Home
Jump to Risk Factors
Jump to Industries
Jump to Exposures
Jump to Event Codes
Jump to Wiki Summary

Industries
Automobiles and Components
Electrical Components and Equipment
Automobile Manufacturers
Motorcycle Manufacturers
Technology Hardware Storage and Peripherals
Information Technology
Technology Hardware and Equipment
Application Software
Food Distributors
Trading Companies and Distributors
Exposures
Economic
Express intent
Regime
Leadership
Military
Crime
Ease
Judicial
Political reform
Material Aid
Event Codes
Yield
Warn
Accident
Yield to order
Force
Riot
Release or return
Solicit support
Agree
Host meeting
Sanction
Grant
Veto
Yield position
Sports contest
Complain
Request
Endorse
Propose
Promise
Adjust
Demand
Vote
Wiki Wiki Summary
List of states and territories of the United States The United States of America is a federal republic consisting of 50 states, a federal district (Washington, D.C., the capital city of the United States), five major territories, and various minor islands. The 48 contiguous states and Washington, D.C., are in North America between Canada and Mexico.
Profit (economics) An economic profit is the difference between the revenue a commercial entity has received from its outputs and the opportunity costs of its inputs. It equals to total revenue minus total cost, including both explicit and implicit costs.
Profitability analysis In cost accounting, profitability analysis is an analysis of the profitability of an organisation's output. Output of an organisation can be grouped into products, customers, locations, channels and/or transactions.
Customer profitability Customer profitability (CP) is the profit the firm makes from serving a customer or customer group over a specified period of time, specifically the difference between the revenues earned from and the costs associated with the customer relationship in a specified period. According to Philip Kotler,"a profitable customer is a person, household or a company that overtime, yields a revenue stream that exceeds by an acceptable amount the company's cost stream of attracting, selling and servicing the customer."\nCalculating customer profit is an important step in understanding which customer relationships are better than others.
Profitable growth Profitable Growth is the combination of profitability and growth, more precisely the combination of Economic Profitability and Growth of Free cash flows. Profitable growth is aimed at seducing the financial community; it emerged in the early 80s when shareholder value creation became firms’ main objective.
Customer Profitability Analysis Customer Profitability Analysis (in short CPA) is a management accounting and a credit underwriting method, allowing businesses and lenders to determine the profitability of each customer or segments of customers, by attributing profits and costs to each customer separately. CPA can be applied at the individual customer level (more time consuming, but providing a better understanding of business situation) or at the level of customer aggregates / groups (e.g.
SAP ERP SAP ERP is an enterprise resource planning software developed by the German company SAP SE. SAP ERP incorporates the key business functions of an organization. The latest version of SAP ERP (V.6.0) was made available in 2006.
Porter's five forces analysis Porter's Five Forces Framework is a method of analysing the operating environment of a competition of a business. It draws from industrial organization (IO) economics to derive five forces that determine the competitive intensity and, therefore, the attractiveness (or lack thereof) of an industry in terms of its profitability.
Net income In business and accounting, net income (also total comprehensive income, net earnings, net profit, bottom line, sales profit, or credit sales) is an entity's income minus cost of goods sold, expenses, depreciation and amortization, interest, and taxes for an accounting period.It is computed as the residual of all revenues and gains less all expenses and losses for the period, and has also been defined as the net increase in shareholders' equity that results from a company's operations. It is different from gross income, which only deducts the cost of goods sold from revenue.
United States The United States of America (U.S.A. or USA), commonly known as the United States (U.S. or US) or America, is a country primarily located in North America. It consists of 50 states, a federal district, five major unincorporated territories, 326 Indian reservations, and nine minor outlying islands.
President of the United States The president of the United States (POTUS) is the head of state and head of government of the United States of America. The president directs the executive branch of the federal government and is the commander-in-chief of the United States Armed Forces.
United States Congress The United States Congress is the legislature of the federal government of the United States. It is bicameral, being composed of a lower body, the House of Representatives, and an upper body, the Senate.
