Home
Jump to Risk Factors
Jump to Industries
Jump to Exposures
Jump to Event Codes
Jump to Wiki Summary

Industries
Oil and Gas Storage and Transportation
Oil and Gas Refining and Marketing and Transportation
Transportation
Oil and Gas Exploration and Production
Investment Banking and Brokerage
Health Care Facilities
Environmental Services
Construction and Engineering
Construction Materials
Construction and Farm Machinery and Heavy Trucks
Asset Management and Custody Banks
Data Processing Services
Exposures
Regime
Intelligence
Provide
Military
Economic
Express intent
Rights
Political reform
Leadership
Judicial
Event Codes
Warn
Yield to order
Ask for protection
Human death
Solicit support
Yield
Reject
Military blockade
Endorse
Agree
Demand
Promise policy support
Accident
Adjust
Demonstrate
Seize
Grant
Censorship
Sports contest
Acknowledge responsibility
Accuse
Release or return
Wiki Wiki Summary
Pipeline transport Pipeline transport is the long-distance transportation of a liquid or gas through a system of pipes—a pipeline—typically to a market area for consumption. The latest data from 2014 gives a total of slightly less than 2,175,000 miles (3,500,000 km) of pipeline in 120 countries of the world.
Knowledge acquisition Knowledge acquisition is the process used to define the rules and ontologies required for a knowledge-based system. The phrase was first used in conjunction with expert systems to describe the initial tasks associated with developing an expert system, namely finding and interviewing domain experts and capturing their knowledge via rules, objects, and frame-based ontologies.
Regulation Regulation is the management of complex systems according to a set of rules and trends. In systems theory, these types of rules exist in various fields of biology and society, but the term has slightly different meanings according to context.
Natural gas Natural law (Latin: ius naturale, lex naturalis) is a system of law based on a close observation of human nature, and based on values intrinsic to human nature that can be deduced and applied independently of positive law (the express enacted laws of a state or society). According to natural law theory, all people have inherent rights, conferred not by act of legislation but by "God, nature, or reason." Natural law theory can also refer to "theories of ethics, theories of politics, theories of civil law, and theories of religious morality."In the Western tradition it was anticipated by the Pre-Socratics, for example in their search for principles that governed the cosmos and human beings.
Liquefied natural gas Liquefied natural gas (LNG) is natural gas (predominantly methane, CH4, with some mixture of ethane, C2H6) that has been cooled down to liquid form for ease and safety of non-pressurized storage or transport. It takes up about 1/600th the volume of natural gas in the gaseous state (at standard conditions for temperature and pressure).
Compressed natural gas Compressed natural gas (CNG) is a fuel gas made of petrol which is mainly composed of methane (CH4), compressed to less than 1% of the volume it occupies at standard atmospheric pressure. It is stored and distributed in hard containers at a pressure of 20–25 MPa (2,900–3,600 psi), usually in cylindrical or spherical shapes.
List of countries by natural gas production This is a list of countries by natural gas production based on statistics from The World Factbook, and OECD members natural gas production by International Energy Agency (down) \n\n\n== Countries by natural gas production ==\nThe data in the following table comes from The World Factbook.
Natural gas in Ukraine Ukraine has been estimated to possess natural gas reserves of over 1 trillion cubic meters and in 2018 was ranked 26th among countries with proved reserves of natural gas. Its total gas reserves have been estimated at 5.4 trillion cubic meters.
Natural-gas condensate Natural-gas condensate, also called natural gas liquids, is a low-density mixture of hydrocarbon liquids that are present as gaseous components in the raw natural gas produced from many natural gas fields. Some gas species within the raw natural gas will condense to a liquid state if the temperature is reduced to below the hydrocarbon dew point temperature at a set pressure.
Natural gas prices Natural gas prices, as with other commodity prices, are mainly driven by supply and demand fundamentals. However, natural gas prices may also be linked to the price of crude oil and petroleum products, especially in continental Europe.
Arithmetic Arithmetic (from Ancient Greek ἀριθμός (arithmós) 'number', and τική [τέχνη] (tikḗ [tékhnē]) 'art, craft') is an elementary part of mathematics that consists of the study of the properties of the traditional operations on numbers—addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, exponentiation, and extraction of roots. In the 19th century, Italian mathematician Giuseppe Peano formalized arithmetic with his Peano axioms, which are highly important to the field of mathematical logic today.
Operation Mincemeat Operation Mincemeat was a successful British deception operation of the Second World War to disguise the 1943 Allied invasion of Sicily. Two members of British intelligence obtained the body of Glyndwr Michael, a tramp who died from eating rat poison, dressed him as an officer of the Royal Marines and placed personal items on him identifying him as the fictitious Captain (Acting Major) William Martin.
Bitwise operation In computer programming, a bitwise operation operates on a bit string, a bit array or a binary numeral (considered as a bit string) at the level of its individual bits. It is a fast and simple action, basic to the higher-level arithmetic operations and directly supported by the processor.
