Home
Jump to Risk Factors
Jump to Industries
Jump to Exposures
Jump to Event Codes
Jump to Wiki Summary

Industries
Home Improvement Retail
Hotels Resorts and Cruise Lines
Health Care Distribution and Services
Asset Management and Custody Banks
Investment Banking and Brokerage
Health Care Facilities
Technology Hardware Storage and Peripherals
Information Technology
Technology Hardware and Equipment
Environmental Services
IT Consulting and Other Services
Exposures
Express intent
Provide
Political reform
Regime
Judicial
Ease
Military
Intelligence
Cooperate
Leadership
Rights
Event Codes
Promise
Reward
Human death
Pessimistic comment
Adjust
Yield position
Host meeting
Release or return
Acknowledge responsibility
Yield to order
Vote
Yield
Endorse
Warn
Negotiation
Accident
Sports contest
Propose
Covert monitoring
Demand
Solicit support
Grant
Force
Military blockade
Sanction
Reject
Agree
Wiki Wiki Summary
Probability distribution In probability theory and statistics, a probability distribution is the mathematical function that gives the probabilities of occurrence of different possible outcomes for an experiment. It is a mathematical description of a random phenomenon in terms of its sample space and the probabilities of events (subsets of the sample space).For instance, if X is used to denote the outcome of a coin toss ("the experiment"), then the probability distribution of X would take the value 0.5 (1 in 2 or 1/2) for X = heads, and 0.5 for X = tails (assuming that the coin is fair).
Resorts World Resorts World is a hospitality and casino franchise owned by the Genting Group, a Malaysian conglomerate. The Resorts World brand is used across Genting Group's international resort and casino properties.
Distribution waterfall In private equity investing, distribution waterfall is a method by which the capital gained by the fund is allocated between the limited partners (LPs) and the general partner (GP).\n\n\n== Overview ==\nIn a private equity fund, the general partner manages the committed capital of the limited partners.
Dividend Division is one of the four basic operations of arithmetic, the ways that numbers are combined to make new numbers. The other operations are addition, subtraction, and multiplication.
Corporate tax in the United States Corporate tax is imposed in the United States at the federal, most state, and some local levels on the income of entities treated for tax purposes as corporations. Since January 1, 2018, the nominal federal corporate tax rate in the United States of America is a flat 21% due to the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.
Common stock Common stock is a form of corporate equity ownership, a type of security. The terms voting share and ordinary share are also used frequently outside of the United States.
Preferred stock Preferred stock (also called preferred shares, preference shares, or simply preferreds) is a component of share capital that may have any combination of features not possessed by common stock, including properties of both an equity and a debt instrument, and is generally considered a hybrid instrument. Preferred stocks are senior (i.e., higher ranking) to common stock but subordinate to bonds in terms of claim (or rights to their share of the assets of the company, given that such assets are payable to the returnee stock bond) and may have priority over common stock (ordinary shares) in the payment of dividends and upon liquidation.
Stock market A stock market, equity market, or share market is the aggregation of buyers and sellers of stocks (also called shares), which represent ownership claims on businesses; these may include securities listed on a public stock exchange, as well as stock that is only traded privately, such as shares of private companies which are sold to investors through equity crowdfunding platforms. Investment is usually made with an investment strategy in mind.
Liquidation Liquidation is the process in accounting by which a company is brought to an end in Canada, United Kingdom, United States, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, Italy, and many other countries. The assets and property of the company are redistributed.
Administration and liquidation of The Rangers Football Club plc Rangers, a football club in Scotland, entered financial difficulties during the late 2000s. The club, trading as The Rangers Football Club plc, entered administration in February 2012.
Dekulakization Dekulakization (Russian: раскулачивание, raskulachivanie; Ukrainian: розкуркулення, rozkurkulennia) was the Soviet campaign of political repressions, including arrests, deportations, or executions of millions of kulaks (prosperous peasants) and their families. Redistribution of farmland started in 1917 and lasted until 1933, but was most active in the 1929–1932 period of the first five-year plan.
Liquidation (miniseries) Liquidation (2007) (Russian: Ликвидация, Likvidatsiya) is a highly popular Russian television series, which parallels the famous The Meeting Place Cannot Be Changed with notable ethical shift. In the "Meeting Place", chief of criminal investigations Gleb Zheglov (played by Vladimir Vysotskiy) had a modus operandi "Thief must go to prison, no matter how I put him there" (and uses planted evidence to do so).
Shareholder rights plan A shareholder rights plan, colloquially known as a "poison pill", is a type of defensive tactic used by a corporation's board of directors against a takeover.\nIn the field of mergers and acquisitions, shareholder rights plans were devised in the early 1980s as a way to prevent takeover bids by taking away a shareholder's right to negotiate a price for the sale of shares directly.
Class B share In finance, a Class B share or Class C share is a designation for a share class of a common or preferred stock that typically has strengthened voting rights or other benefits compared to a Class A share that may have been created. The equity structure, or how many types of shares are offered, is determined by the corporate charter.B share can also refer to various terms relating to stock classes:\n\nB share (mainland China), a class of stock on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges\nB share (NYSE), a class of stock on the New York Stock ExchangeMost of the time, Class B shares may have lower repayment priorities in the event a company declares bankruptcy.
Corporate finance Corporate finance is the area of finance that deals with sources of funding, the capital structure of corporations, the actions that managers take to increase the value of the firm to the shareholders, and the tools and analysis used to allocate financial resources. The primary goal of corporate finance is to maximize or increase shareholder value.Correspondingly, corporate finance comprises two main sub-disciplines.