United States Navy The United States Navy (USN) is the maritime service branch of the United States Armed Forces and one of the eight uniformed services of the United States. It is the largest and most powerful navy in the world, with the estimated tonnage of its active battle fleet alone exceeding the next 13 navies combined, including 11 U.S. allies or partner nations as of 2015.
List of presidents of the United States The president of the United States is the head of state and head of government of the United States, indirectly elected to a four-year term by the American people through the Electoral College. The office holder leads the executive branch of the federal government and is the commander-in-chief of the United States Armed Forces.
United States dollar The United States dollar (symbol: $; code: USD; also abbreviated US$ or U.S. Dollar, to distinguish it from other dollar-denominated currencies; referred to as the dollar, U.S. dollar, American dollar, or colloquially buck) is the official currency of the United States and several other countries. The Coinage Act of 1792 introduced the U.S. dollar at par with the Spanish silver dollar, divided it into 100 cents, and authorized the minting of coins denominated in dollars and cents.
Republican Party (United States) The Republican Party, also referred to as the GOP ("Grand Old Party"), is one of the two major contemporary political parties in the United States, along with its main historic rival, the Democratic Party.\nThe GOP was founded in 1854 by anti-slavery activists who opposed the Kansas–Nebraska Act, which allowed for the potential expansion of chattel slavery into the western territories.
Democratic Party (United States) The Democratic Party is one of the two major contemporary political parties in the United States. It was founded in 1828 by supporters of Andrew Jackson, making it the world's oldest active political party.
United States Marine Corps The United States Marine Corps (USMC), also referred to as the United States Marines, is the maritime land force service branch of the United States Armed Forces responsible for conducting expeditionary and amphibious operations through combined arms, implementing its own infantry, artillery, aerial, and special operations forces. The U.S. Marine Corps is one of the eight uniformed services of the United States.
Proprietary software Proprietary software, also known as non-free software or closed-source software, is computer software for which the software's publisher or another person reserves some licensing rights to use, modify, share modifications, or share the software, restricting user freedom with the software they lease. It is the opposite of open-source or free software.
Health reimbursement account A Health Reimbursement Account, formally a Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA), is a type of US employer-funded health benefit plan that reimburses employees for out-of-pocket medical expenses and, in limited cases, to pay for health insurance plan premiums.An HRA is not truly an account, since it does not place funds under a separate legal title. Instead, it is an agreement under which the employee can submit qualified health expenses to the employer for reimbursement.Following implementation of the Affordable Care Act, HRAs must be integrated with a qualified employer-sponsored group health insurance plan to avoid excise tax penalties.
Capitation (healthcare) Capitation is a payment arrangement for health care service providers. It pays a set amount for each enrolled person assigned to them, per period of time, whether or not that person seeks care.
Diagnosis-related group Diagnosis-related group (DRG) is a system to classify hospital cases into one of originally 467 groups, with the last group (coded as 470 through v24, 999 thereafter) being "Ungroupable". This system of classification was developed as a collaborative project by Robert B Fetter, PhD, of the Yale School of Management, and John D. Thompson, MPH, of the Yale School of Public Health.
Visa requirements for United States citizens As of 25 February 2022, Holders of a United States passport could travel to 186 countries and territories without a travel visa, or with a visa on arrival. The United States passport currently ranks 6th in terms of travel freedom (tied with the passports of Czech Republic, Greece, Malta, Norway, and the UK) according to the Henley Passport Index.
Visa requirements for British citizens Visa requirements for British citizens are administrative entry restrictions by the authorities of other states placed on citizens of the United Kingdom. As of 30 April 2022, British citizens had visa-free or visa on arrival access to 187 countries and territories, ranking their passport 5th in terms of travel freedom (tied with France, Ireland and Portugal) according to the Henley Passport Index.
Requirement In product development and process optimization, a requirement is a singular documented physical or functional need that a particular design, product or process aims to satisfy. It is commonly used in a formal sense in engineering design, including for example in systems engineering, software engineering, or enterprise engineering.
Requirements analysis In systems engineering and software engineering, requirements analysis focuses on the tasks that determine the needs or conditions to meet the new or altered product or project, taking account of the possibly conflicting requirements of the various stakeholders, analyzing, documenting, validating and managing software or system requirements.Requirements analysis is critical to the success or failure of a systems or software project. The requirements should be documented, actionable, measurable, testable, traceable, related to identified business needs or opportunities, and defined to a level of detail sufficient for system design.