Special Activities Center The Special Activities Center (SAC) is a division of the Central Intelligence Agency responsible for covert operations and paramilitary operations. The unit was named Special Activities Division (SAD) prior to 2015.
Operations research Operations research (British English: operational research), often shortened to the initialism OR, is a discipline that deals with the development and application of advanced analytical methods to improve decision-making. It is sometimes considered to be a subfield of mathematical sciences.
Emergency operations center An emergency operations center (EOC) is a central command and control facility responsible for carrying out the principles of emergency preparedness and emergency management, or disaster management functions at a strategic level during an emergency, and ensuring the continuity of operation of a company, political subdivision or other organization.\nAn EOC is responsible for strategic direction and operational decisions and does not normally directly control field assets, instead leaving tactical decisions to lower commands.
Midcontinent Rift System The Midcontinent Rift System (MRS) or Keweenawan Rift is a 2,000 km (1,200 mi) long geological rift in the center of the North American continent and south-central part of the North American plate. It formed when the continent's core, the North American craton, began to split apart during the Mesoproterozoic era of the Precambrian, about 1.1 billion years ago.
Continent A continent is any of several large landmasses. Generally identified by convention rather than any strict criteria, up to seven geographical regions are commonly regarded as continents.
Mid-Continent Airlines Mid-Continent Airlines was an airline which operated in the central United States from the 1930s until 1952 when it was acquired by and merged with Braniff International Airways. Mid-Continent Airlines was originally founded as a flight school at Rickenbacker Airport in Sioux City, Iowa, during 1928, by Arthur Hanford Jr., a dairy operator.
Mid-Continent oil province The Mid-continent oil field is a broad area containing hundreds of oil fields in Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Texas. The area, which consists of various geological strata and diverse trap types, was discovered and exploited during the first half of the 20th century.
Wichita Dwight D. Eisenhower National Airport Wichita Dwight D. Eisenhower National Airport (IATA: ICT, ICAO: KICT, FAA LID: ICT) is a commercial airport 7 miles (11 km) west of downtown Wichita, Kansas, United States. It is the largest and busiest airport in the state of Kansas.
Atlas V An atlas is a collection of maps; it is typically a bundle of maps of Earth or of a region of Earth.\nAtlases have traditionally been bound into book form, but today many atlases are in multimedia formats.
Teddy Atlas Theodore A. "Teddy" Atlas Jr. (born July 29, 1956) is an American boxing trainer and fight commentator.
Atlas Shrugged Atlas Shrugged is a 1957 novel by Ayn Rand. Her fourth and final novel, it was also her longest, and the one she considered to be her magnum opus in the realm of fiction writing.
Atlas Air Atlas Air, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, is a major American cargo airline, passenger charter airline, and aircraft lessor based in Purchase, New York. The airline was named after Atlas, a figure in Greek mythology, who carries the sky on his shoulders.
The Atlas of North American English The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change (abbreviated ANAE; formerly, the Phonological Atlas of North America) is an overview of the pronunciation patterns (accents) in all the major urbanized regional dialects of the English language spoken in the United States and Canada. It is the result of a large-scale survey by linguists William Labov, Sharon Ash, and Charles Boberg.
Atlas F.C. Atlas Fútbol Club (Spanish pronunciation: [ˈatlas ˈfuðβol ˈkluβ]) is a Mexican football club. It plays home matches at the Estadio Jalisco, Guadalajara, Jalisco.
NASA facilities There are NASA facilities across the United States and around the world. NASA Headquarters in Washington, DC provides overall guidance and political leadership to the agency.
Pedestrian facilities Pedestrian facilities include retail shops, museums, mass events (such as festivals or concert halls), hospitals, transport hubs (such as train stations or airports), sports infrastructure (such as stadiums) and religious infrastructures. The transport mode in such infrastructures is mostly walking, with rare exceptions.
Essential facilities doctrine The essential facilities doctrine (sometimes also referred to as the essential facility doctrine) is a legal doctrine which describes a particular type of claim of monopolization made under competition laws. In general, it refers to a type of anti-competitive behavior in which a firm with market power uses a "bottleneck" in a market to deny competitors entry into the market.
Attacks on U.S. diplomatic facilities The United States maintains numerous embassies and consulates around the world, many of which are in war-torn countries or other dangerous areas.\n\n\n== Diplomatic Security ==\nThe Regional Security Office is staffed by Special Agents of the Diplomatic Security Service (DSS), and is responsible for all security, protection, and law enforcement operations in the embassy or consulate.
Zubieta Facilities The Zubieta Facilities (Basque: Zubietako Kirol-instalakuntzak, Spanish: Instalaciones de Zubieta), is the training ground of the Primera Division club Real Sociedad. Located in Zubieta, an enclave of San Sebastian (adjacent to the San Sebastián Hippodrome), it was opened in 2004 in its modernised form, although was originally inaugurated in 1981.
