Home
Jump to Risk Factors
Jump to Industries
Jump to Exposures
Jump to Event Codes
Jump to Wiki Summary

Industries
Home Improvement Retail
Investment Banking and Brokerage
Asset Management and Custody Banks
Health Care Facilities
Exposures
Political reform
Military
Express intent
Cooperate
Economic
Provide
Ease
Crime
Intelligence
Judicial
Rights
Event Codes
Adjust
Solicit support
Threaten
Yield to order
Endorse
Release or return
Warn
Consult
Yield
Decline comment
Agree
Accident
Human death
Reward
Demand
Reject
Promise
Force
Veto
Pessimistic comment
Acknowledge responsibility
Riot
Sports contest
Vote
Host meeting
Seize
Covert monitoring
Wiki Wiki Summary
Business administration Business administration (also known as business management) is the administration of a commercial enterprise. It includes all aspects of overseeing and supervising business operations.
Business Insider Insider – previously named Business Insider (BI) – is an American financial and business news website founded in 2007. Since 2015, a majority stake in Business Insider's parent company Insider Inc.
Business Is Business Business-to-business (B2B or, in some countries, BtoB) is a situation where one business makes a commercial transaction with another. This typically occurs when:\n\nA business is sourcing materials for their production process for output (e.g., a food manufacturer purchasing salt), i.e.
Family business A family business is a commercial organization in which decision-making is influenced by multiple generations of a family, related by blood or marriage or adoption, who has both the ability to influence the vision of the business and the willingness to use this ability to pursue distinctive goals. They are closely identified with the firm through leadership or ownership.
Business Proposal Business Proposal (Korean: 사내 맞선; Hanja: 社內맞선; RR: Sanae Matseon; lit. The Office Blind Date) is a South Korean romantic comedy television series based on the webtoon of the same title written by HaeHwa and illustrated by Narak.
Regulatory capture In politics, regulatory capture (also agency capture and client politics) is a form of corruption of authority that occurs when a political entity, policymaker, or regulator is co-opted to serve the commercial, ideological, or political interests of a minor constituency, such as a particular geographic area, industry, profession, or ideological group.When regulatory capture occurs, a special interest is prioritized over the general interests of the public, leading to a net loss for society. The theory of client politics is related to that of rent-seeking and political failure; client politics "occurs when most or all of the benefits of a program go to some single, reasonably small interest (e.g., industry, profession, or locality) but most or all of the costs will be borne by a large number of people (for example, all taxpayers)".
Perkin Transactions Perkin Transactions is a scientific journal devoted to organic chemistry published from 1997 to 2002 by the Royal Society of Chemistry. It was split into Perkin Transactions I and Perkin Transactions II. The predecessor journals published by the Chemical Society before the merger of that Society with other Societies to form the Royal Society of Chemistry were the Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 1 and Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2 (1972-1996).
Transactions demand Transactions demand, in economic theory, specifically Keynesian economics and monetary economics, is one of the determinants of the demand for money, the others being asset demand and precautionary demand.\n\n\n== Overview ==\nThe transactions demand for money refers specifically to money narrowly defined to include only its liquid forms, especially cash and checking account balances.
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing The IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing is a biweekly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers covering research on signal processing. It was established in 1953 as the IRE Transactions on Audio, renamed to IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics in 1966 and to IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing in 1974, before obtaining its current name in 1992.
Transactions per second In a very generic sense, the term transactions per second (TPS) refers to the number of atomic actions performed by certain entity per second. In a more restricted view, the term is usually used by DBMS vendor and user community to refer to the number of database transactions performed per second.
IEEE Transactions on Computers IEEE Transactions on Computers is a monthly peer-reviewed scientific journal covering all aspects of computer design. It was established in 1952 and is published by the IEEE Computer Society.
Marcus Goldman Marcus Goldman (December 9, 1821 – July 20, 1904) was an American investment banker, businessman, and financier. He was born into an Ashkenazi Jewish family in Trappstadt, and immigrated to the United States in 1848.
Goldman Sachs Foundation The Goldman Sachs Foundation is a New York-based, not-for-profit private foundation that is a subsidiary of the financial services firm Goldman Sachs and has the goal of bettering humanity worldwide, especially regarding health and education. In recent years its principal philanthropic projects have been: 10,000 Women, and 10,000 Small Businesses.
