Home
Jump to Risk Factors
Jump to Industries
Jump to Exposures
Jump to Event Codes
Jump to Wiki Summary

Industries
Department Stores
Asset Management and Custody Banks
Human Resource and Employment Services
Environmental Services
Technology Hardware Storage and Peripherals
Information Technology
Technology Hardware and Equipment
Health Care Distribution and Services
Automobiles and Components
Electrical Components and Equipment
Application Software
Exposures
Military
Express intent
Leadership
Regime
Ease
Rights
Political reform
Crime
Provide
Intelligence
Cooperate
Judicial
Economic
Event Codes
Solicit support
Accident
Rally support
Agree
Consult
Human death
Yield to order
Warn
Psychological state
Force
Yield position
Acknowledge responsibility
Threaten
Yield
Reject
Adjust
Endorse
Vote
Sports contest
Demand
Covert monitoring
Demonstrate
Grant
Seize
Release or return
Host meeting
Request
Reward
Wiki Wiki Summary
Federal government of the United States The federal government of the United States (U.S. federal government or U.S. government) is the national government of the United States, a federal republic in North America, composed of 50 states, a city within a federal district (the city of Washington in the District of Columbia, where the entire federal government is based), five major self-governing territories and several island possessions. The federal government is composed of three distinct branches: legislative, executive, and judicial, whose powers are vested by the U.S. Constitution in the Congress, the president and the federal courts, respectively.
US Government Documents US Government Documents is a digital collection of documents at the Internet Archive. This collection contains digital versions of over 50,000 United States Government documents.
Government shutdowns in the United States Government shutdowns in the United States occur when there is a failure to enact funding legislation to finance the government for its next fiscal year or a temporary funding measure. Ever since a 1980 interpretation of the 1884 Antideficiency Act, a "lapse of appropriation" due to a political impasse on proposed appropriation bills requires that the US federal government curtail agency activities and services, close down non-essential operations, furlough non-essential workers, and only retain essential employees in departments covering the safety of human life or protection of property.
U.S. government response to the September 11 attacks After the September 11, 2001 attacks, the U.S. government responded with immediate action (including rescue operations at the site of the World Trade Center and grounding civilian aircraft), and long-term action, including investigations, legislative changes, military action and restoration projects. Investigations into the motivations and execution of the attacks led to the declaration of War on Terrorism that led to ongoing military engagements in Afghanistan and subsequently Iraq.
Copyright status of works by the federal government of the United States A work of the United States government, is defined by the United States copyright law, as "a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person's official duties." Under section 105 of US copyright law, such works are not entitled to domestic copyright protection under U.S. law and are therefore in the public domain.\nThis act only applies to U.S. domestic copyright as that is the extent of U.S. federal law.
United States federal budget The United States federal budget comprises the spending and revenues of the U.S. federal government. The budget is the financial representation of the priorities of the government, reflecting historical debates and competing economic philosophies.
United States Government Publishing Office The United States Government Publishing Office (USGPO or GPO; formerly the United States Government Printing Office) is an agency of the legislative branch of the United States Federal government. The office produces and distributes information products and services for all three branches of the Federal Government, including U.S. passports for the Department of State as well as the official publications of the Supreme Court, the Congress, the Executive Office of the President, executive departments, and independent agencies.
Zionist Occupation Government conspiracy theory The Zionist occupation government, Zionist occupational government or Zionist-occupied government (ZOG), sometimes also referred to as the Jewish occupational government (JOG), is an antisemitic conspiracy theory claiming Jews secretly control the governments of Western states. According to believers, a secret Zionist organization controls international banks, and through them the governments, in order to collude against white, Christian, or Islamic interests.The expression is used by white supremacist, white nationalist, far-right, nativist or antisemitic groups in Europe and the United States, as well as by ultra-nationalists such as Pamyat in Russia and various far-right groups including the Freemen, Identity Christians and the Ku Klux Klan.The word Zionist in "Zionist occupation government" should not be confused with the ideology of Zionism, the movement for support of a Jewish state in the Land of Israel.
2018–2019 United States federal government shutdown The United States federal government shutdown from midnight EST on December 22, 2018, until January 25, 2019 (35 days) was the longest U.S. government shutdown in history and the second and final federal government shutdown involving furloughs during the presidency of Donald Trump. It occurred when the 116th United States Congress and President Donald Trump could not agree on an appropriations bill to fund the operations of the federal government for the 2019 fiscal year, or a temporary continuing resolution that would extend the deadline for passing a bill.
December 17 December 17 is the 351st day of the year (352nd in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar; 14 days remain until the end of the year.\n\n\n== Events ==\n\n\n=== Pre-1600 ===\n497 BC – The first Saturnalia festival was celebrated in ancient Rome.
December 10 December 10 is the 344th day of the year (345th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar; 21 days remain until the end of the year.\n\n\n== Events ==\n\n\n=== Pre-1600 ===\n1317 – The "Nyköping Banquet": King Birger of Sweden treacherously seizes his two brothers Valdemar, Duke of Finland and Eric, Duke of Södermanland, who were subsequently starved to death in the dungeon of Nyköping Castle.
December 1 December is the twelfth and the final month of the year in the Julian and Gregorian calendars. It is also the last of seven months to have a length of 31 days.