The Facilities Society The Facilities Society was founded in the UK on 9 December 2008 as a not-for-profit company limited by guarantee (registered in England nr. 6769050).
Facilities engineering Facilities engineering evolved from "plant engineering" in the early 1990s as U.S. workplaces became more specialized. Practitioners preferred this term because it more accurately reflected the multidisciplinary demands for specialized conditions in a wider variety of indoor environments, not merely manufacturing plants.
Regulation (European Union) A regulation is a legal act of the European Union that becomes immediately enforceable as law in all member states simultaneously. Regulations can be distinguished from directives which, at least in principle, need to be transposed into national law.
Regulation of therapeutic goods The regulation of therapeutic goods, defined as drugs and therapeutic devices, varies by jurisdiction. In some countries, such as the United States, they are regulated at the national level by a single agency.
Risk Factors
ATLAS PIPELINE PARTNERS LP ITEM 1A RISK FACTORS Limited partner interests are inherently different from the capital stock of a corporation, although many of the business risks we encounter are similar to those that would be faced by a corporation engaged in a similar business
If any of these risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected
Risks Relating to Our Business The amount of cash we generate depends in part on factors beyond our control
The actual amounts of cash we generate will depend upon numerous factors relating to our business which may be beyond our control, including: • the demand for and price of natural gas and NGLs; • the volume of natural gas we transport; • expiration of significant contracts; • continued development of wells for connection to our gathering systems; • the availability of local, intrastate and interstate transportation systems; • the expenses we incur in providing our gathering services; • the cost of acquisitions and capital improvements; • our issuance of equity securities; • required principal and interest payments on our debt; • fluctuations in working capital; • prevailing economic conditions; • fuel conservation measures; • alternate fuel requirements; 21 _________________________________________________________________ [69]Table of Contents government regulation and taxation; and • technical advances in fuel economy and energy generation devices
Our financial and operating performance may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter
We may be unable to continue to generate sufficient cash flow to make distributions to our unitholders or to meet our working capital, capital expenditure or debt service requirements
If we are unable to do so, we may be required to sell assets or equity, reduce capital expenditures, refinance all or a portion of our existing indebtedness or obtain additional financing
Our profitability is affected by the volatility of prices for natural gas and NGL products
As a result, our income depends to a significant extent upon the prices at which the natural gas we transport, treat or process and the natural gas liquids, or NGLs, we produce are sold
Additionally, changes in natural gas prices may indirectly impact our profitability since prices can influence drilling activity and well operations and thus the volume of gas we gather and process
Historically, the price of both natural gas and NGLs has been subject to significant volatility in response to relatively minor changes in the supply and demand for natural gas and NGL products, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors beyond our control, including those we describe in “—The amount of cash we generate depends in part on factors beyond our control,” above
We expect this volatility to continue
This volatility may cause our gross margin and cash flows to vary widely from period to period
Our hedging strategies may not be sufficient to offset price volatility risk and, in any event, do not cover all of the throughput volumes subject to percentage-of-proceeds contracts
Moreover, hedges are subject to inherent risks, which we describe in “— Our hedging strategies may fail to protect us and could reduce our gross margin and cash flow
” The amount of natural gas we transport will decline over time unless we are able to attract new wells to connect to our gathering systems
Production of natural gas from a well generally declines over time until the well can no longer economically produce natural gas and is plugged and abandoned
Failure to connect new wells to our gathering systems could, therefore, result in the amount of natural gas we transport reducing substantially over time and could, upon exhaustion of the current wells, cause us to abandon one or more of our gathering systems and, possibly, cease operations
The primary factors affecting our ability to connect new supplies of natural gas to our gathering systems include our success in contracting for existing wells that are not committed to other systems, the level of drilling activity near our gathering systems and, in the Mid-Continent region, our ability to attract natural gas producers away from our competitors’ gathering systems
Fluctuations in energy prices can greatly affect production rates and investments by third parties in the development of new oil and natural gas reserves
Drilling activity generally decreases as oil and natural gas prices decrease
We have no control over the level of drilling activity in our service areas, the amount of reserves underlying wells that connect to our systems and the rate at which production from a well will decline
In addition, we have no control over producers or their production decisions, which are affected by, among other things, prevailing and projected energy prices, demand for hydrocarbons, the level of reserves, geological considerations, governmental regulation and the availability and cost of capital
Because our operating costs are fixed to a significant degree, a reduction in the natural gas volumes we transport or process would result in a reduction in our gross margin and cash flows
22 _________________________________________________________________ [70]Table of Contents The success of our Appalachian operations depends upon Atlas America’s ability to drill and complete commercial producing wells
Substantially all of the wells we connect to our gathering systems in our Appalachian service area are drilled and operated by Atlas America for drilling investment partnerships sponsored by it
As a result, our Appalachian operations depend principally upon the success of Atlas America in sponsoring drilling investment partnerships and completing wells for these partnerships