Liquidationism In Leninist theory, liquidationism (Russian: Ликвидаторство) is the ideological abandonment (liquidation) of the vanguard party's program, either in whole or in part, by party members.\n\n\n== Concept ==\nAccording to the Bolshevik leader Vladimir Lenin, writing in 1909, liquidationism "consists ideologically in negation of the revolutionary class struggle of the socialist proletariat in general, and denial of the hegemony of the proletariat".Nikolai Aleksandrovich Rozhkov was identified by Lenin as a liquidationist.In his concluding remarks to the 1914 Marxism and Liquidationism symposium, Lenin made the distinction between "Left liquidationism," which is "leaning towards anarchism, and "Right liquidationism," which is "liquidationism proper" and "leans towards liberalism."\n\n\n== Current use ==\nThe term is still used in modern, ideological discussions of the communist left.
Liquidation preference A liquidation preference is one of the primary economic terms of a venture finance investment in a private company. The term describes how various investors' claims on dividends or on other distributions are queued and covered.
Start Liquidation Start Liquidation (Russian: Приступить к ликвидации) is a 1983 Soviet action film directed by Boris Grigoryev.\n\n\n== Plot ==\nThe film takes place in the spring of 1945 in Western Belarus, where the brutal gang of Boleslav Kruk creates chaos.
Fall of the Western Roman Empire The fall of the Western Roman Empire (also called the fall of the Roman Empire or the fall of Rome) was the loss of central political control in the Western Roman Empire, a process in which the Empire failed to enforce its rule, and its vast territory was divided into several successor polities. The Roman Empire lost the strengths that had allowed it to exercise effective control over its Western provinces; modern historians posit factors including the effectiveness and numbers of the army, the health and numbers of the Roman population, the strength of the economy, the competence of the emperors, the internal struggles for power, the religious changes of the period, and the efficiency of the civil administration.
Liquidating distribution A liquidating distribution (or liquidating dividend) is a type of nondividend distribution made by a corporation or a partnership to its shareholders during its partial or complete liquidation. Liquidating distributions are not paid solely out of the profits of the corporation.
Yahoo! Yahoo! (, styled yahoo!
Special-purpose acquisition company A special purpose acquisition company (SPAC; ), also known as a "blank check company", is a shell corporation listed on a stock exchange with the purpose of acquiring a private company, thus making it public without going through the traditional initial public offering process. According to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), SPACs are created specifically to pool funds to finance a merger or acquisition opportunity within a set timeframe.
List of mobile phone brands by country This is the list of mobile phone brands sorted by the country from which the brands originate.
Sentai Filmworks Sentai Filmworks, LLC, also known as Sentai Studios, or just Sentai, is an American entertainment company owned by AMC Networks. Located in Houston, the company specializes in the dubbing and distribution of Japanese animation and Asian cinema.
Normal distribution In statistics, a normal distribution (also known as Gaussian, Gauss, or Laplace–Gauss distribution) is a type of continuous probability distribution for a real-valued random variable. The general form of its probability density function is\n\n \n \n \n f\n (\n x\n )\n =\n \n \n 1\n \n σ\n \n \n 2\n π\n \n \n \n \n \n \n e\n \n −\n \n \n 1\n 2\n \n \n \n \n (\n \n \n \n x\n −\n μ\n \n σ\n \n \n )\n \n \n 2\n \n \n \n \n \n \n {\displaystyle f(x)={\frac {1}{\sigma {\sqrt {2\pi }}}}e^{-{\frac {1}{2}}\left({\frac {x-\mu }{\sigma }}\right)^{2}}}\n The parameter \n \n \n \n μ\n \n \n {\displaystyle \mu }\n is the mean or expectation of the distribution (and also its median and mode), while the parameter \n \n \n \n σ\n \n \n {\displaystyle \sigma }\n is its standard deviation.
Liquidated damages Liquidated damages, also referred to as liquidated and ascertained damages (LADs), are damages whose amount the parties designate during the formation of a contract for the injured party to collect as compensation upon a specific breach (e.g. late performance).
Condo hotel A condo hotel, also known as a condotel, hotel condo or a contel, is a building which is legally a condominium but which is operated as a hotel, offering short term rentals, and which maintains a front desk.\nCondo hotels are typically high-rise buildings developed and operated as luxury hotels, usually in major cities and resorts.
Renting Renting, also known as hiring or letting, is an agreement where a payment is made for the temporary use of a good, service or property owned by another. A gross lease is when the tenant pays a flat rental amount and the landlord pays for all property charges regularly incurred by the ownership.
Swimply Swimply is an online marketplace for renting a private swimming pool as a form of staycation. Home owners with a swimming pool can offer their pool for hourly rentals to individuals or groups to enjoy.
Rental agreement A rental agreement is a contract of rental, usually written, between the owner of a property and a renter who desires to have temporary possession of the property; it is distinguished from a lease, which is more typically for a fixed term. As a minimum, the agreement identifies the parties, the property, the term of the rental, and the amount of rent for the term.
The Drowning Pool (film) The Drowning Pool is a 1975 American neo-noir thriller film directed by Stuart Rosenberg, and based upon Ross Macdonald's novel of the same name. The film stars Paul Newman, Joanne Woodward, and Anthony Franciosa, and is a loose sequel to Harper.
TIP Trailer Services TIP Trailer Services is an American–Dutch truck trailer rental, leasing, and sales company founded in 1957. The company's portfolio measures over 100,000 assets.
Joe Pool Lake Joe Pool Lake is a fresh water impoundment (reservoir) located in the southern part of the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex in North Texas. The lake encompasses parts of Tarrant, Dallas and Ellis counties.
BookSwim BookSwim was a private American online book rental service, offering rental-by-mail of both hardcover and paperback books. The company was launched in 2007.
Don't Make Waves Don't Make Waves is a 1967 American sex comedy (with elements of the beach party genre) starring Tony Curtis, Claudia Cardinale, Dave Draper and Sharon Tate. Distributed by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, the film was directed by Alexander Mackendrick and is based on the 1959 novel Muscle Beach, by Ira Wallach, who also co-wrote the screenplay.