2016 in aviation This is a list of aviation-related events from 2016.\n\n\n== Events ==\n\n\n=== January ===\nThe Government of Italy permitted United States unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs or drones) to fly strike missions from Naval Air Station Sigonella in Sicily where the US has operated unarmed surveillance UAVs since 2001 against Islamic State targets in Libya, but only if they are "defensive," protecting U.S. forces or rescuers retrieving downed pilots.
December 18 December 11 is the 345th day of the year (346th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar; 20 days remain until the end of the year.\n\n\n== Events ==\n\n\n=== Pre-1600 ===\n220 – Emperor Xian of Han is forced to abdicate the throne by Cao Cao's son Cao Pi, ending the Han dynasty.
December 26 December 15 is the 349th day of the year (350th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar; 16 days remain until the end of the year.\n\n\n== Events ==\n\n\n=== Pre-1600 ===\n533 – Vandalic War: Byzantine general Belisarius defeats the Vandals, commanded by King Gelimer, at the Battle of Tricamarum.
December 12 December 12 is the 346th day of the year (347th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar; 19 days remain until the end of the year.\n\n\n== Events ==\n\n\n=== Pre-1600 ===\n627 – Battle of Nineveh: A Byzantine army under Emperor Heraclius defeats Emperor Khosrau II's Persian forces, commanded by General Rhahzadh.
December 31 December 3 is the 337th day of the year (338th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar; 28 days remain until the end of the year.\n\n\n== Events ==\n\n\n=== Pre-1600 ===\n915 – Pope John X crowns Berengar I of Italy as Holy Roman Emperor (probable date).
Windermere Windermere is the largest natural lake in England. More than 11 miles (18 km) in length, and almost 1 mile (1.5 km) at its widest, it is a ribbon lake formed in a glacial trough after the retreat of ice at the start of the current interglacial period.
Lady Windermere's Fan Lady Windermere's Fan, A Play About a Good Woman is a four-act comedy by Oscar Wilde, first performed on Saturday, 20 February 1892, at the St James's Theatre in London.The story concerns Lady Windermere, who suspects that her husband is having an affair with another woman. She confronts him with it but although he denies it, he invites the other woman, Mrs.
The Windermere Children The Windermere Children is a 2020 biographical drama film written by Simon Block and directed by Michael Samuels. Based on the experience of child survivors of the Holocaust, it follows the children and staff of a camp set up on the Calgarth Estate in Troutbeck Bridge, near Lake Windermere, England, where the survivors were helped to rehabilitate, rebuild their lives, and integrate into the British society.
Windermere House The Windermere House is a historic hotel and resort located in Windermere, Ontario in the Muskoka region. The name Windermere comes from the name of a village and lake in Northern England.
Bowness-on-Windermere Bowness-on-Windermere is a town and former civil parish, now in the parish of Windermere, in South Lakeland, Cumbria, England. Due to its position on the banks of Windermere, the town has become a tourist honeypot.
Windermere, Florida Windermere is a town in Orange County, Florida, United States. As of the 2020 census, the town population was 3,030.
Windermere Lake Cruises Windermere Lake Cruises is a boat company which provides leisure trips on Windermere in the central part of the English Lake District. It is based in Bowness-on-Windermere, Cumbria.
Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare infection Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare infection (MAI) is an atypical mycobacterial infection, i.e. one with nontuberculous mycobacteria or NTM, caused by Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), which is made of two Mycobacterium species, M. avium and M. intracellulare.
Windermere Island Windermere Island is a small island located in The Bahamas. It is about five and a half miles long, and is noted for its beaches and its celebrity visitors, who use it as a private retreat.
Windermere, Cumbria (town) Windermere () is a town and civil parish in the South Lakeland District of Cumbria, England. In the 2001 census the parish had a population of 8,245, increasing at the 2011 census to 8,359.
Language acquisition Language acquisition is the process by which humans acquire the capacity to perceive and comprehend language (in other words, gain the ability to be aware of language and to understand it), as well as to produce and use words and sentences to communicate.\nLanguage acquisition involves structures, rules and representation.
Data acquisition Data acquisition is the process of sampling signals that measure real world physical conditions and converting the resulting samples into digital numeric values that can be manipulated by a computer. Data acquisition systems, abbreviated by the initialisms DAS, DAQ, or DAU, typically convert analog waveforms into digital values for processing.
Mergers and acquisitions In corporate finance, mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are transactions in which the ownership of companies, other business organizations, or their operating units are transferred or consolidated with other entities. As an aspect of strategic management, M&A can allow enterprises to grow or downsize, and change the nature of their business or competitive position.
Knowledge acquisition Knowledge acquisition is the process used to define the rules and ontologies required for a knowledge-based system. The phrase was first used in conjunction with expert systems to describe the initial tasks associated with developing an expert system, namely finding and interviewing domain experts and capturing their knowledge via rules, objects, and frame-based ontologies.
Rules of Acquisition In the fictional Star Trek universe, the Rules of Acquisition are a collection of sacred business proverbs of the ultra-capitalist race known as the Ferengi.\nThe first mention of rules in the Star Trek universe was in "The Nagus", an episode of the TV series Star Trek: Deep Space Nine (Season 1, Episode 10).
Target acquisition Target acquisition is the detection and identification of the location of a target in sufficient detail to permit the effective employment of lethal and non-lethal means. The term is used for a broad area of applications.
Resource acquisition is initialization Resource acquisition is initialization (RAII) is a programming idiom used in several object-oriented, statically-typed programming languages to describe a particular language behavior. In RAII, holding a resource is a class invariant, and is tied to object lifetime.