Atlas America operates in a highly competitive environment for acquiring undeveloped leasehold acreage and attracting capital
Atlas America may not be able to compete successfully in the future in acquiring undeveloped leasehold acreage or in raising additional capital through its drilling investment partnerships
Furthermore, Atlas America is not required to connect wells for which it is not the operator to our gathering systems
If Atlas America cannot or does not continue to sponsor drilling investment partnerships, if the amount of money raised by those partnerships decreases, or if the number of wells actually drilled and completed as commercially producing wells decreases, the amount of natural gas transported by our Appalachian gathering systems would substantially decrease and could, upon exhaustion of the wells currently connected to our gathering systems, cause us to abandon one or more of our Appalachian gathering systems, thereby materially reducing our gross margin, and cash flows
The failure of Atlas America to perform its obligations under our natural gas gathering agreements with it may adversely affect our business
Substantially all of our Appalachian operating system revenues currently consist of the fees we receive under the master natural gas gathering agreement and other transportation agreements we have with Atlas America and its affiliates
We expect to derive a material portion of our gross margin from the services we provide under our contracts with Atlas America for the foreseeable future
Any factor or event adversely affecting Atlas America’s business or its ability to perform under its contracts with us or any default or nonperformance by Atlas America of its contractual obligations to us, could reduce our gross margin, and cash flows
The success of our Mid-Continent operations depends upon our ability to continually find and contract for new sources of natural gas supply from unrelated third parties
Unlike our Appalachian operations, none of the drillers or operators in our Mid-Continent service area is an affiliate of ours
Moreover, our agreements with most of the drillers and operators with which our Mid-Continent operations do business do not require them to dedicate significant amounts of undeveloped acreage to our systems
Failure to connect new wells to our Mid-Continent operations will, as described in “— The amount of natural gas we transport will decline over time unless we are able to attract new wells to connect to our gathering systems,” above, reduce our gross margin and cash flows
Our Mid-Continent operations currently depend on certain key producers for their supply of natural gas; the loss of any of these key producers could reduce our revenues
supplied our Mid-Continent systems with a majority of their natural gas supply
If these producers reduce the volumes of natural gas that they supply to us, our gross margin and cash flows would be reduced unless we obtain comparable supplies of natural gas from other producers
23 _________________________________________________________________ [71]Table of Contents The curtailment of operations at, or closure of, either of our processing plants could harm our business
We currently have one processing plant for our Elk City operation and one active processing plant for our Velma operation
If operations at either plant were to be curtailed, or closed, whether due to accident, natural catastrophe, environmental regulation or for any other reason, our ability to process natural gas from the relevant gathering system and, as a result, our ability to extract and sell NGLs, would be harmed
If this curtailment or stoppage were to extend for more than a short period, our gross margin, and cash flows would be materially reduced
We may face increased competition in the future in our Mid-Continent service areas
Our Mid-Continent operations may face competition for well connections
operate competing gathering systems and processing plants in our Velma service area
In our Elk City service area, ONEOK Field Services, Eagle Rock Midstream Resources, LP, Enbridge Energy Partners, LP, CenterPoint Energy, Inc
and Enogex operate competing gathering systems and processing plants
Some of our competitors have greater financial and other resources than we do
If these companies become more active in our Mid-Continent service areas, we may not be able to compete successfully with them in securing new well connections or retaining current well connections
If we do not compete successfully, the amount of natural gas we transport, process and treat will decrease, reducing our gross margin, and cash flows
The amount of natural gas we transport, treat or process may be reduced if the public utility and interstate pipelines to which we deliver gas cannot or will not accept the gas
Our gathering systems principally serve as intermediate transportation facilities between sales lines from wells connected to our systems and the public utility or interstate pipelines to which we deliver natural gas
If one or more of these pipelines has service interruptions, capacity limitations or otherwise does not accept the natural gas we transport, and we cannot arrange for delivery to other pipelines, local distribution companies or end users, the amount of natural gas we transport may be reduced
Since our revenues depend upon the volumes of natural gas we transport, this could result in a material reduction in our gross margin, and cash flows
We may be unsuccessful in integrating the operations from our recent acquisitions or any future acquisitions with our operations and in realizing all of the anticipated benefits of these acquisitions
We acquired Elk City in April 2005 and completed the NOARK acquisition in October 2005 and are currently in the process of integrating their operations with ours
We also have an active, on-going program to identify other potential acquisitions
The integration of previously independent operations with ours can be a complex, costly and time-consuming process
The difficulties of combining Elk City and NOARK, as well as any operations we may acquire in the future, with us include, among other things: • operating a significantly larger combined entity; • the necessity of coordinating geographically disparate organizations, systems and facilities; • integrating personnel with diverse business backgrounds and organizational cultures; • consolidating operational and administrative functions; • integrating internal controls, compliance under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other corporate governance matters; 24 _________________________________________________________________ [72]Table of Contents • the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns; • customer or key employee loss from the acquired businesses; • a significant increase in our indebtedness; and • potential environmental or regulatory liabilities and title problems