Lloyd Blankfein Lloyd Craig Blankfein (born September 20, 1954) is an American investment banker who has served as senior chairman of Goldman Sachs since 2019, and chairman and chief executive from 2006 until the end of 2018. Previous to leading Goldman Sachs, he was the company's president and chief operating officer (COO) from 2004 to 2006, serving under then-CEO Henry Paulson.
David M. Solomon David Michael Solomon (born c. 1962) is an American investment banker, and the chief executive officer (CEO) of Goldman Sachs, a position he has held since October 2018.
Collateralized debt obligation A collateralized debt obligation (CDO) is a type of structured asset-backed security (ABS). Originally developed as instruments for the corporate debt markets, after 2002 CDOs became vehicles for refinancing mortgage-backed securities (MBS).
Obligation An obligation is a course of action that someone is required to take, whether legal or moral. Obligations are constraints; they limit freedom.
Political obligation Political obligation refers to a moral requirement to obey national laws. Its origins are unclear, however it traces to the Ancient Greeks.
Solidary obligations A solidary obligation, or an obligation in solidum, is a type of obligation in the civil law jurisprudence that allows either obligors to be bound together, each liable for the whole performance, or obligees to be bound together, all owed just a single performance and each entitled to the entirety of it. In general, solidarity of an obligation is never presumed, and it must be expressly stated as the true intent of the parties' will.
Law of obligations The law of obligations is one branch of private law under the civil law legal system and so-called "mixed" legal systems. It is the body of rules that organizes and regulates the rights and duties arising between individuals.
Deontology In moral philosophy, deontological ethics or deontology (from Greek: δέον, 'obligation, duty' + λόγος, 'study') is the normative ethical theory that the morality of an action should be based on whether that action itself is right or wrong under a series of rules, rather than based on the consequences of the action. It is sometimes described as duty-, obligation-, or rule-based ethics.
Nondelegable obligation A nondelegable obligation (also known as a non-delegable duty) is a legal obligation or duty which cannot legally be delegated or, if delegated, the principal is still liable for said obligation. They are also known as non-assignable duties or obligations.
Regulatory agency A regulatory agency (regulatory body, regulator) or independent agency (independent regulatory agency) is a government authority that is responsible for exercising autonomous dominion over some area of human activity in a licensing and regulating capacity.\nThese are customarily set up to strengthen safety and standards, and/or to protect consumers in markets where there is a lack of effective competition.
Regulatory state The term regulatory state refers to the expansion in the use of rulemaking, monitoring and enforcement techniques and institutions by the state and to a parallel change in the way its positive or negative functions in society are being carried out. The expansion of the state nowadays is generally via regulation and less via taxing and spending.
Regulatory sign A regulatory sign is used to indicate or reinforce traffic laws, regulations or requirements which apply either at all times or at specified times or places upon a street or highway, the disregard of which may constitute a violation, or a sign in general that regulates public behavior in places open to the public. The FHWA defines regulatory sign as "a sign that gives notice to road users of traffic laws or regulations".
Regulatory sequence A regulatory sequence is a segment of a nucleic acid molecule which is capable of increasing or decreasing the expression of specific genes within an organism. Regulation of gene expression is an essential feature of all living organisms and viruses.
Regulatory capitalism Regulatory capitalism suggests that the operation maintenance and development of the international political economy increasingly depends on administrative rules outside the legislatures and the courts. In other words, it tells us that capitalism is a regulatory institution – one that is being constituted, shaped, constrained and expanded as a historically woven patchwork of regulatory institutions, strategies, and functions.Although this patchwork varies widely across regions, nations, regimes, sectors, issues, and arenas, the general trend despite and beyond the process of liberalization is that of growth rather than decline of the role regulation in shaping policy and politics.
Regulatory T cell The regulatory T cells (Tregs or Treg cells), formerly known as suppressor T cells, are a subpopulation of T cells that modulate the immune system, maintain tolerance to self-antigens, and prevent autoimmune disease. Treg cells are immunosuppressive and generally suppress or downregulate induction and proliferation of effector T cells.
Lawsuit A lawsuit is a proceeding by a party or parties against another in the civil court of law. The archaic term "suit in law" is found in only a small number of laws still in effect today.
Strategic litigation Strategic litigation, also known as impact litigation, is the practice of bringing lawsuits intended to effect societal change. Impact litigation cases may be class action lawsuits or individual claims with broader significance, and may rely on statutory law arguments or on constitutional claims.