Risk Factors
GOLF TRUST OF AMERICA INC ITEM 1A RISK FACTORS Risks that might Delay or Reduce our Liquidating Distributions We have recorded the value of the Resort and our remaining golf courses and liabilities at our best estimates of fair value as of April 12, 2006; however, we cannot provide assurances that these estimates reflect actual current market value for the applicable courses
As a result of our inability to provide assurances regarding the estimates of the fair value of our assets, including the probability of negotiating and closing a sale of the Resort, at the present time, we do not believe that we are able to reliably project the amount of the total liquidating distributions we will make to the holders of our common stock over the remainder of the liquidation period and the amounts may be less than our earlier projections
Further, while we have provided in this report estimated adjustments to net assets in liquidation based upon the sale of the Resort for consideration of approximately dlra35 million, we cannot assure you that we will be able to close a sale of the Resort for a price that will allow us to realize the estimated proceeds for the Resort, if at all
Further, we cannot guarantee that the cash consideration paid for the business of the Resort will be in 17 ______________________________________________________________________ a price range to allow us to repurchase AEW’s preferred stock for dlra20 million, if at all
As a result, the estimated adjustments to net assets in liquidation provided in this report may prove incorrect and the amounts, if any, that we ultimately distribute as liquidating distributions may be less than estimated
Our estimate of the Resort’s fair value, as recorded on our books for accounting purposes, is based on forward-looking estimates which are subject to change
We might sell the Resort for an amount less than our current estimate of its fair value, which could reduce our liquidating distributions to holders of our common stock
We do not believe we are able at this time to project the amount of the total liquidating distributions we will make to the holders of our common stock over the remainder of the liquidating period
The factors giving rise to this uncertainty include, without limitation, the following: · improvement in the financial performance of the Resort that we have observed since we took title in July 2004 may not continue; · despite our execution of a new management agreement with Westin at the Resort providing for increased control by us over accounting and marketing and improved provisions governing Westin’s reporting to us, we do not directly manage the Resort; · our Settlement Agreement with our former borrower and related agreements that we entered with Westin may prove less successful than anticipated, and the performance of the parties to the Settlement Agreement may fall short of our expectations; · historical uncertainty surrounding the future of the Resort and the level of Westin’s involvement upon the prospective sale of the Resort may create uncertainty for corporate meeting planners contracting for large corporate groups, and any such uncertainty may be used as a competitive advantage by our competitors when marketing their hotels against the Resort; · continued threats of terrorism and the impact thereof on the travel and lodging industry; and · uncertainty about our ability to close the transactions contemplated in any asset purchase agreement we may execute
As a result of the foregoing, at the present time we will refrain from either making any adjustments (positive or negative) to any earlier reported range of distributions or proposing a new range
We may, however, be able to do so in future periods in the event that the quality and reliability of all information necessary to make estimates of cash flow and, correspondingly, value become more reliable
You should not assume that the liquidating distributions have not increased or declined, perhaps in material amounts, from the historical projections we provided in earlier filings
Our efforts to preserve the value of the Resort until we are able to consummate its sale may be unsuccessful, and we might ultimately sell our interest in the Resort for less than our last estimate of its fair value
Accordingly, our assessment of the Resort’s fair value may change at some future date, perhaps in a material adverse manner, based on facts and circumstances at that time, and the Resort’s value may again be written-down
We have entered into an Option Agreement with the holder of our series A preferred stock which provides that the holder will permit us to repurchase all of the holder’s series A preferred stock for less than the current liquidation preferences afforded to those shares provided that we receive a cash consideration for the business of the Resort of no more than dlra35 million
As a result of our understandings with AEW, we have not recorded in our net assets a liability for the accrual of preferred dividends payable for the quarter beginning July 1, 2001 and all subsequent quarters
In the event that we are unable to exercise our option to repurchase all of the holder’s series A preferred stock prior to its expiration date, we may be required to pay that holder all or a portion of the 18 ______________________________________________________________________ preferred dividends for which we have not recorded a liability, reducing our liquidating distributions to common stockholders
On April 12, 2006 we executed an Option Agreement, with the holder of our series A preferred stock, AEW, in which AEW agreed that we shall have an option to purchase, on or before June 30, 2006, the 800cmam000 shares of our series A preferred stock held by AEW, including, without limitation, all of AEW’s rights to due and unpaid principal, accrued and unpaid dividends and liquidation preferences payable in respect of such series A preferred shares as of our exercise of the option
The exercise price of this option is approximately dlra20cmam000cmam000
This option is only exercisable if the business of the Resort is sold for no more than dlra35cmam000cmam000 million
This exercise price excludes dividends that would accrue to the series A preferred stock
As a result of our understandings with AEW, we have not recorded in our net assets a liability for the accrual of quarterly preferred dividends for the period July 1, 2001 to December 31, 2005 totaling dlra9cmam914cmam000, plus an additional dividend accrual of dlra625cmam000 per quarter for preferred dividends through the date that the exit transaction is ultimately consummated and liquidation payments are made to AEW In the event that we are unable to exercise our option to repurchase all of the holder’s series A preferred stock prior to its expiration date of June 30, 2006, or if the cash consideration for the business of the Resort is outside of the range permitting us to exercise our option to repurchase AEW’s preferred stock, we may be required to pay that holder all or a portion of the quarterly preferred dividends for which we have not recorded a liability, reducing our liquidating distributions to common stockholders
We cannot guarantee that we will be able to enter into a binding agreement for the sale or other disposition of the Resort
In connection with our efforts to sell the Resort, we intend to negotiate and execute a binding asset purchase agreement
Thereafter, any closing pursuant to an executed asset purchase agreement will be conditioned upon, among other things, consideration and approval of the transaction by the Special Committee of our Board and the receipt of a satisfactory fairness opinion
We cannot assure you that we will enter into an asset purchase agreement for the Resort or, if we do so, that all conditions to closing will be satisfied and the Resort will be sold