Reimbursement Reimbursement is the act of compensating someone for an out-of-pocket expense by giving them an amount of money equal to what was spent.Companies, governments and nonprofit organizations may compensate their employees or officers for necessary and reasonable expenses; under US\nlaw, these expenses may be deducted from taxes by the organization and treated as untaxed income for the recipient provided that accountability conditions are met. UK law provides for deductions for travel and subsistence.
Business mileage reimbursement rate The business mileage reimbursement rate is an optional standard mileage rate used in the United States for purposes of computing the allowable business deduction, for Federal income tax purposes under the Internal Revenue Code, at 26 U.S.C. § 162, for the business use of a vehicle. Under the law, the taxpayer for each year is generally entitled to deduct either the actual expense amount, or an amount computed using the standard mileage rate, whichever is greater.
ERISA reimbursement In the United States, ERISA reimbursement refers to the efforts of an ERISA Plan administrator (an insurer) to obtain repayment from an insured person who had previously received payments for personal injury medical bills.When an insurer pays a injury claim to someone, the insurer can seize cash settlements from whoever caused the injury. This “right of reimbursement” is essentially a subrogation claim.
Fee Reimbursement Scheme (Andhra Pradesh) The Fee Reimbursement Scheme (also known as the Post-matric Scholarship Scheme) is a student education sponsorship programme of the Government of Andhra Pradesh. It supports students from lower economic strata in the state.
Non-functional requirement In systems engineering and requirements engineering, a non-functional requirement (NFR) is a requirement that specifies criteria that can be used to judge the operation of a system, rather than specific behaviours. They are contrasted with functional requirements that define specific behavior or functions.
Age of candidacy Age of candidacy is the minimum age at which a person can legally hold certain elected government offices. In many cases, it also determines the age at which a person may be eligible to stand for an election or be granted ballot access.
Requirements elicitation In requirements engineering, requirements elicitation is the practice of researching and discovering the requirements of a system from users, customers, and other stakeholders. The practice is also sometimes referred to as "requirement gathering".
Proprietary protocol In telecommunications, a proprietary protocol is a communications protocol owned by a single organization or individual.\n\n\n== Intellectual property rights and enforcement ==\nOwnership by a single organization gives the owner the ability to place restrictions on the use of the protocol and to change the protocol unilaterally.
Proprietary firmware Proprietary firmware is any firmware on which is not free (libre). Examples of proprietary works include ones upon which the author has placed restrictions on use, private modification, copying, or republishing.
Intellectual property Intellectual property (IP) is a category of property that includes intangible creations of the human intellect. There are many types of intellectual property, and some countries recognize more than others.
Risk Factors
CONCEPTUS INC ITEM 1A RISK FACTORS In addition to the other information in this Form 10-K, the following factors should be considered carefully in evaluating Conceptus and our business
This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
Some of the forward-looking statements can be identified by use of forward-looking words such as &quote believes, &quote &quote expects, &quote &quote anticipates, &quote &quote may, &quote &quote will, &quote &quote should, &quote &quote seeks, &quote &quote approximates, &quote &quote intends, &quote &quote plans, &quote or &quote estimates, &quote or the negative of these words, or other comparable terminology
The discussion of financial trends, strategy, plans or intentions may also include forward-looking statements
Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected
Although it is not possible to predict or identify all such risks and uncertainties, they may include, but are not limited to, the following factors
The readers should not consider this list to be a complete statement of all potential risks and uncertainties
We have a limited history of operation with the Essure system and have incurred significant operating losses since inception
We expect to incur significant operating losses for the foreseeable future and we may never achieve or maintain profitability
We have a limited history of operation with the Essure system and have incurred significant operating losses since our inception in 1992, including operating losses of dlra22dtta7 million in the fiscal year 2005, dlra26dtta6 million in fiscal 2004 and dlra40dtta2 million in fiscal 2003
We expect to continue to incur significant operating expenses and net losses as we continue sales and marketing efforts in the United States
Our net losses will continue until sufficient revenues can be generated to offset these expenses
We may not be able to generate these revenues, and we may never achieve profitability
Our failure to achieve and sustain profitability would negatively impact the market price of our common stock
We are presently a one-product company and if our product fails to gain market acceptance, our business will suffer
We are attempting to introduce a novel product into the contraception market, which is dominated by procedures that are well established among physicians and patients and are routinely taught to new physicians
As a result, we believe that recommendations and endorsements by physicians will be essential for market acceptance of our product