International litigation International litigation, sometimes called transnational litigation, is the practice of litigation in connection with disputes among businesses or individuals residing or based in different countries.\nThe main difference between international litigation and domestic litigation is that, in the former, certain issues are more likely to be of significance — such as personal jurisdiction, service of process, evidence from abroad, and enforcement of judgments.
Multidistrict litigation In United States law, multidistrict litigation (MDL) refers to a special federal legal procedure designed to speed the process of handling complex cases, such as air disaster litigation or complex product liability suits.\n\n\n== Description ==\nMDL cases occur when "civil actions involving one or more common questions of fact are pending in different districts." In order to efficiently process cases that could involve hundreds (or thousands) of plaintiffs in dozens of different federal courts that all share common issues, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) decides whether cases should be consolidated under MDL, and if so, where the cases should be transferred.
Settlement (litigation) In law, a settlement is a resolution between disputing parties about a legal case, reached either before or after court action begins. A collective settlement is a settlement of multiple similar legal cases.
Public interest law Public interest law refers to legal practices undertaken to help poor, marginalized, or under-represented people, or to effect change in social policies in the public interest, on 'not for profit' terms (pro bono publico), often in the fields of civil rights, civil liberties, religious liberty, human rights, women's rights, consumer rights, environmental protection, and so on.In a celebrated 1905 speech, Louis Brandeis decried the legal profession, complaining that "able lawyers have to a large extent allowed themselves to become adjuncts of great corporations and have neglected their obligation to use their powers for the protection of the people."In the tradition thus exemplified, a common ethic for public-interest lawyers in a growing number of countries remains "fighting for the little guy".\n\n\n== By jurisdiction ==\n\n\n=== Central and Eastern Europe ===\nAt the end of the communist period in the early 1990s, the national legal systems of Central and Eastern Europe were still in a formative stage.
The Review of Litigation The Review of Litigation (TROL) is a law journal established in 1980 at the University of Texas School of Law to serve as "a national forum of interchange of academic and practical discussion of various aspects of litigation." The journal publishes articles on "topics related to procedure, evidence, trial and appellate advocacy, alternative dispute resolution, and often-litigated substantive law."The journal publishes four issues annually, one of which is a symposium issue published in collaboration with the litigation section of American Association of Law Schools. Past topics have included mass torts and conflicts of interest.The journal is often cited in published court opinions, and is the most cited law journal in the category "Civil Litigation and Dispute Resolution" in the Washington & Lee Law School law journal rankings as of 2020.
Parallel litigation Parallel litigation is a scenario in which different courts are hearing the same claim(s). In the United States, parallel litigation (and the "race to judgement" that results)is a consequence of its system of "dual sovereignty, in which both state and federal courts have personal jurisdiction over the parties.
Risk Factors
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC/ Item 1A Risk Factors We face a variety of risks that are substantial and inherent in our businesses, including market, liquidity, credit, operational, legal and regulatory risks
The following are some of the more important factors that could affect our businesses
Our businesses may be adversely affected by conditions in the global financial markets and economic conditions generally
We have achieved record earnings per common share in each of our last two fiscal years, reflecting a favorable trading environment in FICC, an improvement in the trading environment for Equities and an increase in investment banking activity
An adverse change in these market conditions may adversely affect our results of operations
Our businesses are materially affected by conditions in the global financial markets and economic conditions generally and these conditions may change suddenly and dramatically
Unfavorable or uncertain economic and market conditions have adversely affected, and may in the future adversely affect, our business and profitability in many ways, including the following: • We have been operating in a low interest rate market for the past several years
Increasing or high interest rates and/or widening credit spreads, especially if such changes are rapid, may create a less favorable environment for certain of our businesses
• We have been committing increasing amounts of capital in many of our businesses and generally maintain large trading, specialist and investing positions
Market fluctuations and volatility may adversely affect the value of those positions, including, but not limited to, our interest rate and credit products, currency, commodity and equity positions and our merchant banking investments, or may reduce our willingness to enter into new transactions
From time to time, we have incurred significant trading losses in periods of market turbulence
Conversely, certain of our trading businesses depend on market volatility to provide trading and arbitrage opportunities, and decreases in volatility may reduce these opportunities and adversely affect the results of these businesses
• Industry-wide declines in the size and number of underwritings and mergers and acquisitions may have an adverse effect on our revenues and, because we may be unable to reduce expenses correspondingly, our profit margins
In particular, because a significant portion of our investment banking revenues are derived from our participation in large transactions, a decrease in the number of large transactions due to uncertain or unfavorable market conditions may adversely affect our investment banking business