Further, the price that we receive if we sell the Resort might be less than the then applicable carrying value of the Resort on our financial statements
Significant legal and other costs and expenses will be incurred in connection with the negotiation of any sale of the Resort, and these costs and expenses will further reduce the liquidating distributions that we make to the holders of our common stock
We took ownership of the Resort on July 16, 2004 pursuant to a global Settlement Agreement providing for the assumption of certain existing or modified financial obligations of our former borrower
We are now responsible for any negative cash flow of the Resort
If the amount of assumed liabilities and expenditures with respect to the Resort exceed our expectations, our liquidating distributions to common stockholders could be reduced
On July 15, 2004, we entered a Settlement Agreement relating to our June 1997 dlra79dtta0 million loan to our former borrower
This loan was secured by a mortgage on the Resort
As part of the Settlement Agreement, we assumed certain financial obligations of the borrower, such as refurbishment expenses paid by the condominium owners, a modified termination rights fee and outstanding golf facility management fees payable to Troon
As the owner of the Resort, we are responsible for any negative cash flow associated with its ownership and operation
As a result of the assumption of these liabilities and our responsibility for any negative cash flow, we face the risk that our ultimate liabilities and expenditures might be greater than expected
In that case, our cash available for distribution and the ultimate amount of our liquidating distributions to the holders of our common stock could be less than our expectations
In 2005, we funded dlra1cmam050cmam000 to address seasonal cash flow shortfalls
However, there are no assurances that additional intercompany advances will not be necessary prior to the consummation of a sale of the Resort
19 ______________________________________________________________________ Although the revenues of the Resort have begun to increase since we took title to it, we cannot guarantee that the Resort’s future performance will continue to show improvement
If we do not continue to improve the Resort’s financial performance, our recovery with respect to this asset might be significantly delayed
A delay in our recovery of the Resort might reduce the net proceeds that we ultimately receive upon a sale of the Resort to less than our current estimate of the Resort’s fair value, and we may be forced to use funds that otherwise might be distributed to our stockholders to fund cash shortages of the Resort, causing our liquidating distributions to holders of our common stock to be reduced
Our estimate of the Resort’s fair value, as recorded on our books for accounting purposes, is based on forward-looking estimates which are subject to change
We can provide no assurance of success under the Settlement Agreement, the future success of the Resort or the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement
Stockholder litigation related to the plan of liquidation could result in substantial costs and distract our management
Extraordinary corporate actions, such as our plan of liquidation, often lead to securities class action lawsuits and derivative litigation being filed against companies such as ours
We became involved in this type of litigation in connection with our plan of liquidation (and the transactions associated with it) in a legal action we refer to as the Crossley litigation
During the second quarter of 2003, the Crossley claim was dismissed with prejudice on our motion for summary judgment
Accordingly, the lawsuit was dismissed and the plaintiff will not be allowed to refile the claim, although the plaintiff could appeal the dismissal
We subsequently entered into a non-monetary settlement with the plaintiff whereby the plaintiff agreed not to appeal the dismissal and we agreed not to seek reimbursement of our legal costs from the plaintiff
Even though the Crossley litigation has been dismissed, we face the risk that other claims might be brought against us
Any such litigation would likely be expensive and, even if we ultimately prevail, the process would divert management’s attention from implementing the plan of liquidation and otherwise operating our business
If we do not prevail in any such litigation, we might be liable for damages
It is not possible to predict the amount of such potential damages, if any, but they might be significant
Any damage liability would reduce our cash available for distribution and the ultimate amount of our liquidating distributions to holders of our common stock
If we are unable to retain at least one of our key executives and sufficient staff members to complete the plan of liquidation in a reasonably expeditious manner, our liquidating distributions might be delayed or reduced
Our ability to consummate sales transactions for our other interests in golf courses depend to a large extent upon the experience and abilities of our two most senior executives, W Bradley Blair, II, our chief executive officer and president, and Scott D Peters, our senior vice president and chief financial officer, and their experience and familiarity with our assets, our counter-parties and the market for golf course sales
Peters are currently serving us on a reduced schedule basis
We believe our liquidation has progressed to the point that the resignation of one, but not both, of our executives would not likely cause significant adverse consequences
However, a loss of the services of both of these individuals could materially harm our ability to complete the plan of liquidation in a reasonably expeditious manner and our prospects of selling our assets at the best potential prices
The potential resignation of Mr
Blair poses a relatively greater risk at this time in light of the fact that the amount of time that Mr
Blair were to resign, we would likely seek to hire a replacement for Mr
Blair would likely depend upon our determination of the experience and skills that must be possessed by his replacement in light of our financial condition, our assets remaining to be liquidated, and the complexity of any issues bearing on us and the liquidation at that time
20 ______________________________________________________________________ Our ability to complete the plan of liquidation in a timely manner also depends on our ability to retain our key non-executive employees, in particular our controller
Those employees may seek other employment rather than remaining with us throughout the process of liquidation, even though they generally would lose their eligibility for severance payments by resigning
If we are unable to retain enough qualified staff to complete our plan of liquidation in a reasonably expeditious manner, liquidating distributions might be delayed or reduced
If we are unable to consummate a sale of the Resort or our other remaining golf courses at our revised estimates of their respective values, our liquidating distributions might be delayed or reduced
In addition to the four golf courses at the Resort, we have two other properties (or three eighteen-hole equivalent golf courses)
We have entered into an agreement relating to one of the other two remaining assets; however, at the present time that agreement may be terminated by the potential buyer without penalty
In calculating our projected liquidating distributions, we assumed that we would be able to find buyers for the Resort and our other remaining golf courses at purchase prices equal to our estimates of their respective fair market values
However, our estimates of the sales prices of the Resort and our other remaining golf courses may exceed the prices we eventually receive
At December 31, 2005, we recorded a dlra2dtta421 million write-down in the value of the Resort based on market indications of interest