Language acquisition device The Language Acquisition Device (LAD) is a claim from language acquisition research proposed by Noam Chomsky in the 1960s. The LAD concept is a purported instinctive mental capacity which enables an infant to acquire and produce language.
Proposed acquisition of Twitter by Elon Musk On April 14, 2022, business magnate Elon Musk offered to purchase American social media company Twitter, Inc., for $43 billion, after previously acquiring 9.1 percent of the company's stock for $2.64 billion, becoming its largest shareholder. Twitter had then invited Musk to join their board of directors, which Musk at first accepted before subsequently declining.
Information technology controls In business and accounting, information technology controls (or IT controls) are specific activities performed by persons or systems designed to ensure that business objectives are met. They are a subset of an enterprise's internal control.
Stock market A stock market, equity market, or share market is the aggregation of buyers and sellers of stocks (also called shares), which represent ownership claims on businesses; these may include securities listed on a public stock exchange, as well as stock that is only traded privately, such as shares of private companies which are sold to investors through equity crowdfunding platforms. Investment is usually made with an investment strategy in mind.
Risk Factors
ESSEX CORP Item 1A RISK FACTORS Our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected due to any of the following risks
The risks described below are not the only ones we face
Additional risks that we are not presently aware of or that we currently believe are immaterial may also impair our business operations
14 ______________________________________________________________________ [39]Table of Contents Risks Related to Our Business We currently rely on sales to US Government entities, particularly in the intelligence and defense areas, and the loss of certain of our awards with the US Government could have an adverse impact on our operating results
For fiscal years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, revenues derived from the US Government programs were dlra153dtta8 million, or 96prca, and dlra68dtta3 million, or 97prca, of our total revenues, respectively
Awards from the US intelligence and defense communities and other departments and agencies of the Department of Defense accounted for dlra152dtta0 million, or 95prca of our revenues, and dlra66dtta4 million, or 94prca of our revenues for fiscal years 2005 and 2004, respectively
For fiscal years 2005 and 2004, our top three customer programs accounted for approximately dlra83dtta1 million, or 52prca of our revenues, and dlra52dtta6 million, or 75prca of our revenues, respectively
For fiscal year 2005, revenues from the top three customer programs consisting of our Thunder, Woodstock and Jackhammer contracts, were all performed for the same US Government customer
For fiscal years 2004 and 2003, our largest award, Thunder, accounted for approximately dlra45dtta2 million, or 64prca of our revenues, and dlra1dtta5 million, or 9prca of our revenues, respectively
For the year ended December 31, 2005 due to significant increase in revenues from our other contracts, this contract accounted for approximately dlra53dtta3 million, or 33prca of our revenues
In addition, revenues generated under our Woodstock contract since February 28, 2005, the date of the Windermere acquisition, represents 15prca of our total revenues for 2005
For fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, revenues from our largest customer were dlra109dtta9 million, or 69prca of the Company’s revenues
The loss or significant reduction in government funding of a program for which we are the prime contractor or in which we participate could reduce our revenue and cash flows and have an adverse effect on our operating results
We depend on US Government awards which are only partially funded and which depend upon annual budget appropriations; the US Government has no obligation to fully fund our awards
Budget decisions made by the US Government are outside of our control and have significant consequences for our business
Funding for US Government awards is subject to Congressional appropriations
Although multi-year awards may be planned or authorized in connection with major procurements, Congress generally appropriates funds on a fiscal year basis even though a program may be expected to continue for several years
Consequently, awards often initially receive only partial funding, and additional funds are committed only as Congress makes further appropriations
The termination of funding for any of our US Government awards would result in a loss of anticipated future revenues attributable to that program and a reduction in our cash flows and would have an adverse impact on our operating results
Our backlog was dlra499dtta2 million as of December 31, 2005, of which dlra90dtta5 million was funded
Our backlog includes orders under awards that in some cases extend for several years, with the latest expiring in 2011
The US Government’s ability to select multiple winners under multiple award schedule contracts, government-wide acquisition contracts and blanket purchase agreements, as well as its right to award subsequent task orders among such multiple winners, means that there is no assurance that unfunded contract backlog will result in revenue
The actual receipt of revenues on awards included in backlog may never occur or may change because a program schedule could change or the program could be canceled, or a contract could be reduced, modified, or terminated early
Moreover, under indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contracts, the US Government is not obligated to order more than a minimum quantity of goods or services
US Government awards are subject to immediate termination and are heavily regulated
Our US Government awards can be terminated by the US Government either at its convenience or if we default
If the US Government terminates any of our awards, we are entitled to payment of compensation only for work done and commitments made at the time of termination
If any of our US Government awards are terminated for default, we would be obligated to pay the excess costs incurred by the US Government in procuring undelivered items from another source
If any or all of our US Government awards are terminated under either of these circumstances, we may be unable to procure new awards to offset the lost revenues
15 ______________________________________________________________________ [40]Table of Contents In addition, supplying intelligence and defense-related services and equipment to US Government agencies subjects us to the risks that the US Government may unilaterally: • suspend us from receiving new awards pending resolution in the event we are notified of alleged violations of procurement laws or regulations; • terminate our existing awards; • reduce the value of our existing awards; • audit our award-related costs and fees, including allocated indirect costs; and • control and prohibit the export of our products
We must comply with and are affected by laws and regulations relating to the award, administration and performance of US Government contracts
Government contract laws and regulations affect how we do business with our customers and, in some instances, impose added costs on our business
A violation of these laws and regulations could result in the imposition of fines and penalties or the termination of our contracts or debarment from bidding on contracts
In some instances, these laws and regulations impose terms or rights that are more favorable to the government than those typically available to commercial parties in negotiated transactions