• Pricing and other competitive pressures have continued, even as the volume and number of investment banking transactions have increased
In addition, the trend in the underwriting business toward multiple book runners and co-managers handling transactions, where previously there would have been a single book runner, may adversely affect our business and reduce our revenues
Reductions in the level of the equity markets also tend to reduce the value of our clients’ portfolios, which in turn may reduce the fees we earn for managing assets
Even in the absence of uncertain or unfavorable economic or market conditions, investment performance by our asset management business below the performance of benchmarks or competitors could result in a decline in assets under management and in the incentive and management fees we receive
19 _________________________________________________________________ [94]Table of Contents • Concentration of risk increases the potential for significant losses in our market-making, proprietary trading and investing, block trading, merchant banking, underwriting and lending businesses
This risk may increase to the extent we expand our proprietary trading and investing businesses or commit capital to facilitate customer-driven business
For example, large blocks of securities are increasingly being sold in block trades rather than on a marketed basis, which increases the risk that Goldman Sachs may be unable to resell the purchased securities at favorable prices and may incur significant losses as a result
Moreover, because of concentration of risk, we may suffer losses even when economic and market conditions are generally favorable for others in the industry
We also regularly enter into large transactions as part of our trading businesses
The number and size of such transactions may affect our results of operations in a given period
• The volume of transactions that we execute for our clients and as a specialist or market maker may decline, which would reduce the revenues we receive from commissions and spreads
In addition, competitive pressures and other industry factors, including the increasing use by our clients of low-cost electronic trading, could cause a reduction in commissions and spreads
In our specialist businesses, we are obligated by stock exchange rules to maintain an orderly market, including by purchasing shares in a declining market
This may result in trading losses and an increased need for liquidity
Weakness in global equity markets and the trading of securities in multiple markets and on multiple exchanges could adversely impact our trading businesses and impair the value of our goodwill and identifiable intangible assets
In addition, competitive pressures have been particularly intense in the context of block trades
We may incur losses as a result of ineffective risk management processes and strategies
We seek to monitor and control our risk exposure through a variety of separate but complementary financial, credit, operational, compliance and legal reporting systems
Our trading risk management process seeks to balance our ability to profit from trading positions with our exposure to potential losses
While we employ a broad and diversified set of risk monitoring and risk mitigation techniques, those techniques and the judgments that accompany their application cannot anticipate every economic and financial outcome or the specifics and timing of such outcomes
Thus, we may, in the course of our activities, incur losses
For a further discussion of our risk management policies and procedures, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Risk Management” in Part II, Item 7 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K Our liquidity may be adversely affected by an inability to access the debt capital markets or to sell assets
Liquidity is essential to our businesses
Our liquidity could be impaired by an inability to access secured and/or unsecured debt markets, an inability to sell assets or unforeseen outflows of cash or collateral
This situation may arise due to circumstances that we may be unable to control, such as a general market disruption or an operational problem that affects third parties or us
Further, our ability to sell assets may be impaired if other market participants are seeking to sell similar assets at the same time
A reduction in our credit ratings could adversely affect our liquidity and businesses in many ways
A reduction in our credit ratings could adversely affect our liquidity and competitive position, increase our borrowing costs, limit our access to the capital markets or trigger our obligations under certain bilateral provisions in some of our trading and collateralized financing contracts
Under these provisions, counterparties could be permitted to 20 _________________________________________________________________ [95]Table of Contents terminate contracts with Goldman Sachs or require us to post additional collateral
Termination of our trading and collateralized financing contracts could cause us to sustain losses and impair our liquidity by requiring us to find other sources of financing or to make significant cash payments or securities movements
An inability of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc
to access funds from its subsidiaries could adversely affect its ability to meet its obligations
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc
is a holding company and, therefore, depends on dividends, distributions and other payments from its subsidiaries to fund dividend payments and to fund all payments on its obligations, including debt obligations
Many of our subsidiaries, including GS&Co, are subject to laws that authorize regulatory bodies to block or reduce the flow of funds from those subsidiaries to The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc
Regulatory action of that kind could impede access to funds that The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc
needs to make payments on obligations, including debt obligations, or dividend payments