Should our current purchase and sale agreement fail to close, in order to find new buyers in a reasonably expeditious manner, we might be required to lower our asking price for the Resort and our other remaining courses below our estimate of their fair value
If we are not able to find new buyers for these assets in a reasonably expeditious manner, or if we have overestimated the sales prices we will ultimately receive, our liquidating distributions to the holders of our common stock will be significantly delayed or reduced
At the present time, we do not believe we are able to reliably project the amount of the total liquidating distributions we will make to the holders of our common stock over the remainder of the liquidation period
Accordingly, you should not rely on the valuations or ranges earlier provided as representative of our current views on the subject
If we are unable to realize the value of a promissory note taken as part of any purchase price, our liquidating distributions might be reduced
In some golf course sales, we may agree to receive promissory notes from the buyer as a portion of the purchase price
Promissory notes are often illiquid
If we are not able to sell the promissory note without a great discount, or in the case of a short-term note, if we hold it to maturity and the maker ultimately defaults, our liquidating distributions might be reduced
Decreases in golf course values caused by economic recession and/or additional terrorist activity might reduce the amount for which we can sell our assets
The value of our interests in golf courses might be reduced, and substantially so, by a number of factors that are beyond our control, including the following: · adverse changes in the economy, prolonged recession and/or additional terrorist activity against the United States or our allies, or other war-time activities might increase public pessimism and decrease travel and leisure spending, thereby reducing golf course operators’ revenues (particularly destination-resort golf course revenues) and diminishing the resale value of the affected golf courses; · increased competition, including, without limitation, increasing numbers of golf courses being offered for sale in our markets or nationwide; 21 ______________________________________________________________________ · continuing imbalance in supply and demand in the golf course industry; and · changes in real estate tax rates and other operating expenses
Any reduction in the value of our golf courses would make it more difficult for us to sell our assets for the amounts and within the time-frames that we have estimated
Reductions in the amounts that we receive when we sell our assets could decrease or delay our payment of liquidating distributions to our stockholders, perhaps in substantial ways
If our liquidation costs or unpaid liabilities are greater than we expect, our liquidating distributions might be delayed or reduced, potentially in a substantial manner
Before making the final liquidating distribution to the holders of our stock, we will need to pay all of our transaction costs pertaining to the liquidation and all valid claims of our creditors, which we expect will be substantial
Our board may also decide to acquire one or more additional insurance policies covering unknown or contingent claims against us, including, without limitation, additional directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, for which we would pay an additional premium based upon market prices prevailing at the time of any such purchase
In addition, if we form a liquidating trust, we may have additional expenses for items such as insurance for the trustees
We have estimated such transaction costs in calculating the amount of our projected liquidating distributions
To the extent that we have underestimated costs and expenses in calculating our historical projections, our actual aggregate liquidating distributions will be lower than we have historically projected, and perhaps by substantial amounts
Our loss of REIT status exposes us to potential income tax liability in the future, which could lower the amount of our liquidating distributions
In order to maintain our historical qualification as a REIT, at least 95prca of our annual gross income was required to be derived from real property rents, mortgage interest and a few other categories of income specified in the tax code, which importantly do not include income from golf course operations
Although we did not affirmatively intend to revoke our REIT status, business conditions required us to begin operating golf courses in 2000 and the percentage of our gross income supplied by such operations increased in 2001, and surpassing the 5prca ceiling in 2002
Consequently, we did not meet the 95prca gross income test in 2002
Failure to meet this test caused us to fail to qualify as a REIT for the year 2002, which will prevent us from re-qualifying for at least four years
Accordingly, we have been subject to federal income tax as a regular corporation since our failure to qualify as a REIT However, our operations resulted in a net operating loss for income tax purposes during 2003, 2004 and 2005
Therefore, no income tax will be due on our operating income/loss or proceeds from the sale of properties that occurred during 2003, 2004 and 2005
At the present time, we believe we have sufficient net operating loss carryovers to offset any gains we might recognize through our liquidation
If we were to recognize taxable gains in a year before consideration of net operating loss carryovers, we could be subject to alternative minimum tax
Generally, for tax years ending after December 31, 2002, the use of net operating loss carryovers to reduce alternative minimum taxable income is limited to 90prca of alternative minimum taxable income
Therefore, tax at a rate of 20prca could be imposed on our alternative minimum taxable income that cannot be reduced by net operating loss carryovers
The resulting tax liabilities would reduce the amount of cash available for liquidating distributions
The holder of our series A preferred stock might exercise its right to appoint two directors to our board of directors, which might result in decisions that prejudice the economic interests of our common stockholders in favor of our preferred stockholders
We entered into a voting agreement with the holder of our preferred stock, AEW, pursuant to which the holder agreed to vote in favor of our plan of liquidation
The voting agreement provided that if we 22 ______________________________________________________________________ failed to redeem our series A preferred stock by May 22, 2003, the holder of the preferred stock would be entitled to require us to redeem the preferred stock
We received such a demand from the holder of our preferred stock on May 23, 2003; however, we do not have cash available to redeem the holder of our preferred stock
Our default in making a timely redemption payment gives the holder of our preferred stock the right under the voting agreement to appoint two new directors to our board
Our charter also gives the holder of our preferred stock the right to elect two new directors if and when dividends on its series A preferred stock are in arrears for more than six quarters
Currently, dividends on the series A preferred stock are eighteen quarters in arrears
These director election rights are not cumulative, which means that the holder of our preferred stock may elect two, but not four, new directors
The current holder of our preferred stock, AEW, informed us previously that it does not currently intend to exercise its director election rights
However, it might decide to exercise such right at any time in the future
The appointment of such directors to our board might reduce the efficiency of our board’s decision-making or result in decisions that prejudice the economic interests of the holders of our common stock in favor of the holder of our preferred stock