Because a significant portion of our revenues are dependent on our procurement, performance and payment under our US Government awards, the loss of one or more large awards or any suspension or debarment from doing business with US Government agencies would result in a loss of anticipated future revenues from US Government awards and a reduction in cash flows and would have a material adverse effect on our operating results
A general decline in US intelligence and defense spending could harm our operations and adversely affect our future revenues
Revenues under contracts with the US Department of Defense and other intelligence and defense-related entities represented approximately 95prca of our total revenues for fiscal year 2005 and 94prca for fiscal year 2004
While spending authorization for intelligence and defense-related programs have increased significantly in recent years due to greater homeland security and foreign military commitments and to a general outsourcing trend, these spending levels may not be sustainable, and future levels of expenditures and authorizations for those programs may decrease, remain constant or shift to programs in areas where we do not currently provide services
A general decline in United States intelligence and defense spending could reduce our revenues and cash flows and have an adverse effect on our operating results
If we are unable to effectively and efficiently implement measures to address weaknesses in Windermere’s internal control over financial reporting, our ability to provide the public with timely and accurate material information may be adversely affected, which could hurt our reputation and our stock price
In light of the recent consummation of the Windermere acquisition and management’s ongoing evaluation and corrective action with respect to the internal control over financial reporting of the Windermere subsidiary, and in reliance upon SEC staff interpretive guidance, management excluded the disclosure controls and procedures of the Windermere subsidiary from its evaluation of our own disclosure controls for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
As disclosed in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the three month periods ended March 31, 2005, June 30, 2005 and September 30, 2005, we identified certain material weaknesses in the internal control over financial reporting of our recently acquired Windermere subsidiary
Those weaknesses, which we believe are not unusual for a privately held company of the size of Windermere, included a lack of segregation of duties of financial personnel and inadequate financial management systems
In light of those weaknesses, in an effort to remediate and integrate Windermere’s internal controls, we made certain organizational and personnel changes in the period ended December 31, 2005
These included altering the organizational structure of 16 ______________________________________________________________________ [41]Table of Contents Windermere, evaluating and planning training programs for financial management personnel, hiring new financial personnel, and changing reporting structures in a manner designed to provide more direct reporting from Windermere financial personnel to Essex financial personnel
We believe these have resulted in an overall improvement in the internal controls over financial reporting for Windermere
We also believe additional remediation is necessary
For instance, budgetary analysis and processes at Windermere require further strengthening and refinement to be better integrated with, and to be brought up to, overall industry standards to which we adhere
In February 2006, we implemented a new general ledger and budgetary system company-wide
We expect additional improvements in Windermere’s internal controls over financial reporting will be made as the financial personnel training programs progress and financial policies and procedures are adopted company-wide
We expect that these measures will be implemented in the first and second quarters of fiscal 2006
In addition, we undertook additional review procedures to assure that the financial statements for the three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2005 are in accordance with US GAAP Because our evaluation and remediation of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting for our recently acquired Windermere subsidiary is ongoing, and because we have excluded Windermere from management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, the effects, if any, that material weaknesses identified in Windermere’s internal controls may have on our disclosure controls and procedures are not certain at this time
We may find that certain material weaknesses identified in Windermere’s internal controls could have an adverse impact on the reliability of our disclosure controls
If we are unable to conclude that our disclosure controls are effective in any subsequent periodic report, it may harm our reputation and our stock price could be adversely affected
In addition, if we are unable to effectively and efficiently implement measures to remedy any adverse effects of the Windermere internal control weaknesses on our disclosure controls and procedures, it may impede our ability to timely and accurately provide material information to the public, investors may lose confidence in our reporting, and our stock price could be adversely affected
If we are unable to adequately address and remedy any material weaknesses which may present themselves in our internal control over financial reporting, our ability to timely and accurately report our financial results may be impeded, investors may lose confidence in our financial reports, and the market price for our common stock may be adversely affected
In light of the recent consummation of the Windermere acquisition and management’s ongoing evaluation and corrective action with respect to the internal control over financial reporting of the Windermere subsidiary, and in reliance upon SEC staff interpretive guidance, management excluded the internal control over financial reporting of the Windermere subsidiary from its evaluation of our own disclosure controls for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
If we are unable to remediate any material weaknesses effectively and efficiently, it could adversely affect our ability to provide investors with timely and accurate financial information and may have a negative impact on our reputation
Likewise, if we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective in any future period (or if our auditors express an adverse opinion, or are unable to express an opinion at all, on the effectiveness of our internal controls), we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which could have an adverse effect on our stock price
Because our evaluation and remediation of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting for our recently acquired Windermere subsidiary is ongoing, and because we have excluded Windermere from management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, the effects, if any, that material weaknesses identified in Windermere’s internal controls may have on our internal controls are not certain at this time
We may find that certain material weaknesses identified in Windermere’s internal controls could have an adverse impact on the reliability of our internal controls
If we are unable to conclude that our internal controls are effective in any subsequent periodic report, it may harm our reputation and our stock price could be adversely affected
In addition, if we are unable to effectively and efficiently implement measures to remedy any adverse effects of the Windermere internal control weaknesses on our internal controls, it may 17 ______________________________________________________________________ [42]Table of Contents impede our ability to timely and accurately provide material information to the public, investors may lose confidence in our reporting, and our stock price could be adversely affected
Unfavorable government audit results could force us to adjust previously reported operating results and could subject us to a variety of penalties and sanctions