(or any other entity) holds equity interests in the firm’s regulated or unregulated subsidiaries, its rights as an equity holder to the assets of such subsidiaries are subject to the satisfaction of the claims of the creditors of such subsidiaries
Our businesses, profitability and liquidity may be adversely affected by a deterioration in the credit quality of, or defaults by, third parties who owe us money, securities or other assets
We are exposed to the risk that third parties that owe us money, securities or other assets will not perform their obligations
These parties may default on their obligations to us due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, operational failure or other reasons
We are also subject to the risk that our rights against third parties may not be enforceable in all circumstances
In addition, a deterioration in the credit quality of third parties whose securities or obligations we hold could result in losses and/or adversely affect our ability to rehypothecate or otherwise use those securities or obligations for liquidity purposes
The amount and duration of our credit exposures have been increasing over the past several years, as has the breadth of the entities to which we have credit exposures
The scope of our lending businesses has also been expanding and includes loans to small and mid-size businesses, which are not traditional Goldman Sachs clients
As a clearing member firm, we finance our client positions and we could be held responsible for the defaults or misconduct of our clients
In addition, we have experienced, due to competitive factors, pressure to extend and price credit at levels that may not always fully compensate us for the risks we take
In particular, corporate clients sometimes seek to require credit commitments from us in connection with investment banking and other assignments
Although we regularly review credit exposures to specific clients and counterparties and to specific industries, countries and regions that we believe may present credit concerns, default risk may arise from events or circumstances that are difficult to detect or foresee
In addition, concerns about, or a default by, one institution could lead to significant liquidity problems, losses or defaults by other institutions, which in turn could adversely affect Goldman Sachs
Mandatory physical settlement of derivative transactions may expose us to losses if we are unable to deliver the underlying security or obligation
Like many participants in the derivatives marketplace, we are party to a large number of derivative transactions, including credit derivatives, that require that we deliver to the counterparty the underlying security or obligation in order to receive payment
In a number of cases, we do not hold the underlying security or obligation and may have difficulty obtaining, or be unable to obtain, the underlying security or obligation through the physical settlement of other transactions
As a result, we are subject to the risk that we may not be able to obtain the security or obligation within the required contractual timeframe for delivery
This could cause us to forfeit the payments due to us under these contracts or result in settlement delays with the attendant credit and operational risk as 21 _________________________________________________________________ [96]Table of Contents well as increased costs to the firm
The derivatives industry is working on various proposals to address this issue
A failure of the industry to address this issue could result in an unwillingness of counterparties to enter into certain types of derivative transactions, which could negatively impact our businesses
Unconfirmed derivative transactions and unauthorized assignments of derivatives by counterparties may expose us to unexpected risk and potential losses
Derivative contracts and other transactions entered into with third parties are not always confirmed by the counterparties on a timely basis
While the transaction remains unconfirmed, we are subject to heightened credit and operational risk and in the event of a default may find it more difficult to enforce the contract
The growth in the derivatives industry, including credit derivatives and other swap transactions, has also exposed us and other industry participants to an increasing incidence of counterparties seeking to unilaterally assign transactions without required prior notice and consent
Although industry participants have taken steps to eliminate this practice and its effects on a going-forward basis, including through the adoption of the 2005 ISDA Novation Protocol, it is not yet clear how effective these efforts will be, and the steps that have been taken by the industry do not resolve the issue for derivative contracts that were previously entered into
Unauthorized assignments could introduce uncertainty as to the status of a transaction, impair our ability to evaluate credit risk and impede trade reconciliations, which could lead to a higher number of failed transactions and collateral call defaults
A failure in our operational systems or infrastructure, or those of third parties, could impair our liquidity, disrupt our businesses, damage our reputation and cause losses
Shortcomings or failures in our internal processes, people or systems could lead to impairment of our liquidity, financial loss, disruption of our businesses, liability to clients, regulatory intervention or reputational damage
For example, our businesses are highly dependent on our ability to process, on a daily basis, a large number of transactions across numerous and diverse markets in many currencies
The transactions we process have become increasingly complex and often must adhere to client-specific guidelines, as well as legal and regulatory standards
Our financial, accounting, data processing or other operating systems and facilities may fail to operate properly or become disabled as a result of events that are wholly or partially beyond our control, adversely affecting our ability to process these transactions
The inability of our systems to accommodate an increasing volume of transactions could also constrain our ability to expand our businesses