We do not know whether physicians and patients will accept our product or whether we will be able to obtain their recommendations or endorsements in sufficient amounts to be profitable
We believe that physicians will not use a product unless they determine, based on clinical data and other factors, that it is an attractive alternative to other means of contraception and that it offers clinical utility in a cost-effective manner
Physicians are traditionally slow to adopt new products and treatment practices, partly because of perceived liability risks
We are dependent on the Essure system, which is currently our only commercial product
If the Essure system does not achieve significant market acceptance among physicians, patients and healthcare payers, even if reimbursement levels are sufficient and necessary United States and international regulatory approvals are maintained, we may never achieve significant revenues or profitability
Our future liquidity and capital requirements are uncertain
As we commercialize the Essure system on a wide-scale basis, we may require additional financing and therefore may in the future seek to raise additional funds through bank facilities, debt or equity offerings or other sources of capital
Any additional equity financing may be dilutive to stockholders, and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants and interest expenses that will affect our financial results
Additional funding may not be available when needed or on terms acceptable to us
If we are unable to obtain additional capital, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of or 20 _________________________________________________________________ eliminate our selling and marketing activities
Our future liquidity and capital requirements will depend upon many factors, including, among others: • the rate of product adoption by doctors and patients; • obtaining government and third-party reimbursement for the Essure procedure; • the liquidity of private insurance systems, as well as the timeliness of payments of government-management reimbursement systems; • our ability to improve our days sales outstanding; • the resources devoted to increasing manufacturing capacity to meet commercial demands; • our ability to reduce our cost of sales; • the resources devoted to developing and conducting sales and marketing and distribution programs; • the progress and cost of product development programs; and • the potential requirement to make royalty payments subject to the Ovion-Conceptus settlement agreement
If the effectiveness and safety of our product are not supported by long-term data, we may not achieve market acceptance and we could be subject to liability
In September 2005, the Company received from the US Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, approval to terminate the Companyapstas post-approval study with physicians newly trained in performing the Essure procedure due to the positive placement data obtained to date
The purpose of the post-approval study, required by FDA as a condition of the November 2002 approval of the Essure system, was to determine the rate of successful bilateral placements of the Essure micro-inserts at first attempt with a large number of newly trained physicians who were not part of the previous clinical studies
Although treatment of the total number of patients required by FDA had not been completed, the data obtained to date provided the Company with the ability to request an early termination of the study
Nevertheless, the long-term results of using the Essure device will not be available for several years
If long-term studies or clinical experience indicate that the Essure system is less effective or less safe than our current data suggest, we may not achieve or sustain market acceptance and/or we could be subject to significant liability
Our agreements and contracts entered into with partners and other third parties may not be successful
We signed in the past and may pursue in the future contracts and agreements with third parties that would assist our marketing, manufacturing, selling and distribution efforts
There can be no assurances that, if these agreements are entered into in the future, they will be successful
Our advertising campaigns may not be successful
Our advertising programs, which are aimed at increasing consumer awareness for our product, are generally expensive and may have limited success, if any
Such campaigns require consumers to make contact with an Essure trained physician, often involving a referral from their primary care physician and then to be provided information regarding birth control options by the physician, be pre-authorized for insurance reimbursement and then be scheduled for the procedure
Many of these steps are not within our control, and the program may not result in revenue generation commensurate with its costs
21 _________________________________________________________________ We depend on our contract manufacturer to supply our commercial product requirements and we may experience disruption in supply if they are not in compliance with FDA and other health authority regulations or if our manufacturerapstas business fails to succeed
In April 2004, we received FDA approval to begin manufacturing the Essure product at Accellent, Inc, or Accellent, formerly named Venusa, our third-party subcontractor located in Mexico
We transitioned almost all of our internal manufacturing operations to Accellent by the end of 2004 to manufacture the components and assemble our product
If Accellent does not comply with FDA and other health authority regulations or encounters manufacturing difficulties, this could negatively impact sales of the Essure system
Government or third party reimbursement for the Essure procedure may not be available or may be inadequate, which would limit our future product revenues and delay or prevent our profitability
Market acceptance of the Essure system in the United States and in international markets will depend in part upon the availability of reimbursement within prevailing healthcare payment systems