The process of combining companies or the failure to integrate them successfully could harm our business or future prospects, and result in significant decreases in our gross margin and cash flows
The acquisitions of our Velma, Elk City and NOARK operations have substantially changed our business, making it difficult to evaluate our business based upon our historical financial information
The acquisitions of our Velma, Elk City and NOARK operations have significantly increased our size and substantially redefined our business plan, expanded our geographic market and resulted in large changes to our revenues and expenses
As a result of these acquisitions, and our continued plan to acquire and integrate additional companies that we believe present attractive opportunities, our financial results for any period or changes in our results across periods may continue to dramatically change
Our historical financial results, therefore, should not be relied upon to accurately predict our future operating results, thereby making the evaluation of our business more difficult
Before acquiring its Velma and Elk City operations, Atlas had no previous experience either in its Mid-Continent service area or in operating natural gas processing plants
Our Mid-Continent gathering systems are located principally in Oklahoma and northern Texas, areas in which it has been involved only since July 2004 as a result of the Velma acquisition and, subsequently, Elk City acquisition in April 2005 and the NOARK acquisition in October 2005
In addition, as a result of these acquisitions, Atlas began to operate natural gas processing plants, a business in which it had no prior operating experience
Atlas depends upon the experience, knowledge and business relationships that have been developed by the senior management of its Mid-Continent operations to operate successfully in the region
The loss of the services of one or more members of Atlas’ Mid-Continent senior management, in particular, Robert R Firth, President, and David D Hall, Chief Financial Officer, could limit its growth or ability to maintain its current level of operations in the Mid-Continent region
Due to our lack of asset diversification, negative developments in our operations would reduce our ability to make distributions to our unitholders
We rely exclusively on the revenues generated from our transportation, gathering and processing operations, and as a result, our financial condition depends upon prices of, and continued demand for, natural gas and NGLs
Due to our lack of diversification in asset type, a negative development in one of these businesses would have a significantly greater impact on our financial condition and results of operations than if we maintained more diverse assets
Our construction of new assets may not result in revenue increases and is subject to regulatory, environmental, political, legal and economic risks, which could impair our results of operations and financial condition
One of the ways we may grow our business is through the construction of new assets, such as the Sweetwater plant
The construction of additions or modifications to our existing systems and facilities, and the construction of new assets, involve numerous regulatory, environmental, political and legal uncertainties beyond our control and require the expenditure of significant amounts of capital
Any projects we undertake 25 _________________________________________________________________ [73]Table of Contents may not be completed on schedule at the budgeted cost, or at all
Moreover, our revenues may not increase immediately upon the expenditure of funds on a particular project
For instance, if we expand a gathering system, the construction may occur over an extended period of time, and we will not receive any material increases in revenues until the project is completed
Moreover, we may construct facilities to capture anticipated future growth in production in a region in which growth does not materialize
Since we are not engaged in the exploration for and development of natural gas reserves, we often do not have access to estimates of potential reserves in an area before constructing facilities in the area
To the extent we rely on estimates of future production in our decision to construct additions to our systems, the estimates may prove to be inaccurate because there are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of future production
As a result, new facilities may not be able to attract enough throughput to achieve our expected investment return, which could impair our results of operations and financial condition
In addition, our actual revenues from a project could materially differ from expectations as a result of the price of natural gas, the NGL content of the natural gas processed and other economic factors described in this section
In addition to the risks discussed above, expected revenue from the Sweetwater gas plant could be reduced or delayed due to the following reasons: • difficulties in obtaining equity or debt financing for construction and operating costs; • difficulties in obtaining permits or other regulatory or third party consents; • construction and operating costs exceeding budget estimates; • revenue being less than expected due to lower commodity prices or lower demand; • difficulties in obtaining consistent supplies of natural gas; and • terms in operating agreements that are not favorable to us
If we are unable to obtain new rights-of-way or the cost of renewing existing rights-of-way increases, then we may be unable to fully execute our growth strategy and our cash flows could be reduced
The construction of additions to our existing gathering assets may require us to obtain new rights-of-way before constructing new pipelines
We may be unable to obtain rights-of-way to connect new natural gas supplies to our existing gathering lines or capitalize on other attractive expansion opportunities
Additionally, it may become more expensive for us to obtain new rights-of-way or to renew existing rights-of-way
If the cost of obtaining new rights-of-way or renewing existing rights-of-way increases, then our cash flows could be reduced
Regulation of our gathering operations could increase our operating costs, decrease our revenues, or both