We also face the risk of operational failure or termination of any of the clearing agents, exchanges, clearing houses or other financial intermediaries we use to facilitate our securities transactions, and as our interconnectivity with our clients grows, we will increasingly face the risk of operational failure with respect to our clients’ systems
Any such failure or termination could adversely affect our ability to effect transactions, service our clients and manage our exposure to risk
Despite the contingency plans and facilities we have in place, our ability to conduct business may be adversely impacted by a disruption in the infrastructure that supports our businesses and the communities in which we are located
This may include a disruption involving electrical, communications, transportation or other services used by Goldman Sachs or third parties with which we conduct business
These disruptions may occur, for example, as a result of events that affect only the buildings of Goldman Sachs or such third parties, or as a result of events with a broader impact on the cities where those buildings are located
Nearly all of our employees in our primary locations, including New York, London, Frankfurt, Hong Kong and Tokyo, work in close proximity to one another, in one or more buildings
If a disruption occurs in one location and our employees in that location are unable to occupy our offices or communicate with or travel to other locations, our ability to service and interact with our clients may suffer and we may not be able to successfully implement contingency plans that depend on communication or travel
22 _________________________________________________________________ [97]Table of Contents Our operations rely on the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other information in our computer systems and networks
Although we take protective measures and endeavor to modify them as circumstances warrant, our computer systems, software and networks may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer viruses or other malicious code and other events that could have a security impact
If one or more of such events occur, this potentially could jeopardize our or our clients’ or counterpartiesconfidential and other information processed and stored in, and transmitted through, our computer systems and networks, or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our, our clients’, our counterparties’ or third parties’ operations, which could result in significant losses or reputational damage
We may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify our protective measures or to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures, and we may be subject to litigation and financial losses that are either not insured against or not fully covered through any insurance maintained by us
Conflicts of interest are increasing and a failure to appropriately deal with conflicts of interest could adversely affect our businesses
Our reputation is one of our most important assets
As we have expanded the scope of our businesses and our client base, we increasingly have to address potential conflicts of interest, including those relating to our proprietary activities
For example, conflicts may arise between our position as a financial advisor in a merger transaction and a principal investment we hold in one of the parties to the transaction
In addition, hedge funds and private equity funds are an increasingly important portion of our client base, and also compete with us in a number of our businesses
We have extensive procedures and controls that are designed to address conflicts of interest
However, appropriately dealing with conflicts of interest is complex and difficult and our reputation could be damaged if we fail, or appear to fail, to deal appropriately with conflicts of interest
In addition, the SEC and other federal and state regulators have increased their scrutiny of potential conflicts of interest
For example, in June 2005, the NASD filed with the SEC proposed rules that would require certain disclosures to be contained in fairness opinions, and would mandate specific procedures to be followed by member firms in connection with issuing these opinions
While we have policies and procedures in place that are intended to ensure that any potential conflicts of interest are appropriately addressed, it is possible that potential or perceived conflicts could give rise to litigation or enforcement actions
It is possible that the regulatory scrutiny of, and litigation in connection with, conflicts of interest will make our clients less willing to enter into transactions in which such a conflict may occur, and will adversely affect our businesses
Our businesses and those of our clients are subject to extensive and pervasive regulation around the world
Goldman Sachs, as a participant in the financial services industry, is subject to extensive regulation in jurisdictions around the world
We face the risk of significant intervention by regulatory authorities in all jurisdictions in which we conduct our businesses
Among other things, we could be fined, prohibited from engaging in some of our business activities or subject to limitations or conditions on our business activities
New laws or regulations or changes in enforcement of existing laws or regulations applicable to our business or those of our clients may also adversely affect our businesses
For example, the SEC has adopted rules requiring the registration of certain hedge funds advisers under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and the SEC or other regulators may seek to further regulate hedge funds in the future
It is possible that these or other future regulatory developments rules may have a significant impact on our trading, prime brokerage and other business relationships with hedge funds, or on the growth of our prime brokerage and securities lending businesses
In addition, under the European Union’s Transparency Directive (Directive 2004/109/EC), which is due to be implemented by member states by January 2007, issuers of securities admitted to listing on regulated markets in the European Union may, depending upon the manner of implementation, be required to provide 23 _________________________________________________________________ [98]Table of Contents expanded ongoing financial disclosure, which could have an adverse impact on our ability or the ability of certain of our non-European Union-based clients to maintain the listing of these securities or to conduct securities offerings in Europe