Reimbursement systems in international markets vary significantly by country and sometimes by region, and reimbursement approvals must be obtained on a country-by-country basis
Many international markets have government-managed health care systems that determine reimbursement for new devices and procedures
In most markets, there are private insurance systems as well as government-managed systems
Regardless of the type of reimbursement system, we believe that physician advocacy of our product will be required to obtain reimbursement
Availability and extent of continued reimbursement will depend, at least in part, on the clinical and cost effectiveness of our product
We cannot assure you that reimbursement for our product will continue to be available in the United States or in international markets under either government or private reimbursement systems, or that physicians will support and advocate reimbursement for use of our product for all indications intended by us
We may be unable to obtain or maintain reimbursement in any country within a particular time frame, for a particular amount, or at all, which would limit our future product revenues and delay or prevent our profitability
We may not maintain regulatory approvals for the Essure system, our only product, which would delay or prevent us from generating product revenues, and would harm our business and force us to curtail or cease operations
Numerous government authorities, both in the United States and internationally, regulate the manufacture and sale of medical devices, including the Essure system
In the United States, the principal regulatory authorities are the FDA and corresponding state agencies, such as the California Department of Health Services
The process of obtaining and maintaining required regulatory clearances is lengthy, expensive and uncertain
We have received FDA approval to market the Essure system in the United States
If we lose that approval or fail to comply with existing or future regulatory requirements, it would delay or prevent us from generating further product revenues
Sales of medical devices outside of the United States are subject to international regulatory requirements that vary widely from country to country
The time required to obtain clearance required by foreign countries may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA clearance, and requirements for licensing may differ significantly from FDA requirements
Many countries in which we currently market or intend to market the Essure system either do not currently regulate medical devices or have minimal registration requirements; however, these countries may develop more extensive regulations in the future, which could delay or prevent us from marketing the Essure system in these countries
The FDA and certain foreign regulatory authorities impose numerous requirements with which medical device manufacturers must comply in order to maintain regulatory approvals
FDA 22 _________________________________________________________________ enforcement policy strictly prohibits the promotion of approved medical devices for uses other than those for which the device is specifically approved by the FDA We will be required to adhere to applicable FDA regulations, such as the Quality System Regulation, and similar regulations in other countries, which include testing, control and documentation requirements
Ongoing compliance with the Quality System Regulation and other applicable regulatory requirements will be monitored through periodic inspections by federal and state agencies, including the FDA and the California Department of Health Services, and by comparable agencies in other countries
If we fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, we may be subject to, among other things, warning letters, fines, injunctions, civil penalties, recall or seizure of products, total or partial suspension of production, refusal of the government to grant pre-market clearance or pre-market approval for devices, withdrawal of approvals and criminal prosecution, any of which could negatively impact our business
Our intellectual property rights may not provide meaningful commercial protection for our product, which could enable third parties to use our technology, or very similar technology, and could impair our ability to compete in the market
We rely on patent, copyright, trade secret and trademark laws to limit the ability of others to compete with us using the same or similar technology in the United States and other countries
However, as described below, these laws afford only limited protection and may not adequately protect our rights to the extent necessary to sustain any competitive advantage we may have
The laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States, and many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting their proprietary rights abroad
These problems can be caused by the absence of rules and methods for defending intellectual property rights
We will be able to protect our technology from unauthorized use by third parties only to the extent that they are covered by valid and enforceable patents or are effectively maintained as trade secrets
The patent positions of companies developing medical devices, including our patent position, generally are uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions concerning the enforceability of such patents against alleged infringement
Recent judicial decisions have established new case law and a reinterpretation of previous patent case law, and consequently we cannot assure you that historical legal standards surrounding the questions of infringement and validity will be applied in future cases
In addition, legislation may be pending in United States Congress that, if enacted in its present form, may limit the ability of medical device manufacturers in the future to obtain patents on surgical and medical procedures that are not performed by, or as a part of, devices or compositions that are themselves patentable