The federal government audits and reviews our performance on awards, pricing practices, cost structure, and compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and standards
Like most large government vendors, our awards are audited and reviewed on a continual basis by federal agencies, including the Defense Contract Management Agency and the Defense Contract Audit Agency
An audit of our work, including an audit of work performed by companies we have acquired or may acquire or subcontractors we have hired or may hire, could result in a substantial adjustment in our operating results for the applicable period
For example, any costs which were originally reimbursed could subsequently be disallowed
In this case, cash we have already collected may need to be refunded and our operating margins may be reduced
If a government audit uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, fines and suspension or debarment from doing business with US Government agencies
In addition, we could suffer serious harm to our reputation if allegations of impropriety were made against us, even if the allegations were not true
Audits for incurred contract costs for Essex are complete through fiscal year 2002 and are currently in process for fiscal year 2003; audits of incurred contract costs are complete for Windermere through fiscal year 2002; audits for incurred costs are complete through fiscal year 2001 under contracts we obtained in the acquisition of Sensys Development Laboratories, Inc
(“SDL”), through fiscal year 2004 for our subsidiary Computer Science Innovations, Inc
(“CSI”), and through fiscal 1994 under contracts we obtained in the acquisition of assets of Performance Group, Inc
If we were suspended or debarred from contracting with the US Government generally, or any specific agency, if our reputation or relationship with US Government agencies were impaired, or if the government otherwise ceased doing business with us or significantly decreased the amount of business it does with us, our revenues and cash flows could be reduced and our operating results could be adversely affected
If we are unable to manage our growth, our business could be adversely affected
Achieving our plans for growth will place significant demands on our management, as well as on our administrative, operational and financial resources
For us to successfully manage our growth, we must continue to improve our operational, financial and management information systems and expand, motivate and manage our workforce
If we are unable to successfully manage our growth without compromising the quality of our services and products, our business, prospects, financial condition or operating results could be adversely affected
A key part of our business strategy involves acquisitions; however, such acquisitions may not achieve all intended benefits
A key part of our strategy has been to obtain technologies, customers, and personnel through acquisitions
We acquired SDL in March 2003, CSI in April 2004, substantially all of the assets of PGI in June 2004, and Windermere in February 2005
We intend to continue to pursue selective acquisition opportunities in the future, but we may not be able to identify and execute suitable acquisitions in the future on terms that are favorable to us, or at all
We may encounter other risks in our acquisition strategy, including: • diversion of management’s attention from our existing business; • increased competition for acquisitions which may increase the price of our acquisitions; • our failure to discover material liabilities in target companies; and 18 ______________________________________________________________________ [43]Table of Contents • the failure of prior owners of any acquired businesses or their employees to comply with applicable laws or regulations such as the Federal Acquisition Regulation and health, safety, employment and environmental laws, or their failure to fulfill their contractual obligations to the Federal Government or other clients
In connection with our future acquisitions, we may incur significant acquisition expenses as well as amortization expenses related to intangible assets
We also may incur significant write-offs of goodwill associated with companies, businesses or technologies that we acquire
Our operating results could be adversely affected by these expenses and write-offs
We may have difficulty integrating the operations of any companies we acquire, which may adversely affect our results of operations
The success of our acquisition strategy will depend upon our ability to successfully integrate any businesses we may acquire in the future
The integration of these businesses into our operations may result in unforeseen events or operating difficulties, absorb significant management attention and require significant financial resources that would otherwise be available for the ongoing development of our business
These integration difficulties could include: • the integration of personnel with disparate business backgrounds; • the transition to new information systems; • the coordination of geographically dispersed organizations; • the loss of key employees of acquired companies; • the reconciliation of different corporate cultures; and • the synchronization of disclosure and financial reporting controls of acquired companies with our controls and, where applicable, improvement of the acquired company’s controls
For these or other reasons, we may be unable to retain key clients or to retain or renew contracts of acquired companies
Moreover, any acquired business may fail to generate the revenues or net income we expected or produce the efficiencies or cost-savings that we anticipated
Any of these outcomes could materially adversely affect our operating results
We have significant contingent earn-out obligations related to our Windermere acquisition that may adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition
The acquisition agreement for the Windermere transaction contains earn-out provisions that may require us to make an additional purchase price payment on May 31, 2006, to be calculated based on excess earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) of Windermere during the applicable earn-out period
Under the Windermere earn-out arrangement, the Company’s aggregate contingent earn-out obligation may range from a low of zero dollars to a maximum of dlra30dtta0 million in cash, and associated fees, depending upon the extent to which Windermere’s EBITDA during the period March 1, 2005 through February 28, 2006 exceeds the EBITDA target of dlra5dtta5 million for such period established and defined in the acquisition agreement
We are not yet able to determine the extent to which earn-out amounts may become payable under this agreement
We expect to enter into discussions with the Windermere sellers regarding the earn-out by the end of the first quarter of 2006
Pursuant to an oral agreement between Stephen E Tate, who became an Executive Vice President of Essex upon the Windermere acquisition, and Essex, Essex paid Stephen E Tate a dlra1dtta7 million finder’s fee in connection with the Windermere acquisition
To the extent any earn-out is payable to the sellers in connection with the acquisition of Windermere, the Company will be obligated to pay Stephen E Tate an additional fee equal to 2dtta5prca multiplied by such earn-out amount, up to a maximum dlra750cmam000
An additional 1prca finder’s fee is also due to an individual who is neither affiliated with nor employed by Essex
To the extent that any earn-out payment under the Windermere acquisition agreement requires cash beyond any positive cash flows and our existing cash balance at the time payment is required, we may need to obtain 19 ______________________________________________________________________ [44]Table of Contents financing to cover these contingent obligations
We may also use the proceeds from sales of securities under our shelf registration statement or advances under our Credit Facility
