expectations, or if we are unable to fully utilize our service personnel, our operating results are likely to decline because a significant portion of our expenses cannot be quickly reduced to respond to any unexpected revenue shortfall
We have in the past and may in the future be impacted by customer bankruptcies that occur in periods subsequent to the software license sale
During weak economic conditions there is an increased risk that certain of our customers will file bankruptcy
When our customers file bankruptcy, we may be required to forego collection of pre-petition amounts owed and to repay amounts remitted to us during the 90-day preference period preceding the filing
Accounts receivable balances related to pre-petition amounts may in certain of these instances be large due to extended payment terms for software license fees, and significant billings for consulting and implementation services on large projects
The bankruptcy laws, as well as the specific circumstances of each bankruptcy, may severely limit our ability to collect pre-petition amounts, and may force us to disgorge payments made during the 90-day preference period
We also face risk from international customers that file for bankruptcy protection in foreign jurisdictions, in that the application of foreign bankruptcy laws may be more difficult to predict
Although we believe that we have sufficient reserves to cover anticipated customer bankruptcies, there can be no assurance that such reserves will be adequate, and if they are not adequate, our business, operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected
We are developing our next generation PortfolioEnabled solutions based upon the Microsoft
The initial PortfolioEnabled solutions may not offer every capability of their predecessor products but will offer other advantages such as an advanced technology platform, the ability of PRO to install on Unix/ Oracle environments utilizing Microsoft
Net application services componentry with subsequent releases to include Microsoft SQL Server 2005, or other advantages such as “planning by attributecapabilities in the enterprise planning solution
Further, the PortfolioEnabled products do offer some capabilities that go beyond the current generation products they are replacing, 16 _________________________________________________________________ [52]Table of Contents and as a result, we believe they offer features and functionality that will be competitive in the marketplace
Sales cycles to new customers tend to be more elongated than those to existing customers who already have contracts in place with us and prior experience with our products
We will continue selling the equivalent Portfolio Synchronized versions of these products until the new PortfolioEnabled solutions have achieved critical mass in the marketplace and the demand for the Portfolio Synchronized versions has diminished
The risks of our commitment to the
Net Platform include, but are not limited to, the following: • The possibility that it may be more difficult than we currently anticipate to develop our products for the
Net Platform, and we could incur costs in excess of our projections to complete the planned transition of our product suite; • The difficulty our sales organization may encounter in determining whether to propose the Portfolio Synchronized products or the next generation PortfolioEnabled products based on the
Net Platform to current or prospective customers; • The possibility that our
Net Platform beta customers will not become favorable reference sites; • Adequate scalability of the
Net Platform for our largest customers; • The possibility we may not complete the transition to the
Net Platform in the time frame we currently expect; • The ability of our development staff to learn how to efficiently and effectively develop products using the
Net Platform; • Our ability to transition our customer base onto the
Net Platform when it is available; • The possibility that it may take several quarters for our consulting and support organizations to be fully trained and proficient on this new technology and as a result, we may encounter difficulties implementing and supporting new products or versions of existing products based on the
Net Platform; • We may be required to supplement our consulting and support organizations with
Net proficient resources from our product development teams to support early
Net implementations which could impact our development schedule for the release of additional
Net products; • Microsoft’s ability to achieve market acceptance of the
Net platform; • Delays in Microsoft’s ability to commercially release necessary components for deployment of our applications; and • Microsoft’s continued commitment to enhancing and marketing the
The risk associated with developing products that utilize new technologies remains high
Despite our increasing confidence in this investment and our efforts to mitigate the risks of the
Net Platform project, there can be no assurances that our efforts to re-write many of our current products and to develop new PortfolioEnabled solutions using the
Net Platform project is not successful, it likely will have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition
Certain of our software products, including Portfolio Point of Sale, Portfolio Workforce Management, Portfolio Registry, Trade Events Management, PRO, Enterprise Planning and certain modules of Portfolio CRM and Intellect, have been commercially released within the last two years
The markets for these products are new and evolving, and we believe that retailers and their suppliers may be cautious in adopting new technologies
Consequently, we cannot predict the growth rate, if any, and size of the markets for our e-commerce products or that these markets will continue to develop
Potential and existing customers may find it difficult, or be unable, to successfully implement our e-commerce products, or may not purchase our products for a variety of reasons, including their inability or unwillingness to deploy sufficient internal personnel and computing resources for a successful implementation
In addition, we must overcome significant obstacles to successfully market our newer products, including limited experience of our sales and consulting personnel
If the markets for our newer products fail to develop, develop more slowly or differently than expected or become saturated with competitors, or if our products are not accepted in the marketplace or are technically flawed, our business, operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected
The markets for our software products are characterized by rapid technological change, evolving industry standards, changes in customer requirements and frequent new product introductions and enhancements
We continuously evaluate new technologies and when appropriate implement into our products advanced technology such as our current
Net Platform effort
However, if we fail in our product development efforts to accurately address in a timely manner, evolving industry standards, new technology advancements or important third-party interfaces or product architectures, sales of our products and services will suffer
Our software products can be licensed with a variety of popular industry standard platforms, and are authored in various development environments using different programming languages and underlying databases and architectures
There may be future or existing platforms that achieve popularity in the marketplace that may not be compatible with our software product design
Developing and maintaining consistent software product performance across various technology platforms could place a significant strain on our resources and software product release schedules, which could adversely affect our results of operations We May Face Liability If Our Products Are Defective Or If We Make Errors Implementing Our Products
Our software products are highly complex and sophisticated
As a result, they may occasionally contain design defects or software errors that could be difficult to detect and correct
In addition, implementation of our products may involve customer-specific configuration by third parties or us, and may involve integration with systems developed by third parties
In particular, it is common for complex software programs, such as our UNIX/Oracle,
They are discovered only after the product has been implemented and used over time with different computer systems and in a variety of applications and environments
Despite extensive testing, we have in the past discovered certain defects or errors in our products or custom configurations only after our software products have been used by many clients
For example, we will likely continue to experience undetected errors in our
Net applications as we begin to implement them at early adopter customer sites
In addition, our clients may occasionally experience difficulties integrating our products with other hardware or software in their environment that are unrelated to defects in our products
Such defects, errors or difficulties may cause future delays in product introductions, result in increased costs and diversion of development resources, require design modifications or impair customer satisfaction with our products
We believe that significant investments in research and development are required to remain competitive, and that speed to market is critical to our success
Our future performance will depend in large part on our ability to enhance our existing products through internal development and strategic partnering, internally develop new products which leverage both our existing customers and sales force, and strategically acquire complementary retail point and collaborative solutions that add functionality for specific business processes to an enterprise-wide system
If clients experience significant problems with implementation of our products or are otherwise dissatisfied with their functionality or performance or if they fail to achieve market acceptance for any reason, our market reputation could suffer, and we could be subject to claims for significant damages
Although our customer agreements contain limitation of liability clauses and exclude consequential damages, there can be no assurances that such contract provisions will be enforced
Any such damages claim could impair our market reputation and could have a material adverse affect on our business, operating results and financial condition
We May Have Difficulty Implementing Our Products
Our software products are complex and perform or directly affect mission-critical functions across many different functional and geographic areas of the enterprise
Consequently, implementation of our software products can be a lengthy process, and commitment of resources by our clients is subject to a number of significant risks over which we have little or no control
Although average implementation times have recently declined, we believe the implementation of the UNIX/Oracle versions of our products can be longer and more complicated than our other applications as they typically (i) appeal to larger retailers who have multiple divisions requiring multiple implementation projects, (ii) require the execution of implementation procedures in multiple layers of software, (iii) offer a retailer more deployment options and other configuration choices, and (iv) may involve third party integrators to change business processes concurrent with the implementation of the software
Delays in the implementations of any of our software products, whether by our business partners or us, may result in client dissatisfaction, disputes with our customers, or damage to our reputation
18 _________________________________________________________________ [54]Table of Contents There is also a risk that it may take several quarters for our consulting and support organizations to be fully trained and proficient on the new
Net technology platform and as a result, we may encounter difficulties implementing and supporting new products or versions of existing products based on the
In addition, we may be required to supplement our consulting and support organizations with
Net proficient resources from our product development teams to support early
Net implementations which could impact our development schedule for the release of additional
Significant problems implementing our software therefore, can cause delays or prevent us from collecting license fees for our software and can damage our ability to obtain new business
As a result of the headcount reductions taken in fourth quarter 2004 and the first half of 2005 to manage the utilization pressure from decreased demand for our services, we face the risk of constraints in our services offerings in the event of greater than anticipated licensing activity or more complex implementation projects
We offer a combination of software products, consulting and maintenance services to our customers
Historically, we have entered into service agreements with our customers that provide for consulting services on a “time and expenses” basis