Our ability to protect our proprietary methods and procedures may be compromised by the enactment of this legislation or any other limitation or reduction in the patentability of medical and surgical methods and procedures
Changes in either the patent laws or in interpretations of patent laws in the United States and other countries may therefore diminish the value of our intellectual property
We own, or control through licenses, a variety of issued patents and pending patent applications
However, the patents on which we rely may be challenged and invalidated, and our patent applications may not result in issued patents
Moreover, our patents and patent applications may not be sufficiently broad to prevent others from practicing our technologies or from developing competing products
We also face the risk that others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or design around our patented technologies
We have taken security measures to protect our proprietary information, especially proprietary information that is not covered by patents or patent applications
These measures, however, may not provide adequate protection of our trade secrets or other proprietary information
We seek to protect our proprietary information by entering into confidentiality agreements with employees, collaborators and consultants
Nevertheless, employees, collaborators or consultants could still disclose our proprietary information and we may not be able to protect our trade secrets in a meaningful way
If we 23 _________________________________________________________________ lose any employees, we may not be able to prevent the unauthorized disclosure or use of our technical knowledge or other trade secrets by those former employees despite the existence of a nondisclosure and confidentiality agreement and other contractual restrictions designed and intended to protect our proprietary technology
In addition, others may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information or techniques or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets
Our ability to compete effectively will depend substantially on our ability to develop and maintain proprietary aspects of our technology
Our issued patents, any future patents that may be issued as a result of our United States or foreign patent applications, or the patents under which we have license rights may not offer any degree of protection against competitive products
Any patents that may be issued or licensed to us or any of our patent applications could be challenged, invalidated or circumvented in the future
If we cannot operate our business without infringing third-party intellectual property rights, our prospects will suffer
Our success will depend in part on our ability to operate without infringing or misappropriating the proprietary rights of others
We may be exposed to future litigation by third parties based on claims that our product infringes the intellectual property rights of others
There are numerous issued patents in the medical device industry and, as described in the next risk factor, the validity and breadth of medical device patents involve complex legal and factual questions for which important legal principles remain unresolved
Our competitors may assert that our product and the methods we employ may be covered by United States or foreign patents held by them
In addition, because patent applications can take many years to issue, there may be currently pending patent applications of which we are unaware that may later result in issued patents that our product may infringe
There could also be existing patents of which we are unaware that our product may inadvertently infringe
If we lose a patent infringement lawsuit, we could be prevented from selling our product unless we can obtain a license to use technology or ideas covered by that patent or are able to redesign the product to avoid infringement
A license may not be available to us on terms acceptable to us, or at all, and we may not be able to redesign our product to avoid any infringement
If we are not successful in obtaining a license or redesigning our product, we may be unable to sell our product and our business would suffer
We have been, and may be in the future, a party to patent litigation, which could be expensive and divert our managementapstas attention
The medical device industry has been characterized by extensive litigation regarding patents and other intellectual property rights, and companies in the industry have used intellectual property litigation to gain a competitive advantage
We may become a party to patent infringement claims and litigation or interference proceedings declared by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, or PTO, to determine the priority of inventions
The defense and prosecution of these matters are both costly and time consuming
We may need to commence proceedings against others to enforce our patents, to protect our trade secrets or know-how or to determine the enforceability, scope and validity of the proprietary rights of others
These proceedings would result in substantial expense to us and significant diversion of effort by our technical and management personnel
A third party, Ovion, Inc, Ovion, which is now a subsidiary of American Medical Systems, or AMS, brought to our attention a patent and certain claims from a pending patent application owned by it
Ovion indicated that it believes that the claims of its patent and application cover the Essure system and its use
On October 23, 2003, we entered into a settlement agreement with Ovion pursuant to which we received a sole, worldwide license to Ovionapstas patent rights relative to the Essure system, and Ovion may not grant any additional such licenses to other parties