There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain financing on terms favorable to us, if at all, or that we can be successful in raising the requisite amounts
If we are unable to make any required earn-out payment on the applicable date, we may default in our obligations under the Windermere acquisition agreement, which could result in proceedings against us and could adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition
We face intense competition from many competitors that have greater resources than we do, which could result in price reductions, reduced profitability and loss of market share
We operate in highly competitive markets and may encounter intense competition to win US Government awards
If we are unable to successfully compete for new business, our revenue growth may decline
Many of our competitors are larger and have greater financial, technical, marketing and public relations resources than we do
Larger competitors include Lockheed Martin Corporation and divisions of large defense contractors such as Boeing Support Services
These competitors may be able to compete more effectively for very large scale government awards
These competitors also may be able to provide customers with different or greater capabilities or benefits than we can provide in areas such as technical qualification, past performance on larger scale contracts, geographic presence, price, and the availability of key professional personnel
Our competitors also have established or may establish relationships among themselves or with third parties, including through mergers and acquisitions, to increase their ability to address customers’ needs
Accordingly, it is possible that new competitors or alliances among competitors may emerge against whom it will be difficult for us to compete
In addition, competition in the commercial market for network communications equipment is intense
This market has historically been dominated by such large companies as Alcatel, Ciena, Cisco Systems, JDS Uniphase, Lucent Technologies, NEC and Nortel Networks
Some of these companies, as well as emerging companies, are currently developing products that may compete in the areas that our technology is designed to address
We also may face competition from other large communications companies who may enter our markets
Many of these possible competitors have longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger customer bases and greater financial, technical and business development resources than we do and may be able to undertake more extensive marketing efforts and adopt more aggressive pricing policies than we can
Furthermore, additional competitors with significant market presence and financial resources may enter our markets, which are rapidly evolving, further intensifying competition
Our success largely depends on our ability to hire and retain key personnel
Our success has historically depended in large part on our ability to attract and retain highly skilled technical, managerial and operational personnel, particularly those knowledgeable about the US Government intelligence and defense agencies, those with security clearances and those skilled in optoelectronics and optical communications equipment
In addition, the relationships and reputation that many members of our senior management team have established and maintain with government personnel contribute to our ability to maintain good customer relationships and to identify new business opportunities
The loss of key personnel may impair our ability to obtain new US Government awards or adequately perform under our current US Government awards
We also rely on the skills and expertise of our senior technical development personnel, the loss of any of whom could prevent us from completing current development projects and restrict new development projects
We currently do not maintain “key man” insurance on any of our executives or key employees
Our quarterly operating results may vary widely
Our quarterly revenues and operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past, and may fluctuate in the future
A number of factors can cause our revenue, cash flow and operating results to vary from quarter to quarter, including: • acquisitions of other businesses; 20 ______________________________________________________________________ [45]Table of Contents • commencement, completion or termination of projects during any particular quarter; • variable purchasing patterns under government awards, blanket purchase agreements and IDIQ awards; • seasonal work patterns due to vacation, holiday, and weather incidences resulting in reduced work days on our time and materials awards; • changes in senior US Government officials that affect the timing of technology procurement; and • changes in policy or budgetary measures that adversely affect appropriations for government awards in general
Changes in the number of projects commenced, completed or terminated during any quarter may cause significant variations in our cash flow from operations because a relatively large amount of our expenses are fixed
We also may incur significant or unanticipated expenses when awards expire or are terminated
In addition, payments due to us from US Government agencies may be delayed due to customer payment cycles or as a result of the failure of Congress and the President to approve budgets in a timely manner
If we are unable to protect our intellectual property effectively, we may be unable to prevent third parties from using our technologies, which would impair our competitive advantage
We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and restrictions on disclosure to protect our intellectual property rights
We also enter into confidentiality or license agreements with our key employees and consultants and control access to and distribution of our software, documentation and other proprietary information
We believe that our patents and patent applications provide us with a competitive advantage and, therefore, patent protection is important to our business
However, our patent and other intellectual property protection may not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or keep any competitive advantage
For instance, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy, reverse engineer or otherwise obtain and use our patented products or technology without our permission, eroding or eliminating the competitive advantage we hope to gain though the exclusive rights provided by patent protection
Moreover, our existing patents and pending patent applications, if granted, may not protect us against competitors that independently develop proprietary technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to our technologies, or design around our patents
The competitive advantage provided by patenting our technology may erode if we do not upgrade, enhance and improve our technology on an ongoing basis to meet competitive challenges
In addition, we conduct research and development under projects with the US Government
In general, our rights to technologies we develop under those projects are subject to the US Government’s non-exclusive, non-royalty bearing, world-wide license to use those technologies
In the case of awards under the US Government’s Small Business Innovation Research program, the US Government has limited rights to the delivered data for five years after project completion, and unlimited rights after five years
We retain title to the SBIR technology, but our rights to exclusively license and protect our technology may be affected by the US Government’s rights to SBIR technical data
Monitoring unauthorized use of our technology is difficult, and we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent unauthorized use of our technology, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect our proprietary rights as fully as in the United States
There is a risk that some of our patent applications will not be granted