We believe our competitors may be offering fixed-price service contracts to potential customers in order to differentiate their product and service offerings
As a result, we may be required during negotiations with customers to enter into fixed-price service contracts which link services payments, and occasionally software payments, to implementation milestones
Fixed bid consulting services work represented 14prca of total consulting services revenue in 2005 as compared to 16prca in 2004 and 15prca in 2003
If we are unable to meet our contractual obligations under fixed-price contracts within our estimated cost structure, our operating results could suffer
Our Success Depends Upon Our Proprietary Technology
Our success and competitive position is dependent in part upon our ability to develop and maintain the proprietary aspect of our technology
The reverse engineering, unauthorized copying, or other misappropriation of our technology could enable third parties to benefit from our technology without paying for it
We rely on a combination of trademark, trade secret, copyright law and contractual restrictions to protect the proprietary aspects of our technology
We seek to protect the source code to our software, documentation and other written materials under trade secret and copyright laws
To date, we have not protected our technology with issued patents, although we do have several patent applications pending
Effective copyright and trade secret protection may be unavailable or limited in certain foreign countries
We license our software products under signed license agreements that impose restrictions on the licensee’s ability to utilize the software and do not permit the re-sale, sublicense or other transfer of the source code
Finally, we seek to avoid disclosure of our intellectual property by requiring employees and independent consultants to execute confidentiality agreements with us and by restricting access to our source code
There has been a substantial amount of litigation in the software and Internet industries regarding intellectual property rights
It is possible that in the future third parties may claim that our current or potential future software solutions or we infringe on their intellectual property
We expect that software product developers and providers of e-commerce products will increasingly be subject to infringement claims as the number of products and competitors in our industry segment grows and the functionality of products in different industry segments overlap
Moreover, as software patents become more common, the likelihood increases that a patent holder will bring an infringement action against us, or against our customers, to whom we have indemnification obligations
There appears to be an increase in the number of firms with patent portfolios whose primary business is to bring or threaten to bring patent infringement lawsuits in the hope of settling for royalty fees
In particular, we have noticed increased activity from such firms in the in-store systems area
In addition, we may find it necessary to initiate claims or litigation against third parties for infringement of our proprietary rights or to protect our trade secrets
Since we resell hardware, we may also become subject to claims from third parties that the hardware, or the combination of hardware and software, infringe their intellectual property
Although we may disclaim certain intellectual property representations to our customers, these disclaimers may not be sufficient to fully protect us against such claims
We may be more vulnerable to patent claims since we do not have any issued patents that we can assert defensively against a patent infringement claim
Any claims, with or without merit, could be time consuming, result in costly litigation, cause product shipment delays or require us to enter into royalty or license agreements
Royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition
We license and integrate technology from third parties in certain of our software products
For example, we license the Uniface client/server application development technology from Compuware, Inc
for use in Portfolio Merchandise Management, certain applications from Silvon Software, Inc
for use in Performance Analysis by IDEAS, IBM’s Net
commerce merchant server software for use in Customer Order Management, the Syncsort application for use in certain of the Portfolio Planning by Arthur products, and IBM’s Ascential Software integration tool
Our third party licenses generally require us to pay royalties and fulfill confidentiality obligations
We also resell Oracle database licenses
If we are unable to continue to license any of this third party software, or if the third party licensors do not adequately maintain or update their products, we would face delays in the releases of our software until equivalent technology can be identified, licensed or developed, and integrated into our software products
These delays, if they occur, could harm our business, operating results and financial condition
It is also possible that intellectual property acquired from third parties through acquisitions, mergers, licenses or otherwise may not have been adequately protected, or infringes another parties intellectual property rights
We encounter competitive products from a different set of vendors in each of our primary product categories
We believe that while our markets are still subject to intense competition, the number of significant competitors in many of our application markets has decreased over the past five years
We believe the principal competitive factors in our markets are feature and functionality, product reputation and quality of referenceable accounts, vendor viability, retail and demand chain industry expertise, total solution cost, technology platform and quality of customer support
The enterprise software market continues to consolidate
Although the consolidation trend has resulted in fewer competitors in every significant product market we supply, it has also resulted in larger, new competitors with significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we possess
This could create a significant competitive advantage over us and negatively impact our business
The consolidation trend is evidenced by Oracle’s acquisitions of Retek on April 12, 2005, of ProfitLogic, Inc
on July 18, 2005, and of 360Commerce on January 13, 2006; and by SAP AG’s acquisitions of Triversity, Inc
on September 19, 2005 and its pending acquisition of Khimetrics, Inc