The settlement agreement provided for the payment of a royalty to Ovion that will be equal to 3dtta25prca of the cumulative net sales of the 24 _________________________________________________________________ Essure system in excess of dlra75dtta0 million for a period of no longer than ten years
In addition, the settlement agreement provided for a cash payment of dlra2dtta0 million in the fourth quarter of 2003 as a prepaid royalty, and a license fee of dlra2dtta0 million payable in our common stock in equal installments in the first and second quarters of 2004
Ovion was not granted any rights to our intellectual property pursuant to the settlement agreement
The settlement agreement was approved by the US District Court for the Northern District of California on November 6, 2003
Although we have reached a settlement agreement with Ovion, we still believe that some or all of Ovionapstas claims should be included within our own patents and we have requested that the PTO to declare an interference
An interference is a proceeding within the PTO to determine which party was the first to invent, and which party is thereby entitled to ownership of the claims
We believe that we filed our patent applications for the Essure system before Ovion filed the application that issued as its patent, and that we are entitled to any patentable claims now appearing in their patent that cover our product
We do not know whether the PTO will declare an interference, whether we invented our product prior to Ovionapstas date of invention, or whether we will prevail in an interference proceeding if it is declared by the PTO If the PTO declares an interference in our favor and we are found to have priority of invention, we may avoid having to pay Ovion future royalties on the sales of our product
An adverse determination in new litigation or interference proceedings to which we are or may become a party could subject us to significant liabilities to third parties or require us to seek licenses from third parties
Although patent and intellectual property disputes in the medical device area have often been settled through licensing or similar arrangements, costs associated with such arrangements may be substantial and could include ongoing royalties
We may be unable to obtain necessary licenses on satisfactory terms, if at all
Adverse determinations in a judicial or administrative proceeding or failure to obtain necessary licenses could prevent us from manufacturing and selling the Essure system
One of the patents included in our license from Target Therapeutics, a division of Boston Scientific Corporation, has been the subject of reexamination proceedings in the PTO and an infringement lawsuit by Target Therapeutics
The patent is directed to variable stiffness catheters for use with guidewires, as might be used in our future products
Although the PTO reaffirmed the patent with amended claims and the lawsuit was settled, the patent could be challenged or invalidated in the future
If this patent is invalidated, our ability to prevent others from using this proprietary technology would be compromised
We may in the future acquire one or more technologies, products or companies that complement our business
We may not be able to effectively integrate these into our business and any such acquisition could bring additional risks, exposures and challenges to our company
If we fail to manage any acquisition, our business could be impaired
Our third-party manufacturer and we will depend upon third party and single source suppliers for raw materials and finished goods and we do not have forward contracts with many of these suppliers
We and our third party manufacturer purchase both raw materials used in our product and finished goods from various suppliers, and we rely on a single source supplier for one component of our product, the polyester fiber
We do not have formal supply contracts with several key vendors and, accordingly, these firms may not continue to supply us or our third party manufacturer with raw materials or finished goods in sufficient quantities, or at all
Delays associated with any future raw materials or finished goods shortages could impair our sales of the Essure system, particularly as our third-party manufacturer scales up its manufacturing activities in support of United States and international commercial sales of the Essure system
25 _________________________________________________________________ Health care reform may limit our return on our product
The levels of revenue and profitability of medical device companies may be affected by the efforts of government and third party payers to contain or reduce the costs of health care through various means
In the United States, there have been, and we expect that there will continue to be, a number of federal, state and private proposals to control health care costs
These proposals may contain measures intended to control public and private spending on health care, as well as to provide universal public access to the health care system
If enacted, these proposals may result in a substantial restructuring of the health care delivery system
Significant changes in the United States health care system are likely to have a substantial impact over time on the manner in which we conduct our business and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations
We may be exposed to product liability claims, and we have only limited insurance coverage
The manufacture and sale of medical products involve an inherent risk of exposure to product liability claims and product recalls
We currently maintain product liability insurance with coverage limits of dlra10dtta0 million per occurrence and an annual aggregate maximum of dlra10dtta0 million, which we believe is comparable to that maintained by other companies of similar size serving similar markets
However, we cannot assure you that product liability claims in connection with clinical trials or commercial sales of the Essure system will not exceed such insurance coverage limits or that such insurance will continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all