Although we have received our first hyperfine WDM and VLI patents, we have filed several other applications for US and International patents relating to our hyperfine WDM, VLI and OPERA™ technologies, and there is a risk that some or all of the pending applications will not be granted
Although we believe our patent applications are valid, the failure of our pending applications to be granted would affect the competitive advantage we hope to gain by obtaining patent protection and could have a material adverse effect upon our business and operating results
21 ______________________________________________________________________ [46]Table of Contents We may become involved in intellectual property disputes, which could subject us to significant liability, divert the time and attention of our management and prevent us from selling our products
We or our customers may be a party to litigation in the future to protect our intellectual property or to respond to allegations that we infringe on others’ intellectual property
We have not performed any patent infringement clearance searches and are not in a position to assess the likelihood that any claims would be asserted
If any parties assert that our products infringe upon their proprietary rights, we would be forced to defend ourselves and possibly our customers against the alleged infringement
If we are unsuccessful in any intellectual property litigation, we could be subject to significant liability for damages and loss of our proprietary rights
Intellectual property litigation, regardless of its success, would likely be time consuming and expensive to resolve and would divert management’s time and attention
In addition, we could be forced to do one or more of the following: • stop selling, incorporating or using our products that include the challenged intellectual property; • obtain from the owner of any infringed intellectual property right a license to sell or use the relevant technology, which license may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all; or • re-design those products that use the technology
If we are forced to take any of these actions, our business could be seriously harmed
Because we currently are developing our optoelectronic products for the commercial market, it is difficult to evaluate our future business and prospects in this market
We traditionally have derived our revenues from awards from the US Government
While we intend to enhance and expand our government business, we are continuing our work to develop new optoelectronic commercial products, including products based on our hyperfine WDM fiber optic communications technology, such as our optical encryptor
Because we have not begun significant commercial sales of these products, including those products under development by our recently created Commercial Communications Products Division (CCPD), our commercial revenues and profit potential is unproven and our limited history in the commercial market makes it difficult to evaluate our business and prospects
We cannot accurately forecast our commercial revenue and we have limited historical financial data upon which to base production budgets
You should consider our business and prospects in light of the heightened risks and unexpected expenses and problems we may face as a company developing new commercial products for a rapidly changing industry
Our ability to expand into the commercial optical networking market may be adversely affected by unfavorable and uncertain conditions in the commercial communications industry and the economy in general
One element of our strategy is to develop products targeted at the commercial optical networking market, including products under development by CCPD The market for communications equipment, including optical components, has suffered a severe and prolonged downturn
Many of our potential customers in this market have experienced significant financial distress, and some have gone out of business
This has resulted in a significant consolidation in the commercial communications equipment industry, combined with a substantial reduction in overall demand
In addition, most of the potential customers we would like to reach have become more conservative about their future purchases, which has made our commercial business slow to materialize
We expect the following factors to affect our ability to expand our commercial market business for an indeterminate period: • capital expenditures by many of our potential customers may be flat or reduced; • increased competition may enable commercial customers to insist on more favorable terms and conditions for sales, including extended payment terms or other financing assistance as a condition of procuring their business; and 22 ______________________________________________________________________ [47]Table of Contents • the bankruptcies or weakened financial condition of several communications companies may adversely affect the commercial market for the optical networking products we are developing
The result of any one or a combination of these factors could eliminate or reduce our ability to successfully enter and compete in this market
Our optoelectronic products are complex, operate in demanding environments and have not yet been widely deployed
If our products contain defects that are undiscovered until full deployment we may incur significant and unexpected expenses, losses of sales and harm to our reputation
Optoelectronic products are complex and are designed to be deployed across complex networks
Because of the nature of the products, they can only be fully tested when completely deployed in large networks with high amounts of traffic
Our products have not yet been deployed and tested in a commercial environment, and when they are, customers may discover errors or defects in the hardware or the software, or products we develop may not operate as expected
If we are unable to fix defects or other problems that may be identified in full deployment, we would likely experience: • a loss of, or delay in, revenues and loss of market share; • a loss of existing customers; • difficulties in attracting new customers or achieving market acceptance; • diversion of development resources; • increased service and warranty costs; • legal actions by our customers; and • increased insurance costs
Defects, integration issues or other performance problems could result in financial or other damages to our customers or could negatively affect market acceptance for the products we develop
Our customers could also seek damages for losses from us, which, if they were successful, could adversely affect our cash flow from operations
A product liability claim brought against us, even if unsuccessful, would likely be time consuming and costly and would put a strain on our management and resources
We have likely lost our ability to bid for and obtain new contracts under government programs aimed at small businesses
We currently participate in certain government programs under the regulations promulgated by the US Small Business Administration, or SBA, such as the Small Business Innovative Research, or SBIR, program and small business set-aside contracts and preferences
Qualification as a small business is determined under the criteria set forth in the SBA Small Business Size Standards regulation
These criteria include the classification of the product or service in the North American Industry Classification System, trailing three year averages of the number of employees or annual receipts, affiliates, and other applicable factors
The restriction of a particular project or program under small business limited competition rules is a unilateral decision that is made at the time of procurement by the responsible agency procurement authority
The restriction of a particular project or program to small businesses, as a small business set-aside, in one procurement cycle does not assure that it will be similarly restricted in follow-on or related procurements