Furthermore, the SEC’s Regulation NMS, which was adopted in 2005 and is expected to become effective in 2006, introduces significant changes to the regulation of trading on securities exchanges and marketplaces
While it is too early to predict the impact that Regulation NMS will have, it could result in the imposition of additional compliance costs on our trading businesses and alter the competitive environment in which these businesses function
Many of our businesses are operating in an uncertain and difficult regulatory environment
Firms in the financial services industry have been operating in a difficult regulatory environment
The industry has experienced increased scrutiny from a variety of regulators, both within and outside the United States
Penalties and fines sought by regulatory authorities have increased substantially over the last several years
This environment has led some of our clients to be less willing to engage in transactions that may carry a risk of increased scrutiny by regulators
In addition, while the firm always strives to fully comply with all legal and regulatory requirements, this regulatory and enforcement environment has created uncertainty with respect to a number of transactions that had historically been entered into by financial services firms, including our firm, and that were generally believed to be permissible and appropriate
This environment has led us and our competitors to modify transaction structures and, in some cases, to limit or cease our execution of some types of transactions
Substantial legal liability or significant regulatory action against Goldman Sachs could have material adverse financial effects or cause significant reputational harm to Goldman Sachs, which in turn could seriously harm our business prospects
We face significant legal risks in our businesses, and the volume of claims and amount of damages and penalties claimed in litigation and regulatory proceedings against financial institutions remain high
The interaction between our equity research analysts and investment banking businesses has been subject to new requirements and litigation
As discussed under “Business — Regulation” in Part I, Item 1 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, the research areas of investment banks have been and remain the subject of regulatory scrutiny that has led to restrictions on the interaction between equity research analysts and investment banking personnel at securities firms
has agreed to a global settlement to resolve investigations into equity research analysts’ alleged conflicts of interest pursuant to which GS&Co
has been subject to certain restrictions and undertakings
Certain of these requirements and restrictions have imposed additional costs and limitations on the conduct of our businesses
Litigation and regulatory scrutiny of complex, structured financial transactions remain high
Regulators, both within and outside the United States, continue to scrutinize complex, structured finance transactions and have brought enforcement actions against a number of financial institutions in connection with such transactions
In some of the enforcement actions, clients of the financial institutions allegedly engaged in accounting, disclosure or other violations of the securities laws, and the financial institutions allegedly facilitated these improprieties by entering into transactions with the clients
We seek to create innovative solutions to address our clients’ needs, and we have entered into, and continue to enter into, structured transactions with clients
While we have policies and procedures in place that are intended to ensure that the structured transactions we enter into are appropriately reviewed and comply with applicable laws and regulations, it is possible that certain of these transactions could give rise to litigation or enforcement actions
It is possible that the regulatory scrutiny of, and litigation in connection with, structured finance transactions will make our clients less willing to enter into these transactions, and will adversely affect our business in this area
24 _________________________________________________________________ [99]Table of Contents We are subject to regulatory inquiries and investigations into market timing, late trading and other activities involving mutual funds
In recent years, there have been industry-wide and other investigations by federal and state authorities concerning market timing, late trading and other activities involving mutual funds and investment advisers
Federal and state authorities have made informational requests regarding trading practices broadly across all of the major fund companies and broker-dealers
Goldman Sachs has received requests for information and has been fully cooperating with those authorities
While we believe that we have in place reasonable measures to detect and deter disruptive and abusive trading practices and comply with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, we cannot predict the course that these inquiries and areas of focus may take or the impact that any new laws or regulations governing mutual funds may have on our businesses
Our specialist business is subject to a global settlement and civil actions
Regulators have also been conducting investigations into certain trading practices of specialist firms, including our specialist unit
In March 2004, certain NYSE specialist firms, including our specialist unit, agreed to a global settlement with the SEC and NYSE to resolve charges that the firms violated certain federal securities laws and NYSE rules in connection with their activities as NYSE specialists during the years 1999 through 2003
The global settlement involves, among others, restitution and penalties, a censure, cease and desist order and certain undertakings with respect to our specialist unit’s systems and procedures
The settlement did not resolve the related civil actions discussed under “Legal Proceedings — Specialist