Oracle did not compete with our retail specific products prior to its acquisition of Retek and although this acquisition has not significantly impacted our near-term strategy, it is difficult to estimate what effect this acquisition will ultimately have on our competitive environment
We have recently encountered competitive situations with Oracle in certain of our international markets where, in order to encourage customers to purchase their retail applications, we suspect they have offered to license their database applications at no charge
We have also encountered competitive situations with SAP AG where, in order to encourage customers to purchase licenses of its non-retail applications and gain retail market share, they have offered to license at no charge certain of its retail software applications that compete with the JDA Portfolio products
If large competitors such as Oracle and SAP AG and other large private companies are willing to license their retail and/or other applications at no charge it may result in a more difficult competitive environment for our products
In addition, we could face competition from large, multi-industry technology companies that have historically not offered an enterprise solution set to the retail supply chain market
Because competitors such as Oracle and SAP AG have significantly greater resources than we possess, they could also make it more difficult for us to grow through acquisition by outbidding us for potential acquisition targets
We cannot guarantee that we will be able to compete successfully for customers or acquisition targets against our current or future competitors, or that competition will not have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition
We Are Dependent Upon The Retail Industry
Historically, we have derived over 75prca of our revenues from the license of software products and the performance of related services to retail customers, and our future growth is critically dependent on increased sales to retail customers
The success of our customers is directly linked to general economic conditions as well as those of the retail industry
In addition, we believe that the licensing of certain of our software products involves a large capital expenditure, which is often accompanied by large-scale hardware purchases or other capital commitments
As a result, demand for our products and services could decline in the event of instability or potential downturns
We believe the retail industry has remained cautious with their level of investment in information technology during the uncertain economic cycle of the last few years
We remain concerned about weak and uncertain economic conditions, 20 _________________________________________________________________ [56]Table of Contents industry consolidation and the disappointing results of retailers in certain of our geographic regions
The retail industry will be negatively impacted if weak economic conditions or geopolitical concerns persist for an extended period of time
Weak and uncertain economic conditions have in the past, and may in the future, negatively impact our revenues, including a potential deterioration of our maintenance revenue base as customers look to reduce their costs, elongate our selling cycles, and delay, suspend or reduce the demand for our products
As a result, it is difficult in the current economic environment to predict exactly when specific software licenses will close within a six to nine month time frame
In addition, weak and uncertain economic conditions could impair our customers’ ability to pay for our products or services
Any of these factors could adversely impact our business, quarterly or annual operating results and financial condition
International revenues represented 41prca of our total revenues in 2005 as compared to 40prca and 44prca of total revenues in 2004 and 2003, respectively
If our international operations grow, we may need to recruit and hire new consulting, sales and marketing and support personnel in the countries in which we have or will establish offices
Entry into new international markets typically requires the establishment of new marketing and distribution channels as well as the development and subsequent support of localized versions of our software
International introductions of our products often require a significant investment in advance of anticipated future revenues
In addition, the opening of a new office typically results in initial recruiting and training expenses and reduced labor efficiencies associated with the introduction of products to a new market
If we are less successful in a new market than we expect, we may not be able to realize an adequate return on our initial investment and our operating results could suffer
We cannot guarantee that the countries in which we operate will have a sufficient pool of qualified personnel from which to hire, that we will be successful at hiring, training or retaining such personnel or that we can expand or contract our international operations in a timely, cost effective manner
If we have to downsize certain international operations, the costs to do so are typically much higher than downsizing costs in the United States, particularly in Europe
Our international business operations are subject to risks associated with international activities, including: • Currency fluctuations; • Higher operating costs due to local laws or regulations; • Unexpected changes in employment and other regulatory requirements; • Tariffs and other trade barriers; • Costs and risks of localizing products for foreign countries; • Longer accounts receivable payment cycles in certain countries; • Potentially negative tax consequences; • Difficulties in staffing and managing geographically disparate operations; • Greater difficulty in safeguarding intellectual property, licensing and other trade restrictions; • Ability to negotiate and have enforced favorable contract provisions; • Repatriation of earnings; • The burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws; • Anti-American sentiment due to the war with Iraq, and other American policies that may be unpopular in certain regions; • The effects of regional and global infectious diseases; • The challenges of finding qualified management for our international operations; and • General economic conditions in international markets
Consulting services associated with certain international software licenses typically have lower gross margins than those achieved domestically due to generally lower billing rates and/or higher labor costs in certain of our international markets