A significant portion of our revenues historically have resulted from our participation in these small business set-aside programs
Our awards under our largest Set-aside for Small Business Program accounted for 40prca of our revenues for the 2005 fiscal year
23 ______________________________________________________________________ [48]Table of Contents We believe that, due to the increases in the levels of our revenues and number of employees, we have lost our ability to participate in most of these programs, including receiving new awards under the programs
We also anticipate that some follow-on or related procurements for programs that were originally awarded to us as small business set-asides will not be issued under the small business limited competition rules of the SBA If necessary licenses of third-party technology are not available to us or are very expensive, we may not be able to sell products of the same quality, and our cost of operations could increase
From time to time we may be required to license technology from third parties to sell or develop our products and product enhancements
These third-party licenses may not be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, if at all
Our inability to maintain or obtain any third-party license required to sell or develop our products and product enhancements could require us to obtain substitute technology of lower quality or performance standards or at greater cost
If we were required to use technology with lower performance standards or quality, customers may stop buying our products and this would cause our revenues to decline
Similarly, if our costs rise significantly, customers may choose less expensive alternative products, which would cause our revenues to decline
Manmade problems such as computer viruses or terrorism may disrupt our operations and harm our operating results
Despite our implementation of network security measures, our servers are vulnerable to computer viruses, break-ins, and similar disruptions from unauthorized tampering with our computer systems
Any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition
In addition, the continued threat of terrorism and heightened security and military action in response to this threat, or any future acts of terrorism, may cause further disruptions to the economies of the US and other countries and create further uncertainties or otherwise materially harm our business, operating results, and financial condition
To the extent that such disruptions or uncertainties result in delays or cancellations of customer orders or the manufacture or shipment of our products, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected
Risks Related to Our Company A limited number of shareholders are able to exert significant influence over matters requiring shareholder approval
As of February 28, 2006, a few private investors collectively hold approximately 3dtta2 million shares, or 15prca of our total outstanding shares of common stock
Accordingly, these investors could seek to exercise significant control and influence of certain actions requiring the approval of the holders of shares of our common stock
This concentration of ownership may also delay or prevent a change in control of us or reduce the price other investors might be willing to pay for our common stock
In addition, the interests of this limited number of investors may conflict with the interests of other holders of our common stock
The market price of our common stock is subject to significant price fluctuations
The trading price of our common stock has historically been volatile and will likely continue to fluctuate significantly in the future
We believe this volatility has often been unrelated to our operating performance
Volatility in the market price of our common stock may prevent investors from being able to sell their common stock at or above the price such investors paid for their shares or at any price at all
In addition, in the event our operating results fall below the expectations of public market analysts and investors, the market price of our common stock would likely decline
24 ______________________________________________________________________ [49]Table of Contents Sales of a significant number of shares of our common stock by existing shareholders could cause the market price of our common stock to decline
If our shareholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock, including shares issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, the market price of our common stock may decline
These sales also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem appropriate
We are unable to predict the effect that sales may have on the then prevailing market price of our common stock
As of February 28, 2006, there remain registered for resale under the Securities Act approximately 680cmam000 shares of our common stock on behalf of certain of our shareholders
There are approximately 192cmam307 shares of our common stock issued in December 2003 upon conversion of a note payable, the holder of which is entitled to “piggy-back” registration rights
Sales of substantial amounts of common stock under Rule 144 or pursuant to the holder’s registration rights, or the perception that such sales may occur, could depress the market price of our common stock
All of these shares will become eligible for public resale at various times within two years subject to volume limitations and certain restrictions on sales by affiliates
Changes in stock option accounting rules may adversely impact our operating results prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
Technology companies like ours have a history of using broad based employee stock option programs to hire, incentivize and retain our workforce in a competitive marketplace
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Nodtta 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”), allows companies the choice of either using a fair value method of accounting for options which would result in expense recognition for all options, or using an intrinsic value method, as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion Nodtta 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”), with a pro forma disclosure of the impact on net income (loss) of using the fair value option expense recognition method
We have elected to apply APB 25 and the disclosure provisions of SFAS 123 and accordingly we generally do not recognize any expense with respect to employee stock options as long as such options are granted at exercise prices equal to the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) Nodtta 123R, “Share-Based Payment”, which is a revision of SFAS Nodtta 123, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”
SFAS Nodtta 123R requires that all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, be valued at fair value on the grant date and be expensed over the applicable vesting period
SFAS Nodtta 123R is effective for the Company on January 1, 2006
The Company will transition to SFAS Nodtta 123R using the “modified prospective application
Under the “modified prospective application”, compensation costs will be recognized in the financial statements for all new share-based payments granted after January 1, 2006
Additionally, the Company will recognize compensation costs for the portion of previously granted awards for which the requisite service has not been rendered (“nonvested awards”) that are outstanding as of January 1, 2006 over the remaining requisite service period of the awards
The compensation expense to be recognized for the nonvested awards will be based on the fair value of the awards
Our adoption of SFAS Nodtta 123R will adversely affect our Financial Position and Results of Operations in future periods
At December 31, 2005, the total value of options outstanding and vesting after January 1, 2006 is expected to be approximately dlra429cmam000, with dlra369cmam000 (before the consideration of income taxes, if any) vesting in the year ending December 31, 2006