Currently our gathering of natural gas from wells is exempt from regulation under the Natural Gas Act of 1938
However, the implementation of new laws or policies, or interpretations of existing laws, could subject us to regulation by FERC under the Natural Gas Act
We expect that any such regulation would increase our costs, decrease our gross margin and cash flows, or both
FERC regulation will still affect our business and the market for our products
FERC’s policies and practices affect a range of our natural gas pipeline activities, including, for example, its policies on open access transportation, ratemaking, capacity release, and market center promotion, which indirectly affect intrastate markets
In recent years, FERC has pursued pro-competitive policies in its regulation of interstate natural gas 26 _________________________________________________________________ [74]Table of Contents pipelines
However, we cannot assure you that FERC will continue this approach as it considers matters such as pipeline rates and rules and policies that may affect rights of access to natural gas transportation capacity
Other state and local regulations will also affect our business
Matters subject to regulation include rates, service and safety
Our gathering lines are subject to ratable take and common purchaser statutes in Texas and Oklahoma
Ratable take statutes generally require gatherers to take, without undue discrimination, natural gas production that may be tendered to the gatherer for handling
Similarly, common purchaser statutes generally require gatherers to purchase without undue discrimination as to source of supply or producer
These statutes restrict our right as an owner of gathering facilities to decide with whom we contract to purchase or transport natural gas
Federal law leaves any economic regulation of natural gas gathering to the states
Texas and Oklahoma have adopted complaint-based regulation of natural gas gathering activities, which allows natural gas producers and shippers to file complaints with state regulators in an effort to resolve grievances relating to natural gas gathering access and, in Texas and Oklahoma, with respect to rate discrimination
Should a complaint be filed or regulation by the Texas Railroad Commission or Oklahoma Corporation Commission become more active, our revenues could decrease
Increased regulatory requirements relating to the integrity of the Ozark Transmission pipeline will require it to spend additional money to comply with these requirements
Ozark Gas Transmission is subject to extensive laws and regulations related to pipeline integrity
For example, federal legislation signed into law in December 2002 includes guidelines for the US Department of Transportation and pipeline companies in the areas of testing, education, training and communication
Compliance with existing and recently enacted regulations requires significant expenditures
Additional laws and regulations that may be enacted in the future, such as US Department of Transportation implementation of additional hydrostatic testing requirements, could significantly increase the amount of these expenditures
Ozark Gas Transmission is subject to FERC rate-making policies that could have an adverse impact on our ability to establish rates that would allow us to recover the full cost of operating the pipeline
Rate-making policies by FERC could affect Ozark Gas Transmission’s ability to establish rates, or to charge rates that would cover future increases in its costs, or even to continue to collect rates that cover current costs
Natural gas companies may not charge rates that have been determined not to be just and reasonable by FERC The rates, terms and conditions of service provided by natural gas companies are required to be on file with FERC in FERC-approved tariffs
Pursuant to FERC’s jurisdiction over rates, existing rates may be challenged by complaint and proposed rate increases may be challenged by protest
We cannot assure you that FERC will continue to pursue its approach of pro-competitive policies as it considers matters such as pipeline rates and rules and policies that may affect rights of access to natural gas capacity and transportation facilities
Any successful complaint or protest against Ozark Gas Transmission’s rates could reduce our revenues associated with providing transmission services
We cannot assure you that we will be able to recover all of Ozark Gas Transmission’s costs through existing or future rates
Ozark Gas Transmission is subject to regulation by FERC in addition to FERC rules and regulations related to the rates it can charge for its services
FERC’s regulatory authority also extends to: • operating terms and conditions of service; • the types of services Ozark Gas Transmission’s may offer to its customers; • construction of new facilities; 27 _________________________________________________________________ [75]Table of Contents acquisition, extension or abandonment of services or facilities; • accounts and records; and • relationships with affiliated companies involved in all aspects of the natural gas and energy businesses
FERC action in any of these areas or modifications of its current regulations can impair Ozark Gas Transmission’s ability to compete for business, the costs it incurs in its operations, the construction of new facilities or its ability to recover the full cost of operating its pipeline
For example, the development of uniform interstate gas quality standards by FERC could create two distinct markets for natural gas—an interstate market subject to uniform minimum quality standards and an intrastate market with no uniform minimum quality standards
Such a bifurcation of markets could make it difficult for our pipelines to compete in both markets or to attract certain gas supplies away from the intrastate market
The time FERC takes to approve the construction of new facilities could raise the costs of our projects to the point where they are no longer economic
FERC has authority to review pipeline contracts
If FERC determines that a term of any such contract deviates in a material manner from a pipeline’s tariff, FERC typically will order the pipeline to remove the term from the contract and execute and refile a new contract with FERC or, alternatively, to amend its tariff to include the deviating term, thereby offering it to all shippers
If FERC audits a pipeline’s contracts and finds deviations that appear to be unduly discriminatory, FERC could conduct a formal enforcement investigation, resulting in serious penalties and/or onerous ongoing compliance obligations
Should Ozark Gas Transmission’s fail to comply with all applicable FERC administered statutes, rules, regulations and orders, it could be subject to substantial penalties and fines