The Option Agreement executed between us and AEW on April 12, 2006 does not impact AEW’s right under the voting agreement as described above to appoint two new directors to our board should they desire to do so
Distributing interests in a liquidating trust may cause you to recognize gain prior to the receipt of cash
As we contemplate the sale of our remaining assets and the wind-up of our company, as expressly contemplated by our plan of liquidation, we may elect to contribute our remaining assets and liabilities to a liquidating trust
Our stockholders would receive interests in the liquidating trust, our corporate existence would terminate and our shares would no longer trade publicly
The plan of liquidation prohibits us from contributing our assets to a liquidating trust unless and until our preferred stock has been redeemed in full or until such time as it consents to such a contribution
For tax purposes, the creation of the liquidating trust should be treated as a distribution of our remaining assets to our stockholders, followed by a contribution of the same assets to the liquidating trust by our stockholders
As a result, we will recognize gain or loss inherent in any such assets, with any gains offset by available net operating loss carry-overs (discussed above)
In addition, a stockholder would recognize gain to the extent his share of the cash and the fair market value of any assets received by the liquidating trust was greater than the stockholder’s basis in his stock, notwithstanding that the stockholder would not contemporaneously receive a distribution of cash or any other assets with which to satisfy the resulting tax liability, and would not be able to transfer its interests in the liquidating trust
In addition, it is possible that the fair market value of the assets received by the liquidating trust, as estimated for purposes of determining the extent of the stockholder’s gain at the time interests in the liquidating trust are distributed to the stockholders, will exceed the cash or fair market value of property ultimately received by the liquidating trust upon its sale of the assets, in which case the stockholder may not receive a distribution of cash or other assets with which to satisfy any tax liability resulting from the contribution of the assets to the liquidating trust
In this case, the stockholder would recognize a loss in a taxable year subsequent to the taxable year in which the gain was recognized, which loss might be limited under the tax code
If we do not distribute our assets to a liquidating trust and, instead, continue to operate as a regular corporation until all of our assets are sold, we would recognize gains or losses upon the sale of assets for federal income tax purposes
Since we are no longer a REIT, we could be subject to income tax on any recognized gains
If a 23 ______________________________________________________________________ liquidating trust is formed, our net operating loss carryovers will not be available to reduce any gains recognized within the trust
However, the trust will have a tax basis equal to the fair market value of its assets at the date the liquidating trust is formed
Any gain recognized by the trust would thus be the result of either appreciation in the value of the assets during the time that they are owned by the trust, or an initial underestimation of the fair market value of the assets at the time the trust is formed
If we are not able to sell the Resort and our remaining golf courses in a timely manner, we may experience severe liquidity problems, not be able to meet the demands of our creditors and, ultimately become subject to bankruptcy proceedings
In the event that we are unable to sell the Resort and our other remaining golf courses as planned, we may be unable to pay our obligations as they become due or upon demand
In addition, our ability to pay our obligations may be compromised if our chief executive officer requires payment of outstanding performance milestone payments owed by us to him before we are able to realize net cash proceeds from asset sales sufficient to discharge those obligations
As of April 12, 2006, we owed our two most senior executive officers a total of approximately dlra1cmam755cmam000 in milestone payments and accrued interest on such milestone payments
We also owe a substantial sum in legal fees, including fees incurred in connection with the negotiation of agreements providing for the sale of the Resort
Further, given that the Resort’s only source of cash is from any profitable operations of the Resort, and that the operational cash flow capacity of the Resort will likely not permit the Resort to establish self-sufficiency in the near term, we may be required to seek to provide additional capital to the Resort
In 2005, we funded dlra1cmam050cmam000 to address seasonal cash flow shortfalls
However, there are no assurances that additional intercompany advances will not be necessary prior to the consummation of a sale of the Resort
In the event we are not able to sell our remaining assets within a reasonable period of time and for reasonable amounts, or if our expenses exceed our estimates, we may experience severe liquidity problems and not be able to meet our financial obligations of our creditors
If we cannot meet our obligations to our creditors, we could ultimately become subject to bankruptcy proceedings
Our stock may be de-listed from American Stock Exchange, which would make it more difficult for investors to sell their shares
Currently, our common stock trades on the American Stock Exchange, or Amex
We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our listing on Amex or any other established trading market
Among other things, Amex has considerable discretion with respect to listing standards, which include qualitative and quantitative criteria, some of which are beyond our control
Further, in the event that we form a liquidating trust, we expect that we would de-list from the Amex
We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our listing on Amex, and involuntary delisting would harm our business and the value of your investment
If our common stock were to be de-listed from Amex, either as a result of voluntarily action by us or because we no longer meet the Amex listing standards, it could severely limit the market liquidity of the common stock and your ability to sell our securities in the secondary market
We and our subsidiary, GTA-IB LLC, expect to incur significant compliance costs relating to the Exchange Act and Sarbanes-Oxley Act
We and our subsidiary, GTA-IB, LLC, are required to comply with the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act as they apply to non-accelerated filers
As such, both entities must timely file Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Annual Reports on Form 10-K and Current Reports on Form 8-K, among other actions
Further, recently enacted and proposed laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and disclosure requirements applicable to public companies, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 24 ______________________________________________________________________ and new SEC regulations have increased the costs of corporate governance, reporting and disclosure practices which are now required of us and of GTA-IB We were formed prior to the enactment of these new corporate governance standards, and as a result, we did not have all necessary procedures and policies in place at the time of their enactment
Our efforts to comply with applicable laws and regulations, including requirements of the Exchange Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, are expected to involve significant, and potentially increasing, costs