Insurance is expensive and in the future may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all
A successful product liability claim or series of claims brought against us in excess of our insurance coverage, or a recall of our product, could cause our stock price to fall
We may not be able to attract and retain additional key management, sales and marketing and technical personnel or we may lose existing key management, sales and marketing or technical personnel, which may delay our development and marketing efforts
We depend on a number of key management, sales and marketing and technical personnel
The loss of the services of one or more key employees could delay the achievement of our development and marketing objectives
Our success will also depend on our ability to attract and retain additional highly qualified management, sales and marketing and technical personnel to meet our growth goals
We face intense competition for qualified personnel, many of whom are often subject to competing employment offers, and we do not know whether we will be able to attract and retain such personnel
We face intense competition, and if we are unable to compete effectively, demand for the Essure system may be reduced
The medical device industry is highly competitive and is characterized by rapid and significant technological change
The length of time required for product development and regulatory approval plays an important role in a companyapstas competitive position
As we commercialize Essure, we expect to compete with: • other methods of permanent contraception, in particular tubal ligation; • other methods of non-permanent contraception, including devices such as intrauterine devices, or IUDs, vaginal rings, condoms and prescription drugs such as the birth control pill, injectable and implantable contraceptives and patches; and • other companies that may develop permanent contraception devices that are similar to or otherwise compete with the Essure system
26 _________________________________________________________________ We are aware of a company that is in the clinical stages of development for non-incisional permanent contraception devices
In addition, new competition and products may arise due to mergers or acquisitions performed by external parties
Other companies may develop products that could compete with the Essure system
Competitive factors may render the Essure system obsolete or noncompetitive or reduce demand for the Essure system
Our future quarterly results may fluctuate
Our future revenues and results of operations may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and will depend upon, among other factors: • the rate at which new physicians are trained; • actions relating to reimbursement matters; • the rate at which we establish United States and international distributors or marketing partners and the degree of their success; • the extent to which the Essure system gains market acceptance; • the timing and size of distributor purchases; and • introduction of competitive products
Changes in stock option accounting rules may adversely impact our reported operating results prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, our stock price and our competitiveness in the employee marketplace
Technology companies like ours have a history of using broad based employee stock option programs to hire, incentivize and retain our workforce in a competitive marketplace
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, Nodtta 123 allowed companies the choice of either using a fair value method of accounting for options, which would result in expense recognition for all options granted, or using an intrinsic value method, as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion Nodtta 25, &quote Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees &quote , or APB 25, with a pro forma disclosure of the impact on net income (loss) of using the fair value option expense recognition method
We had elected to apply APB 25 and accordingly we generally do not recognize any expense with respect to employee stock options as long as such options are granted at exercise prices equal to the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued SFAS Nodtta 123(R) &quote Share-Based Payments &quote
We adopted this statement on January 1, 2006, which is the first annual reporting period after June 15, 2005
This statement will have a significant impact on our consolidated statement of operations as we will be required to expense the fair value of our stock options rather than disclosing the impact on our consolidated result of operations within our footnotes in accordance with the disclosure provisions of SFAS Nodtta 123
This will result in lower reported earnings per share or in higher reported losses per share, which could negatively impact our future stock price
In addition, this could impact our ability to utilize broad based employee stock plans to reward employees and could result in a competitive disadvantage to us in the employee marketplace
Future changes in financial accounting standards or practices or existing taxation rules or practices may cause adverse unexpected revenue fluctuations and affect our reported results of operations
A change in accounting standards or practices or a change in existing taxation rules or practices can have a significant effect on our reported results and may even affect our reporting of transactions completed before the change is effective
New accounting pronouncements and taxation rules and varying interpretations of accounting pronouncements and taxation practice have occurred and may 27 _________________________________________________________________ occur in the future
Changes to existing rules or the questioning of current practices may adversely affect our reported financial results or the way we conduct our business