Under the recently enacted Energy Policy Act of 2005, FERC has civil penalty authority under the Natural Gas Act to impose penalties for current violations of up to dlra1cmam000cmam000 per day for each violation
Finally, we cannot give any assurance regarding the likely future regulations under which we will operate Ozark Gas Transmission or the effect such regulation could have on our business, financial condition, and results of operations
Compliance with pipeline integrity regulations issued by the United States Department of Transportation and state agencies could result in substantial expenditures for testing, repairs and replacement
United States Department of Transportation and state agency regulations require pipeline operators to develop integrity management programs for transportation pipelines located in “high consequence areas
” The regulations require operators to: • perform ongoing assessments of pipeline integrity; • identify and characterize applicable threats to pipeline segments that could impact a high consequence area; • improve data collection, integration and analysis; • repair and remediate the pipeline as necessary; and • implement preventative and mitigating actions
28 _________________________________________________________________ [76]Table of Contents We do not believe that the cost of implementing integrity management program testing along certain segments of our pipeline will have a material effect on our results of operations
This does not include the costs, if any, of any repair, remediation, preventative or mitigating actions that may be determined to be necessary as a result of the testing program, which costs could be substantial
Our midstream natural gas operations may incur significant costs and liabilities resulting from a failure to comply with new or existing environmental regulations or a release of hazardous substances into the environment
The operations of our gathering systems, plant and other facilities are subject to stringent and complex federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations
These laws and regulations can restrict or impact our business activities in many ways, including restricting the manner in which we dispose of substances, requiring remedial action to remove or mitigate contamination, and requiring capital expenditures to comply with control requirements
Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may trigger a variety of administrative, civil and criminal enforcement measures, including the assessment of monetary penalties, the imposition of remedial requirements, and the issuance of orders enjoining future operations
Certain environmental statutes impose strict, joint and several liability for costs required to clean up and restore sites where substances and wastes have been disposed or otherwise released
Moreover, it is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the release of substances or wastes into the environment
There is inherent risk of the incurrence of environmental costs and liabilities in our business due to our handling of natural gas and other petroleum products, air emissions related to our operations, historical industry operations including releases of substances into the environment, and waste disposal practices
For example, an accidental release from one of our pipelines or processing facilities could subject us to substantial liabilities arising from environmental cleanup, restoration costs and natural resource damages, claims made by neighboring landowners and other third parties for personal injury and property damage, and fines or penalties for related violations of environmental laws or regulations
Moreover, the possibility exists that stricter laws, regulations or enforcement policies could significantly increase our compliance costs and the cost of any remediation that may become necessary
We may not be able to recover some or any of these costs from insurance
We may not be able to execute our growth strategy successfully
Our strategy contemplates substantial growth through both the acquisition of other gathering systems and processing assets and the expansion of our existing gathering systems and processing assets
Our growth strategy involves numerous risks, including: • we may not be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates; • we may not be able to make acquisitions on economically acceptable terms; • our costs in seeking to make acquisitions may be material, even if we cannot complete any acquisition we have pursued; • irrespective of estimates at the time we make an acquisition, the acquisition may prove to be dilutive to earnings and operating surplus; • we may encounter difficulties in integrating operations and systems; and 29 _________________________________________________________________ [77]Table of Contents • any additional debt we incur to finance an acquisition may impair our ability to service our existing debt
Limitations on our access to capital or on the market for our common units will impair our ability to execute our growth strategy
Our ability to raise capital for acquisitions and other capital expenditures depends upon ready access to the capital markets
Historically, we have financed our acquisitions, and to a much lesser extent, expansions of our gathering systems by bank credit facilities and the proceeds of public and private equity offerings of our common units and preferred units of our operating partnership
If we are unable to access the capital markets, we may be unable to execute our strategy of growth through acquisitions
Our hedging strategies may fail to protect us and could reduce our gross margin and cash flow
We pursue various hedging strategies to seek to reduce our exposure to losses from adverse changes in the prices for natural gas and NGLs
Our hedging activities will vary in scope based upon the level and volatility of natural gas and NGL prices and other changing market conditions
Our hedging activity may fail to protect or could harm us because, among other things: • hedging can be expensive, particularly during periods of volatile prices; • available hedges may not correspond directly with the risks against which we seek protection; • the duration of the hedge may not match the duration of the risk against which we seek protection; and • the party owing money in the hedging transaction may default on its obligation to pay
Litigation or governmental regulation relating to environmental protection and operational safety may result in substantial costs and liabilities