Costs incurred in complying with these regulations may reduce the amount of cash available for liquidating distributions
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and related laws, rules and regulations create legal bases for administrative enforcement, civil and criminal proceedings against us in case of non-compliance, thereby increasing our risk of liability and potential sanctions
Costs incurred in defending against any such actions or proceedings, and any liability or sanctions incurred in connection with such actions or proceedings, could negatively affect the amount of cash available for liquidating distributions
Risks Relating to the Resort In the event that the Resort does not provide sufficient cash flow to us, we may be forced to reduce capital expenditures and improvements at the Resort, diminishing the value of the Resort
As the owner of the Resort, we are responsible for any negative cash flow associated with its operation
As a result of our assumption of these liabilities and our responsibility for any negative cash flow of the Resort, we may be exposed to liabilities and expenditures exceeding our expectations or ability to pay
In the event cash flow is insufficient to fund planned improvements, our ability to rent the units in the Rental Pool may decline
A decline in the rental rates that can be charged for the units or related vacancies resulting from our inability to make necessary capital expenditures may cause the value of the Rental Pool units, and the Resort, to decline
The Resort’s performance may not provide adequate resources to fund the refurbishment reimbursement to the Rental Pool participants
Pursuant to GHR’s arrangement with many of the persons who own condominium units at the Resort, the condominiums owned by these participating persons are placed in a securitized pool and rented as hotel rooms to guests of the Resort
We refer to this securitized pool of participating condominiums as the Rental Pool
In addition to the current Rental Pool agreement, GHR agreed with the Association that GHR would reimburse 50prca of the refurbishment costs, plus accrued interest at 5prca per annum on the unpaid balance of that portion of the unpaid refurbishment costs which we are required to reimburse
This amount will be reimbursed to participating condominium owners (or transferees of their condominium unit(s)) over the five-year period beginning in 2005
The reimbursement is contingent on the units remaining in the Rental Pool from the time of their refurbishment through 2009
If the unit does not remain in the Rental Pool during the reimbursement period from 2005 through 2009, the owner or successor owner forfeits any unpaid installments at the time the unit is removed from the Rental Pool
Accordingly, maintaining condominium owner participation in the Rental Pool is very important to the continued economic success of the Resort
We assumed certain existing or modified financial obligations of GHR, including its responsibilities regarding the administration of the condominium unit Rental Pool, when we took ownership of the Resort pursuant to the Settlement Agreement
Also as part of the Settlement Agreement, we assumed GHR’s obligation to reimburse the refurbishment expenses paid by the condominium owners
As owner of the Resort, we are responsible for any negative cash flow associated with the ownership and operation of the Resort
As a result of the assumption of these liabilities and our responsibility for any negative cash flow, we face the risk that our ultimate liabilities and expenditures might be greater than we expected
In that case, we may not have sufficient cash available for the payment of the refurbishment 25 ______________________________________________________________________ expenses relating to the Rental Pool units, or we may otherwise decide not to use our funds in this manner
If this occurs, a disagreement involving the funding for the Rental Pool may arise, and this disagreement could both divert our management’s attention from the operation of the Resort and prove costly to the parties to any such dispute
The number of Rental Pool units may decline if current owners find alternative uses of the units more attractive than participating in the Rental Pool, reducing the number of available Rental Pool units and diminishing the value of the remaining units
Participants in the Rental Pool may decide that alternative uses of their condominium units are more attractive than participating in the Rental Pool
In particular, condominium owners may determine that it is more financially advantageous to rent their units to longer term tenants, or to live in their units rather than paying to live elsewhere and allowing their units to participate in the Rental Pool
Any such reduction in the number of participants in the Rental Pool may result in increased pro-rata costs and reduced revenues for the remaining Rental Pool participants
In particular, a decrease in the number of participants in the Rental Pool will result in higher per capita costs relating to fixed costs that are incurred in connection with the administration of the Rental Pool
In the event that the number of units in the Rental Pool declines below 575, our obligation to reimburse refurbishment expenses for the units will be abated until the number of units in the Rental Pool is restored to 575 or higher
As of April 12, 2006, the number of units participating in the Rental Pool is 612
Severe weather patterns experienced by Florida during 2004 and the southeastern portion of the United States during 2005 could result in depressed bookings, adversely affecting the Resort’s results of operations and reducing proceeds to the participants in the Rental Pool
We expect that bookings at the Resort during the late summer and early fall of future years may be adversely affected as a result of a series of hurricanes that affected Florida during 2004 and the southeastern portion of the United States during 2005
Our management detected such an adverse effect in 2005
In particular, the hurricanes that occurred during 2005 may have increased the awareness of potential guests, particularly those not residing in the southeastern portion of the United States, to the danger that hurricanes and tropical storms present
We expect that potential guests may be more reluctant to book rooms in regions subject to such weather patterns
In particular, it is possible that groups will choose alternative destinations for travel during the hurricane season
In the event that potential guests and groups choose alternative destinations as a result of these weather-related concerns, the Resort may experience lower bookings and reduced revenues, which in turn will result in reduced distributions to the Rental Pool participants
Recent severe weather patterns could further intensify the seasonal nature of the results of the Resort
The hotel industry is cyclical in nature
Our business has historically been weaker during the third quarter of each year
In the event that we suffer from reduced bookings during the third quarter as a result of hurricane-related concerns of potential guests, this effect could reduce the revenues to the Resort in the third quarter of each year, increasing the disparity between our results in the third quarter as compared to other quarters
This increased cyclicality could make it more difficult for us to project the results of the Resort, and may result in a lower than expected percentage of the Resort’s fixed costs being offset by revenue during the third quarter
26 ______________________________________________________________________ We are subject to all the operating risks common to the hotel industry which could adversely affect our results of operations