Accordingly, any significant growth in our international operations may result in declines in gross margins on consulting services
We expect that an increasing portion of our international software license, consulting services and maintenance services revenues will be denominated in foreign currencies, subjecting us to fluctuations in foreign currency 21 _________________________________________________________________ [57]Table of Contents exchange rates
If we expand our international operations, exposures to gains and losses on foreign currency transactions may increase
We use derivative financial instruments, primarily forward exchange contracts, to manage a majority of the foreign currency exchange exposure associated with net short-term foreign denominated assets and liabilities which exist as part of our ongoing business operations
We cannot guarantee that any currency exchange strategy would be successful in avoiding exchange-related losses
In addition, revenues earned in various countries where we do business may be subject to taxation by more than one jurisdiction, which would reduce our earnings
Impact Of Substantial Cash Bids When Competing For Acquisition Opportunities We continue to focus our acquisition strategy on larger companies
However, we may increasingly compete for acquisitions with companies that have significantly greater cash resources
These companies are able to make substantial all cash offers to acquisition targets
Because of the volatility of our stock price, it may be difficult for us to compete for large acquisitions where there are competing all cash offers and our offer price includes our stock
If we are unable to successfully compete for larger acquisitions, our ability to achieve growth through acquisitions will be adversely affected
We May Have Difficulty Integrating Acquisitions
We continually evaluate potential acquisitions of complementary businesses, products and technologies, including those that are significant in size and scope
In pursuit of our strategy to acquire complementary products, we have completed nine acquisitions over the past eight years including the Arthur Retail Business Unit in June 1998, Intactix International, Inc
in April 2000, E3 Corporation in September 2001, and substantially all the assets of Timera Texas, Inc
The E3 acquisition was our largest to date, and involved the integration of E3’s products and operations in 12 countries
The risks we commonly encounter in acquisitions include: • We may have difficulty assimilating the operations and personnel of the acquired company; • The challenge to integrate new products and technologies into our sales and marketing process, particularly in the case of smaller acquisitions; • We may have difficulty effectively integrating the acquired technologies or products with our current products and technologies; • Our ongoing business may be disrupted by transition and integration issues; • We may not be able to retain key technical and managerial personnel from the acquired business; • We may be unable to achieve the financial and strategic goals for the acquired and combined businesses; • We may have difficulty in maintaining controls, procedures and policies during the transition and integration; • Our relationships with partner companies or third-party providers of technology or products could be adversely affected; • Our relationships with employees and customers could be impaired; • Our due diligence process may fail to identify significant issues with product quality, product architecture, legal or tax contingencies, and product development, among other things; • We may be subject to as a successor, certain liabilities of our acquisition targets; and • We may be required to sustain significant exit or impairment charges if products acquired in business combinations are unsuccessful
Our certificate of incorporation, which authorizes the issuance of “blank check preferred” stock, our stockholders’ rights plan which permits our stockholders to counter takeover attempts, and Delaware state corporate laws which restrict business combinations between a corporation and 15prca or more owners of outstanding voting stock of the corporation for a three-year period, individually or in combination, may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that a JDA stockholder may consider favorable
Our success is heavily dependent upon our ability to attract, hire, train, retain and motivate skilled personnel, including sales and marketing representatives, qualified software engineers involved in ongoing product development, and consulting personnel who assist in the implementation of our products and services
The market for such individuals is competitive
For example, it has been particularly difficult to attract and retain product development personnel experienced in the Microsoft
Net Platform since the
Net Platform is a new and evolving technology
Given the critical roles of our sales, product development and consulting staffs, our inability to recruit successfully or any significant loss of key personnel would adversely affect us
A high level of employee mobility and aggressive recruiting of skilled personnel characterize the software industry
It may be particularly difficult to retain or compete for skilled personnel against larger, better known software companies
has announced it intends to open a research and development center in the Phoenix area
We cannot guarantee that we will be able to retain our current personnel, attract and retain other highly qualified technical and managerial personnel in the future, or be able to assimilate the employees from any acquired businesses
We will continue to adjust the size and composition of our workforce to match the different product and geographic demand cycles
If we were unable to attract and retain the necessary technical and managerial personnel, or assimilate the employees from any acquired businesses, our business, operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected
We Are Dependent On Key Personnel
Our performance depends in large part on the continued performance of our executive officers and other key employees, particularly the performance and services of James D Armstrong our Chairman and Hamish N J Brewer our Chief Executive Officer
We do not have in place “key person” life insurance policies on any of our employees
Brewer, or other key executive officers or employees without a successor in place, or any difficulties associated with our succession, could negatively affect our financial performance