Our operations are subject to federal and state environmental laws under which owners of natural gas pipelines can be liable for clean-up costs and fines in connection with any pollution caused by their pipelines
We may also be held liable for clean-up costs resulting from pollution which occurred before our acquisition of the gathering systems
In addition, we are subject to federal and state safety laws that dictate the type of pipeline, quality of pipe protection, depth, methods of welding and other construction-related standards
Any violation of environmental, construction or safety laws could impose substantial liabilities and costs on us
We are also subject to the requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Act, or OSHA, and comparable state statutes
Any violation of OSHA could impose substantial costs on us
We cannot predict whether or in what form any new legislation or regulatory requirements might be enacted or adopted, nor can we predict our costs of compliance
In general, we expect that new regulations would increase our operating costs and, possibly, require us to obtain additional capital to pay for improvements or other compliance action necessitated by those regulations
30 _________________________________________________________________ [78]Table of Contents We are subject to operating and litigation risks that may not be covered by insurance
Our operations are subject to all operating hazards and risks incidental to transporting and processing natural gas and NGLs
These hazards include: • damage to pipelines, plants, related equipment and surrounding properties caused by floods and other natural disasters; • inadvertent damage from construction and farm equipment; • leakage of natural gas, NGLs and other hydrocarbons; • fires and explosions; • other hazards, including those associated with high-sulfur content, or sour gas, that could also result in personal injury and loss of life, pollution and suspension of operations; and • acts of terrorism directed at our pipeline infrastructure, production facilities, transmission and distribution facilities and surrounding properties
As a result, we may be a defendant in various legal proceedings and litigation arising from our operations
We may not be able to maintain or obtain insurance of the type and amount we desire at reasonable rates
As a result of market conditions, premiums and deductibles for some of our insurance policies have increased substantially, and could escalate further
In some instances, insurance could become unavailable or available only for reduced amounts of coverage
For example, insurance carriers are now requiring broad exclusions for losses due to war risk and terrorist acts
If we were to incur a significant liability for which we were not fully insured, our gross margin and cash flows would be materially reduced
The IRS could treat us as a corporation for tax purposes, which would substantially reduce the cash available to us for payment of principal and, in some instances, interest on the notes
If we were treated as a corporation for US federal income tax purposes for any taxable year for which the statute of limitations remains open or any future year, we would pay federal income tax on our taxable income for such year at the corporate tax rates, currently at a maximum rate of 35prca, and would likely pay state income tax at varying rates
Because a tax would be imposed on us as a corporation, our cash available for payment of distributions to our unitholders would be substantially reduced
Risks Related to Our Ownership Structure Atlas America and its affiliates have conflicts of interest and limited fiduciary responsibilities, which may permit them to favor their own interests to the detriment of our unitholders
Atlas America and its affiliates own and control our general partner, which also owns a 13prca limited partner interest in us
We do not have any employees and rely solely on employees of Atlas America and its affiliates who serve as our agents, including all of the senior managers who operate our business
A number of officers and employees of Atlas America also own interests in us
Conflicts of interest may arise between Atlas America, our general partner and their affiliates, on the one hand, and us, on the other hand
As a result of these conflicts, our general partner may favor its own interests and the interests of its affiliates over our interests and the interests of our unitholders
These conflicts include, among others, the following situations: 31 _________________________________________________________________ [79]Table of Contents • Employees of Atlas America who provide services to us also devote significant time to the businesses of Atlas America in which we have no economic interest
If these separate activities are significantly greater than our activities, there could be material competition for the time and effort of the employees who provide services to our general partner, which could result in insufficient attention to the management and operation of our business
• Neither our partnership agreement nor any other agreement requires Atlas America to pursue a future business strategy that favors us or, apart from our agreements with Atlas America relating to our Appalachian region operations, use our assets for transportation or processing services we provide
Atlas America directors and officers have a fiduciary duty to make these decisions in the best interests of the stockholders of Atlas America
• Our general partner is allowed to take into account the interests of parties other than us, such as Atlas America, in resolving conflicts of interest, which has the effect of limiting its fiduciary duty to us
• Our general partner controls the enforcement of obligations owed to us by our general partner and its affiliates, including our agreements with Atlas America
Conflicts of interest with Atlas America and its affiliates, including the foregoing factors, could exacerbate periods of lower or declining performance, or otherwise reduce our gross margin and cash flows
Cost reimbursements due our general partner may be substantial and will reduce the cash available for distributions to our unitholders
We reimburse Atlas America, our general partner and their affiliates, including officers and directors of Atlas America, for all expenses they incur on our behalf
Our general partner has sole discretion to determine the amount of these expenses
In addition, Atlas America and its affiliates provide us with services for which we are charged reasonable fees as determined by Atlas America in its sole discretion
The reimbursement of expenses or payment of fees could adversely affect our ability to make distributions to our unitholders