Operating risks common to the Resort include: · changes in general economic conditions, including the timing and robustness of the apparent recovery in the United States from the recent economic downturn and the prospects for improved performance in other parts of the world; · the impact of war and terrorist activity (including threatened terrorist activity) and heightened travel security measures instituted in response thereto; · domestic and international political and geopolitical conditions; · decreases in the demand for transient rooms and related lodging services, including a reduction in business travel as a result of general economic conditions; · the impact of internet intermediaries on pricing and our increasing reliance on technology; · cyclical over-building in the hotel industry which increases the supply of hotel rooms; · changes in travel patterns; · changes in operating costs, including, but not limited to, energy, labor costs (including the impact of unionization), workers’ compensation and health-care related costs, insurance and unanticipated costs such as acts of nature and their consequences; · disputes with the managers of the Resort which may result in litigation; · the availability of capital to allow us to fund renovations and investments at the Resort; and · the financial condition of the airline industry and the impact on air travel
General economic downturns, or an increase in labor or insurance costs, may negatively impact our results
Moderate or severe economic downturns or adverse conditions may negatively affect the operations of the Resort
These conditions may be widespread or isolated to one or more geographic regions
A tightening of the labor markets in Florida may result in fewer and/or less qualified applicants for job openings at the Resort
Higher wages, related labor costs and the increasing cost trends in the insurance markets may negatively impact our results as these costs increase
A general economic downturn, or increase in expenditures on insurance and labor costs, would adversely impact the operations of the Resort, potentially reducing funding that we provide to the Rental Pool and negatively impacting our results
If we are unable to successfully compete for customers, it may adversely affect our operating results
The hotel industry is highly competitive
The Resort competes for customers with other hotel and resort properties
Some of our competitors may have substantially greater marketing and financial resources than we do, and they may improve their facilities, reduce their prices, or expand or improve their marketing programs in ways that adversely affect the Resort and our operating results
Internet reservation channels may negatively impact our bookings and results of operations
Internet travel intermediaries such as Travelocity
com® are attempting to commoditize hotel rooms by increasing the importance of price and general indicators of quality at the expense of brand or property-specific identification
These travel intermediaries hope that consumers will eventually develop brand loyalties to their reservations system rather than to lodging 27 ______________________________________________________________________ brands
Although we expect to derive most of our business from traditional channels, if the amount of sales made through internet intermediaries increases significantly, our business and profitability may be significantly harmed
The Resort places significant reliance on technology
The hospitality industry continues to demand the use of sophisticated technology and systems including technology utilized for property management, procurement, reservation systems, operation of customer loyalty programs, distribution and guest amenities
These technologies can be expected to require refinements and there is the risk that advanced new technologies will be introduced
There can be no assurance that as various systems and technologies become outdated or new technology is required we will be able to replace or introduce them as quickly as our competition or within budgeted costs for such technology
Further, there can be no assurance that we will achieve the benefits that may have been anticipated from any new technology or system
The Resort is capital intensive, and may become uncompetitive in the event that sufficient financing is not available
For the Resort to remain attractive and competitive, we must spend money periodically to keep the properties well maintained, modernized and refurbished
These expenditures result in an ongoing need for cash
From time to time, it may also be necessary to undertake material capital expenditure projects at the Resort
To the extent we cannot fund expenditures from cash generated by the Resort’s operations, we must seek to obtain funds by borrowing or otherwise
To the extent that we are unsuccessful in obtaining such financing, it could adversely impact the Resort’s results from operations
Our investment in the Resort is subject to numerous risks, which could adversely affect our income
As a result of our ownership of the Resort, we are subject to the risks that generally relate to investments in real property
The investment returns available from equity investments in real estate such as the Resort depends in large part on the amount of income earned and capital appreciation generated by the Resort, reduced by the expenses incurred to operate it
In addition, a variety of other factors affect both income from the Resort and the Resort’s real estate value, including governmental regulations, real estate, insurance, zoning, tax and eminent domain laws, interest rate levels and the availability of financing
When interest rates increase, the cost of developing, expanding or renovating real property increases and real property values may decrease as the number of potential buyers decreases
Any of these factors could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations or financial condition
If the Resort does not generate revenue sufficient to meet operating expenses, including debt service and capital expenditures, our income will be adversely affected
Environmental regulations may increase the Resort’s costs, or limit our ability to develop, use or sell the Resort
Environmental laws, ordinances and regulations of various federal, state, local and foreign governments impact our properties and could make us liable for the costs of removing or cleaning up hazardous or toxic substances on, under, or in property we currently own or operate
These laws could impose liability without regard to whether we knew of, or were responsible for, the presence of hazardous or toxic substances
The presence of hazardous or toxic substances, or the failure to properly clean up such substances when present, could jeopardize our ability to develop, use, sell or rent the real property or to borrow using the real property as collateral
If we arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic wastes, we could be liable for the costs of removing or cleaning up wastes at the disposal or treatment facility, even if we never owned or operated that facility
Other laws, ordinances and regulations could require us to manage, abate or remove lead or asbestos containing materials
Certain laws, ordinances and 28 ______________________________________________________________________ regulations, particularly those governing the management or preservation of wetlands, coastal zones and threatened or endangered species, could limit our ability to develop, use, or sell the Resort
Further, in the event that environmental obligations prevent us from developing, using or selling the Resort, distributions that we are able to pay to the holders of our stock could be reduced
Although the courts have recently delivered favorable rulings in the Land Use Lawsuits to which we are a party, in the event that the ultimate rulings in these matters are unfavorable to us, the value of Parcel F and the Resort would be adversely effected
As discussed in further detail under the heading “Legal Matters” in Part I,